want to get packages into Sqeeze

2010-08-08 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I am aware of the freeze, but find that I have been unable to meet my personal goal of having current packages in the release. This I attribute partly to problems with my health that forced me to announce a VAC (to actually go to hospital), which I left only last Friday, although not fully r

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze

2010-08-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Adam, On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 18:36:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 00:44 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > although not fully recovered (see d-p@ for that). > Sorry to hear that, and glad you're on the mend. the dance isn't over yet. I'm

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze [UPDATE]

2010-08-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 19:54:37 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 18:36:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 00:44 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > * postfix-cluebringer (#577270): > > > > This doesn't appea

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze [UPDATE]

2010-08-15 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 20:42:16 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > I'm one big step further: Installing and de-installing not the virtual > package, but one of the concrete packages, works just fine. I got it the wrong way around, but anyway, I ripped out dbconfig-common, and things

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze [UPDATE]

2010-08-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, yesterday, I uploaded a new package of roundup which fixes this problem, reported against upstream: http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/issue2550665 Kind regards, --Toni++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze

2010-08-22 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Adam, On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 18:36:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > * postfix-cluebringer (#577270): > > This doesn't appear to have even made it to NEW yet? On that basis I'm > afraid we'd be unlikely to grant a freeze exception for it. the package is now in NEW since last Sunday (ie

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze

2010-08-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Adam, On Sun, 22.08.2010 at 15:58:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As I said above, it's unlikely that a package not even in unstable will > get in to squeeze now. I fully understand, but also thought that the program itself is both benign and valuable to the project. Anyway, if you say n

roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I have a package *almost* ready to fix this bug, plus a few others. The changelog currently has this to say: * fixing compatibility with PostgreSQL 8.3 (closes: #510342) * man page structural typo (closes: #509969) * fix roundup-demo argument parsing (closes: #509973) * create tempo

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Luk, On Wed, 04.02.2009 at 11:04:21 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > Should I upload the completed package to testing or to unstable, and > with urgency high? I opted to upload roundup 1.4.4-3 to 'unstable' with severity 'medium' for the time being. The packag

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Luk, On Tue, 03.02.2009 at 19:48:05 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Toni Mueller wrote: > > * fix roundup-demo argument parsing (closes: #509973) > if this is fixed in the manpage, then ok, otherwise it depends on the diff thanks for ack'ing the other bugs. I have two questio

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 04.02.2009 at 12:48:38 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > I opted to upload roundup 1.4.4-3 to 'unstable' with severity 'medium' > for the time being. The package is lintian-clean. I'll most likely output a new package, 1.4.4-4, to fix the two prob

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 05.02.2009 at 12:36:50 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > #514221 - PostgreSQL backend does not support tracker names with dashes this is a two-line patch quoting the tracker's name in SQL: diff -urNad roundup-1.4.4~/roundup/backends/back_postgresql.py roundup-1.4.4/roundup/

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-06 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 05.02.2009 at 18:16:54 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > I've opted to upload the package to my DD home page to avoid > cluttering the "semi-approved" version 1.4.4-3 in unstable: > > http://people.debian.org/~toni/roundup/ > > > Please advise ab

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-06 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 13:04:33 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > s/t-p-u/unstable/ done. Thank you! -- Kind regards, --Toni++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-07 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 13:43:46 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 13:04:33 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > s/t-p-u/unstable/ > > done. > > Thank you! I forgot to say: I request unblocking roundup-1.4.4-4 for Lenny. TIA! -- Kind regards, --To

Re: Bug#531556: upgrade problem with the proposed libarchive-tar-perl Etch update

2009-06-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Niko, On Tue, 02.06.2009 at 15:36:31 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > I see three options for a fix: > - update the lenny perl-modules Conflicts methinks that the by far easiest and cleanest solution would be to update the perl or perl-modules package in Lenny. > FWIW, I'd prefer having this fix

please allow roundup-1.2.1-9 in

2007-03-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, I have updated packages for roundup, most notably 1.2.1-9, which fixes a grave bug that rendered the predecessor uninstallable. The fix was successfully tested by a user prior to my updating the package. On the whole, the 1.2.1-9 package (and the 1.3.3-2 package) are the best versions of t

funkload update to 1.8.0: fixes #492755

2008-07-29 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today, a new upstream fixing this bug was released. I ran short tests - there's not much I can do in less than 12 hours - and packaged the new version. You can find the package, along with "everything", here: http://people.debian.org/~toni/funkload/ The package is as lintian clean, as is

Re: funkload update to 1.8.0: fixes #492755

2008-07-29 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Marc, On Tue, 29.07.2008 at 14:48:22 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No new upstream releases, sorry. ok, but can I get this in lenny-proposed-updates somehow? Kind regards, --Toni++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

