e sid (I assume).
- ignore
- ???
Thanks for any suggestion, if I have to do something to get this fixed.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena
D
orbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D
Hi Andreas, hi Release Team!
On Mon, 18 Dez 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 02:07]:
> > There is something going on which I do not understand: the execuses page
> > texlive-bin tells me that it is waiting for libpng, but this one is in
et)/3600,
(abs(tz_offset)/60)%60);
+ }
return date_string;
}
***
texlive-bin_2005.dfsg.2-10 fixes the same problem, furthermore it adds
some functionality that is present in teTeX but was missing in TeXlive,
or fixes bugs already fixed
and the list of deb files are available
at
http://people.debian.org/~frank/texlive-extra_src_3-4.debdiff
and
http://people.debian.org/~frank/texlive-extra_3-4.debdiff
respectively.
Best wishes
Norbert
------
t add mktexlsr calls to the postinst/postrm script of texlive
package, as it does not contain 'real' files (Closes: #400369)
* add an updated dcpic.sty to texlive-pictures (Closes: #388653)
-- Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:15:20 +0100
Comments:
ak anything.
- "remap" is maybe a bit too technical, here it just means means "move
the files". Where they belong.
Best wishes and thanks a lot
Norbert
-------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTE
tetex-bin 3.0-29
texlive-bin 2005.dfsg.2-10
texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-5
Thanks a lot for *your* work, we are just doing what we are doing
normally ;-)
Best wishes
Norbert
-------
Dr. Norbert Prei
by luk
> > texlive-bin 2005.dfsg.2-10
still not unblocked, or better unblocked only version -7 by aba
> > texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-5
in testing.
Thanks a lot and all the best
Norbert
------
all the best
Norbert
-------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Università di Siena
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4
Hi Adam,
> That would have been somewhat useful /before/ the packge was uploaded to
> unstable. :-(
Hahahahaha, sure, I can also wait another two years.
And BTW, how often has an upgrade of poppler broken TeX without prior warning?
And recently wasn't it also zlib that did some incompatible ch
Hi Adam,
>> Hahahahaha, sure, I can also wait another two years.
>
> fwiw, if you'd requested binNMUs while the new texlive-bin was in
> experimental, we'd have been happy to schedule them for you. I'm not sure
> why you think that would have taken so long.
Call me ignorant, but I don't know
hers I will look also into it tomorrow, now it is time to
sleep.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian
e it might take more time.
I have preliminary packages, but they need some fixup, but at
least they compile on current sources.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0
guess we have to live with an uninstallable
texfam.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Deve
Kohda-san
> Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
> packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
> from ptex-bin.
> jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote.
If needed I can include pmetapost and pxdvi in the builds of texlive-binaries,
the patches are r
n be resolved over time, if we manage so!
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Well, then I only incude pmetapost ... it all depends on what we
Some question concerning implementation of that:
- include pmpost binary
- include pmakempx script from former jmpost package (?)
- conflict/replace/provide: jmpost
Is t
Should I upload to unstable now or should
I wait until the testing transition is over once?
debian-release people? Advise?
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian
know an advice too.
Too late, I am leaving soon. Will have to wait after Golden Week.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people,
> does that sound okay?
Definitely.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist
Hi Adam,
> - okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
> virtual packages provided by texlive-lang-cjk, so I've assumed the "old"
> source packages should be removed from testing
Yes from my side, but the maintainers have to give their word.
> - cadabra depends on tex
es
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF
wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0
s upgraded in testing
> and find pTeX related programs work incredibly fine.
Good to hear ... anyway, if there are more suggestions, please
let me know ...
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist
.rb
with
.RB
as the former gives a warning "macro not defined".
I attach the full debdiff to this email.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian
On Mi, 04 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I would like to ask for a freeze exception for
> > luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3
>
> Done, thanks.
Thanks a lot. THis is very much appreciated!
Best wishes
Norbert
------
me know what you think, if this is ok for stable
or I should wait and leave it like it is for now!
Thanks a lot and all the best
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release managers,
although late in the release cycle, I would like to ask for an unblock of
context 2014.05.21.20140528-2
Changes are minimal, namely fixing 3 wrapper scripts
e Team [0] for consideration. They will
> offer additional guidance or instruct you to upload your package.
Attached is a debdiff for the version prepared. Please let me know
if this is fine and I will upload the files.
Thanks
Norbert
---
On Do, 21 Mär 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Attached is a debdiff for the version prepared. Please let me know
>> if this is fine and I will upload the files.
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Uploaded.
Norbert
---
As I said, the texlive build system needs the configuration step even if the
library is not used or build.
I don't need to say more, reading the build log and searching for "gd" is
enough.
> texlive-bin MUST NOT migrate to testing with embedded outdated libgd.
Who decides that, you?
>> The on
Dear release managers,
the TeX Live packages seem to be stuck in sid, the excuses pages
list all of them as valid candidates (texlive-bin/base/lang)
but none of it has transitioned to testing after 12 days.
Could you please hint them into testing.
Thanks
Norbert
Hi Niels,
> I have added a hint for it.
Thanks for the prompt action, great!
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live &
t for the texlive-*, although the debian-qa page lists them as already
in testing.
Anyway, all fine now ;-)
Thanks a lot
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAI
running with png.c from libpng-1.2.49
libpng error: Incompatible libpng version in application and library
Please let me know what your plans are, because otherwise I will
make a temporary upload with *all* the libraries included
as copies, the only way to get it going.
Thanks a lot
Norbert
ges.
I hope this will be fixed at some point.
> We think that it can provide more detailed information in the next week.
That is good news, so I can wait till after new year, and then target
a experimental upload.
Norbert
> > And I am testing build with libpng16[1].
One more thing ... you seem not to have a pristinetar branch in
your git repository, and so there is no way I can build the package
with git-buildpackage. I guess that is on purpose?
N
the other libraries are updated.
If you need any help with the transition, I will gladly help
Thanks a lot
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Ja
Dear all,
> Yes, because we do not start yet transidion. And libpng16-dev does not
Are there any news about the libpng transition?
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JA
it is in experimental.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD
with the release managers
to push a new libpng-dev based on 1.6 into unstable and start
a real transition?
Thanks a lot and all the best
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST
png-dev based on 1.6 to *experimental*. This is a
sign that we are planning to transition.
But again, libpng developers, please let me know your plans!
I *really* want to help to get this transition going!
Thanks
Norb
test
build other libs and progs, but as long as there is no decision from
the libpng *what* should be in jessie it is a vain efford.
Thanks for your consideration
Norbert
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> it is high time that we go forward with transitioning l
eft over to do, let me know.
Thanks
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A
that for us to finish db5.1 to db5.3
> > transition?
>
> I am told that the clisp FTBFS is tricky. So if that could be done, we could
> then get the old libdb5.1 out of testing.
I thought that got fixed at some point in clisp? What is the current
status?
Should I upload so
And, will clisp and xindy come back later on?
In the mean time I will go forward with the new upload.
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan
201 - 249 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
