On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:06:49AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Philipp Kern, le Mon 09 Jul 2012 08:22:37 -0600, a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:24:09AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Philipp Kern, le Sun 08 Jul 2012 17:17:47 -0600, a écrit :
> > > >
e case given some recent mails.
Is emacs23 in good shape for the release?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
PS: Your efforts fixing it up are appreciated, but it's just way too late to
add a new package at this point that might cause other packages to need
modifications.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
te undocumented API but given that
it really does affect other packages, it makes sense to me at least.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ase?
Unblocked, thanks.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
debian/rules.
I can live with the other changes even if they are really not conformant to the
freeze rules.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:29:09PM +0900, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ah, gcc-4.4 will stay? That's an option which should work, yes.
Yep, it will. See for instance [1].
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2012/04/msg1.html
signature.asc
Description:
o set "-pipe -Wall", *why* --as-needed
(whose prior absence might cause rdepends to rely on linkage to be
present), *why* --no-undefined. But then I see now that it hasn't got
any rdepends at all.
Also I do not see how reverting those changes make that package FTBFS
shortly after stable is released.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:16:57PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> nmu bobcat_3.01.00-1 . ALL . -m "recompilation with current g++ (closes:
> #683049)"
What's the condition here? What changes to g++ will cause it to need a rebuild?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
quot;. Should it?
Which kernels are broken so that they need the per-CPU workaround?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e reload is triggered when the microcode
> module is loaded by the initramfs.
Well, it's also done in the postinst.
I unblocked amd64-microcode nevertheless.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Note, I just first would like to get a pre-approval, if the change is
> okay to be passed to wheezy.
>
> Attached is the debdiff against 0.58-1 currently in wheezy and
> unstable.
ACK.
Kind regar
That makes a useful discussion pretty hard.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
given that we
cannot even inspect the package in NEW?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:10:39PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 04:36 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > What do you expect us to do
> ftp-masters told me to ask the release-team to tell ftp-master that they
> are allowed to process my package and (accept or reject) it for
tag 683400 + moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:54PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 08:32 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Thanks for not giving any further information.
>
> let me re-iterate: ftp-master told me to do ask the release-team to give
> permissio
find a definite answer in the archives, this
still needs confirmation. KiBi?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-08-06 17:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I gathered. That doesn't answer my point, though. It is the *last* package
> > in the archive doing so, instead of using dkms.
> There is nvidia-kernel-dkms
ver
package that does all the magic using dkms at install time, how is that more
sophisticated than providing pre-built module packages, especially in the light
that it's the only one left doing it that way? ("Why isn't it the same for
fglrx? Where's that 3.2.0-3 module for virtualbox?")
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t;${ACTION}" = "purge"
then
- rm -f ${CFG_FILE}
+ rm -f "${CFG_FILE}".cfg
+ rm -f "${CFG_FILE}".bak
+ rm -f "${CFG_FILE}".*dpkg*
fi
The second part does not make me happy.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug against ftp.debian.org
instead.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
evant changes being
> > part of the release.
> Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the
> Wheezy release?
Did you read (and understand) what he wrote?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;
> ++ pager = ENV['MANPAGER'] || ENV['PAGER'] || 'sensible-pager -R'
> +
> + Kernel.exec "#{groff} #{root}/#{command} | #{pager}"
> + else
Well, more for instance does not know -R (and that's the default if PAGER is
unset). Did you test that with something else than less?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d prevent people from doing binNMUs, but given that the non-multiarch use
was fixed by them it wouldn't be that great.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 04:44:38PM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 15 August 2012 16:42, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Three different people in Debian have already told you that emacs24 will
> > not be in Wheezy.
> No, actually, you're the first person to outright say it
Bullshit.
[1] and
command line interface. Work is still underway to salvage that
> release.
FWIW I tested 0.6.9.1-1 on wheezy and it still responds to "conflicts" with the
removal of all i386 binaries on an amd64 system.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ompatible
with the DFSG.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uld be cleared up in testing before accepting them. Because any rebuild
in testing (or then stable) will inflate them again.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
an-installer/0.83
>
> # https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/08/msg00431.html
>
> unblock partman-crypto/54
> unblock-udeb partman-crypto/54
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
oving F*EX from the archive -
> which IMHO would be a sad loss as there currently exsits no other product in
> Debian providing the same services as F*EX does.
