Hi,
A recent RC bug has been opened against my package gajim, so I fixed it
and a new package has been uploaded.
The difference with the one currently in squeeze is only in rules file
and in control files. Nothing has changed in sources (same upstream
release).
Could you include it in squeez
Hi,
I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100%
CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is
already in newer versions of Gajim for months [1].
The package is ready, can I ask my Debian developper to upload it?
Thanks.
[0] http://bugs.debi
On 09/17/2011 07:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100%
CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is
already in newer versions of Gajim for months [1
On 09/18/2011 07:38 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
"Yann Leboulanger" wrote, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:32:50 +0200
On 09/18/2011 05:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please could you provide a debdiff against the current stable package
(i.e. "debdiff $stable.dsc $new.dsc") for a final
On 09/22/2011 08:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 19:46 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
On 09/18/2011 07:38 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd generally prefer 0.13.4-3+squeeze1 as a version number, but please
go ahead.
Ok, will change that and ask my debian developp
On 12/12/2012 11:40, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 07:57:30 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Looks like this should be added to the embedded code copies list,
regardless of the minor diff:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
This can also be
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 11:50:25 GMT) :
Ok then we wait for an answer from secure-testing-team?
I think so.
I don't think I need to do somthing, do I?
I think you don't, now that I added them to the loop myself.
Which me
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is
On 12/28/2012 12:05 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the "current copy of
Wheezy'
Is there something missing to go further?
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5134b10d.9060...@lagaule.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gajim
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0]
More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing
list: [1]
de
On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gajim
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and
On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06:
- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look
bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there?
gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,
FWIW, it _is_ packaged
I'll ask a debian developper to upload it as soon as you tell me it's ok
(or you prefer it to be uploaded now? )
Hi,
0.15.1-2 is now in unstable,
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On 01/12/2012 14:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian
On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (14 Oct 2012 16:35:07 GMT) :
On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.
right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')
Hi,
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs in the current 0.15 release.
A list of fixed bugs is here: [0]
4 debian bugs are also closed, including an important one:
[1], [2], [3], [4].
I prepared a package for this bug-fix only release: [5].
But the question is: does it have any chance to go in
Hi,
I fixed a bug in Gajim that makes it crash when canceling gnome keyring
creation with the new version of gnome keyring. I added a small patch in
Gajim 0.13.4-3 version that has been uploaded by the Debian developper
that sponsors me.
Could you include it in squeeze?
Thanks,
--
Yann
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
