Helmut Grohne:
Hi,
Hi Helmut
Thanks for your work - both on this specific problem and in general!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:08:22PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Axel Beckert:
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debhel...@packages.debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de
Hi,
I propose the following series of NMUs to close #1024261. The list is
based on the set of packages that Helmut found wit
Sebastian Ramacher:
[...]
Any progress here? If this issue should be fixed for bookworm, time is
running short.
Cheers
I find that anytime I look at this bug my motivation to work on Debian
instantly vanishes. In fact, I cannot even motivate myself to read the
bug log to figure out what the
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Antoine Beaupre:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package matrix-synapse
>
> The package currently in buster generates gigabytes of logs which can
> easily fi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Sergio Durigan Junior:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to request the unblock of ipywidgets, please. The current
> package in buster FTBFS due to a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Simon McVittie:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Now that gnome-shell's RC bugs are (hopefully) dealt with, I'd like
> to update gnome-shell with the remaining bug fixes from
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Simon McVittie:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> While preparing gnome-shell/3.30.2-9 (see separate unblock request) I
> thought I should also look into updating the closely
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Antoine Beaupre:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package youtube-dl
>
> youtube-dl, as often happens, has already lagged behind the youtube
> interface and c
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:30:03 -0400 Antoine Beaupre
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package matrix-synapse
>
> The package currently in buster generates gigabytes of logs which can
> easi
Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2019-04-18 13:18, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Andreas Beckmann:
>>> This NMU adds 'missingok' to the logrotate config, fixing piuparts
>>> unblock sia/1.3.0-1.1
>> Unblocked, thanks.
>
> This is stuck behind golang-golang-x-
wf...@niif.hu:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:12:00 +0000 Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Related note (with my RT hat on): Please defer debhelper compat bumps
>> for anything targeting buster as it is not considered a "minimal change".
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
Andreas Beckmann:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: sia/1.3.0-1.1~deb10u1 [t-p-u]
>
> On 2019-04-29 07:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Ok, can you prepare a t-p-u upload to fix this directly in testing then?
>
> What is the correct (or preferred) distri
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Xavier Guimard:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lemonldap-ng
>
> Hi all,
>
> upstream authors of lemonldap-ng have updated language translations. I
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Johannes 'josch' Schauer:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello release team!
>
> [...]
>
> I find especially support for old apt versions and derivative
> distributions im
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Mo Zhou:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: Robert Lemmen , Dominique Dumont
>
>
> Please unblock package perl6-zef
>
> (explain the reason for the unblock here)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Julian Andres Klode:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package apt
>
> I'd like to add systemd inhibitor support to apt in buster, so people
> don't shoot each
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Bernhard Schmidt:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package bind9
>
> -4 and -5 have the following changes over -3 currently in testing.
>
> - CVE-2018-5743 (Bug#9
Michael Biebl:
> Am 30.04.19 um 17:26 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 29.04.19 um 21:53 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>
>>> override_dh_installinit:
>>> DH_COMPAT=12 dh_installinit ...
>>>
>>> override_dh_installsystemd:
>>> DH_COMPAT=12
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On Thu, 9 May 2019 23:10:14 +0900 Kentaro Hayashi
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock groonga package:
>
> * It fixes #928304.
> The bug is reported ag
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Scott Kitterman:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package spf-engine
>
> It's just been reported that postfix-policyd-spf-python is missing a
> depends on pyt
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Samuel Henrique:
> I do understand that this is a new upstream release but it should be
> unblocked because it's a 198 line python script.
>
> If we don't fix this, then acme-tiny will have to be removed from Buster.
>
> @LetsEncrypt team, do you have any word
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Axel Beckert:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> In the light of dhcpcd5 automremoval (#928056, #928104, #928105), I'd
> like to upload a wicd package which relies less on dhcpcd5. [...
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Santiago Vila:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello. I'm asked to make a release of hello to fix the version skew
> created by the test security upload for stretch. Since t
Sean Whitton:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 13 May 2019 at 11:52AM +00, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> [re-sent with debian-release list address corrected...]
>
> Also resending. Sorry.
