ort for spellchecking for Dutch. They are also generated
>> differently upstream, so reviewing the changes between the 2
>> versions isn't easy.
>>
>> Please consider appoving a new version of the source package
>> dutch for testing.
>
> Can someone eit
On 11/30/2010 06:49 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 16/11/2010 22:06, Jari Aalto wrote:
>>
>> Hello Release Team,
>>
>> Please consider latest 6tunnel for inclusion:
>>
>
> Can you please prepare an upload to t-p-u? (See below).
>
FTR, I uploaded it t
y in the package (as it was done before) (Closes: #603456)
>* Set urgency to medium due to rc bug fix
>
This can't migrate directly since it depends on a recent version of nagios3.
Can you re-upload in t-p-u please?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UN
;
> Well the reason I ask is the dependency is actually missing in the
> new version... Please put it back.
>
Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get this
finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dog
On 12/12/2010 03:59 AM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get
>> this finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU?
>
> My package has been up at mentors.debian.ne
why
we are quite reluctant to your change in -8.
> Take 2-7 which has no RC-relevant bug or use 2-8 from mentors if you
> prefer that. At this point, I'm strictly against anything else.
There's always a third alternative…
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
/pool/main/p/postgrey/postgrey_1.32.orig.tar.gz
doesn't match postgrey_1.32-6.dsc.
[…]
[dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source: error: File
./postgrey_1.32.orig.tar.gz has size 35486 instead of expected 34653
Can you please check again and re-upload?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://do
t; Clytie Siddall
>> Vietnamese Free-Software Translation Team
>
> I am sorry, I did not see that there was a pending translation in the
> BTS when I uploaded the NMU fixing #601161.
>
> Release Team, is it OK if I upload a new NMU including the translation?
>
Yes.
Regards,
On 13/12/2010 12:48, Luca Capello wrote:
Hi there!
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:11:13 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:49 AM, Luca Capello wrote:
Release Team, is it OK if I upload a new NMU including the translation?
Yes.
Thank you, uploaded to DELAYED/0:
Unblocked (and aged a
-host | host,
libopenssl-ruby1.8 | libopenssl-ruby1.9
Why does it depend on "libopenssl-ruby1.8 | libopenssl-ruby1.9" when it
has a
strong dependency on ruby1.8? I tend to think that putting
"libopenssl-ruby1.9"
as an alternative dependency is wrong in this case. (icbw
nt.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101215131140.ga26...@dogguy.org
On 12/15/2010 02:48 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
Uploaded and accepted[1].
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
l_c.h in testing's version
and compared it to unstable's version?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d09cc9a.9020...@dogguy.org
sd-amd64
> now
> because it just isn't picked up. And if it's now built we run into the neon27
> shlibs issue...
>
Yes, neon27 is being dealt with… we will in a few days…
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-releas
but I am happy to
fix them in an upload, if you would prefer?
Go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d136300.1070...@dogguy.org
because they
don't work with current Emboss from Squeeze.
So, Squeeze's emboss is not supported upstream (as you said) and is left
without embassy-* packages. Does it make sense to you to drop emboss from
Squeeze too? It looks like the best option we have, imho.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
On 23/12/2010 16:52, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Unfortunately, we are not able to accept them in Squeeze. We are left
with emboss only in Squeeze now. Embassy-* packages were removed
because they don't work with current Emboss
still shipping the old lyrics (twice now, since it's
>> both in the upstream source and the debian patch) so that's not fixed.
>
> Well, I agree. What do you suggest? Upload a new revision without that
> patch?
>
re-package?
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
On 12/12/2010 03:15 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 12/12/2010 02:24 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Take 2-7 which has no RC-relevant bug or use 2-8 from mentors if you
>> prefer that. At this point, I'm strictly against anything else.
>
> There's always a third alternat
less to
care about). Now, I've prepared an NMU based on Squeeze's version.
One remark before you read the diff: 50_graphdir.sh was removed in
favour of 70_cve-2010-3764.sh which contains the whole patch to fix the
security issue.
I'll wait for your comments before uploading.
