Bug#419261: What about creating a new section 'ruby' ?

2007-04-14 Thread Vincent Fourmond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: ftp.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, A quick look into the interpreters section [in sid] shows that ruby packages make up nearly half of it: 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection interpreter | wc

Re: What about a ruby Section ?

2007-04-14 Thread Filipe
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Paul van Tilburg wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:03:15AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 13/04/07 at 22:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: Nearly half of the interpreter section is actually ruby packages. What about asking for a Section: ruby just like for Perl and Py

Re: What about a ruby Section ?

2007-04-14 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:03:15AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 13/04/07 at 22:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > Nearly half of the interpreter section is actually ruby packages. What > > about asking for a > > > > Section: ruby > > > > just like for Perl and Python ? > > That would b

Re: What about a ruby Section ?

2007-04-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/04/07 at 22:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > Hello ! > > Look at this: > > 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection > interpreter | wc > 411 8229366 > 22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection > interpreter | grep ruby | wc >