Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Sat, 04 May 2019 15:06:10 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> I would like to fix some issues in corekeeper reported by Jakub Wilk.
>
> unblock corek
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, 1 May 2019 14:24:06 +0200 Pierre Chifflier
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Although it is an upstream release, please unblock suricata 4.1.4-1 for
> buster
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi Gianfranco,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:22:05 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock package libpng1.6
>
> Finally, the arm issue we ar
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi doko,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:23:15 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock python3.7, python3-stdlib-extensions and python3-defaults,
> bumping
Hi Utkarsh,
On 12-05-2019 11:44, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hence, requesting you to:
> unblock ruby-globalid/0.4.2+REALLY.0.3.6-1
It would have been easier if you would have left the old patches in
place, but anyways. Thanks for following up and reverting the new
upstream version in unstable.
unblo
Hi David,
On 12-05-2019 21:38, David Gilman wrote:
[...]
Please file an unblock request bug in the bts, otherwise chances are
high this will be lost.
Paul (who didn't read the mail except for the header).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Benjamin,
On 14-05-2019 13:13, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 20:40 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> So, all in all, I don't want to unblock the new upstream with your
>> packaging, we&#x
Hi Jens,
On 12-05-2019 14:50, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Reassigning to the release team then, please binNMU and unblock:
>
> nmu wine-development_4.2-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against
> unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2"
Scheduled. I'll unblock it when all builds are fine.
Paul
signature.asc
Desc
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Santiago,
On 16-05-2019 17:52, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Please allow razor back in testing, as a freeze exception.
razor was already on my radar, and I already have considered an exception.
> It was autoremoved because there was a RC bug in the BTS, but the
> real pro
Hi doko,
On 09-05-2019 09:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 02.05.19 10:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> From what I understand bug#926009 is a regression in that version.
>>> There's no explanation that I can see for that change, no associated
>>> bug, and it doesn
Hi Santiago,
On 16-05-2019 20:24, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>> The reason why it got removed, is that nobody was looking after razor.
>> Otherwise, preventing removal would have been easy.
>
> Indeed. If I had
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Arnaud,
On Tue, 14 May 2019 10:19:06 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout
wrote:
> I just had a quick look, so it turns out that:
>
> - testing has "golang-golang-x-sys (= 0.0~git20181228.9a3f9b0-1)"
> - unstable has "golang-golang-x-sys (=0.0~git20190412.9773273-1)"
>
> As long
Hi,
On 18-05-2019 07:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> It seems that I should instead upload to *testing-proposed-update**s*,
>> am I correct?
>
> As docker.io embeds golang-golang-x-sys (am I correct on that), yes.
O, and you want to target *buster* instead of *testing-propo
Hi Shengjing,
On 08-05-2019 18:33, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:45 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> There's no tool yet, but some SQL scripts like
> http://paste.debian.net/1082099/
>
> As show in the result, for
> golang-golang-x-net-dev/1:0.0+git20181201.351d
Hi all,
[@ftp-master: we're discussing the biggest blocker for picking a buster
release date]
TL;DR; With this mail I'd like to ask technical background and/or
reasoning of why the security archive can't do binNMUs for packages that
weren't sourcefully uploaded there and to search for concrete po
Hi Shengjijng,
And how do we prevent that binNMU'ing all these reverse dependencies
don't pick up other golang changes in unstable? Can you tell us if there
are any? We don't want to accept more unnecessary packages.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:41:44 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> The straight debdiff is huge, because of a) usual release updates of
> autogenerated files and b) because it includes a global
> 's/http:/https:/'. Stripped down debdiff is attached.
Indeed, even th
Hi Shengjing,
On 18-05-2019 17:10, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:53 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shengjijng,
>>
>> And how do we prevent that binNMU'ing all these reverse dependencies
>> don't pick up other golang changes in unstab
Hi Jan, Bálint,
On 20-05-2019 09:02, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner:
>>>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded
>> or removed
>>> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554)
>> I'm still considering this as a regression and thus RC.
