Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 5/25/21 9:45 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-05-08 22:17:42 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 5/8/21 9:18 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-05-08 07:29:01 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.de
On 5/30/21 9:12 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Sebastiaan, Sebastian,
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>>
>> On 5/25/21 9:45 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-05-08 22:17:4
On 5/31/21 8:07 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-05-31 05:38:15 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 5/30/21 9:12 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>> Sebastiaan, Sebastian,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wro
On 5/31/21 8:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-05-31 08:17:25 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 5/31/21 8:07 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-05-31 05:38:15 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 5/30/21 9:12 PM, Salvatore Bona
On 6/5/21 11:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/4/21 10:14 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 07:10:02 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 6/4/21 10:14 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 07:10:02 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package saga which fixes
>> t
On 6/8/21 11:56 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Let's start with the debian-release@ discussion here, this may be turned
> into an unblock request later.
>
> On Tue, 18 May 2021 20:36:23 +0200 Dennis Filder wrote:
>> One more observation: Bullsey
On 6/9/21 12:11 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 11.56, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> gdal can rename gdal-data to gdal3-data, build with
>> --datadir=/sur/share/gdal3 and drop the Breaks on libgdal20.
>> Thus libgdal20 + gdal-data from buster should be co-installable with
>> libgdal28 + gd
On 6/11/21 8:49 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-09 12:41:29 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/9/21 12:11 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2021 11.56, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>>> gdal can rename gdal-data to gdal3-data, build with
>&
On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> I have unblocked gdal.
Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as well, it goes
hand in hand with gdal (3.2.2+dfsg-1). libgdal needs the same upstream
version of gdal to build successfully.
> Please go ahead with an upload adding a gdal
On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> I have unblocked gdal.
>>
>> Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as well, it goes
>
> libgdal-
On 6/13/21 11:12 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 10:58:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>> I have unblocked gdal.
>>>
>>> Thanks
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 6/13/21 3:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package ogdi-dfsg
>>
>> [ Rea
On 6/13/21 11:32 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 11:14:45 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrot
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-5
On 6/13/21 10:40 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 16:47:58 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/13/21 3:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>&g
On 6/14/21 9:29 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 23.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-06-13 23:35:40 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 13/06/2021 22.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
My goal is to make libgdal20 and libgdal28 co-installable. Adding those
Breaks is not en
On 6/14/21 1:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 14/06/2021 10.06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> What actual problems do are solved by making them co-installable?
>>
>> So far the only actualy problem that has been identified is the need for
>> `apt full-upgrade` twi
On 6/14/21 9:55 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-14 13:49:47 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/14/21 1:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 14/06/2021 10.06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> What actual problems do are solved by making them co
On 6/15/21 8:23 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 06.05, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> From the many other packages I haven't seen other issues other than the
>> partial upgrade with monteverdi which is fixed with Breaks/Replaces.
>>
>> I really nee
On 6/15/21 1:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> If neither you as maintainer nor upstream care about upgrade without
> data loss, I don't think postgis is suitable to be included in a stable
> release. Best option moving forward is to get postgis and its reverse
> dependencies removed from bullseye
On 6/15/21 3:55 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-15 13:18:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/15/21 1:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> If neither you as maintainer nor upstream care about upgrade without
>>> data loss, I don't think postgis is sui
On 6/14/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/14/21 1:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 14/06/2021 10.06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> What actual problems do are solved by making them co-installable?
>>>
>>> So far the only actualy problem that
On 6/15/21 8:23 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 06.05, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> From the many other packages I haven't seen other issues other than the
>> partial upgrade with monteverdi which is fixed with Breaks/Replaces.
>>
>> I really nee
On 6/18/21 5:19 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 18/06/2021 09.50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I'm increasingly in favor of removing the Breaks from gdal-data, the
>> attached procedure works for me in buster chroot.
>
>> There is much less need for gdal-data b
On 7/1/21 11:25 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Besides libotb-apps, is this an issue for any other package? I've randomly
> tried two packages from your list above (elastix and odin), but apt
> found upgrade paths just fine.