>
>> so there is "#928172 debian-security-support: fails to upgrade from
>> 'testing':
>> dpkg: error: error executing hoo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Eduard Bloch:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please advise how to process with a required fix for the package
> apt-cacher-ng.
>
> The change is a one-liner and solves the bug #928
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock libdebian-installer/0.119 fixing RC bug #55
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=55
Ferenc Wágner:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package pacemaker
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Three security issues were discovered in Pacemaker, all of which were
> fixed by the GitHub pull requ
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Simon McVittie:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> I would like to follow the dbus upstream 1.12.x stable branch in buster,
> like I did for 1.8.x in jessie and 1.10.x in stret
Niels Thykier:
> Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
>
> Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock libdebian-installer/0.119 fixing
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Eduard Bloch:
> Control: retitle -1 [pre-approval] unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3.2.1-1
>
> Hallo,
> * Niels Thykier [Wed, May 15 2019, 07:53:00PM]:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Sure, see attachments. As explained before, just a one-lin
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Samuel Thibault:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello,
>
> As reported on Bug#929169, “the Linux kernel in Buster seems to take
> much longer (as much as 12s!) to detect some s
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Michael Biebl:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package systemd
>
> All patches are cherry-picked from upstream git.
>
> Annotated changelog:
>
> systemd (241-4)
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Simon McVittie:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 18:59:00 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am ok with these changes on the premise that you are ready to promptly
>> rollback to the bare minimum changes in case of re
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Martin Pitt:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Three months ago, a new libssh upstream bug fix release 0.8.7 was done, which
> fixes a dozen security issues, crashes, and othe
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Xavier Guimard:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi all,
>
> dur to unicode change, 2 nodejs packages require an update:
> - node-regenerate-unicode-properties
> - node-regexpu-core
>
> These 2 packages have been updated in unstable so can no more
Michael Biebl:
> Am 20.05.19 um 14:06 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 19.05.19 um 12:47 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>>
>>>> * Add check to switch VTs only between K_XLATE or K_UNICODE.
>>>> Switching to K_UNICODE from other than L_XLATE can make the keybo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Michael Tokarev:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi!
> I've prepared next release of the qemu debian package, with
> a few bugfixes, and am asking if it's okay to upload the
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Vagrant Cascadian:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
> Please unblock package flash-kernel
>
> This upload adds supp
Norbert Preining:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:50:10 +0900 Norbert Preining
>
> What a time lag for a release related bug, impressive.
>
Hi Nobert,
I can understand that the delay in the reply is unsatisfying to you -
personally, I am not ha
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Jean-Michel Vourgère:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> Severity: normal
>
> Please allow me to add an upstream patch in order to fix segfaults in rrdtool
> daemon, that occurs when xport'ing an
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Vagrant Cascadian:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
> Please unblock package ltsp
>
> This fixes two release-critic
Vagrant Cascadian:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
> Please unblock package simple-cdd
>
> This update fixes several release-critical and importan
Vincent Bernat:
> ❦ 7 juillet 2019 02:47 +01, Jonathan Wiltshire :
>
>> No binary maintainer uploads for bullseye
>> =
>>
>> The release of buster also means the bullseye release cycle is about to
>> begin.
>> From now on, we will no longer allow binaries
Hi Release team,
Bug #1017441 was filed against debhelper in related to a change to
dh_installtmpfiles that made it apply an unconditional dependency on
"systemd | systemd-tmpfiles".
My concern is not the dependency itself (as I understand it, the systemd
GR ratifies that). What might be con
Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
308 armel
313 armhf
316 i386
613 mipsel
I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org/
Paul Gevers:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> [...]
>
> Also, as this is a debhelper plugin, can't you couple this to a
> debhelper compat level? I believe those were introduced to enable
> introduction of backwards incompatible changes, but I have no idea if
> that propagates to t
Paul Gevers:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 09:32:00 +0000 Niels Thykier wrote:
>> 3) Build-Depends are not enforced on removal. That is packages
>> /can/ be removed while packages are build depending on them.
>>
>> Limitation 2+3 are slightly more in
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 22:02:46 +0200 Yves-Alexis Perez
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> the Xfce team would like to upload the Xfce 4.14 release to unstable
Yves-Alexis Perez:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> the Xfce team would like to upload the Xfce 4.14 release to unstable
> (most packages pre-release have been uploaded to experimental).