>
> DO we
Hi Shengjing,
On 19-05-2019 17:01, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 4:06 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 18-05-2019 17:10, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:53 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> I'm sure most packages can't migrat
Hi Ansgar,
On 20-05-2019 09:06, Ansgar wrote:
> I though about importing the full source to security-master already for
> a different reason: `Built-Using` leads to a similar problem as binNMUs
> in that uploads require source that is not already present in the
> archive.
>
> It is not necessary
Hi Georges,
On 19-05-2019 12:22, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Unmaintained upstream, not usable inside debian/buster, low popcon
I notice you are the maintainer. You don't have any bugs
Hi Andreas,
I am going to push back.
On 19-05-2019 10:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I probably could try to pick the CVE related changes and other important
> bug-fixes, however I do not think it is the right choice. The changes
> will be smaller but the risk of breakage is higher.
Can you explai
Hi Shengjing,
I have decided that I'll let golang-golang-x-net-dev migrate to testing
do the binNMUs in buster. I'll leave the bug open until the rebuilds
have succeeded to keep track of the issue.
Let's hope for the best.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Bálint,
On 21-05-2019 09:58, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> OK, I understand. I hoped Release Team could take a look at the
> referenced bugs and list the ones they would see important enough to
> include in Buster. IMO letting 1.12 in would come with the least
> am
Hi Bálint,
On 22-05-2019 17:07, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Please remove the moreinfo tag when the package built successfully.
>
> Done, with the version number adjusted. The failing autopkgtest is not
> related to this change.
Unblocked, thanks. However, can you explain why the autopkgtests starte
Hi Drew,
On 23-05-2019 09:17, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Is there a buildd url we can use to track the status of the binNMUs? Or
> something akin to transition tracking
> (https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-.html) ?
Not that I know of. This is exactly one of these infrastructure items
t
Hi Hideki
On 23-05-2019 10:48, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> And just for the future, it helps to have the meta data of the bug
>> correct. Please use the right severity of your bugs, you just filed this
>> as "normal".
>
> Okay, I'll set it as "wishlist" next time...
Hmm, I see there is room for con
Control: reassing -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 RM: algotutor -- ROM; abandoned upstream
On 20-05-2019 21:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 19-05-2019 12:22, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Benjamin,
On 24-05-2019 15:38, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I would like to upload that proposed version to unstable.
Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when the package is build
and installed.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On Fri, 24 May 2019 10:54:24 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?=
wrote:
> unblock dmarc-cat/0.9.2-4
That isn't available to unblock at the moment.
Please upload to unstable and remove the moreinfo tag when it is build
and installed.
Paul
signature.asc
Hi Bálint,
On 23-05-2019 08:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Unblocked, thanks. However, can you explain why the autopkgtests started
> failing and do you expect it to keep failing? If the fix is obvious and
> easily and only in the debian/tests/ directory, I'd like to have it,
> such th
Hi,
On 21-05-2019 20:35, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Shengjing,
>
> I have decided that I'll let golang-golang-x-net-dev migrate to testing
> do the binNMUs in buster. I'll leave the bug open until the rebuilds
> have succeeded to keep track of the issue.
>
> Let&#x
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Sun, 12 May 2019 19:33:57 -0400 Nicholas D Steeves
wrote:
> Please unblock package elpy
>
> I'm filing this unblock request before uploading to unstable.
Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when there is something to
unblock.
Paul
signature.asc
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi David,
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:52:56 -0400 David Gilman
wrote:
> Users who want to use s3ql with Google's cloud storage API need to
> obtain an OAuth credential with the appropriate permissions. s3ql
> ships a helper binary s3ql_oauth_client that makes the appropriate
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, 19 May 2019 20:43:29 -0400 Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> The changes between qpdf 8.4.0 and 8.4.2 are bug fixes, but I am
> asking for consideration because this update includes fixes to a
> serious performance bug (CLI), a CLI non-compatibility bug, and a
> library fi
Hi Bálint,
On 27-05-2019 22:53, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> The funny thing is that when Buster becomes stable and security
> updates start flowing the autopkgtest will pass again.