2008-08-01 Thread Toni Mueller
stable; urgency=low + + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) + * suggests -> recommends due to the high usability impact + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) + + -- Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:11:58 +0200 + funkload (1.6.2-

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

2008-08-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Cyril, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:27:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/08/2008): > > + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) > > -Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-central

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

2008-08-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:49:00 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) > > + * suggests -> recommends due to the high usability impac

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205), + python-webunit fix (closes: #493388)

2008-08-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 17:12:02 +0200, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:49:00 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + * added pyth

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205), + python-webunit fix (closes: #493388)

2008-08-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 02.08.2008 at 19:02:43 +0200, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 18:47:43 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > +Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-central (>= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, > > python-webunit (>= 1.3.8) > > +

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205), + python-webunit fix (closes: #493388)

2008-08-04 Thread Toni Mueller
uploaded both packages (to unstable), but can't see them in incoming somehow. Upload protocol: $ dput python-webunit_1.3.8-2_i386.changes Uploading package to host ftp-master.debian.org Checking Signature on .changes gpg: Signature made Sat 02 Aug 2008 06:43:14 PM CEST using DSA key ID 75CB1AD

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205), + python-webunit fix (closes: #493388)

2008-08-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 04.08.2008 at 20:24:36 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That part looks fine. Please ping us when you've uploaded both > python-webunit and funkload, so that we can grant the final freeze > exceptions. both packages are now in unstable. Kind regards, --To

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205), + python-webunit fix (closes: #493388)

2008-08-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 05.08.2008 at 16:11:48 +0200, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 04.08.2008 at 20:24:36 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That part looks fine. Please ping us when you've uploaded both > > pyth

Bug#692011: taxbird: version in testing (0.16.x) is completely useless, need the latest version for 2012 tax declaration

2012-12-19 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:49:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Potentially, yes. tzdata's debdiff tends not to end up as > > 83 files changed, 13318 insertions(+), 16724 deletions(-) > > though. :-( ok, so what do you suggest? I reckon that all tax calculating software should have th

Bug#692011: taxbird: version in testing (0.16.x) is completely useless, need the latest version for 2012 tax declaration

2012-12-19 Thread Toni Mueller
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:21:41PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Do we have similar software for other jurisdictions in the archive? > taxbird's the only one I've heard of needing updates, but that might > just be an issue of timing. ("apt-cache search tax" mostly seems to > throw up results re

Bug#692011: taxbird: version in testing (0.16.x) is completely useless

2012-12-21 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:18:15AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > In theory, table-driven code or at least good modularity can be a way > to minimize the damage from changing facts of life on unrelated > aspects of a program's functionality. yes. In general, I would agree to this, although

Bug#692011: unblock: taxbird/0.18-1.1

2012-11-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:35:26AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Actually, including taxbird in wheezy might not be very useful anyway. > Its website says: "Taxbird ist tot! ... lang lebe Geierlein". So > another option to consider is removal. the typical use case is imho to have such so

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#378484: Roundup server does not setgid to specified GID when starting as root]

2006-07-16 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, would this qualify for inclusion in a point release (ref. http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable)? If yes, I'd try to create such a fixed package. Best, --Toni++ - Forwarded message from Frank Hempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 16

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#378484: Roundup server does not setgid to specified GID when starting as root]

2006-08-07 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Andi, On Tue, 18.07.2006 at 22:22:19 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060717 00:26]: > > would this qualify for inclusion in a point release (ref. > > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en

updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the > same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, but that are way too many changes after freeze. well, the 1.2.1-4 package version is much more broken, and it did take so much time to clean up for a reason (and some RL factors I could not influ

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Freeze does really mean: No new changes unless really required. you meman, I should consider opening an RC bug against the package? You also didn't answer the questions about the other packages. Best

request-tracker3.6 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the > same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix

please accept the new roundup package (1.2.1-5)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, the new package closes bug #402826. I can change it to 1.2.1-6 to make it formally do so via its changelog, if desired. Best, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pkg-db-devel] Bug#675611: libdb5.1-dev: no way to install libdb4.x-dev in parallel

2012-06-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Toni Mueller wrote: > > I'm not sure, but argued against that on the python list > > (debian-python@l.d.o). [1] > > So, what is the conclussion? I don't

Re: Bug#618314 closed by Debian FTP Masters (Bug#659309: Removed package(s) from unstable)

2012-07-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Dear Release Team, dear FTP Masters, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:57:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:42:13PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > which was filed against the scim-tables-zh package: > > > > #618314: scim-tables-zh: des

Re: need the latest version for 2012 tax declaration

2012-07-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Jonathan, On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:22:37AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Toni Mueller wrote: > > it does. I have probably made a mistake, though, but I wanted to have > > this package flow into Wheezy, when it appeared to be stuck in > > unstable. That's why I t