>
> Panel plugins m
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 09:55 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Could you check if
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xfce4-panel.html matches
>> your expectation for the packages affected by this transition?
>
> I'm a bit surprised we have so few libxfce4
Ian Jackson:
> Debian testing watch writes ("vacation 3.3.2 MIGRATED to testing"):
>> FYI: The status of the vacation source package
>> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>>
>> Previous version: 3.3.1
>> Current version: 3.3.2
>
> Hi. I think something went wrong with testing migr
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 08:33 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Ack, please go ahead.
>
> Thanks, I've started uploading stuff.
>
>> Please let us know what will need binNMUs and when.
>
> Sure, I'll let stuff settle a bit after uploading everything and I
Hi Mark
Thanks for the investigative work and the patch.
I have not had time to review the patch yet in details and hope to have
a look this weekend.
Could I convince you to add a small test case for this problem to our
britney2-tests repo (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/britney2-tests)
that fa
Mark Hindley:
> Neils,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:03:00AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> Thanks for the investigative work and the patch.
>>
>> I have not had time to review the patch yet in details and hope to have
>> a look this w
Control: tags -1 confirmed patch
Niels Thykier:
> [...]
>
> I looking forward to your test case as it will make this issue a lot
> easier to debug.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the test case. :)
I have pushed it to britney2-tests and flagged it as a known failure.
> What is supposed
Paul Gevers:
> Control: tags -1 patch
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/compare/31e32782...c9e8751c
>
> Hi all
>
> On 28-11-2019 10:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> With the addition of arm64 as a CI architecture, the situation got
>> worse. E.g. https://qa.debian.
Aurelien Jarno:
> On 2016-08-17 22:05, ni...@thykier.net wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Like last release, we are doing a roll call for porters of all release
>> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of the [release
>
Hi,
Apologies for the tardiness on my part for this.
> Does it really c
ni...@thykier.net:
> Hi,
>
> Like last release, we are doing a roll call for porters of all release
> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of the [release
> architectures] for the entire lifetime of Debian Stretch (est. end of
> 2020), please respond with a signed email containin
t yet.
The shortlog:
Colin Watson (3):
Clarify excuse HTML/text for the mindays == 0 case
Rename fucked_arches to outofsync_arches
Make removal of obsolete source packages configurable
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (1):
Update whitespace; make the output easier to read
Adam D. Barratt:
> On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 16:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> It would be useful if queue-viewer could run debdiff on binary uploads,
>> in order to catch things like missing or new files and permission
>> changes. If anything interesting is found this could then be included
>> i
Hi,
As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for
PIE by default in Stretch on all release architectures!
* It is a substantial hardening feature
* Upstream has vastly reduced the performance penalty for x86
* The majority of all porters believe their release architec
Robert Park:
> On Sep 25, 2016 9:48 AM, "Niels Thykier" wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>
> Thanks for accepting my patch!
>
> I was wondering if you had a chance to review my other patch as well?
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812155
>
Florian Weimer:
> * Niels Thykier:
>
>> [...]
>
> Do you think that PIE-by-default makes BIND_NOW-by-default
> unnecessary?
>
> (The argument is that with PIE, it is much more difficult to get a
> controlled GOT write.)
>
Is this an implicit "Why did
Mathieu Malaterre:
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
>
> [Let's assume that we can't find a powerpc porter in time for Stretch.]
>
> 1. Will `powperpc` automatically be downgraded to simple port ? Or is
> this also not automated and the port may simply be removed (eg. sparc)
> ?
> 2. Apart from loosing the au
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 09/30/2016 06:08 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I strongly /suspect/ that "no porters" for powerpc will imply the
>> removal of powerpc for Stretch. It may or may not be moved to ports
>> (assuming someone is willing to support it there)
Niels Thykier:
> [...]
>
> As for "porter qualification"
> =
>
> We got burned during the Jessie release, where a person answered the
> roll call for sparc and we kept sparc as a release architecture for
> Jessie. However, we end
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to merge the branch [britney-patch-bundle-2016-09] consisting
> of 22 patches into master no later than Monday the 3th of October. It
> has been tested with [no regressions].