Would the test start failing again around the bullseye release period?
> I can upload them if you would like to see them
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Zigo,
On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:50:28 +0200 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Note that it may (or not) break some reverse dependencies, though according
> to upstream, OpenStack (the biggest SQLAlchemy consumer in Debian) behaves
> correctly with it. If this happens, t
Hi Nikolaus,
On 27-05-2019 22:58, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> IIRC the necessary changes are isolated and easy to backport.
> However, the new release is already in testing which IIRC makes
> things more complicated.
If your interested to provide these fixes, then please revert the new
upstream release
Control: reopen -1
On 28-05-2019 21:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Shengjing,
>
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 02:24:07 +0800 Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> unblock golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.0-2
>
> Unblocked, thanks.
A fellow RT member pointed out that there are rever
Hi,
On 28-05-2019 22:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/05/2019 à 21:41, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for this information, it was valuable.
>>
>> I'm not happy with the current situation, but I'll let openjdk-11 go
>> into buster now.
>
> Than
Control: tags -1 928185 moreinfo
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On 28-05-2019 23:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Tony Mancill has prepared the tpu upload yesterday and Matthias was ok
> with 11.0.3+7 in testing [1].
Can I see a debdiff please?
> Unless Buster is expected at the end of July I'd advise again
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 28-05-2019 21:35, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> I'll binNMU that first, let's see if it doesn't pick up anything else.
>> Otherwise, you know the drill by now.
>
> It(snapd) would,
>
> snapd Build-Dpends golang-golang-x-sys.
>
> Let's binNMU after the mess is cleaned up.
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Fri, 24 May 2019 14:20:54 + =?utf-8?q?Etienne_Dubl=C3=A9?=
wrote:
> Package 2.3 of debootstick was just uploaded to experimental by my sponsor
> (Vincent Danjean).
> If you accept this unblock request, he will upload it to unstable.
You're probably awa
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andrej,
You're not going to like it.
On Sat, 25 May 2019 12:46:12 +0100 Andrej Shadura
wrote:
> I’m attaching a git diff between patches-applied trees of 0.99.2-5
> currently in buster and 0.99.5.1-1 currently in experimental (the
> version in testing ships with a f
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alberto,
On Sun, 26 May 2019 23:08:03 +0200 Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Please unblock package webkit2gtk
>
> The new upstream stable release contains (among others) fixes
> for these three security bugs: CVE-2019-8595, CVE-2019-8607 and
> CVE-2019-8615.
Just to get it
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Timo,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:06:36 +0300 Timo Aaltonen
wrote:
> Please unblock package python-jwcrypto
>
> The new upstream release is needed to fix:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925457
Can't we have a targeted fix for that issue? New upstrea
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:50:10 +0900 Norbert Preining
wrote:
> I am asking to unblock onedrive 2.2.6-2 for buster. This is a new
> upstream release that fixes a considerable amount of (critical) bugs,
> most of which not reported in Debian, but still present.
Hi Nathan,
On 30-05-2019 06:55, Nathan Scott wrote:
> The issues below no longer affect pcp-4.3.2, which has been in
> unstable for some time.
> According to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pcp this version is blocked ...
>
> "Not touching package due to block request by freeze (please contact
> d
Hi Mike, zigo,
Thanks for your replies,
>> I very much think it's safer to just allow SQLAchemy to migrate right
>> now, to fix the potential SQL insertion vulnerability, rather than
>> waiting for any (potential, but likely rare) issue in the above reverse
>> dependencies.
>>
>> I do think a gen
Hi Peter,
On 30-05-2019 11:24, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Just for my information, is there a chance that this upgrade could be
> allowed later on during the buster lifecycle as a stable update?
