On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:30:07PM -0700, Cameron Dale wrote:
> torrentflux (2.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
--
To UNSUBSC
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:26:40AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: soqt
> Followup-For: Bug #498364
>
Assuming you mean 1.4.1-1 (you don't mention this anywhere), it's been
done by luk already.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top post
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:29:17 +0100
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > http://incoming.debian.org/dp
clone 474947 -1
reassign -1 release-notes
retitle -1 Update information about apt MMap problem in release notes
thanks
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:03:49PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi bug, hi people, hi d-release
>
> I did some study on bug 474947, that is grave/RC, and is posted against APT.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:58:30AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This version of refit adds support for the new Apple laptops released
> last week. Adding support means adding the correct path for the legacy
> loader for this generation of hardware, so there are no code changes.
>
Unbloc
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> could you please review the changes for postfwd 1.10pre7c-3, which I plan
> to upload to unstable and state if it could be considered for unblock it for
> lenny?
>
Please upload, and re-ping for an unblock hin
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:39:19AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I recently NMU'ed (or worked with the maintainer of) aolserver4 to fix
> some pending l10n bugs.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
bah Germans. You just put 100 DDs in one country and then they all
become friends of each other
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 02:06:29PM +0100, John Lines wrote:
> Please allow plptools-1.04-4 into Lenny, the only differences between it and
> 1.04-2 are translation updates.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> FYI, the Release Team was asked for an advice on Sun, 26 October [2].
> However, I know we (the Debian foo2zjs maintainers) decided to go to the
> tech-ctte just two days later...
>
Indeed, hence the lack of comment. However, as this
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:22:43AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Friday 31 October 2008, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > Dear release team,
> > >
> > > could you please review the cha
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 12:06:13PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote:
> man2html/1.6f-3
Unblocked.
>* Rename debian/README.build to debian/README.source.
Please don't do this, it's a pain to review.
> rlinetd/0.6.2-2
Unblocked.
> smb2www/980804-37
Unblocked.
> solid-pop3d
Unblocked.
> upx-u
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 04:14:37PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Maybe someone could massage the dependencies into testing as well?
>
> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=net-snmp
>
> "- trying to update net-snmp from 5.4.1~dfsg-10 to 5.4.1~dfsg-11 (candidate
> is 4 days old)
>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 01:20:18PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Neil McGovern, 2008-11-10]
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:10:43PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > Please unblock phatch 0.1.6-1.
> >
> > What's: locale/.dropbox?
>
> hmm, it loo
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:00:29PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I've just uploaded javatools 0.17 which fixes 505066 and 503890, please
> could you hint it for migration to testing
>
Unblocked, age-days to 10.
Neil
--
I miss a computer physically... I can ping it, but don't know where
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:30:37AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Version 5.4-9 adds the Swedish debconf translation and fixes bug #504336
> which IMO is RC. Simple explanation, /etc/init.d/watchdog restart failed, but
> works now.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
int getRandomNumber() {
return 4; // c
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Version 1.0-11 only adds the Swedish translation.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
<@nurn> Paedophile Glitter arrives in UK
<@nurn> is it me or does that sound like a very inappropriate brand name?
<@sooB> the sort that would only be adverti
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:40:38AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> On its way.
>
Apologies, seems I misread the status of this. It should go in when perl
does.
Neil
--
< Erik_J> good day! i hear this might be a good place to get some technical
advice when one is debian eliterate :)
signa
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:36:52AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Version 1.0.6-16 add some better documentation in /etc/default/acpi, fixes
> some
> problems in the boot process that resulted in acpid not even starting on some
> systems with a self build kernel and removes the stop links in runle
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:10:43PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Please unblock phatch 0.1.6-1.
>
What's: locale/.dropbox?
Neil
--
< linuxpoet> rails is a perversion
< mc> someone who use pgsql as calculator shouldnt talk of perversion.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:33:36AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to ask for a freeze exception of
> tex-common 1.11.3
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 06:35:44AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> an NMU of samhain (prepared by Li Daobing) was uploaded yesterday to
> fix an RC bug.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I can just read some of it because it makes sense
. o O ( There is stuff Ganneff wr
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 05:02:53PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Hi, I backported some changes from 3.6.2 (currently in experimental
> to keep unstable open) to 3.5.2 (testing and unstable have 3.5.2-4).
