clone 933829 -2
reassign -2 release.debian.org
retitle -2 buster-pu: package win32-loader/0.9.3+deb10u1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags pu
thanks
Let's hope I got that right.
On 16-08-2019 08:55, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> debian-boot@ / debian-release@: can I upload src:w
Hi,
On 18-08-2019 04:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> I can already trigger all the autopkgtests in unstable for packages that
>> are in experimental, so if you interested in this, please contact me.
>
> **Yes please**. This will certainly help *a lot* specially for us that we
>
]
+ * Fix regression with /bin/sh pointing to bash due to changes in its
+POSIX behaviour (Closes: #934027)
+
+ [ Paul Gevers ]
+ * tests: use sh instead of hardcoded *sh to catch issues like the above
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sun, 18 Aug 2019 21:23:05 +0200
+
dbconfig-common (2.0.11) unstable
Hi Ryan,
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:53:22 -0700 Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:25:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Thank you. Uploaded, accepted, and visible on the queue page now.
Do you have any idea why the autopkgtest of gnupg2 (maintainers in C
Hmm, sorry for the noise, that is because of bug 905563. I forgot I had
that blocked in the past.
Paul
On 22-08-2019 21:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:53:22 -0700 Ryan Tandy wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:25:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote
Hi Santiago,
On 25-08-2019 11:47, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'm still tracking FTBFS bugs in buster. Am I right to think that this
> upload for stable (when accepted) will fix Bugs #931002 and #931003 in
> rust-coresimd and rust-simd, making them buildable again?
I don't know about that, I can only
Hi
On 29-08-2019 14:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Note: pkg-security@tracker.d.o is not a valid email, dropped)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> In general, we (Debian) don't have a good answer to this problem and
>>> virtualbox is clearly a bad precedent. We really need
Hi,
On 31-08-2019 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
> experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
> regression.
I can have the experimental-to-unstable pseudo britney run finish its
work for glibc soo
Hi Aurelien,
On 31-08-2019 18:37, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 31-08-2019 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
>> experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
>> regression.
> I can
Hi Aurelien,
On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc
>
> I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive:
Thanks for doing so.
> - dante: needs to be binNMUed against the new libc
You already identified that
Control: tag -1 pending
On 18-08-2019 18:54, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 04:29:31PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
>> llvm-toolchain-8.
>
> Ok, let's go!
It's ongoing.
Pau
Hi Sylvestre,
On 04-09-2019 19:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It's ongoing.
And blocked from migration. Please fix the RC issue *and* upload a
source only package next time.
Paul
Hi Aurelien,
On 02-09-2019 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
>>> - nemo: seems to be a bug in udisks2 postinst script
>>> - pg-repack: debci issue, the regression is caused by libpq5 from
>>> experimental, which is wrongly selected instead of the unstable
>>> version.
>>> - repmgr: ditto wi
Hi maintainers of sextractor and iraf-fitsutil,
In bug 939048 we are discussing a transition slot for glibc 2.29. As
part of the preparation we are checking autopkgtest results in unstable,
when glibc 2.29 from experimental is installed. This e-mail is a heads
up of failures in your packages. Can
Hi Sylvestre,
On 04-09-2019 19:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> And blocked from migration. Please fix the RC issue *and* upload a
> source only package next time.
I noticed that you did a new upload. From the outside it seems like you
forgot to fix the RC bug. Can you please fix the issue? It w
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Aurelien,
Let's have this going.
Paul
@ginggs, I don't mind if you beat me to the binNMU's ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for talking about the issues you have, I could not have guessed.
On 10-09-2019 17:53, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> I was using a test over a DKMS package (lime-forensics). I removed
> all tes
Hi Peter,
On 12-09-2019 19:03, peter green wrote:
> astroid2 was removed from unstable a couple of weeks ago. However it is
> still in testing, britney claims.
>
>> trying: -astroid2
>> skipped: -astroid2 (424, 28, 295)
>> got: 32+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-28:m-2:m-0:p-0:s-1
>> * mips64el: pyt
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Julien,
On 15-09-2019 13:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
> I'm the package maintainer (within the Debian Games Team), and I'm
> proposing to drop it off Debian testing (and unstable, with another bug
> report).
Did you already file that bug? Than we can close this bug as tes
Hi Gunnar,
[please forward this e-mail to the ctte if it bounces again].
On 14-08-2019 21:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Disclaimer, I haven't discussed this with the team, so what I write here
> is my personal perception and opinion.
