Re: Please unblock mozilla-dom-inspector

2008-08-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:14:20AM +0000, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > mozilla-dom-inspector is a new package, that provides > > iceweasel-dom-inspector that used to b

Please binNMU librsvg

2008-08-24 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Please binNMU librsvg against libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1, due to bug #496125. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please binNMU librsvg

2008-08-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:21:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Please binNMU librsvg against libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1, due to bug > > #496125. > > Can you elaborate on why a binNMU is appropriate h

Please unblock libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-3 [Was: Please binNMU librsvg]

2008-08-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:21:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Please binNMU librsvg against libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1, due to bug > > #496125. > > Can you elaborate on why a binNMU is appropriate h

Re: Please unblock mozilla-dom-inspector

2008-08-31 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:12:41AM +0000, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:14

Please unblock libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-4

2008-09-19 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, I just uploaded libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-4 incorporating a new regression fix from upstream following up previous security update. It also got a CVE number because of some security implication of the regression at hand. Feel free to put a delay on the package if you feel the need for

Please unblock nspr 4.7.1-4

2008-09-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, Please unblock newest nspr release, that fixes #499146. The patch is a bit big for what it does, but that is the patch that is going to be applied upstream. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=339296 That's the only change in the package (well, it's dpatched so it's not

Please unblock webkit 1.0.1-3

2008-09-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, I just uploaded a new release of webkit, fixing the long standing problem with fonts that made it not display properly, for example, japanese characters on non-japanese locales (only squares were shown). The fix was cherry-picked from upstream, with a small fix to avoid pulling an

Please unblock webkit 1.0.1-4

2008-09-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, I just uploaded yet another release of webkit, fixing a security issue (CVE-2008-3632). The fix was cherry-picked from upstream, and the commit diff can be seen here: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-webkit/webkit.git;a=commitdiff;h=1d794eee77947e0a2251a0d2d383f0fb8417a57b There is a

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

2008-09-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Here is another status update, for xulrunner only. It's not moving as fast as it should, but I lack time for that. On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:57:46AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Current versions of iceweasel and xulrunner in unstable are better than > the ones in testing right n

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

2008-09-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:29:26PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > [snip] > > > > - Anti-phishing protection should be disabled by default, because of its > > > privacy concerns. > > > > This must be done on

Please unblock xulrunner 1.9.0.3-1 [Was: Re: Mozilla in Lenny]

2008-09-28 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release managers, On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 06:53:22PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:39:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I'm going to upload 1.9.0.3-1 soon, so I invite the release team to > > already take a look at the upstream changes to a

Please unblock iceape 1.1.12-1

2008-10-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, Iceape 1.1.12-1 is a new upstream that contains a bunch of security and stability fixes. Its changelog: iceape (1.1.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New security/stability upstream release. * Fixes mfsa-2008-{37-38,40-46}, also known as CVE-2008-0016, CVE-2008-3835, CV

Re: Please unblock icedove 2.0.0.17-1

2008-10-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 09:15:58PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > icedove (2.0.0.17-1) unstable; urgency=low > * debian/control: > - Changed maintainer to Ubuntu Mozillateam That's an interesting move... Do you know there is a debian mozilla team that is desperate to grow ? Mike -- T

Last(?) round of patches to iceweasel/xulrunner to come

2008-10-19 Thread Mike Hommey
connections and avoid sucking bandwidth. Closes: #491144. -- Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:15:54 +0200 iceweasel (3.0.3-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * browser/app/profile/firefox.js: Replace %APP% with firefox in some places. Closes: #501540, #502450. * b

Re: Last(?) round of patches to iceweasel/xulrunner to come

2008-10-19 Thread Mike Hommey
Oh, I almost forgot. There is also a workaround that should be added in cairo, so that iceweasel stops throwing garbage at users' faces: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=49;bug=495620 Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Please ublock iceweasel 3.0.3-3 [Was: Last(?) round of patches to iceweasel/xulrunner to come]

2008-10-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > xulrunner (1.9.0.3-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > iceweasel (3.0.3-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > Both look reasonable. > > >

