press says OK :)
Neil
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:11:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> press@ / -live *gentle poke*
>
> fwiw, the BSP weekend (12/13th) is looking a likely candidate currently.
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in
> >either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct me if I'm
> >mistaken on that.
>
> Anyone? :-)
>
> Op
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution
> > indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of
> > users and contributors w
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> I want to ask if the release team decided anything in this direction.
> Does the release team want a useful version of the package in wheezy?
>
> I'm not interested in any discussion but a plain offical statement from
> the Re
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does
> in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev
> package is missing a dependency that makes building against the
> library impossible. The change
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:09:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> warzone2100 3.1 beta 11 was released today and I would like it and
> future 3.1 versions to enter wheezy. 3.1 is the culmination of a year's
> work and brings some important improvements (like deterministic network
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm planning to upload dpkg 1.16.5 to unstable on the 26th, to be able
> to finish cleaning up some pending changes I've locally and to give
> some time for the initial wave of translation updates once I've sent
> the call. Given that
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:00:50AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Still, Karolin Seeger, the Samba release manager, announce recently in
> the samba-technical mailign list tjhat the 3.6.6 release is due out
> for July 2nd.
>
Hi,
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening i
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Sylpheed upstream has published a release plan for next Sylpheed stable
> version, 3.2 [0] and the release it's planned for next 29 June.
>
> If possible, I would like to have this version instead of cur
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:04:29AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Claws Mail upstream has also set a release date for the next version [0],
> which will be on 27 June.
>
Hi,
That would be cutting it very fine. If you are happy to maintain the
snapshot for the length of a stable release, I would
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> as already explained by Jordi, there’s one big remaining bit for GNOME
> in wheezy: GDM. Currently it is stuck at version 3.0 (mostly because I
> didn’t have enough time to work on it), and version 3.4 should be
> hopefully ready f
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:05:26PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16:07AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We know no-one likes reading long mails on d-d-a, so we'll keep this
> > short: we'll be stopping automatic
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:02:28AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> ocl-icd is small and the core code should not change a lot until
> OpenCL 1.3 or more appears. The core code of the version already in
> testing is very similar to the one waiting in NEW.
>
In that case, hopefully it will be pro
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:06:12PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> > I have no preference either way, as long as the package complies with
> > release
> > policy, then it may be included in the release.
> >
> Your answer isn't very helpfull to me as it is. So I have some
> questions:
I
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Uploaded. There may be a point release with translation updates
> and potentially minor bugfixes at some point in the next month or so.
>
Great, thanks.
> > gutenprint 5.2.8
> > This is a point release with a large number of new p
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:45:14PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> 2012/6/27 Julien Cristau :
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am still correcting FTBFS.
> >> However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
> >> May I upload libpng 1.
Hi Toni,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
[snip lots]
> This will at least prevent practical scim usage in Wheezy for any new
> installs. I therefore request that you re-think that course of action,
> and allow swift re-introduction of possibly stripped-down packages
[
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I suggest we remove libggi from Wheezy. It's totally obsolete these days,
> dead upstream and RC-buggy since 1.5 years (608981).
>
> Removing it would involve the following packages:
>
> GGI-related and to be removed along, no r
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:34:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> songwrite is currently orphaned and has an RC bug #672210. The problem is
> that the version of songwrite is much too old, in fact upstream has since
> october 2007 (!) moved from songwrite to songwrite2. IMHO, fixing #672210
> would r
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:11:35PM +0200, Frank Habermann wrote:
> Dear release managers,
>
> I ask for a freeze exception request for zendframework version 1.11.12-1.
>
> This version fixes security bug #679215 and is the last minor bugfix version
> of
> zendframework 1.11.
>
Hi,
4303 file
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Frank Habermann wrote:
> > 4303 files changed, 43422 insertions(+), 12755 deletions(-)
> >
> > Can you please provide a clean patch that we can review, preferably
> > one that doesn't touch every single file.
> >
> > Additionally, do you know what
> > /t
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:18:58PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> I will file RM requests (also for unstable as I don't see how the
> situation could be resolved this way) as soon (still wating for the-me
> to be back from holidays).
If there's no r-depends, and the package is removed from unstab
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:22:58PM -0600, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Ansgar has been experimenting with .deb sizes to make the packages
> needed for a minimal desktop installation fit in the first CD. It looks
> like that's doable by switching to xz compression for the involved
> binaries. Would
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > The Fix
> | > Add required font package to debian/control::Depends
> | >
> +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
> + .
> + NOTE: If you experience problems with the F1 help key, please
> + make sure you have package xfonts-100dp
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> 2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern :
> | Hi,
> |
> | On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > | > The Fix
> | > | > Add required font package to debian/control
> | >
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> the python-weblib package in Debian has recently been taken over by
> me. The package has a long-standing mis-name bug, since it should be
> called python-pyweblib to be in alignment with the python policy.
>
> Would it be possible to d
severity 658139 serious
reassign 658139 evince
tags 658139 + patch
retitle 658139 missing mime entry
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:09:27AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > It does seem quite annoying. Have you considered asking the release
> > team whether they would be inclined to agree that this bu
s
decision.
Thanks,
Neil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:34:35PM -0600, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hence, I consider this bug serious and thus RC, and am reassigning to evince.
>
> Feel free to pop it over to tech-ctte if you don't agree.
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
> --
&g
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > May 23/24
>
> Offline-ish on May 23.
>
Same for me.
> > May 30/31
>
> OK.
>
OK
> > June 6/7
>
> Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7.
>
OK
> > June 13/14
>
> Offline-ish on June 13.
>
OK
> > June 20/21
>
> OK.
tags 698117 moreinfo
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 671635 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:51:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The time spent by the RM and the maintainer to prepare and accept the tpu
> upload is higher than adding a simple unblock (assum
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Pete
Hi Marco,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:14:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Yes, but they are all trivial changes.
>
[...]
> OK, I suck as a maintainer and as a human being and I neglected my
> packages for most of the last year.
> But I'd rather move on and fix what can still be fixed.
>
[...]
>
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
> Within the next one or two months I mean, not "maybe in a years
> time". :)
>
I don't see it happening, to be honest.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
> so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
> disk support. I for instance installed it on my Dell D430, and network
> just works fin
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:07:42AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
> &
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:33:03PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
> > But not tested - how about USB - did that ever get sorted?
>
> We have not worked on it.
>
> > How about things like wireless drivers, raid
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:01:38PM +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:56:51PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16
> > June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point rele
Hi Jay,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> The release team has not yet found the time to reply to my message of
> May 6 on when they will be ready to think about the tiff transition or
> whether my plans for the transition are okay. (It is not my intention
> to be
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:50:27AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our "standard" time intervals lead to us looking at point releases for
> both stable and oldstable during February.
>
> The weekend of the 1st / 2nd February is FOSDEM, so probably best avoided. :-)
> How are people fixed for:
>
>
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:44:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * April 12th/13th
> * April 19th/20th (Easter)
> * April 26th/27th
> * May 3rd/4th
>
> Please reply before the 15th of March with your preferred date(s).
These are all fine by me.
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 23:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 09:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:44 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > > We are slowly starting to prepare for the
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
> dates would be:
>
> - June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
> - July 5/6
Running a half m
401 - 442 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