This was discussed in our IRC meeting of 28-08-2019. [
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 21-09-2019 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le ven. 20 sept. 2019 10:30:36 +0200, a ecrit:
>> The new liblouis release (3.11.0) changed its ABI. I have checked
>> the rdeps, they build and run fine, except liblouisutdml, which uses
>> internal function
Hi Shengjing, Sylvestre,
On 15-09-2019 09:52, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
>> llvm-toolchain-8.
[...]
>> Affected: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[345678]/
>> Good: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[8]/
>> Bad: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[34
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 12-08-2019 17:24, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Please schedule a transition for libmatio. The new version stands in
> experimental. I expect the transition to be smooth (only two symbols
> deprecated, and those are not used by reverse dependencies according to
> source
Control: tags -1 pending
On 23-09-2019 22:50, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le lun. 23 sept. 2019 21:51:06 +0200, a ecrit:
>> On 21-09-2019 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Samuel Thibault, le ven. 20 sept. 2019 10:30:36 +0200, a ecrit:
>>>> The new libloui
Control: tags -1 pending
On 24-09-2019 13:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le lundi 23 septembre 2019 à 22:13 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 12-08-2019 17:24, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>> Please schedule a transition for libma
Hi Dai,
Please consider using reportbug to file bugs against release.debian.org.
Mail to our list has high chance of getting lost.
On 24-09-2019 17:44, d...@debian.org wrote:
> ruby-gnome2 upstream source name has been renamed to ruby-gnome ("2" removed)
> in version 3.3.8.
>
> Changed our proje
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:16:36 +0200 Andreas Henriksson
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I've done rebuild tests of reverse dependencies for the gnome-desktop3
> transition and the results are that there's one failure:
> budge-desktop
>
>
Hi Pirate,
On 28-09-2019 06:40, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Are we blocked by some other transitions?
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Could you please next time provide more context than only the bug
number. It's annoying to need to look it up if all you n
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
wrote:
> Please schedule a transition for octave 5.
>
> Most reverse dependencies have already been updated by the Debian Octave Group
> and should therefore be compatible with the ne
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:53:21 +0100 Iain Lane wrote:
> I've uploaded to experimental-NEW and I'm in the process of testing
> r(-build)-deps now. I'll make any bugs block this one so we can see
> what's needed. This definitely *will* need sourceful changes to quite
Hi Sébastien,
On 30-09-2019 13:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9
Control: reassign -1 src:erlang,src:elixir-lang
Control: retitle -1 elixir-lang (autopkgtest) fails with new erlang
Control: found -1 erlang/1:22.1+dfsg-1
Control: found -1 elixir-lang/1.9.1.dfsg-1
Control: severity -1 serious
On 25-09-2019 10:53, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.or
Hi Sebastiaan,
Please stop. We don't need the python2 removal that urgent that we need
to break stuff. And yes, breaking piuparts is a NOGO in my opinion. As
is breaking all kind of other stuff while you know you break it. Give it
time, please. We may even ship python2 in bullseye if we need to. F
Hi Sébastien,
On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and
> I could reproduce it on the porterbox.
>
> For a given C++ source file, the generated assembly file is 303Mb
> large. Then the assembler hits the virtual space
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 01-10-2019 21:15, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/1/19 8:15 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Please stop. We don't need the python2 removal that urgent that we need
>> to break stuff. And yes, breaking piuparts is a NOGO in my opinion.
>
> piuparts i
Hi,
On 02-10-2019 03:31, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/933573 has a patch for eweouz
If somebody could please do an upload that fixes eweouz, that would be
great, than we don't need to resort to removal. If my view of things is
up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the pu
Control: block 934630 by 919641
Hi Sébastien,
On 02-10-2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> However this time it failed to build on all arches, because of texinfo
> 6.7.0.dfsg.2-2 which was buggy. Since then, texinfo 6.7.0.dfsg.2-3 has
> been uploaded which should fix that. Can you please give
Hi,
On 03-10-2019 09:39, intrigeri wrote:
> FWIW, libgtk2-perl is going away in Bullseye; most of its
> reverse-dependencies were either ported to GTK 3, or not shipped in
> Buster thanks to RC bugs I had filed, or removed from the archive.
> What's left is tracked there:
>
> - https://bugs.debi
Hi Niko, Dom,
On 25-08-2019 20:39, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Please let us know when we might get a transition slot. Both of us
> are currently rather taken by real life stuff, so would appreciate an
> advance warning if possible.
As discussed on IRC, if you are ready to go in a couple of days (let
say
Hi Rhonda,
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:55:52 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:05:23 +0800 Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> > please binNMU the irssi plugins for the last irssi upload. I did a local
> > test
> > build to confirm that they don't need any sour
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 03-10-2019 21:32, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Yes, I am able to cut a release and upload on Saturday (morning Europe
> time).
