Dear kernel team,
I am reaching out to you as I help to coordinate this release's
release-notes. In most release-notes in the past, there have been words
about the kernel. For buster, is there anything that is worth mentioning
in the notes?
We already mention that AppArmor is pulled in via Recomm
Dear all,
Regarding this PostgreSQL reindexing issue, is there anything we need to
mention in the release-notes? If this isn't fleshed out, but the most
likely answer is yes, than I'd appreciate it to receive a bug against
release-notes to remind us about it later on. Text can come later when
it i
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: qutebrowser/1.6.1-2
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 03:54:36 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:
Please upload the 1.6.1-1 version in experimental to unstable an removed
the moreinfo tag when it is build (I couldn't find logs on buildd.d.o,
please
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 10-04-2019 20:04, Drew Parsons wrote:
> debci tests were intermittently failing (Bug#919929), evidently due to
> running out of memory in the test system because of an excessive
> number of deprecation warnings emitted during the tests.
>
> 1.1.0-4 applied a patch whi
Hi rajudev,
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:55:26 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 28-03-2019 21:36, rajudev wrote:
> > Shengjing pointed it out that golang-github-data-dog-go-sqlmock-dev can be
> > used for package which imports gopkg.in/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock.v1
> >
> > Henc
Hi Drew,
On 10-04-2019 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Thanks. I want to run a couple of tests, to see if it now appears stable
> (the first two passed).
>
> I'll unblock when I don't find any failure.
The score isn't great (and not all results are in): 3/14 failure (2 i
g-Issue-2581.patch from upstream (Closes: #926700)
+CVE-2019-11025: In clearFilter() in utilities.php no escaping occurs
+before printing out the value of the SNMP community string (SNMP
+Options) in the View poller cache, leading to XSS.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:42:
Hi Drew,
On 11-04-2019 17:49, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2019-04-11 23:41, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>
>> The one failure is odd. It's not in the same class as previous test
>> failures, not a MemoryError.
> ...
>> E ValueError: `x0` is infeasible with respect to some
>> inequality constraint
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
On 11-04-2019 19:51, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> The second notable change is related to sa-exim. Exim in Debian was
> patched to allow dlopening a localscan() module. The single consumer of
> this patch in Debian is sa-exim. (The patch also originates there.)
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 14-04-2019 16:27, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> As discussed in #818366
>
>> If somebody comes up with a decent Wayland detection and (also
>> graphical) error message to the user explaining how to get a working
>> synaptic, the release team is considering letting
Hi Steve,
On 07-11-2018 20:15, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Currently all the amd64 CI nodes are VM's on Amazon EC2. There is
>> currently no arrangement for hosting actual hardware.
>
> Right. I didn't realise that. In that case for arm*, would VMs on
> packet.net or similar work for us then?
While
Hi all,
This is a kind ping for a reply. There was a note on IRC for a reply,
but I fear it was forgotten or ENOTIME.
On 31-03-2019 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I am reaching out to you to align on the security support that users can
> expect during the lifeti
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Hi Elana,
On 17-04-2019 19:22, Elana Hashman wrote:
> This package was initially uploaded because leiningen-clojure was pinned
> to Clojure 1.8 while the clojure package was updated to 1.9 and onward.
> clojure/1.10 is currently in testing and leiningen-clojure
Source: mpfit, graphicsmagick
Control: found -1 graphicsmagick/1.4~hg15968-1
Control: found -1 mpfit/1.85+2017.01.03-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
[X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org]
Dear maintainers,
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi doko,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:15:40 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> binutils (2.31.1-16) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Snapshot, taken from the 2.31 branch (20190321).
> - Fix PR ld/24355, segfault in function called from ppc_finish_symbols.
>* Fix VCS
Hi Xavier,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:44:01 +0200 Xavier Guimard wrote:
> I updated node-superagent for Buster. Now I would like to propose the
> security fix for stretch. This fixes CVE-2017-16129 (ZIP bomb attacks).
I think your patch seems to be invalid in stretch. When I ran the
autopkgtests in
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mo,
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 03:30:38 + Mo Zhou wrote:
> I'm going to fix this bug (the severity is actually important):
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926909
Please fix the bug's meta info to reflect that.
It causes a FTBFS (on non-release arch
Hi Timo,
On 24-04-2019 10:28, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Dogtag-pki needed this, but I wasn't aware that another version
> was already being packaged by pkg-java (geronimo-annotation-1.3-spec), and
> that version is fine for Dogtag too. So, please remove
> jboss-annotations-1.2-api
> which is essenti
Hi Holger,
We're getting closer and closer to the release of buster. We can't
properly release without the installation guide and the Debian-installer
release notes. To see where we stand on this front, I am asking you what
the status is of those documents. And just to state the obvious, they
don'
Dear kernel team,
I hope I didn't miss your response, but AFAICT the request below is
still open. A reply like "no, there is no need for any specifics" is
also very welcome.