> * CC: People known to run Britney
> * BCC: contributors + the
Hi,
Slightly overdue, we have created a survey for the Stretch artwork.
Please cast your vote at:
*
https://surveys.larjona.net/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=926823&lang=en_us
* Please be nice and vote only once!
The survey closes: 2016-10-19 23:59 UTC
Thanks,
~Niels
signature.asc
Descrip
Martin Zobel-Helas:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon Oct 03, 2016 at 22:02:00 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Slightly overdue, we have created a survey for the Stretch artwork.
>>
>> Please cast your vote at:
>> *
>> https://surveys.larjona
Vlad Orlov:
> Hi all,
>
Hi :),
I am moving this to debian-release with the MATE packaging team as CC.
(Also BCC'ed to debian-de...@lists.debian.org)
> I'm one of the upstream developers of MATE desktop environment. Current
> version, 1.16, just reached Unstable and should make it into Testing s
Adrian Bunk:
> [ fullquote adding -ports, for people not following -release or -devel ]
>
> [...]
>
> Is https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html the up-to-date
> information available to you, and the "candidate" line how a decision
> would look like based on the current information?
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for
> PIE by default in Stretch on all release architectures!
> * It is a substantial hardening feature
> * Upstream has vastly reduced the performance penalty for x86
> * The ma
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:25:30 +0200 Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Package: gcc-6
> Version: 6.1.1-12
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Matthias,
>
> As a continuation of the discussions [1][2] on debian-devel I'm
> attaching the simple patch that implements enabling the PIE
> hardening flags f
Hi,
We are very excited to announce that the default theme for Stretch is:
~~~ softWaves ~~~
Many thanks to all the artists and all who voted. :) For the full
announcement, please v
Alex Santos:
> Hello
>
> Just a quick question on the bulk of PPC architecture and the eventual
> abandonment.
>
> I admit that my question may seem naive so I apologize.
>
> How long can we expect PPC G3, G4 and G5 architectures to continue seeing
> security updates? Is there a clear roadmap.
erage! (excluding live-data tests)
The shortlog:
Martin Pitt (4):
Move build checks before running policies
Pass excuse to BasePolicy.apply_policy()
Move updating of excuses into policies
Use Excuse.is_valid when iterating through checks and Policies
Niels Thykier (17)
Mike Hommey:
> Hi,
>
> Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
> weeks or months without it happening?
>
> Mike
>
Hi Mike,
Britney believes migrating nspr will break libnspr4-0d in testing.
Which is technically true as libsnpr4-0d has a strictly equal dependency
o
Jonathan Dowland:
> Hi,
>
> At least chocolate-doom and linux-wlan-ng are blocked from transitioning to
> testing due to a bug in "control-suite", part of the infrastructure on
> ftp.debian.org: #824169
>
> As far as we are aware, there are no RC problems in these packages themselves.
>
> I just
Afif Elghraoui:
> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining two packages affected by this transition. So far, I've
> just been monitoring the situation, as I share many of the concerns that
> have been raised on -devel.
>
> Is it an acceptable solution to instead build-depend on libbsl1.0-dev,
> downgrade the seve
Afif Elghraoui:
>
>
> على الأحد 20 تشرين الثاني 2016 23:05، كتب Niels Thykier:
>> Which source packages are we talking about?
>
> gridengine and ori. In the case of gridengine, we have a contributed
> patch, but it has not been applied upstream or seen more than
> c
Niels Thykier:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to merge the branch [britney-patch-bundle-201611] consisting
> of 21 patches into master no later than Monday the 21st of November. It
> has been tested with [no regressions].
> * I have Cc'ed people, whom I know run Britney
>
&
Martin Pitt:
> Hello Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier [2016-11-13 12:53 +]:
>> [...]
>> * It cherry-picks 4 commits proposed by Martin Pitt to assist Ubuntu
>>with refactoring some their changes into policies.
>>
>> Martin Pitt (4):
>> Move b
Sam Hartman:
>
> My understanding of the current plan is that we're adding openssl 1.1.0
> to unstable, but will make a decision about whether to drop libssl1.0.2
> later.