Ok, let's go this going.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06-10-2019 18:46, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 at 21:00:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> If my view of things is
>> up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the puzzle together with
>> the samba situation (assuming LO will just build on mips
Hi Sébastien,
On 08-10-2019 14:07, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> All packages concerned by this transition are now fixed, the only
> exception being octave-mpi. For the latter, I suggest that it be
> removed from testing, because the fix is not obvious, and upstream has
> to be involved.
I'll hint
Control: block -1 by 922566
Control: block -1 by 922569
Control: block -1 by 922570
Control: block -1 by 922573
Control: block -1 by 922574
Control: block -1 by 922578
Control: block -1 by 922579
Control: block -1 by 922582
Control: block -1 by 922583
Control: block -1 by 922584
Control: block -1 b
Hi Matthias,
On 10-10-2019 15:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a tracker to add python3.8 as a supported python3 version.
> This is non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built.
> I'm not yet starting this, just want to have an overview of affected
> packages.
>
> Please
Hi Lisandro,
[Please provide more context in your replies to bugs, it really annoying
to have to look up a bug just to figure the context out. A
"qtbase-opensource-src transition" anywhere in your e-mail subject or
body would have fixed that].
On 04-10-2019 20:18, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Me
Hi Christoph,
On 13-10-2019 12:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2019-10-12
> <09c44ee4-1bee-bc9a-43fd-64fbbdf5c...@debian.org>
>> Go ahead.
>
> Thanks. We'll start as soon as postgresql-12 is in testing to minimize
> any possible entanglement with other transitions.
The mi
Dear Craig,
Next time, can you please start your transition in experimental?
Everybody is supposed to coordinate transitions with us such that they
don't interfere with ongoing transitions. I think we're lucky [1], but
there were others waiting for a transition slot, so this isn't nice to them.
Y
Hi Craig,
On 14-10-2019 04:27, Craig Small wrote:
> Hi Paul (and others),
> I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which speaks to the
Whow, not updated since 2014.
> developer and doesn't mention at all things li
Hi Craig,
On 15-10-2019 01:15, Craig Small wrote:
> Hi,
> I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to
> fix at least the perl problem. For that second upload, do you want me
> to run it through experimental or just upload "normally"?
As the new soname is already in uns
Hi Craig,
On 15-10-2019 07:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 15-10-2019 01:15, Craig Small wrote:
>> I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to
>> fix at least the perl problem. For that second upload, do you want me
>> to run it through e
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Lisandro, Dmitry,
On 12-10-2019 00:05, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El vie., 11 oct. 2019 17:00, Paul Gevers <mailto:elb...@debian.org>> escribió:
> We're currently having a perl transition ongoing and I already ack'
Hi Yves,
> On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 15:45 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: binnmu
>
>> nmu libimobiledevice_1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-1 . ANY . unstable . -m
>> "rebuild against newer libus
Hi Andreas,
On 16-10-2019 08:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The final real blocker as I can see it is the gupnp-igd armel FTBFS.
Could you please file a bug about this and add it as a blocker of this bug?
> The problem is 100% reproducible on abel porterbox.
> The tests that hangs are the final
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sandro,
On 15-10-2019 23:53, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> I'm not sure, what ben rules you want, I can create ben rules for all
> 38 packages, but as the 57 packages are get a new upload anyways,
> those get recompiled anyways.
This sounds like one transition, so I think we
Hi Dmitry,
On 22-10-2019 17:49, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> You can start scheduling binNMUs already. An extra build-dependency on
> qtbase5-dev (>= 5.12) is enough to make sure it builds against the new
> version. For qtcreator, please also add qbs-dev (>= 1.13).
I have scheduled those. First build
Hi Dmitry,
On 22-10-2019 22:19, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:57:16PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I have scheduled those. First build failures are appearing. Can you
>> please check?
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dee
Hi,
On 22-10-2019 22:21, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Please make sure that all FTBFS bugs are tagged with the ftbfs tag. That
> will have them show up on the buildd pages and eases our review work.
The rebuilds seem to go mostly OK. I saw that qtbase-opensource-src
triggered two autopkgtest regre
Hi,
On 24-10-2019 15:18, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Can you please also binNMU pyqt5webengine to make sure it picks up the
> latest functions in qtwebengine (to solve #941959)?
Done.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 25-10-2019 08:06, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I have uploaded kdelibs4support and it fixes the autopkgtest failure.
Great.
> Libreoffice failure is tracked in #943401 and the maintainer added help tag.