On 06-04-2019 21:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear kernel team,
>
> I am reaching out to you as I
Hi Holger,
On 25-04-2019 08:11, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> First, I wonder why you ask personally me for this.
Because the task was originally self-assigned to kibi and was documented
on the wiki [1] as "ask Holger".
> Why not ask the debian-boot team?
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 RM: jboss-annotations-1.2-api -- ROM; duplicate
On 24-04-2019 11:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> On 24-04-2019 10:28, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> Dogtag-pki needed this, but I wasn't aware that another version
Control: tag -1 patch
On 17-11-17 19:42, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Travis¹ already ran on my push to github², but it seems that the test-suite is
> out-of-date (pun intended) on the current state of britney. I'll fix the
> test-suite ASAP. I manually tested the runtests framewor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cacti uses dh_linktree to manage several embedded JavaScript packages. Until
bug 783906¹ is fixed, dh_linktree adds a strict version dependenc
IRC also mentioned:
* https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html says at
the very end: "After 5th January 2017, removed packages will not be
permitted to re-enter testing."
* The #links in the first paragraph are also invalid.
Meaning, the date is wrong and the links don't work.
Happ
Dear release team,
I volunteered to Niels yesterday to migrate britney's test suite and
live data to salsa.
Please, use ¹ and ² from now on for your tests.
I have updated the description on Alioth to mark its retirement and have
made the repositories read only.
I'll update the Travis tests toda
Dear release team,
Since Dec 2016⁰ I have been working together with multiple people
(including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where full
deployment can be considered. Let me describe how it is designed to work
and
Hi Raphael
On 05-04-18 14:48, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> (including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
>> autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where full
>> deployment can be considered. Let
Hi Raphaël
On 09-04-18 17:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> All the information in the HTML should be in the YAML too. At least that
> was the goal of Niels when he created that file. And the Debian package
> tracker is now consumer of the YAML file only so everything that we want
> to display to users
Hi Niels,
On 15-04-18 12:50, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Ok, a few remarks:
>
>
> AutopkgtestPolicy.__init__:
>> self.pending_tests_file = os.path.join(self.options.state_dir,
>> 'pending.json')
>> self.results_cache_file = os.path.join(self.options.state_dir,
>> 'results.cache')
>
> The basenames
[Re-sending as the autopkgtest list on Alioth has ceased to exist. Sorry
for the dup.]
Hi Niels,
On 15-04-18 12:50, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Ok, a few remarks:
>
>
> AutopkgtestPolicy.__init__:
>> self.pending_tests_file = os.path.join(self.options.state_dir,
>> 'pending.json')
>> self.results_c
Hi all,
On 15-04-18 20:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Just for reference, I started collecting relevant bugs in the
> bts with the ci-t...@tracker.debian.org user¹ in the bts (bunk and
> ginggs added a couple using the right usertags as well).
It has been brought to my attention that
Hi,
On 29-04-18 13:40, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The branches have been merged and deployed now (with bounty/penalty set
> to 0). The first few britney runs appears to have run successfully and
> the excuses are now mentioning autopkgtests.
I am processing data more than daily. All looks good (have
tl;dr; I want to fix the "Test dependencies are unsatisfiable with using
apt pinning. Retrying with using all packages from unstable" situation
because it has unwanted side effects¹. But how to do it?
Hi Martin, Julian, all,
After a discussion between pitti and me on IRC about using an
alternativ
(from IRC)
I just saw (unfortunately the data will be gone now):
old binaries left on all: python-doc (from 2.7.15~rc1-1) (but ignoring
cruft, so nevermind)
Maybe a hint, this happened in the package python-defaults.
I don't think it shouldn't say "cruft".
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Ope
Hi all,
The last couple of days I have been discussing with you via e-mail and
IRC (much thanks to those involved) about current issues of autopkgtest
running tests for britney. I'll summarize my view of it in this e-mail
with the pro's and con's of different solutions and my proposed way
forward
Hi Sébastien,
On 14-06-18 10:08, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> I saw an upload of dynare 4.5.5-2, which apparently tried to fix part of
>> this, but now the test for dynare migration¹ fails with a segfault of
>> octave. Looking at the list of installed packages and their versions, I
>> suspect dyna
Control: owner 901847 !