> Do they have a chance to get an unblock for testing
> after being uploaded to unstable or
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:08:24AM +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] found out today that jesred doesn't work with squid 3
> at all, only squid 2.x. the cause is that squid 3 changed the format of
> redirector messages sent to things like jesred.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
* Tolimar
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 03:41:21PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Tuesday 11 November 2008, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > * Remove multi.surbl.org from default DNSBL list, since they change
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 05:32:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please consider unblocking grub2 1.96+20080724-12. It includes:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> * Remove multi.surbl.org from default DNSBL list, since they changed their
> policy and restricted the use of it, see
> http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
>
That would be fine, but I'd also suggest a README addition sayin
> Please unblock clamav-data as this will bring more virus signatures
> Please unblock clamav-getfiles.
> Please unblock snoopy
>
All unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:57:46AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Hi, the debian-refcard (pure documentation package) contains new
> and updated translations. It is 10 days in unstable now. Please
> let it go into Lenny. Thanks!
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
So we can expect stockholm to be elected
this included as it's used on the official irc
channels.
All the best,
Neil McGovern
[1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.l
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:14:41PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:39:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > In meanwhile I think the debdiff is too huge to have this for an
> > unblock to wheezy. I suggest to close this request to reduce the
> > current open unblock r
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:41:11AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Since we'll have released by then[1], I thought it might be nice if you
> guys were to hold a talk at FOSDEM about the past release process and/or
> the upcoming one. Anyone up for that?
>
I won't be attending this year - anyone e
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
Hi,
365 files changed, 23718 insertions(+), 14033 deletions(-)
This isn't something that can be reviewed, especially with the large
number of unrelated changes to (for example build system switch!) the
package.
The options remaining are:
* Backport specific fixes for the version in testing
* Re
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:40:25PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> As I've stated previously, I don't believe that backporting fixes is
> really feasible. There are too many, they are mixed with
> non-security-related modifications, there would be enormous opportunity
> for error, and ongoing
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Since my GPG key has expired, I will not be able to upload this in a
> timely fashion, so you can consider this email as a call for NMU.
>
For info, you can simply change the expiration date...
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:20:56AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> If it is essential, I can make a 0.8.1-13 upload with the extra
> changelog detail against 0.8.1-11
>
Hi,
We won't accept any changes to packaging systems, and we won't review
anything without a diff. PLEASE go read
http://release.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:35:16AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:54:36AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > +netgen (4.9.13.dfsg-3.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Non-maintainer upload.
>
> Have the maintainers commented on your proposed change?
Control: tag 540512 +wheezy-ignore
Control: tag 538822 +wheezy-ignore
This is obviously not going to get fixed this time. Adding ignore tags.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:40:58PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> There has been a small discussion about dash RC bugs 538822 and 540512
> in the bts and the
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
Removal hint added.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks for looking into this bug. VCS of coin3d has a COPYING file, which
> is clearly BSD-license [1]. So this version should be packaged to fix
> the license issue properly. The current version of coin is GPL [2].
>
This does
Package: freevo
Severity: grave
Hi,
Youtube-dl is about to be removed from testing. As freevo depends on it,
it is also a candidate for removal. Please let
debian-release@lists.debian.org know how you plan on handling this
issue.
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT pre
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> what's the release team opinion on fixing several "important" bugs for
> wheezy? These are problems discovered by piuparts and all have bugs
> filed long ago, usually with a sentence like "Getting the archive
> piuparts-clean
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I simply haven't included any patches with any prior version of the
> package, so I haven't needed to rely on any 1.0 or 3.0 methods for
> including a patch
>
Again, I'm going to point at the freeze policy. Specifically Rule 1.
> I
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:26:53PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> The fix is to add missing dependency on xz-utils.
> Also a unit tests is added explicitly testing xz compressed deb.
>
This doesn't look clean due to changes in:
> --- unattended-upgrades-0.79.3/test/aptroot/var/log/apt/his
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:59:11PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> And I see nothing wrong with breaking packages in unstable, but maybe
> there too I'm mistaken.
>
Yes, as you breaking a package in unstable may:
a) Break other packages
b) Remove the ability to update via unstable if a RC bug does
tags 692614 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692619 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692624 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692625 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692627 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692628 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692629 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692630 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692631 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692613 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692615 + wheez
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01:58PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> the discussion in RC bug #591969 ended with a call for a wheezy-ignore
> tag. The bug was also tagged squeeze-ignore. What does the release team say?
>
In general, I'm fairly loathed to add a *second* release ignore tag.
Can someon
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
> > we go for one of:
> >
> > 11/12 October
> > 18/19 October
> > 25/26 October
>
> All of these are still good for me.
>
All
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear lovely release team,
TL;DR:
# CVE-2014-4887
unblock wget/1.16-1
age-days 2 wget/1.16-1
wget 1.16 in unstable currently fixes CVE-2014-4887:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in G
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
> - see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
> security and release teams.