>
> That's really frustrating for the rest of the ecosystem--our users and
> our upstreams, and I'd ask the release team to c
ts all pass: https://travis-ci.org/Debian/britney2/builds/179089994
Test coverage at: 87% (as defined by python3-coverage)
From 947f26f6e055a6b42408165b81234a722c29f79a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:31:18 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fetch piuparts summarie
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Iain Lane:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: britney
>
> Ahoy,
>
> I noticed when using hint-tester on Ubuntu.
>
> britney> easy […] dreamchess/0.2.1-RC2-2build1 […]
> Version mismatch, drea
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> I am back again with another branch [britney-patch-bundle-201611-2] for
> Britney, which I intend to merge into master. I intend to merge it into
> master no later than Sunday, the 4th of December.
>
> [...]
>
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
&g
Pirate Praveen:
> package: release.debian.org
>
> This version fixes many bugs in testing and the piuparts regression is
> not introduced by this version (current version in testing has the exact
> same problem with piuparts).
According to piuparts.d.o, gitlab succeeds the test in testing.
> I w
Pirate Praveen:
> On ബുധന് 07 ഡിസംബര് 2016 02:02 രാവിലെ, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
>>
>> And the actual problem for the piuparts test failing currently
>> is a ton of cruft lying around after the package was purged:
>>
>> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/gitlab_8.13.6+dfsg2-1.log
>>
Julien Cristau:
> On 12/04/2016 11:18 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> looking at
>> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/gitlab_8.13.6+dfsg2-1.log I see:
>>
>> 12m12.4s ERROR: WARN: Processes are running inside chroot:
>> 12m20.4s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlinks:
>> 12m55.1s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging l
Josh Triplett:
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> [...]
>
> Does it seem reasonable to attempt to introduce these new sections
> before the release, so that these pieces of software in stable can
> successfully work with upcoming sections that will appear in
> testing/unstable/backports?
>
> I'd b
clone 828266 -1
severity 828266 serious
close 828266
fixed-version 828266 302-5.2
done
Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> # it still fails to build with openssl 1.1
>> reopen 828266
> [...]
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for helping track these.
There ha
Control: tags -1 pending
Ondřej Surý:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> there's an upcoming new release of ldns that is going to fix OpenSSL
> 1.1.0 RC bug (#846768). Upstream has changed SOVERSION
Pirate Praveen:
> On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര് 2016 01:45 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> The hint was there, it's just that since this is a new kind of hint, it
>> hadn't
>> been enabled in the configuration and so britney was ignoring it.
>>
>> I have fixed that now and urgented gitlab so it doe
Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:44:58 +0100 Mathieu Parent
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: serious
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please let package samba enter testing fast, it includes security fixes only.
>
> unblock
Rob Browning:
>
> I suspect it might be too late, but 0.29 has just been uploaded to sid,
> and at least speaking from the upstream perspective (I'm one of the
> developers there), we'd certainly be happy to see it stretch.
>
> I think we're probably about 2 days past the 10-day migration window,
Santiago Vila:
> Dear Release Managers:
>
> If Release Policy wording is not going to be clarified in any way, that's ok.
>
> [...]
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Santiago,
Thanks for your interest in this subject and for wanting to increase the
stability of builds in Debian.
As Julien
dpawluk:
> Hello,
> I would like to ask, if Debian 8.7 release supports Apache 8.5.x?
>
Hi,
Debian 8.7 will /not/ have Apache Tomcat 8.5, but it is available from
jessie-backports (which has 8.5.9-1~bpo8+1 at the moment).
Thanks,
~Niels
Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2017-01-23 21:24, Nathan Scott wrote:
>> Understood, and yep, I would love to see that fixed (patches welcome), but
>> its
>> not reached the front of my queue yet.
>
> The deadline for uploading before the freeze is *soon*. *Really soon*
>
> [...]
Sorry, but pcp is no lo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Thomas Goirand:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear release team,
>
> CVE-2017-2592 was reported against python-oslo.middleware/3.19.0-2. We need
> python-oslo.middleware/3.19.0-3 i
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Samuel Thibault:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello,
>
> The freeze is soon now, so I'm pre-asking for freeze unblock.
>
> This is about Bug#852863: switching between pidgin and
1 - 100 of 1553 matches
Mail list logo