Control: retitle 901847 [britney] accept debci/autopkgtest neutral state
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertags 901847 britney
On 19-06-18 11:50, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Is there someone who knows the britney codebase and would be willing
> t
Hi Adrian,
On 12-07-18 20:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Example:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults
>
> Lines like:
> autopkgtest for aodh/6.0.0-7: amd64: Regression ♻
>
> The "amd64" and "Regression" are already links (to ci.debian.org).
>
> It would be useful if the package name "ao
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/merge_requests/2
Control: tags -1 patch
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:29:19 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 19-06-18 11:50, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Is there someone who knows the britney codebase and would be willing
> &g
Control: tags -1 pending
On 18-07-18 22:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:29:19 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 19-06-18 11:50, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Is there someone who knows the britney codebase and would be willing
>>> to implement that?
>
Dear all,
On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
I believe there is a regression, at least in the autopkgtest. I filed
bug 905559 for that already.
Paul
htt
Dear Lisandro,
On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to, if
> my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for
a while that I didn't check caref
Dear all,
To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
you're wrong. However, you have also added that test for a reason.
On 06-08-18 15:33, L
Hi
On 12-08-15 09:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Ok, let's go ahead with this; feel free to upload to jessie.
Just did so.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Stable Release Managers,
I come to you with this request after discussion with the security
team. Because the issue I de
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:02:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> I will start to work on a proper debdiff, but I appreciate it to know if I
> should include the fixing of existing files in it.
Due to lack of a response, which I expect is due to the lack of a
debdiff, I went ahead and fix
Hi
On 04-12-15 11:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:02:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I will start to work on a proper debdiff, but I appreciate it to know if I
>> should include the fixing of existing files in it.
>
> Due to lack of a response, which I expe
tags 808282 patch
retitle 808282 wheezy-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu1+deb7u1
tags 806247 patch
retitle 806247 jessie-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu3+deb8u1
thanks
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:54:24 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Please find attached my proposed fix for jessie. The de
Hi,
On 01-01-16 18:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like the fix for existing permissions isn't in the unstable
> package?
Correct. But it is in the NEW queue [1] for nearly two weeks. Because it
doesn't seem to move there and because there are other issues in
dbconfig-common that I worked o
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 02-01-16 20:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can be done. Let me work on a proposal.
Please find attached my renewed proposal. I must admit that I didn't
know exactly how to express "greater than any version that is after the
largest wheezy point release".
when upgrading
+from versions before this one (but not from versions after squeeze's
+lts update).
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:14:55 +0100
+
dbconfig-common (1.8.47+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru dbconfig-common-1.8.47+nmu1/debian/dbc
I had the versioning scheme for LTS wrong. I'll update the version in
the comment to 1.8.46+squeeze.1 + change the version in the dpkg
comparison for wheezy to 1.8.46+squeeze.99.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
On 13-01-16 23:26, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Great. Hopefully my sponsor will be able to upload before the 8.3 window
> closes. Paul, let me know if you want me to upload the stuff to
> mentors.d.n; otherwise you can checkout the *jessie* branch from the git
> repo.
Uploaded.
Paul
signatu
Hi,
On 03-01-16 14:19, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Please find attached my renewed proposal. I must admit that I didn't
> know exactly how to express "greater than any version that is after the
> largest wheezy point release". I suppose I could also just make that
> version
On 14-01-16 21:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> "1.8.47+nmu1+deb8u1~" (or +deb8u0 I guess) should work in practice
> afaict.
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded with 1.8.47+nmu1+deb8u1~.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Simon Ruderich
+(Closes: #805638)
+ * Repair permissions of already created backups, but only when upgrading
+from versions before this one (but not from versions after squeeze's
+lts update).
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:14:55 +0100
+
dbconfig-common (1.8.47+nmu1) uns
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear release managers,
After an extremely brief discussion some days ago on IRC, I took the liberty to
upload a new upstream version of fpc,
Hi
On 30-01-16 20:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Do you want a separate bug for castle-game-engine, or can it be done in this
> same bug?
>
> nmu caste-game-engine_5.2.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fpc 3.0.0"
No need to do this (it fails to build currently). We will upload a
Hi Emilio,
On 01-02-16 10:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> nmu lazarus_1.4.4+dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fpc 3.0.0"
>
> Scheduled. Note you want ANY, not ALL.
Please be aware that I just answered N to the reportbug question:
Choose the request type: 1
Please enter the name of the pac
Hi
On 01-02-16 20:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> No, you just need to update your reportbug, it was fixed in version
> 6.6.5, see #795687.