Re: Another round of GNOME unblock requests

2008-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
all: install it. >* Closes: #393837. Thanks to Romain Beauxis and Mike Hommey. Please note there will be a round of BinNMU requests for epiphany-browser and other applications depending on xulrunner-1.9 with next xulrunner-1.9 upload, hopefully in a few days (depending on how responsive our

Re: Please unblock icedove 2.0.0.17-1

2008-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 09:15:58PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > > > icedove (2.0.0.17-1) unstable; urgency=low

Re: Please unblock icedove 2.0.0.17-1

2008-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:22:07PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 18,

Pre-approval for next iceweasel/xulrunner uploads

2008-11-02 Thread Mike Hommey
if it was previously set to the granparadiso homepage. * debian/iceweasel-restart-required.update-notifier: Added japanese translation. Thanks Hideki Yamane. Closes: #503595. -- Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:02:21 +0200 xulrunner (1.9.0.3-2) UNRELEASED; urgen

Re: Pre-approval for next iceweasel/xulrunner uploads

2008-11-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 11:29:33AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > While iceweasel should be in its final shape I'm a liar again I have a fix for #495897, too, which would be either https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=344763 + a fix in HexToNum() or https://bugzilla.moz

Re: Pre-approval for next iceweasel/xulrunner uploads

2008-11-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2008-11-13, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disposition: inline > > > > On Sun, Nov 02

libxml2 and libxslt uploads to sid, soon

2005-01-26 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi fellow developpers, I just want you to make you aware that I'm planning to upload new upstream versions of libxml2 and libxslt into sid soon. Since the number of reverse dependencies on them are quite significant, and since shlibs are going to be bumped, I'm posting this warning on -release and

Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#293989: xsl stylesheet does not work anymore

2005-02-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:46:45PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previously Mike Hommey wrote: > > Thus, libxslt changed its broken behaviour to actually follow the XSLT > > specification. Yes, it breaks broken stylesheets, but the breakage is > &g

Re: mozilla dependencies and versioned conflicts

2005-05-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:16:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > It looks like the security-fix-only new upstream version of mozilla, 1.7.8, > has blocked again on kazehakase and enigmail (and probably on locale > packages, but I haven't gotten there yet) becaus

Re: mozilla dependencies and versioned conflicts

2005-05-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:12:56PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > This time, the version update is supposed to be security only, and not > > to break stuff. Thus, theorically, just changing the Conflicts: in the > &g

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

2004-11-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 12:24:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:51:39AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > The GNOME team have been talking about what the chances are of having > > GNOME 2.8 uploaded to unstable since it was released upstream early in > > September. > > All

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

2004-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:10:41PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > Alternatively, if someone with a sparc could make the build, i'd be very > happy (joshk tried (many thanks), but has not enough memory, > unfortunately). Forget the firefox thing, joshk did succeed (many many thanks). Mike

Please hint mozilla-firefox

2004-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Please hint mozilla-firefox for migration, so that locale packages which depend on older versions don't block it. Thanks. Mike

Re: Please hint mozilla-firefox

2004-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:45:08PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > And Colin set some more hints, so that AFAWCS, mozilla-firefox is going > in tonight. Thanks everybody. Mike

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

2004-11-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:34:07AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > They're libs used by GNOME -- that's not the same thing as being GNOME libs, > at least for this question, because they're also used by lots of *other* > stuff that's not GNOMEish in the least. (Like, say, KDE.) The fact that they'

[RFC] xulrunner, shlibs, and dependencies.

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla technology, meaning that at more or less long term, all mozilla products (firefox, thunderbird, etc.) will be built on top of it. That will be indeed a great i

Firefox logo (Was: Re: making udev require 2.6.15 kernels)

2006-02-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:33:32AM +0100, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also plan a GR to accept in main "less free" artwork which if removed > does not change the functionality of the software using it (e.g. the > firefox logo). The main problem with the firefox logo is not its non

Small issue in libnss3 in wheezy, do we fix it or not?