>
I consider there to be two issues which would concern
[resent... signed this time. Again]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with
> > non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have will be able to do so, because mumble u
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you please make sure that mumble 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2 does not
> migrate to wheezy ? In particular, please do not accept an unblock
> request for it or for any later version.
>
I've commented out the automatic unblock it was gran
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 09:56:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:42:18 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Advancing that as much as you can would certainly be useful to catch any
> > errors, and to ensure translators get a chance to contribute.
>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> > a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to mig
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If it's the solution that the TC decide on to resolve the issue, it
> > sounds like something we could work with, at least imho, from what I've
> > seen so far. I've CCed -release for any further comments, as I don't
> > know how
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
> > broken. Once we've managed to have a look at that, it may give a clu
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:59:07AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
&
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 07:52:18PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:59:07 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Right, the delta diff was small enough that I actually put in the time
> > to look at the full diff. This took a number of hours, but anyway:
>
>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
> > wheezy, that works just as well as far as I'm concerned, but I thought
> > I'd give it a chance.
>
> feel free to do so if you thi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Emacs 24 has been in pre-release mode
So... not actually released then.
> Anyways, this doesn't answer my question, which I've asked thrice.
> Here it goes again: is this a done deal, and we're getting an ancient
> (yes, a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:59:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
> > We still need a pre
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
> 10th / 11th - Fine for me
> 17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
> afternoon to Sunday afternoon
> 31st / 1st - Fine for me
>
All fine.
> 24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from ear
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:42:18PM -0400, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> unblock request for sisu 2.6.3-6 (documentation & reliability fixes for
> Squeeze)
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.tx
Hello,
As previously announced[RT:PM], the Debian Release Team held a meeting
on 2 and 3 Oct, 2010 in Paris, France. The meeting was kindly sponsored
by IRILL[RT:PMS]. The attendees were Adam D. Barratt (adsb), Luk Claes
(luk), Julien Cristau (jcristau), Mehdi Dogguy (mehdi), Philipp Kern
(pkern)
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:30:03PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please could a freeze exception be made for roxterm 1.18.5-3 which fixes
> bug 598971. Although there are no reported symptoms in Debian the faulty
> code contributed to quite a serious problem in Ubuntu ie a terminal
> emula
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:25:52PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Can we move forward and discuss what should be done now, rather than
> > discussing the past?
> >
> > Thomas
>
> It's been more than 10 days, and I still have no answer to what I will
> be allowed to chang
the "this week in Debian" podcast. It was
> fun. I wish I was living in Cambridge with 9 other DDs, I feel alone
> here in Shanghai (lucky, Li Daobing lives here now)! :)
>
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Firstly, please accept my apologies for
Hi Michael, thanks for getting in touch.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> The only part of your email that I do not agree with is the part about
> removing. Yes, it's not easily possible, but I don't understand why this is
> even considered.
>
Just on this point,
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Give it more time for testing in unstable then.
That's one of the things that's being considered, if you'd carefully
read the thread.
> Virtualbox is important enough to have the latest version of it in the
> next release
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Neil,
>
> On Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 09:49:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > 3) Remove the package from squeeze
>
> did you had a look at it's r-depends? Removing is not an option.
>
I should hav
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch
> for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad
> about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x
> branch is in a v
Hi Peter, thanks for getting in touch
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Thanks for your efforts towards great Debian releases!
>
> I've made some
Hia,
I'm currently wondering why #598135 is RC. Would someone care to
explain what I'm missing? :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
[local irc server has just been brought up]
suddenly there's quite some silence in the hacklab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:09:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2006-12-14, Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just uploaded a new moodle version which only includes a new
> > patch for a XSS security problem.
>
> Isaac, this is the 34th security problem in Moodle since 2
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:22:16PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:53:28AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 10:45]:
> > > * Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 10:38]:
> > > > proftpd-dfsg (1.3.0-17) unstabl
Hi all,
Could I please have the following:
gaim - priority bump
1:2.0.0+beta5-8 to 1:2.0.0+beta5-9
no CVE ID yet, crash when receiving an invalid UPnP response
libarchive - unfreeze
1.2.53-2 to 1.3.1-1
CVE-2006-5680 - DoS (CPU consumption)
nexuiz - unfreeze/bump
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:15:41PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
> >> krb5 1.4.4-6 fixes mit-sa-2006-2 (see
> >> http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/ ) which is a fa
Hi team,
Can I have an unblock for:
kdenetwork from 4:3.5.5-3 to 4:3.5.5-4
CVE-2006-6811 - remote DoS
debdiff show that only the fix is present in the changed version
Thanks,
Neil
--
hm, maybe wearing a black t-shirt while dusting my bedroom for the
first time in years w
Hi all,
Can I have a unblock for:
phpmyadmin from 4:2.9.1.1-1 to 4:2.9.1.1-2
CVE-2007-0203 / CVE-2007-0204 - XSS
Diff is fine.