Well, it could still be moved to non-free.
I wonder how it passed NEW in the beginning, though. It was always that way,
you say?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n emacs23 src package with the
emacs binary dropped first because emacs has already been taken over by
emacs24. And an upload trying to include that binary would be rejected.
Also emacs in sid already depends on emacs23.
But doing them roughly at the same time makes sense to me.
Kind regards
Phili
readlink returns 1024, that goes kaboom? (Also, using a constant
> might be nice.)
Patch pushed. Thanks and sorry.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing left
to solve, from my point of view, is dropping the breaks on microcode.ctl and
the upload of a transitional package replacing it.
Just to update the status here, given that a private conversation with hmh
happened more or less accidentially.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Des
27;d close p-u-NEW on the 15th,
which would leave us with a week.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
eference external resources, even if I don't expect git.d.o to
> disappear any time soon.
Ping.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on
> svn diff -c 1629 http://arthurdejong.org/svn/nss-pam-ldapd
That seems gratious and is IMHO not suitable.
> svn diff -c 1648 http://arthurdejong.org/svn/nss-pam-ldapd
ACK.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e
without.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120910191051.gb7...@hub.kern.lc
ing
> ping?
So not even newer kernels support this properly and it's deactivated for
wheezy? If so, please go ahead.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
3.4.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with xz compression."
> - gnome-search-tool 338
> nmu yelp_3.4.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with xz compression."
> - yelp 183
> nmu vino_3.4.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with xz compression."
> - vino 183
Done, thanks.
eel free to re-upload using version number 2.2.1-1.1+squeeze1 and
> > > without mentioning backports in the changelog. :-)
> > Okay, I'll do it as your advice.
> Ugh, sorry, I messed up the version number there. It should have been
> 2.2.1-1+squeeze1. :-(
I think it should h
Hi,
ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there&#
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
> We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send ou
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 04:21:10PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 22:53 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > (1) extra checking of overflows of numeric values retrieved from LDAP
> > > This change was developed and tested by Redhat and has been in
> &
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:54:02PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 21:12 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Hence you can go ahead and prepare a debdiff for the final ACK.
> Thanks. Attached is the debdiff from 0.7.15+squeeze1 to 0.7.15+squeeze2.
> > Thanks and
be
> > Sunday, so it should hit the archive by Saturday. :-)
> I've just uploaded nss-pam-ldapd_0.7.15+squeeze2 so that should be on
> time.
And accepted into proposed-updates. Thank you for your patience and work.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:55:00AM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> Please unblock package mono
This doesn't seem to have hit sid yet.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
retitle 773515 pre-approval: mono/3.2.8+dfsg-9
thanks
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:11:51AM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> On 22/12/14 09:35, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:55:00AM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> >> Please unblock package mono
> >
> > Thi
retitle 773712 pre-approval: unblock: jenkins-job-builder/0.9.0-0.1
tag 773712 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:29:36PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> The version of jenkins-job-builder as available in current jessie is
> totally broken with regards to its feature to delete Jenkins jo
ks fine.
Please go ahead with the upload and report back once it has been
accepted.
Kind regards and thanks for your efforts
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libinfinity
libinfinity 0.6.5 contains multiple crash fixes. I'd feel much better if
those were included in the package. The diff is slightly noisy, but
mostly becaus
om testing.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/50e1ae2a77c3a7450871ca08b280e...@hub.kern.lc
'd be used.
Assuming that you tested that in a minimal chroot and that this is sufficient
vs. build-essential, I'd be inclined to approve the upload.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ported anymore.
if this request still applies, please provide an updated debdiff against stable
of what you want to ship. Thanks!
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
countries. These should
> also go into stable so that users can easily comply with current laws
> and use the full permitted ranges of frequency and transmit power.
please go ahead. Thanks!
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tes where this
> package is installable. Ideally there would be a way to actually detect the
> Android kernel, I have not found that way.
I wonder if you could probe for either ashmem or binder?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
upload/backport with the old lib-numa to make the crafty package
> use the squeeze version of this lib.