If it would be suitable for a stable release point update, it would be
suitable now. We're close to relea
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: julia/1.0.4+dfsg-1
Hi Mo,
On Thu, 09 May 2019 19:26:06 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
> The current version in testing is 1.0.3, I'm requesting
> unblock for 1.0.4 (not-yet-released) because Julia's
> 1.0.X series is strictly a bug-fix-only branch. As
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mo,
On Thu, 09 May 2019 22:09:18 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
> zfs-linux (= 0.7.13-1) is 66 days in unstable and there is no new bug
> for it.
> Compared to (0.7.12-2), the (0.7.13-1) version in unstable only
> introduces
> bug fixes. Aron has already applied for an unblock
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, 11 May 2019 16:43:45 +0200 Andreas Boll wrote:
> This unblock request contains a stable upstream release with lots of
> bug fixes for mesa's graphics drivers including fixes for driver
> crashes and visual corruption. It fixes two RC bugs (#922346,
>
Hi Timo,
On 30-05-2019 13:18, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Hi, I don't know how much would have to be backported, but it's probably
> better to just unblock freeipa 4.7.2-3 instead, because python-jwcrypto
> is a dep of freeipa-server (which isn't built on sid/buster).
Do I understand correctly that th
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Thomas,
On 31-05-2019 01:34, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Dear package maintainer,
>
> We're about to upgrade SQLAlchemy in Buster to address an SQL injection
> issue. The fixed package is in unstable, under the version 1.2.18+ds1-2.
>
> In some rare cases, this update
severity 55 grave
merge 929172 904699
thanks
Hi Diederik,
On 31-05-2019 21:16, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
Please don't use this if you CC multiple bugs that aren't all of the
same severity.
> The fix has actually been made. But the problem is that it needs an unb
Hi Shengjing, golang maintainers,
On 27-05-2019 05:25, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:04 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> [...]
>> The following are all the affected packages, generated by [2]:
>>
>
> This list is now at
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianGoTeam/AlignUnstableWithBu
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01-06-2019 12:10, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Debdiff between 2:2.1.0-3 and 2:2.1.0-4 attached. This also includes a
> patch by jmtd fixing the long description of cryptsetup-{bin,run}. The
> diff doesn't touch our .udeb binary packages, but X-Debbugs-CC'ing kibi
> anyw
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 31-05-2019 22:38, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> nmu cdebootstrap_0.7.7+b11 . ANY . buster . -m "Rebuild for change in
> libdebian-installer (v0.119)"
should not have been there.
> I don't know if this is the correct way, but cdebootstrap-sta
Grr.
On 02-06-2019 11:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> nmu cdebootstrap_0.7.7+b11 . ANY . buster . -m "Rebuild for change in
>> libdebian-installer (v0.119)"
> should not have been there.
And it should have been ". unstable ." i.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Jens, duck,
On 01-06-2019 17:47, Jens Reyer wrote:
> I'm posting this now because I'm really worried about the lack of
> progress with this issue. However as stated before by me in this bug
> here, and by the libmspack maintainer in #923885, we both think t
Hi Michael, Jonathan,
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:11:23 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 08:23:09AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > I've prepared next release of the qemu debian package, with
> > a few bugfixes, and am asking if it's okay to upload these
> > changes to unstab
Ping... [fixed borked address of doko and added Tony]
On 29-05-2019 20:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 928185 moreinfo
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Hi,
>
> On 28-05-2019 23:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Tony Mancill has prepared the tpu upload yesterday and Matthias
Ping... [adding the team]
On 30-05-2019 22:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> On 30-05-2019 13:18, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> Hi, I don't know how much would have to be backported, but it's probably
>> better to just unblock freeipa 4.7.2-3 instead, because python-
Hi Martín,
On 05-06-2019 14:34, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Now, still to this day it is also not clear to me what we can do to
> address this problem, could you elaorate?
One problem is that the security archive doesn't have the sources
available from stable to do binNMUs.
One other problem is that
Hi Timo,
On 04-06-2019 22:54, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> That said, fixing the python-jwcrypto test is a trivial commit, so maybe
> this could be pushed too.