Cheers,
Neil
--
bah Germans. You just put 100 DDs in one country and then they all
become friends of each other.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:55:49AM +1300, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
> phpGroupware had an RC bug (#401045) filed against it due to it being
> incompatible with PHP 5.2, and had an NMU to drop PHP 5 dependencies
> from the package. However 0.19.16.011-3 has been uploaded to unstable
> which has
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:06:29AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>* SECURITY UPDATE: Denial of Service.
>* New patch, 108_CVE-2007-0104; limits recursion depth of the parsing tree
> to
> 100 to avoid infinite loop with crafted documents; CVE-2007-0104; from
> Ubuntu's 0.4.2-0ubuntu6.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Can you check, whether the changes in bcfg2 in sid can be allowed in?
> Otherwise this will need to be fixed through t-p-u.
>
FWIW, there's a packages waiting in NEW on klecker with the security fix
in. This should make it's wa
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> If anyone has some time available, please NMU 406628.
>
geoip 1.3.17-1.1 uploaded, please unblock :)
Neil
--
bah Germans. You just put 100 DDs in one country and then they all
become friends of each other.
sign
Hi,
I've just uploaded hinfo 1.02-3.1 which fixes a DoS with hinfo-update
and potential arbitary code execution.
Please unblock :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
"Debian women - porting the most succesfull operating system to the
most unknown architecture"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:13:09PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> Can you check, whether the changes in bcfg2 in sid can be allowed in?
> >> Otherwise this will nee
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:14:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just uploaded hinfo 1.02-3.1 which fixes a DoS with hinfo-update
> > and potential arbitary code execution.
> >
> > Please unblock :)
>
&
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:36:23AM +0200, Achilleas Kotsis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> according to CVE-2007-0460, ulogd is prone to several vulnerabilities
> due to improper string length calculations. ulogd is running as root,
> and the vulnerability is thought to be remotely exploitable, so I guess
> t
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:13PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Like the subject says, bind9_9.3.4-2 should be promoted to testing,
> either now, or in 2 days when it's old enough. :-) (And yes, I know it
> just went through dinstall today...) It is currently built on alpha,
> amd64, hppa, i386,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Please approve egroupware 1.2.106-2.dfsg-1 for etch. This is a
> maintenance release over what is currently in etch, and it is required
> to be able to use PHP 5 and/or PostgreSQL 8.1.
>
FWIW:
addressbook/inc/import/Import_fr
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:09:07PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:47:27PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:13PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Both marked as fixed in 1:9.3.4-2 in our tracker, HOWEVER:
> > 355 files chan
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:39:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm the new maintainer of libnids and I would like to ask you to move libnids
> version 1.21-1 to testing release because it is in freeze state.
>
This has reverse depends. Is there a good reason why this should b
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:55:11PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:13:09PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >> Can you check, whether the changes in
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:28:23AM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> at the moment I am away and without Internet access (well, mostly ;-)
> and can't upload the fix for a crash in qalculate-gtk myself.
> Can somebody please make an NMU for qalculate-gtk #404241 with the patch
> from upstrea
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:10:25PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Please consider nmap 4.20-1 for etch. Nearly all of the bugs ever filed
> against nmap have been enhancements, etc. It would be a shame to not
> have the latest nmap in etch, especially now that it's over 50 days
> old...
>
> Upstre
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Debian-Release,
>
> These packages entered Debian recently. It would be nice to see them
> added to Etch, if they match your criteria.
>
> freedroidrpg 0.10.0+d070110-1
> gwhere 0.2.3.dfsg.1-2
> gmorgan 0.25-2
> grhino 0.15.2-3
>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:02:48PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wordpress.html
>
Right, as I mentioned on IRC, but you may have missed it:
This needs an update through t-p-u, and as it's a security issue, I'll
send a DTSA for it. So, can you produce patches which fi
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:56:29PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Moi!
>
> Please consider the following versions currently in unstable for
> inclusion in etch:
>
> # Security fix for CVE-2007-0578
> mpg123/2.7.5-6
>
For info, our tracker says:
NOTES: Not much of a security problem; user will ab
I'm not free on the 25th, 3rd (daytime) and 10th/11th will be sporadic.
Others in press may be available :)
Neil
(Press hat)
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:11:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 25-26/2 - Steve's not available for CDs
>
301 - 400 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