2013-02-15 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I just figured the libnss3 package in wheezy contains duplicated libraries as can be seen on http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/libnss3/filelist : /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreebl3.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssckbi.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssdbm3.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linu

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove. > > Now I have a question about its release/update schedule. > As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll > terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove. > > > > Now I have a question about its release/update schedule. >

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the > > iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will

Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security updates for the extended support branch. unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 -- System

Bug#690662: unblock: iceape/2.7.9-1

2012-10-16 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape Same as iceweasel 10.0.9esr, this is a security update (containing the same changes as those in iceweasel). unblock iceape/2.7.9-1 -- System Information: Deb

Bug#691720: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.10esr-1

2012-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.10esr is a security update fixing additional window.location issues. No debian changes, only upstream changes. unblock iceweasel/10.0.10esr-1 -- Syst

Bug#691721: unblock: iceape/2.7.10-1

2012-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape 2.7.10 is a security update fixing additional window.location issues. It corresponds to iceweasel 10.0.10esr. No debian changes, only upstream changes. unbloc

Bug#693447: unblock: pkg-mozilla-archive-keyring/1.1

2012-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pkg-mozilla-archive-keyring The version currently in wheeze contains an expired key. The new package only changed the expiry info. Please also consider making it tr

Bug#693865: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.11esr-1

2012-11-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel Version 10.0.11esr-1 is a new security update for iceweasel. Note there will be a corresponding iceape and icedove update as well. No other changes to the

Bug#694175: unblock: iceape/2.7.11-1

2012-11-24 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape 2.7.11-1 is the security update corresponding to iceweasel 10.0.11esr-1. unblock iceape/2.7.11-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT pref

Bug#1036531: unblock: firefox-esr/102.11.0esr-1

2023-05-21 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package firefox-esr [ Reason ] Security update for Firefox. The same package has already reached bullseye. [ Impact ] See above [ Tests ] Usual smoke tests [ Risks ] See a

Re: chromium and rustc in bookworm

2024-01-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:39:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:55:31PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > >... > > b) Backport the profiler patch to bookworm's rustc, and do a s-p-u update to > > Bookworm's rustc. Since this adds a new feature, I don't view it as too > > risk

Bug#768395: unblock: iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1

2014-11-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:31:04AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > unblock iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1 > > Hello, > > I would like to NMU the attached changes to iceweasel. The curr

Please unblock iceweasel/10.0.6esr-1 ; and iceape pre-approval request

2012-07-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Iceweasel 10.0.6esr-1 is a security update for the upstream extended support branch. It also includes a few regression fixes and other (few) minor fixes. Please allow it in testing. I'm going to upload a corresponding security update of iceape to unstable, with the same changes, but I would l

Re: Please unblock iceweasel/10.0.6esr-1 ; and iceape pre-approval request

2012-07-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:30:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > Iceweasel 10.0.6esr-1 is a security update for the upstream extended support > branch. It also includes a few regression fixes and other (few) minor fixes. > Please allow it in testing. Iceweasel transiti

Re: Bug#682914: Iceweasel Fails to detect that accessibility is enabled on the Gnome 3 desktop

2012-07-26 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi release team, Would you allow this patch to go in, for the reasons outlined below? https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e95cb5b98154 On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27:51AM +1000, Jason White wrote: > Package: iceweasel > Version: 10.0.6esr-1 > Severity: normal > > Debian now uses the Gnome

Re: Bug#682914: Iceweasel Fails to detect that accessibility is enabled on the Gnome 3 desktop

2012-07-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:45:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi release team, > > Would you allow this patch to go in, for the reasons outlined below? > https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e95cb5b98154 Same patch would need to be applied to icedove and iceape, obviously. &

Bug#684460: unblock: iceape/2.7.6-1

2012-08-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape, as per https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01652.html and https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01620.html unblock iceape/2.7.6-1

Bug#684459: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.6esr-2

2012-08-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel as per https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01620.html unblock iceweasel/10.0.6esr-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT

Bug#684459: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.6esr-2

2012-08-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:49:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package iceweasel as per > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/

Bug#684460: unblock: iceape/2.7.6-1

2012-08-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:49:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package iceape, as per > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg0

Bug#686319: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1

2012-08-30 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.7esr-1 is a security/stability upstream update. It also fixes iceweasel-l10n-all version to have an epoch so that it has a greater version number than

Bug#686319: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1

2012-08-31 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 07:28:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Note one of the CVEs essentially disables webGL with mesa because of a > mesa bug that leads to security problems. Considering the mesa bug has been fixed in 8.0.4-2 and doesn't affect stable/stable-backports, I'm plan