> But it looks like the failure is unrelated to Qt, so maybe it can be ignored
> for the t
Hi,
On 28-10-2019 13:44, Christian Kastner wrote:
> There are only two reverse dependencies:
> * nmapdepends on liblinear-dev
> * python-pattern depends on python-liblinear
>
> I just successfully tested a rebuild of both (although the latter
> eventually won't matter because o
Hi,
On 28-10-2019 20:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> What's the correct procedure to follow now?
You'll also need to do a source-only upload, as we're not allowing
binaries build by maintainers to migrate to testing.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=liblinear
Dear all,
The visible progress on this bug report stopped several days ago. I'd
like to try an get it a bit further. I'm expecting frustration on all
sides, but let's try to work together to fix the current situation. In
case you aren't aware, the fact that gcc-9 hasn't migrated to testing in
the
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:30:27 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:> With only libgit-raw-perl and julia
remaining, which aren't key packages have
> one and none (resp) rdeps, and with all the time that has passed since their
> bugs were reported with no action from the maintainers so far, I thi
Hi Christian,
On 28-10-2019 20:52, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 28.10.19 20:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> The auto tracker now exists, but didn't add python-pattern. Is there
>> anything special that it needs rebuilding (normally python packages
>> don't need that)?
Control: reopen-1
Ehmm
On 03-11-2019 18:42, Paul Gevers wrote:
> This seems to be finished, closing.
I must have been blind...
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Micha,
On 20-10-2019 13:47, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi release team,
>
> AqBanking and Gwenhywfar, a Germany focused pair of libraries for online
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Drew,
On 30-10-2019 08:26, Drew Parsons wrote:
> So yes, the unversioned libhypre package name is certainly the option
> that will preserve the greatest sanity (I'll proceed directly with
> 2.18.2 once you give the thumbs up).
Thumbs up.
Paul
signature.asc
Descr
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Stéphane,
On 07-10-2019 15:50, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1.
>
> It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release
> architectures. [1]
>
> Most of reverse-dependencies recompile fine with no changes (on
>
Hi Christoph,
Did I see correctly that not much changed in the status of the
postgresql-12 transition? Are you done uploading and do the other
packages need binNMU's? Or are you just busy?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
Sorry for the delay in follow-up, but RL.
On 07-11-2019 15:20, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Here's the situation as of now, looking at
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=postgresql-common
Just wondering, but does that cover the full situation?
> Issues preventing migration:
>
> Fix wai
Hi Christoph,
On 09-11-2019 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Need fixing upstream (and should be ignored and/or removed from
>> testing until that happens):
>>
>> autopkgtest for cstore-fdw/1.6.2-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for hypopg/1.1.2-1: amd64: Regressio
Hi Jan,
On 10-11-2019 01:10, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I can build qpdf 9.1 for Debian in one of three ways: 1) use only the
> native crypto as in all previous releases, thus avoiding a dependency
> on gnutls; 2) build only the gnutls crypto provider thus causing a
> dependency on gnutls but elimina
Hi all,
For the record, Christoph and I had the following discussion on IRC today.
Paul
Myon: I am starting to wonder, are all those PostgreSQL-11
based packages broken with the postgresql-common update, or just their
autopkgtests
if the latter is the case, I don't mind ignoring it all if you
Hi Aurelien,
On 10-11-2019 13:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> glibc 2.29-3 is prevented to migrate to testing due to autopktest
> regressions. However those regressions are unrelated to glibc and are
> due to the postgresql transition.
I agree to ignore all postgresql regressions due to the transitio
Hi Joachim,
On 11-11-2019 19:34, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> For more than 10 years grub2 is the successor of lilo as
> boot loader and finally it seems all problems and wishes
> were solved with grub2.
>
> I have maintained lilo for many years and I think it is
> now the right time to remove lilo
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Balint,
On 16-10-2019 13:44, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to update libevent in unstable.
>
> I have performed te
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Gudjon,
On 02-11-2019 10:11, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear release team
>
> I would like to ask for a transition of qscintilla2 2.11.2+dfsg
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi IOhannes
On 18-10-2019 18:18, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> The new upstream version assimp-5.0.0 comes with a soname bump from
> libassimp.so.4 t
Hi Stéphane,
On 12-11-2019 14:05, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 04/11/2019 à 13:50, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>>> Please go ahead.
>>
>> Started.
>
> Here is a status update after 8 days.