What's that supposed to mean? Did you get prior approval by
debian-rele...@lists.d.o for this upload?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
problem and
> John Sullivan for patch (Closes: #584380).
>* Fixed documentation reference problems. Thanks to John Sullivan for
> patch.
Did I miss a thread or did you ask for pre-upload approval on
debian-rele...@lists.d.o?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> there's a better recommended way to state that any of the alternatives
> will suffice for building, I'm happy to apply it.
The fix is to list the real package you want it to build it in the archive
first, and the alternatives (even virtual) or'ed after.
(Like emacs2
installed files at build time
+
+ -- Chase Douglas Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:07:16 -0400
this is not Ubuntu. We do not autogenerate -dbg packages. Could you please
revert this change? (If a -dbg package is needed, that is.)
Thanks,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(awk '$1 ~ /^commandkey$/ { print $2; exit}'
/etc/chrony/chrony.conf)
PASSWORD=`awk '$1 ~ /^'$KEY'$/ {print $2; exit}'
/etc/chrony/chrony.keys`
# Make sure chronyc can't hang us up.
isn't there anything better than doubling the sleep timeout to d
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:33:40PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:31:27PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> > > I checked all Breaks, Provides and Conflicts statements in
> > > deb
dbus backend (compile-time setting).
(Closes: #497401, #595480, #595480)
* Correct upstream source location in `debian/copyright'.
(Closes: #574352)
-- Philipp Kern Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:00:16 +0200
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
un, 19 Sep 2010 12:51:07 +0200
Would you mind sending the unblock requests after them being accepted,
given that you're only sending a changelog entry anyway?
Thanks,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ld be fixed before
it gets unblocked to propagate to testing, so a timely upload would be
appreciated.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I'm asking for a pre-approval to upload sml-mode to t-p-u. The package in
unstable converts the build system and moves to dh7. This patch is minimal.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
diff -u sml-mode-4.0/debian/changelog sml-mode-4.0/debian/changelog
--- sml-mode-4.0/debian/changelog
++
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
python2.5 is currently phased out for squeeze, so it should be demoted from
standard to optional. Likewise python2.6 should be promoted from optional to
standard. (Otherwise python2.5 is still present in a standard installation
of squeeze, which it sho
new package into squeeze, I would greatly appreciate it. If
> not, I understand.
sorry, now is not the time to change a 4y old package in testing.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:50:24PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 14:35:58 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > unblock rubber/1.1-2.3
> I suck, please make that 1.1-2.4.
Wow. Hint adjusted.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hen please contact Soeren Sonnenburg
> by
> replying to this email.
the current diff against squeeze is:
206 files changed, 94529 insertions(+), 91216 deletions(-)
Could you please provide a targetted fix for upload to
testing-proposed-updates?
Thanks in advance,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e release team meeting next
weekend. (I.e. until the decision about the scope of volatile.)
Sorry for the delay.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
shlist, so no, it would be too late for this.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, I know that pygrub was in Lenny, I was
unsure about pv-grub, but as we see, it wasn't there.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Lesser General Public License version 2, right? That
replacement seems to be made of fail. Didn't review more, sorry.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1]
http://synflood.at/blog/index.php?/archives/741-strtoul-considered-harmful.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
It would be very helpful if the Release Team could get bug reports on bugs of
severity >= important on package versions in proposed-updates sent to
debian-release@lists.debian.org as a Cc. Could this possibly be implemented
in the BTS? That way we wouldn
should name the correct license (which they are free to relicense it to) in the
license headers.
Furthermore you now install dlna profiles, whatever they are. I'm not really
able to review the XML changes, and they weren't previously used in the
package?
And in general it looks like a too big diff to review. ):
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the "if it blows to pieces, you get to keep them"
mode. But as the future uploads will be out of our control anyway, I guess
I just need to ask you if you are confident with your current package.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
atch system is so that
> the
> package will work with the DPMT svn layout.
>
> Please approve/let me know what else needs doing.
>
> Scott K
>
> P.S. Please cc me on any replies as I am not subscribed.
Go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package splix
splix (2.0.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix alignment to allow printing on ARM, thanks to Luca Niccoli.