Bug#686319: closed by Julien Cristau (Re: Bug#686319: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1)

2012-09-01 Thread Mike Hommey
19: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686319 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:16:52 +0200 > From: Julien Cristau > To: Mike Hommey , 686319-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#686319: un

Bug#686647: unblock: iceape/2.7.7-1

2012-09-04 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape This is a security and stability upstream update, the same as iceweasel 10.0.7esr-1. The one difference with iceweasel 10.0.7esr-1 is that this version of icea

Bug#688291: unblock: nspr/2:4.9.2-1

2012-09-21 Thread Mike Hommey
en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 51c11ad..d1085cf 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +nspr (2:4.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream release. + * debian/libnspr4.symbols: Add

Bug#688291: unblock: nspr/2:4.9.2-1

2012-09-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules > index 77021cf..9187c28 100755 > --- a/debian/rules > +++ b/debian/rules > @@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: $(PREPROCESS_FILES:.in=) >

Bug#771262: unblock: iceweasel/31.3.0esr-1

2014-11-27 Thread Mike Hommey
..f1f1617 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +iceweasel (31.3.0esr-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release. + + * debian/browser.mozconfig.in: Revert change from release 31.2.0esr-3, +because it made no difference. + + -- Mike Hommey Fri, 28

Bug#771262: unblock: iceweasel/31.3.0esr-1

2014-12-03 Thread Mike Hommey
tag 771262 - moreinfo thanks On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:18:09PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:46:34AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > There is going to be a (mostly) security update of iceweasel early next > > week

Bug#598223: unblock: iceape/2.0.8-1

2010-09-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape This version fixes a possible crash regression introduced in version 2.0.7, another minor regression (one-liner fix), and an irrelevant fix (only changes a fil

Bug#598224: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.13-1

2010-09-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel This version fixes a possible crash regression introduced in version 3.5.12, and another minor regression (one-liner fix). No Debian-specific changes. unbl

Possible update of libnss3

2010-09-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Upstream (nss) release 3.12.8 yesterday. Currently, what we have in the archive is 3.12.6 in testing and 3.12.7 in unstable. 3.12.7 has one known issue that is the main reason I kept it out of testing so far: #592315. There is a workaround patch upstream (mozilla) that I haven't applied (yet)

Re: Possible update of libnss3

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:06:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:37:24 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > We thus have several options: > > - apply the 3 mentioned changes to 3.12.6 and update through t-p-u. > > - apply the 3 mentioned changes and

Re: Bug#597864: libproxy0 not functional without libmozjs2d

2010-10-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:30:41AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/09/10 23:45, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le jeudi 23 septembre 2010 à 19:55 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a > > écrit : > >> That's not true. libproxy can autodetect the proxy configuration from > >> several > >> plac

Bug#600742: unblock: nss/3.12.8-1

2010-10-19 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nss Following 20101006164114.gy10...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr, let's now get libnss3 in testing. Thanks unblock nss/3.12.8-1 unblock nspr/4.8.6-1 -- System Informati

Bug#601738: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.15-1

2010-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 3.5.14-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 2 days, but there is a zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened in 3.5.15-1. This

Bug#601739: unblock: iceape/2.0.10-1

2010-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape 2.0.9-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 4 days, but there is a zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened in 2.0.10-1. This is

Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#602609: CVE-2010-4008: does not well process a malformed XPATH

2010-11-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:22:18PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Package: libxml2 > Version: 2.7.7.dfsg-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > it was discovered that libxml2 does not well process a malformed XPATH, > causing cra

Re: Pre-approval request for dpkg sync() changes for squeeze

2010-11-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:18:04AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I'm coming to this late. It sounds like dpkg has changed its behaviour > > several times recently. Please can you summarise dpkg's current and > > proposed use of fsync() vs sync(), an

Bug#606651: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.16-1

2010-12-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel The new version fixes various security issues. The diff between the previous upstream version and this one is quite big and probably hard to review, especia

Bug#606653: unblock: iceape/2.0.11-1

2010-12-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape Same as for iceweasel 3.5.16-1 (bug #606651), this is mostly a security fixes release. The additional iceape specific changes are only a few: - http://hg.mozil