>
> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few
> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all
Hi
On 12-11-2019 10:52, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Here's the list of remaining packages that need a "rebuild on buildd"
> binnmu:
>
> bgw-replstatus
> ip4r
> jsquery
> orafce
> pg-cron
> pg-dirtyread
> pgextwlist
> pgfincore
> pgmemcache
> pg-partman
> pgq
> pg-qualstats
> pg-rage-terminator
> pg-r
Hi Carsten,
On 13-11-2019 21:33, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> Am 13.11.19 um 19:35 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> On 13-11-2019 07:20, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>> But I"m struggling *how* to add such an versioned test dependenc
Hi Stéphane,
On 14-11-2019 09:07, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>>> Here is a status update after 8 days.
>>>
>>> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few
>>> exceptions, bugs have been
Hi Joachim,
On 16-11-2019 13:42, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote on 2019-11-11 22:57:
>
>> On different thoughts, are users of lilo migrated to grub2 in any way?
>> Is this possible? If not, this is probably worth mentioning in the
>> release-notes, no?
>
Hi,
On 14-11-2019 16:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Let's see where we are when all ages are fine.
I'm failing to (quickly) see why ocaml doesn't want to migrate. Does
anybody already have some foo laying around to see what the problem is?
I'm only seeing ocaml in the auto
Hi Stéphane,
Thanks for the reply.
On 17-11-2019 10:14, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now, I see the following reasons:
> - hivex is too young
Grr... why upload during a transition
> - lwt is blocked because arch:all packages are not built... but there
> are no longer arch:all packages (I don't
Hi Sandro,
On 17-11-2019 14:09, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> calligra is identified as fake candidate (for the moment) every reverse
> dependency is built correctly and it is nothing to do left expect for wait
> till kdepim will go to testing.
>
> Just for the record, for thise who are not familiar wi
Dear Russ,
[Disclaimer: the words below are as a member of the release team, but
not necessarily those of the team. We haven't discussed this yet.]
On 17-11-2019 20:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Let me copy the release team. How would you all prefer to handle the
> relationship between release-criti
Hi
On 08-11-2019 06:43, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> python-networkx is finally fixed, please remove the block to let gdal
> migrate to testing, and let's move on with this transition.
python-networkx doesn't want to migrate, probably due to networkx not
migrating. That in turn may (or may not)
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Steve,
On 09-11-2019 05:50, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> New upstream, new soversion.
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "exiv2";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libexiv2-14" | .depends ~ "libexiv2-27";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libexiv2-27";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libexiv2-14";
Pl
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sebastian,
On 10-11-2019 18:08, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> libdvdread bumped its SONAME from 4 to 7. All reverse dependencies build
> fine against the new version.
Please go ahead in unstable.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Samuel,
On 28-11-2019 09:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/hwloc
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libr/librsb/3524853/log.gz
>
> shows that autopkgtest fails in testing for librsb, thus blocking
> the libhwloc.so.5 -> libhwloc.so.15 transition, b
Control: owner -1 !
Control: affects -1 src:q2-demux
On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 21:42:20 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/console-setup
>
> console-setup-freebsd/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: vidcontrol
> console-setup-freebsd/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: kbdcontrol
> uninstalla
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for the response.
On 28-11-2019 13:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The package works only by luck, the warning does indicate that something
> wrong is happening. I do think that in the case of hwloc it could very
> well crash, because structures have changed between hwloc1 and hwlo
Hi Joachim,
On 29-11-2019 18:01, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Now I have decided to let lilo in the repository for some more months and
> create a new package with debian/NEWS file with this content:
Do you mean, a new version of the lilo package (I was reading it for a
while you were going to introd
Hi Xavier,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 20:44:27 + Xavier Guimard wrote:
[...]
> cyrus-imapd (3.0.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
>* Improve autopkgtest:
> + use native autopkgtest packages system
> + add more perl packages to minimize cpan downloads
I don't know how CPAN work
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sandro,
On 30-11-2019 00:08, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> I prepared a patch for zanshin [!1]. That means I could now built every
> reverse dependency with KDEPIM 19.08 and nothing is stopping me to start with
> the transition (except the ACK from your side).
Please, go
severity 942999 important
thanks
Dear Georges,
Thanks for reaching out.
On 01-12-2019 19:34, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> I received an e-mail three days ago, Message-Id: p...@respighi.debian.org>, stating that:
>
> pymecavideo 6.5.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-12-28
>
> It
Package: release-notes
Tags: bullseye
Hi Joachim,
On 30-11-2019 11:26, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> But then the only solution is making a transitional package "lilo" which
> have dependency to grub2, which will install grub2 and remove the binaries
> of lilo. This can entail many risks. Because of m
Hi all,
On 01-12-2019 22:45, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Paul, this is the thread i was talking about.
>
> you were copied in the original email:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00098.html
>
> if there is something the RT wants to discuss about this effort,
> please do so here, not
701 - 800 of 1548 matches
Mail list logo