>
> libotp-apps has a reported popcon of 0. Even if that means that ther
On 3/31/21 7:30 PM, Lee Garrett wrote:
> Unfortunately 2.10 didn't make it into bullseye in time (#984557). I tried
> getting the unit tests from 2.9.16 to work with python 3.9, but I had to give
> up. I don't feel comfortable with maintaining such a large package over the
> lifecycle of bullseye w
Control: trags -1 - moreinfo
On 4/8/21 8:31 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-04-07 16:17:45 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> To fix two important issues affecting the ve
retitle 988225 buster-pu: package mapserver/7.2.2-1+deb10u1
thanks
On 5/8/21 8:24 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 08:08:26AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: buster
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 5/8/21 9:18 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-05-08 07:29:01 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package mapserver to fix CVE-2
On 9/5/21 6:48 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-08-20 11:32:16 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Control: forwarde
On 9/7/21 3:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/5/21 6:48 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-08-20 11:32:16 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>&g
On 8/17/21 8:33 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pdal.h
On 9/8/21 6:56 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/7/21 3:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/5/21 6:48 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-08-20 11:32:16 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
On 9/9/21 5:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/8/21 6:56 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/7/21 3:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 9/5/21 6:48 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>> On 2021-08-20 11:32:16 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
On 9/10/21 9:35 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-09 13:02:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/9/21 5:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 9/8/21 6:56 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 9/7/21 3:07 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
On 9/11/21 5:56 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-11 17:02:48 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/10/21 9:35 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-09-09 13:02:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 9/9/21 5:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 9/17/21 7:56 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 07:34:27PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> [ Reason ]
>> As reported in #993895, the update of protobuf to 3.12.4 requires
>> regenerating the header files.
>>
>> [ Impact ]
>> Headers provided by l
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 9/17/21 7:46 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:04:32PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> [ Reason ]
>> As reported on the GIS list by the upstream author, osmcoastline in
>> bullseye doesn't work with projections other than WGS84.
>
> Please g
On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> grass & otb in experiment still need to be rebuilt.
grass had a source upload, only otb in experimental needs a binNMU now.
Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc
changes, it allowed libgdal-grass to migra
On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>> Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc
>> changes, it allowed libgdal-gr
On 9/23/21 11:40 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-23 11:34:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 9/23/21 11:47 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-23 11:44:14 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> There is also postgis which is blocked by a piuparts regression that's
>> not actually caused by postgis. piuparts-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
>> has been cont
On 9/23/21 11:40 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-23 11:34:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 9/29/21 10:02 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Please go ahead
Thanks. netcdf (1:4.8.1-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built &
installed on all release architectures.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4
On 9/29/21 4:19 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/29/21 10:02 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> Please go ahead
>
> Thanks. netcdf (1:4.8.1-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built &
> installed on all release architectures.
eccodes and gdal have been fixed, dep
Testing still lacks a few rebuilt packages for this transition.
labplot should migrated in two days.
pymol will be rebuilt in unstable after it gets out the DELAYED
according to #995666, although I don't see it at
ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/
magics++ & metkit are block
On 10/20/21 2:45 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
>>
On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-04 19:49:39 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Control: forwa
On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-09-04 19:49:39 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
&g
On 10/22/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-09-04 19:49:39 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
On 10/22/21 5:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/22/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>> On 2021-09-04 19:49:39 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
On 10/22/21 6:17 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/22/21 5:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/22/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
On 10/23/21 08:27, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 6:17 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 5:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/22/21 11:19 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/21/21 11:17 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Anton,
On 10/26/21 08:56, Anton Gladky wrote:
OK, I will upload it into unstable very soon. What abou #997664?
The package should go to NEW actually. Or leave it as it is for the moment?
The upload to experimental is built on all release architectures.
Is there anything preventing the uplo
On 11/16/21 14:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to upload python3-defaults later tonight, adding 3.10 as a
supported Python version. Packages are able to migrate on their own, there are
no blockages introduced on other transitions.
numpy rdeps (e.g. pyproj) are a bit problematic, they fa
On 11/18/21 09:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11/18/21 06:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/16/21 14:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to upload python3-defaults later tonight, adding 3.10 as a
supported Python version. Packages are able to migrate on their own, there are
no bloc
On 11/19/21 12:58, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/18/21 09:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11/18/21 06:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/16/21 14:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to upload python3-defaults
On 11/19/21 21:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 19-11-2021 20:50, David Prévot wrote:
Le 10/11/2021 à 05:16, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
On 2021-09-05 19:26:39, Ondřej Surý wrote:
the PHP 8.1 RC1 was released, so I think it would be better to skip
php8.0
[…]
I’ll update this issue when I am ready.