>
> diff --git a/jwcrypto/jwa.py b/jwcrypto/jwa.py
> index a6554b5..bbcd24c 100644
> --- a/jwcrypto/jwa.py
> +++ b/jwcrypto/jwa.py
> @@ -141,7
Hi Tony, Emmanuel, Matthias,
On 05-06-2019 08:07, tony mancill wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Ping... [fixed borked address of doko and added Tony]
>>
>> On 29-05-2019 20:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 928185 m
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi doko,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:25:23 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please unblock gcc-8/8.3.0-7 and updated cross builds.
>
> This includes upstream backports to around the date of the GCC 9.1 release.
>
> this includes
>
> gcc-8/8.3.0-7
> gcc-8-cross/28
> gcc-8-cro
Hi Tobias,
On 05-06-2019 21:49, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> I think you could start with the binNMUs for the reverse dependencies of
> golang-golang-x-net-dev now, using unstable this time instead of testing.
I started with abci.
> All golang-*-dev packages have been reverted to their correspo
7;t easy
either.
On 06-06-2019 04:23, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
> On 2019-06-04 03:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>>> About this alternative version here:
>
> Thanks Jens for your help. Comments later on.
>
>> We prefer this route.
>
> I provided, as well as other main
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On Thu, 30 May 2019 00:36:36 +1000 Stuart Prescott
wrote:
> There are two important bugs in python-debian that I would like to fix in
> buster. I don't think the changes are sufficiently large or problematic to
> prevent that, but I seek your pre-approval for t
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ilias,
On Sun, 12 May 2019 14:40:09 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis > Due to a
misconfiguration of ghc, where it uses the 'arm1136jf-s' ARM11
> core family on armel, all Haskell packages are currently miscompiled and
> will only work on a subset of armel machines (the ones tha
Hi Michael,
Ping... We are getting ready for the release. If you want changes in,
you have to at least reply. Otherwise, please close the bug, so that it
gets of our radar.
Paul
On 02-05-2019 21:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 30-04-2019
Hi Alexis,
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 22:35:47 +0200 Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> Did you have any chance to look at this ? Is this upload ok ?
Looking at the message header (the TO field) you addressed you sponsor
with this question, right? I think you should however be able to answer
the question by Jonath
Hi Afif,
On Sun, 26 May 2019 15:15:07 -0400 Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>
> I missed that the release team asked for the moreinfo tag once the
> package has made it to Unstable and is ready to be unblocked. Since the
> package is waiting in NEW, my removal of the tag was premature.
You may want to pr
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 07-06-2019 12:56, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Please pre-approve perl 5.28.1-7 which fixes a FTBFS in some environments.
> This doesn't meet the letter of the hard freeze policy, hence requesting
> pre-approval before upload.
Hi Dominic,
You're debdiff is very annoyi
Hi,
On 06-06-2019 23:14, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> Indeed it would be too difficult for me to directly apply the proposed
> patch and recompile all the needed packages - my armv5tel machine (QNAP
> TS-219P) is too underpowered for that. For example, I tried to recompile
> git-annex from sources b
Hi Salvatore,
On 07-06-2019 08:37, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 07:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> On 02-06-2019 00:07, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> Please unblock package libheif to address CVE-2019-11471, aka #928210 in
>>> Debian/buster.
>>>
>>> unbl
Hi
On 07-06-2019 20:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I just have uploaded 1:3.1+dfsg-8~deb10u1 for buster to get that
> sorted out. Could you please accept it for buster?
Unblocked, thanks.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sebastian,
On 08-06-2019 00:35, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please unblock package openssl.
> The updated package is the `c' version, which is the latest upstream
> release for the 1.1.1 series.
> This update causes a regresion in the m2crypto test suite which
Hi Dominic,
Thanks for the improved debdiff, really helpful.
On 07-06-2019 19:51, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On 07-06-2019 12:56, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>> Please pre-approve perl 5.28.1-7 which fixes a FTBFS in some environments.