(Closes: #5743
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> gssdp, gupnp, gupnp-av have all been uploaded and built on all archs now,
> so please unblock their testing migration.
All unblocked.
Thanks!
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n't support skipping releases and it's possible that
you cannot debootstrap the new one with an environment two versions earlier.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 05:57:55PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> So... should I upload -4 to fix it, or is it too late now? :)
> Thanks in advance for your time, and keep up the great work!
Please upload and ping us when it got accepted.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Descr
to have some of my business competitors to read, and forecast my
> next move.
Debian isn't about business competition. We did tell you to submit it to a
public list, AFAICS you did not followup, not even stating such a reason,
neither.
> > FWIW, I don't read private mails f
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:55:50AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 599058 remove plymouth from testing
> thanks
>
> On 10/07/2010 01:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I don't think it's worth it at this point. If you want a splash screen
> > you probably have X installed anyway, so plymouth
uest a freeze exception, or if the package
> in unstable is unsuitable, upload something to t-p-u ASAP?
>
> It gets worse because 0.96.3 is a security fix for CVE-2010-0405.
Hrm, yeah, they already requested one and it's stalled at our side. Please
give us a bit but we'll sort it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package gobby-infinote
gobby-infinote (0.4.93-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Apply upstream commit ecfdae11289287fec91513ba406f03d044dc56d9:
Add a "Disconnec
in one go (#546)
-- Philipp Kern Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:25:00 +0200
libinfinity (0.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Add bug fixes from upstream git repository:
- Fix recon ordering on remote delete operation split
- Make the central method aware of callbacks manipulating the connection
of webgen0.4 in testing as well).
I can't say I'm happy with ignoring failures this way, but well, unblocked.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ng. Please let the above
version migrate first.
Workarounds like these are really hard to judge IMHO. But as the line 690+
changes are irrelevant you can go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y version,
which is only possible while being arch:all to get binary:Version in a sane
way.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:36:08PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> today I received #601137 -- i.e. gThumb segfaults because of an unhandled
> situation of a missing Exif tag (the "orientation").
> I could track it down, and made a patch [1] for it.
[...]
> [1]:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-main
> expect the users of this package to deny upgrades on non-Debian systems?
I'm not convinced that this will work. Sync is more or less autoupgraded
through the extension system on other platforms. If it's still that much in
flux I guess we should rather not provide it in a stable relea
gt; isc-dhcp
> kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64
> kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386
> libbsd
> libfakekey
> libpciaccess
> libxrender
> matchbox-keyboard
> ufsutils
> zfsutils
Ping?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
changes way post-freeze that might not
be suitable for squeeze. It is still possible to update the old one in squeeze
with newer packages without the packaging changes or fix the remaining issues
with ia32-libs in unstable. (The versioning is a tad crazy for that, though.)
Kind regards,
Philipp
less crack smoking all around.
It's also plain wrong considering that we do exactly that. The buildds run
amd64 with linux32.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ug: #584254
>
> <http://git.hadrons.org/?p=debian/dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=0484cd7d>
So even when you don't do sync() anymore you still want to disable those
fsyncs()? Granted, it's a self-contained new feature. What's the use case
for squeeze? d-i I heared,
in many more places at
this point (i.e. Linux is still "special", and will be for quite some
time).
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-6-6b11'
make: *** [stamps/build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
The failure is also reproducable with a machine with 4G of RAM, so it's not a
buildd problem of too few RAM. Given that the limits are explicitly set I
suppose
they need to be
some random other revision)
or if we even get data safety regressions.
Thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:50:23PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > 1) Switch back from sync() to fsync() before rename() (while keeping
> > the sync() code around for the benefit of other distributions
> >
ct us
ASAP on `debian-rele...@lists.debian.org'. Another d-i respin is in the
queue and will be hopefully done in time. ;-)
Kind regards and thanks for the fish
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 05:57:40PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2010/9/14 Philipp Kern :
> > This depends on the ftp-masters. We'll discuss this on IRC when they meet
> > (this or next weekend), hopefully we'll have a solution some weeks after
> > that.
> Just fo
801 - 900 of 1035 matches
Mail list logo