Ok, good to know. I run jessie on my laptop. And yes, I indent to switch
to strech soon.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>> In Ubuntu I checked that the following packages builddepend on FPC:
>> lazarus
>> imapcopy
>> hedgewars
>> libhdate
>> gearhead
>> m-tx
>> python-soappy
>> poker-network
>> I assume, but have not check yet, that the same goes for Debian.
>
> Looks like quite a lot of packages seem to have go. T
Hi Abou,
On 17-12-12 14:36, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "fpc".
>
> This upload is fixing an important bugs#686038 to allow translating user
> targeted question upon installation.
>
> The respective dsc file can be found
> at:http://mentors.debian.net/debi
Hi RT,
Just one note to make it perfectly clear, except for the typo change in
d/copyright, all changes that went into fpc/2.6.0-7 are the result of a
change initiated and reviewed by debian-i18n.
Paul
P.S. Abou mistook me for Peter Green, one of his regular sponsors of
fpc, but I did the sponsor
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Reading through the discussion of a later CVE bug in bind9 [2], my
expectation regarding the unblock bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1 request is that
the answer will be no, due to:
"""
And then we're talking about a version that does this o
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Some remarks:
- The package is in unstable now.
- The debdiff in the first message is the same as created from the
archive by "debdiff packagekit_0.7.6-1.dsc packagekit_0.7.6-2.dsc"
- It would be good to mention bug numbers again
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Some remarks:
- I suggest explaining in more detail why this version of the package
deserves a freeze exception [2]. I don't see any RC or important bugs
fixed, or release goals achieved, so I DON'T expect the RT to grant
t
ters
+descriptor (Closes: Bug#697350)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:02:39 +0100
+
ebook-speaker (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Samuel Thibault ]
diff -Nru ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patches/mbrola.patch ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patches/mbrola.patch
--- ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patch
Hi,
On 12-12-12 22:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-12-12 10:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I'd recommend uploading 4) to experimental, compile a debdiff and send
>> it our way. We may have to back down 3) or 1) once we see the debdiff, but
>
> I have just uploaded cact
Improve 0005-sprintf-error-message-hardening-format-security.patch to use
+strcpy i.s.o. sprintf and properly format string.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:36:38 +0100
+
+openmotif (2.3.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+- Set maintainer to QA group
+ * Allow multia
On 22-01-13 15:21, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Openmotif 2.3.3-7 is an update to 2.3.3-5 to allow two release goals:
>> - code hardening
>
> This does not appear to close a bug and therefore, I presume, is there
> for not on the "target list" for Wheezy? If it is not on this list,
> then I would pref
m (see bug #698661) to allow for transition to Wheezy.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:52:01 +0100
+
+openmotif (2.3.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Improve 0005-sprintf-error-message-hardening-format-security.patch to use
+strcpy i.s.o. sprintf and properly format
20:43:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Upload to unstable after acknowledge by the RT, see #694850.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:41:05 +0100
+
cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low
* Removed non-dfsg-free treeview cod
3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed typo in recommends libjs-jquery* i.s.o. libjs-query
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:33:20 +0100
+
cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Upload to unstable after acknowledge by the RT, see #694850.
diff -Nru cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/contr
On 19-02-13 23:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> It's a regression and a trivial fix, so you can go ahead with this change.
> Please ping this bug when it's uploaded.
Ping.
(Only difference with the previous debdiff, is that I now had a bug
number [1] to close).
Paul
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/700
On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the very late answer.
No problem.
>> +If you read this and care about keeping your system maintainable, please
>> change
>> +the layout of the plugins structure of cacti. Due to the way a lot of
>> plug-ins
>> +are written (details i
On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any
> update to the package won't be effective. Is there really no better way
> of handling this?
And one more thing related to the unblock request, just in case it was
not clear alread
le; urgency=low
+
+ [ Thomas Goirand ]
+ * Fixes bad handling of /var/run/lastfm life cycle (Closes: #689896).
+
+ [ Paul Gevers ]
+ * Prepare upload
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:19:02 +0200
+
lastfmsubmitd (1.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -u lastfmsubmitd-1.0.6
Hi release team,
There has been a small discussion about dash RC bugs 538822 and 540512
in the bts and the general idea is to postpone the proper fix (again)
till after the release. Do you agree, and if so, can you tag this bug
appropriate as wheezy-ignore? If you do, these bugs should again
"affe
n Perl long time ago and removed in 5.12 (closes: #692342)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:41:39 +0100
+
apt-move (4.2.27-2) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -Nru apt-move-4.2.27/debian/patches/fix_perl_implicit_split_deprecation.patch apt-move-4
On 09-11-12 13:17, intrigeri wrote:
> I think the code would be a bit more robust / future-proof if it
> localized @_ before assigning to it. Paul, what do you think?