On 11/21/21 21:44, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
mariadb-10.5 (1:10.5.13-0+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 10.5.13. Includes security fixes for:
- CVE-2021-35604
* Drop MIPS and libatomic patches applied now upstream
-- Otto Kekäläinen Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:53:28
On 11/23/21 14:34, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[ Reason ]
The LVBAG driver in GDAL 3.2.2 is unable to process BAG 2.0 Extract file
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 12/3/21 17:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 14:34 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
The LVBAG driver in GDAL 3.2.2 is unable to process BAG 2.0 Extract
files
correctly. Since October 2021 BAG 1.0 Extract files are no longer
updated,
so users are expecte
On 12/8/21 12:30, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-11-09 15:07:50 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://relea
On 12/8/21 20:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Thanks. gdal (3.4.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now
built & installed on all release architectures.
pdal is built & installed on all release architectures, grass & paraview
can be binNMUed.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
On 12/10/21 14:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/8/21 20:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Thanks. gdal (3.4.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now
built & installed on all release architectures.
pdal is built & installed on all release architectures, grass & para
On 12/10/21 17:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/10/21 14:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/8/21 20:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Thanks. gdal (3.4.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now
built & installed on all release architectures.
pdal is built & installe
On 1/1/22 10:18, Kunal Mehta wrote:
On 1/1/22 00:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
It seems I don't understand how PHP packaging works. I scheduled
rebuilds of several packages that were yesterday on the tracker page
[1] when that still only had the phpapi-* listed. Several packages
can't be build yet it
On 2/25/22 17:07, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libgdal-grass_3.2.2-1 . ANY . bullseye . -m "Rebuild with grass (>=
7.8.5-1+deb11u1)"
libgdal-grass is unusable since the stable update of gra
On 3/21/22 22:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. proj (9.0.0-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built &
installed on all release architectures.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4A
On 3/22/22 09:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/21/22 22:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. proj (9.0.0-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built &
installed on all release architectures.
Thanks for scheduling the binNMUs. Dependency level 2 and 3 are
On 3/22/22 16:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/22/22 09:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/21/22 22:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. proj (9.0.0-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built
& installed on all release architectures.
Thanks for schedu
On 3/23/22 08:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/22/22 16:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/22/22 09:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 3/21/22 22:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. proj (9.0.0-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built
& installed on
Can we get this into the upcoming 11.7 point release?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On 4/1/23 21:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 19:38 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
As reported in #1031392, postgis 3.1.1 has an important issue with
polar
stereographic projections which was resolved in 3.1.2.
[ Impact ]
Unusable coordinates from transformations.
Please go ahea
On 7/4/19 3:51 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:13:03PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> My strong preference is for you to maintain the backport as you are the most
>> able maintainer of the package, so I hope we can find a solution where I can
>> support you with the unpl
On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
>
> Backport for Buster:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
> Please spons
On 5/13/22 16:45, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
mysql-workbench (8.0.26+dfsg-1) FTBFS due to gcc-11 (#998833).
vtk6 (6.3.0+dfsg2-8.1) FTBFS due to gcc-11 (#984398).
Neither of these are in testing, and they still depends
qgis (3.22.5+dfsg-1) FTBFS due to sip6 (#1009939) and not supporting
Multi-Arch
On 6/11/22 01:32, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. gdal (3.5.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built
and installed on all release architectures.
libgdal-grass (1:1.0.0-1) has also been uploaded to unstable.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D
On 6/11/22 11:06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 6/11/22 01:32, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. gdal (3.5.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built
and installed on all release architectures.
libgdal-grass (1:1.0.0-1) has also been uploaded to unstable
On 6/11/22 18:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 6/11/22 11:06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 6/11/22 01:32, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thanks. gdal (3.5.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built
and installed on all release architectures.
libgdal-grass (1
On 8/1/22 22:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 01-08-2022 22:18, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
nmu abinit_9.6.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdff7 (>=
4.6.0+ds-1)"
To resolve the autopkgtest failure reported in #1016414, the package
needs to be rebuilt.