Prospective last minute changes to iceweasel/iceape

2010-12-17 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes: - Remove the upgrade notification. It has too many caveats to be useful to our users at the moment. I plead guilty to not having cared about the issue. - Relax build d

Re: Prospective last minute changes to iceweasel/iceape

2010-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release > of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes: > - Remove the upgrade notification. It has too many caveats to be > useful t

Re: Prospective last minute changes to iceweasel/iceape

2010-12-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:06:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release > > of iceweasel and iceape with the following change

Bug#608100: unblock: libxml2/2.7.8.dfsg-2

2010-12-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libxml2 This release contains a security fix. unblock libxml2/2.7.8.dfsg-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'un

Re: sarge upgrade - linux, grub conflict

2006-04-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks > > For sarge updates of the linux kernels, grub needs to be updated before > linux-image*. Can this be forced by an conflict with older versions? A > dependency is not appropriate. Why does grub have t

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hej, The recently released mozilla 1.7.13 is supposed to be the last > release of the mozilla suite. > > http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/04/12/sunset-announcement-for-fxtb-10x-and-mozilla-sui

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:55:25AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > evolution -- The groupware suite The experimental package is built against xulrunner libraries. > libedataserver1.2-4 -- Utility library for evolution data servers > libedataserver1.2-dev -- Utility lib

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:37:40AM +, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:55:25 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > OK, I've tried to look up which packages would be broken by removing > > mozilla from testing. There are the locale packages (21) [1] and some > >

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:29:58PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > > I'm busy fixing stuff in xulrunner packaging right now, but it's on my > > TODO list to go

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

2006-04-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:41:12PM -0400, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > It cannot be done immediately, as a couple of packages[1] (openoffice[2], > > ...) link against mozilla libraries (libnspr4, libnss3) but I think it > > should be a release goal, shouldn't i

Re: gcc 4.1 or not

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > Hi, > > hi, > > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team > > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for e

Re: mozilla security bugs, NMU?

2006-06-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:58:15PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This bug is open for almost two months. As Mozilla version 1.7.13 fixes > several security bugs, please package it. If you don't have time, can I > NMU it? Please do. Nobody cares enough for mozill

Please hint xulrunner

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built on arm, which seem to be not likely to happen soonish :( Could you hint xulrunner in, despite arm not being built yet ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: Please hint xulrunner

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]: > > Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built > > on arm, which seem to be not likely to happen soonish

Re: Please hint xulrunner

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:27:56PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]: > > > Important security fixes for te

Re: Please hint xulrunner

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:02:53AM -0500, Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have physical ownership of leisner.debian.org (armel), though I'm not > a DD and not the buildd admin. Is there something I can do to restart > the build? Top says that leisner is idling. As a DD, I have acc

Re: Please hint xulrunner

2006-07-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:27:19AM +0900, Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:27:56 +0200, > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > *

Re: RFC on gnome-python-extras circular build-dep

2006-07-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:49:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed yesterday on IRC, there's a problem with the circular > build-deps of gnome-python-extras. gnome-python-extras build-deps on > python-gnome2-dev which depends on python-gnome2 which

Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc

2006-07-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:06:49PM +, Marc Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (...) > Etch will carry 4.0 as version number. Just out of curiosity, what is the rationale behind the major version change ? > (...) > And these release goals currently: > - - LSB 3.1 compatibility > - - SE

Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc

2006-07-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > It's not even RC at all, just a badly configured buildd. They should > > be using linux32. > > No, it is configured correctly. The buildd pro

Re: release update: Etch 4.0, Blockers and Goals, Arch status, kernel 2.4, etc

2006-07-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:39:37PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Martin Michlmay

Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

2006-08-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:49:32AM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:46:09PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > > > On Aug 08, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> We Do Not Distribute

Please hint mozilla-cascades for removal from testing

2006-08-21 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi RMs, As mozilla is planned to be removed before release of etch, cascades (source package: mozilla-cascades), which depends only on it, becomes useless. I could ask for its full removal by the ftp-masters, but, as seamonkey should replace mozilla some day in the future, cascades will switch to

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:43:56PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well xulrunner seems to have an issue with javac based on this last part > of the build log: Waw, I must say I'm impressed that for once in a while it doesn't abort ld because it takes too much time to do its

<    1   2   3   4   >