I am nearly hopeless in perl. So if you have a more robust solution, I
am 100% in favor.
I just tried to get rid of a QA RC bug (I
On 11-10-12 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any
>> update to the package won't be effective. Is there really no better way
>> of handling this?
>
> A
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gnuspool has RC bug 664754 standing against it (removal of gnuspool makes files
disappear from lpr). As this package has never been released in De
Hi release team,
Cacti has a nearly 5 months old standing RC bug [1] filed against it
about files with a non-DFSG license (distribution is possible, but
others can not use the copy for other purposes, they need to get their
own free copy). I was hoping that cacti upstream would create the code
nee
-release@l.d.o was still in
your queue and this is a duplicate.
Paul
On 25-11-12 13:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> Cacti has a nearly 5 months old standing RC bug [1] filed against it
> about files with a non-DFSG license (distribution is possible, but
> others can n
1-Fix-port-allocation-in-tests.patch and
+0003-Try-to-wait-until-socket-is-free.patch to include missing
+instances of port 0 added in upstream 2.6.0.1-1~exp1 (Closes: #834686)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:38:15 +0200
+
ruby-httpclient (2.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Hi Salvatore,
On 15-04-2023 17:02, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Would you in principle agree on that, imporantly, at this stage of the
release? The current debian/changelog is attached.
I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this to you before, but to be clear to
everybody I'll state it in public here
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Patrick,
Thanks.
On 14-04-2023 10:45, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that
we're not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the
tpu route for kdenlive.
Please upload the version you have in unst
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Otto,
On 02-04-2023 05:50, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
This Debian revision has been carefully crafted to only include bug
fixes, test improvements and translations (following the release
policy[2]). There are no risky functional changes, and the package has
not had any
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 13-04-2023 22:56, Markus Blatt wrote:
None, because no real code is changed
Can you elaborate why this is needed? I confirm I see nothing of interest.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Benjamin,
On 02-04-2023 16:31, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I was discussing with Mattia Rizzolo the open merge requests for
devscripts and which of them are material for the bookworm release.
*Before* we discuss this, can you please handle the version skew we
currently
Hi,
Sorry for taking so long to respond (the moreinfo tag was still attached
to the bug, so it didn't show up in my regular bts view, so please
remove it when you reply).
On 16-03-2023 11:40, Christian Kastner wrote:
Overall, the diff is a bit long (and has some irrelevant stuff), so
I'm hes
Hi,
On 19-04-2023 22:03, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
unblock libxml2/2.9.14+dfsg-1.2
Unblocked, thanks.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Adrian,
On 04-04-2023 12:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I would like to ask for the package ausweisapp2 to be unblocked for
testing. While the debdiff is rather large (about 1.8 MB),
Could you prepare a debdiff stripping tests (assuming those are not
influe
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 07-04-2023 19:34, Marc Haber wrote:
This is a pre-upload request for guidance regarding aide 0.18.2.
upstream released a new version that fixes a number of locking issues,
each of which possible a release-critical bug.
It seems you are overly cautious in
Dear all,
Progress \o/.
On 13-04-2023 11:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
For me to do the release, I'd need to get my hands on the key.
I'm in contact with Jonathan and we're convinced we'll be able to get
the key to me in time.
Which leaves finding a date (and me learning
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 23:55:44 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
This unblock is related to #1034127 and the unblock of rhino.
rhino is now unblocked.
The main reason for
upgrading from 3.6.1 to 3.6.2 was to include missing Javascript files
which are needed to run th
Hi Markus,
On 20-04-2023 15:21, Markus Koschany wrote:
In version 3.5.x upstream included all Javascript files in the original source
tarball but also shipped some minified files without the unminified sources.
[...]
This was a missing piece. At least it explains how you got where you are
no
Hi all,
TL;DR: ftp & press input for June needed.
On 20-04-2023 18:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The 13th does seem a bit close now, without having announced.
After some consideration today, and the vibe felt in this discussion,
let's not rush this, so let's skip May 13 (also giving Press some
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 21-04-2023 23:43, Christian Kastner wrote:
In the event that llvm-toolchain-15 will not be allowed to migrate:
I would be surprised if llvm-toolchain-15 gets updated in bookworm.
there are some fixes in the current version of rocm-hipamd that really
should g
1101 - 1200 of 1715 matches
Mail list logo