>>> This doesn't meet the letter of the hard freeze policy,
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Samuel,
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:29:26 +0200 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> As reported in #930132, when using the baratinoo speech synthesis, none
> of the character spelling triggered by Orca works. So for instance, the
> character feedback while typing and charac
Hi
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:05:44 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 05-06-2019 21:49, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> > I think you could start with the binNMUs for the reverse dependencies of
> > golang-golang-x-net-dev now, using unstable this time instead of testing.
>
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Control: block 930194 by -1
Hi Sebastian, Daniel, Python modules team
On 08-06-2019 17:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a proposal for m2crypto which could be uploaded to unstable and
> unblocked for Buster unless someone objects.
> The testsuite
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Afif,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 03:47:28 -0400 Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Please unblock package singularity-container/3.1.1+ds-1
>
> This package is prone to security vulnerabilities. Upstream provides
> long-term support for selected versions to their paid users, but also
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 08-06-2019 10:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> Even if we were to unblock, can we get the m2crypto fix available, such
>> that they can migrate together? I understood (last time I checked that
>> bug) that this may just be a test fix?
>
> I believe m2
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 928097
Hi László,
On Sun, 5 May 2019 18:40:51 +0200
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
> Chromium is a bit bigger than me, but as I've experienced it's one of
> its pre-checks with an assert. As the size of the Unicode set
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:43:39 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The package is not uploaded to unstable yet, waiting for 5.7.0-2 to pass
> experimental/NEW for libpapi5.7.
The package isn't in NEW anymore. I add the moreinfo tag to move it
slightly on our radar for now. Th
Hi Lázló,
On 08-06-2019 22:17, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> While I think binNMU can be done for testing as well, I know that
> would make things more complicated.
We don't know why, but that currently doesn't work. We tried that for
bug 928227.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP d
7;t there before.
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:55PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Maybe use experimental for this run then? Or debomatic (which I use to
>> compile for my QNAP as well).
>
> In order to use experimental, we will have to prepare source-full uploads
> for 1017 packages
Hi,
On 08-06-2019 23:15, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> thanks for the update. I suspect that the FTBFS is due to the (probably
> accidental) upload of a new version of
> golang-github-mendersoftware-mender-artifact to unstable instead of
> experimental.
>
> I've just reverted that package with a
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Daniel,
On 09-06-2019 10:05, Daniel Stender wrote:
> On 6/8/19 9:20 PM, Paul Gevers wrote
>> If this version gets uploaded, be it by the maintainers of m2crpyto or
>> by Sebastian, it will be acceptable from the Release Team point of view.
>
&
Hi,
On 05-06-2019 22:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I really want bug 900912 and 925071 fixed. It seems that is missing from
> your second approach. Let me sleep on it. What are the chances of you
> agreeing on doing the +really upstream version dance such that we can
> get some tes
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, 27 May 2019 20:32:48 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> please unblock the three cross-toolchain-base* packages, rebuilt using glibc
> 2.28-10, which was already accepted for testing.
>
> cross-toolchain-base 35
> cross-toolchain-base-ports 29
> cross-t
Hi Shengjing,
On 10-06-2019 19:52, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:03 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>> google-cloud-print-connector FTBFS on armel
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=google-cloud-print-connector&arch=armel&ver=1.12-1%2Bb22
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sergey,
On 10-06-2019 12:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package monit. The new upstream
> bugfix release fix two CVEs: CVE-2019-1145
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi Sebastian,
On 08-06-2019 21:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 08-06-2019 10:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> Even if we were to unblock, can we get the m2crypto fix available, such
>>> that they can mig
Hi Alexis,
[Note: when you think you have covered questions asked, please remove
the moreinfo tag, as it will make the bug show up in the list of bugs
that need attention from us].
On 06-06-2019 22:16, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> The modification I've done in version aqemu/0.9.2-2.3 specifically fix
Hi Matthias,
On 12-06-2019 10:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I talked to Matthias on IRC yesterday, he was ok with the +really
> version in unstable only as a testbed for a tpu upload with a sane version.
Can you explain why, please?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
401 - 500 of 1548 matches
Mail list logo
