Hello,
Several days ago, I uploaded a new ebtables package for review on
mentors.debian.net;
Bart Martens is my mentor for this package (he already approved a
package from me). He suggested me to ask debian-release team for a
possible pre-approval for wheezy since the upload is fixing "safe
bugs"
Hi Julien,
Thank your for your quick answer.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm afraid it's too late for these changes, as none of these bugs are
> release critical.
Understood.
Thanks,
--
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I can also confirm we are using this package in production since a few
months without any regression (including thousands of users).
Regards,
--
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 18 Mar 2014 12:18, "Clement Wong" wrote:
>
> Ok, sorry for the misleading email, apparently 7u8 is from
wheezy-security, so this fix is not applied yet.
Yes indeed.
Hi,
Is there someone available to validate this package? Lots of present
fixes are more than needed to have an usable version of php in
production.
Thanks,
--
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Hello Adam,
Thank your for your quick reply.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> I realise you've put a lot of effort in to the patch, and that's
> obviously appreciated, but a diff for stable of the size
>
> 46 files changed, 4303 insertions(+), 372 deletions(-)
>
> where
On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> One thing that wasn't absolutely clear from the original (although I guess
> was potentially implied) is whether any of the fixes which are relevant have
> previously been applied in some way to the packages in unstable.
All the fixes are backports from ups
Hi release team,
Do you need any help to validate this package? As a reminder all these
fixes are simple backports from upstream.
In addition I have been using this version on production with
thousands of users.
I'm also waiting for this validation in order to submit a new one with
more stable fix
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> "Simple backports from upstream" is not equivalent to "suitable for an
> update to a package in stable", particularly when there's a non-trivial diff
> involved.
All the backported fixes are bugs which make the package more stabl
9 matches
Mail list logo