That normally means it's papering over
On 8/25/22 07:24, yokota wrote:
Please remove Calibre 5.44.0+dfsg-1 mips64el/mips package from unstable
distribution, and enable testing migration.
Removal from unstable is done by the FTP team:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#removing-packages
Once the p
On 10/22/22 16:25, David Prévot wrote:
I believe there are no more blockers that could be spotted with debci.
Since not all packages have tests, and those tests can’t spot every
regressions, there will probably be more issues, but I believe it looks
good for now (especially compared to previous
Please also binNMU gdal & python-shapely in experimental:
nmu gdal_3.6.0+dfsg-1~exp1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with
Python 3.11 as supported"
nmu python-shapely_2.0~b2-1~exp1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild
with Python 3.11 as supported"
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R
On 11/19/22 20:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-11-11 11:55:45 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://rele
On 11/21/22 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
As this is
On 11/21/22 17:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
higher levels manually to be able to build
On 11/20/22 20:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/19/22 20:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-11-11 11:55:45 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de
How can we schedule autopkgtest runs for testing with gdal &
libgdal-grass from unstable?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On 11/22/22 21:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 22-11-2022 11:26, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
How can we schedule autopkgtest runs for testing with gdal &
libgdal-grass from unstable?
Most of the time britney and autopkgtest handle it automatically if
dependencies are rightly versioned (alth
On 11/23/22 19:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 23-11-2022 05:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The libgdal-grass autopkgtest in testing is failing because it
requires gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass from unstable.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gdal
This combination needs to be tested
On 11/24/22 21:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at
them? Thanks
Patch available in: https://bugs.debian.org/1024677
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E8
On 10/22/22 21:46, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I'll be uploading the PECL extensions for PHP 8.2 to experimental as I will
update them
for PHP 8.2 - I haven't started yet, but should be able to do before or around
the PHP 8.2.0
release.
Do you plan to include php-imagick in this?
I had to rebuild it
On 12/30/22 12:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-12-30 05:07:54 +0100, Patrick Franz wrote:
Qt 6.4.2~rc1 has now been built successfully on every architecture
except s390x where the builds have been queued. However, we don't see a
reason why 6.4.2 couldn't be built on s390x.
Please go ahea
On 1/5/23 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who
This has been a best practice for quite a while, high time to make it
hard requirement.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146
On 1/5/23 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
2. If there is already a version in experimental that is unsuitable for
the next stable release, because there's only one experimental, in the
rare case that upstream bumps the SONAME of the "old" branch, we can't
do as asked. For example:
-
On 1/2/23 16:28, Graham Inggs wrote:
qtbase-opensource-src is done, there's been no progress with PHP 8.2,
but we can deal with mapserver and zeroc-ice if they become entangled.
php-defaults got updated in unstable, now mapserver is BD-Uninstallable
until php8.2 gets built on ppc64el & s390x w
On 1/6/23 08:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 06-01-2023 07:39, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
What's your plan to deal with these entanglements?
I have bumped the priority of php8.2 on ppc64el and s390x as a start.
Thanks, gtk+3.0 is also blocking several packages on s390x.
Kind Regards,
On 7/14/22 15:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php8.2.html
[...]
title = "php8.2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "phpapi-20210902" | .depends ~
"phpapi-20210903";
is_good = .depends ~ "phpapi-20210903";
is_bad = .depends ~ "phpapi-20210902";
Tracker file set up
On 12/15/22 20:15, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I think everything is mostly ready in experimental. I'll try to sort out
the rest of the missing extensions over the weekend (imagick, memcached,
redis and maybe few others).
php-igbinary needs to be moved to unstable, php-apcu is built &
installed on all
On 1/4/23 23:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2023-01-04 04:40:43 +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote:
This is still a package with a soname coupled to its release number, so
there isn't really anything significantly changed.
It has genomicsdb, otb and qiskit-aer as rdepds and I successfully built
all t
1 - 100 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