Regards,
--
M
On 12/26/2010 02:02 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> On Sonntag, 26. Dezember 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> I'll wait for your comments before uploading.
>
> did you include the fix for 604230/602738? (which is in the sid version)
>
Yes. (first hun
ipt 2010-07-04 07:49:00.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+
+echo
+echo "Gathering system configuration viai `wodim -checkdrive` (please
wait)..."
+/usr/bin/wodim -checkdrive >&3 2>%3
I guess you meant "2>&3" at the end?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
On 12/28/2010 08:00 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On antradienis 28 Gruodis 2010 12:34:40 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> +++ k3b-2.0.1/debian/k3b.bug-script 2010-07-04 07:49:00.0 +
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh -e
>> +
>> +echo
>&g
On 12/26/2010 01:22 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> I'll wait for your comments before uploading.
>
FTR, I've uploaded Bugzilla to testing-proposed-updates.
(debdiff is attached, fixed an issue found by Julien).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
diff -N
upload as well.
>
Well, no. Both bugs are found in testing's version. So, there is no
reason to wait for. So, Please get the reportbug script fixed, include the
patch for #587996 and upload. We will see for #607950 later.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNS
that it has migrated while I was writing
this mail :)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1bb23b.4040...@dogguy.org
On 12/29/2010 08:39 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> It looks ok (from the bug log) but I'd like to see a debdiff
>> first.
>
> I attached a proposed diff which is in principle a
>
> sed -i 's/14/13/
re-send to the correct address…
On 12/30/2010 12:45 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 12/30/2010 10:44 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Since this is AFAIUI the (only) issue why the package has been
>> removed from squeeze, would the RT please consider an unblock of
>> dovecot-an
to 8 and rewrites debian/rules.
I'm considering removing this package from Squeeze. It has no reverse
dependencies and has low popcon.
Please fix #608376 by uploading to testing-proposed-updates, using
Luca's patch, as soon as possible. I'll add a removal hint on Sunday if
it'
,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1e0eec.7060...@dogguy.org
Hi,
Armhf and s390x are part of testing since ~2 weeks (see [1]). Could you
please update the architectures list for Wheezy on edos.debian.net to
reflect that change? It would help us to track evolution of
installability counts for Wheezy on those architectures over time.
[1]
http://anonscm.debi
On 06/02/12 23:21, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 22:14, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I'm pretty sure something like that was done for python. I don't
think perl breaks source level compatibility to anywhere near the
same extent (could be wrong, though).
http://wiki.debian.org/PHP/54Transit
On 16/02/11 16:58, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
Thanks. I'll follow those steps. I'll contact -release later.
FWIW, libcegui-mk2-1 is no longer in testing. The transition is finished.
Next time, please file a "transition" bugreport against the
pseudo-package "release.debian.org" to have a transi
On 04/04/12 13:42, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
removed from unstable). The package will be maintained in experimental.
Removal hint added.
Kind regards,
--
Mehdi
On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is gone
from testing. In this case, that appears to be iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1
(see below).
My removal hint takes care of removing iceowl-l10n too, fwiw.
(It doesn't make sense to keep iceowl-l
On 04/04/12 14:15, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is
gone from testing. In this case, that appears to be
iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1 (see below).
My removal hint takes care of removing iceowl-l10n too, fwiw
; and for most of them in version 10.0.3esr-3.
>
> Yes. iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 started building the iceweasel-l10n-all
> binary package.
No, 10.0~b6-1 did. (afaik)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
ent patches to fix ekiga FTBFS and NMUed it in delayed/2.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7d78f4.2090...@debian.org
On 05/04/12 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
Allegedly, there is way to ask Ben only to match exact package names.
Unfortunately, I forgot the syntax, so for now, I used:
.depends ~ /libapt-pkg4.10|libapt-inst1.2|libept1(\s|\z|\()/
.depends ~ "libapt-pkg4.10" | .depends ~ "libapt-inst1.2" | .de
that we have a better
picture of the transition.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f808ecd.7000...@dogguy.org
On 06/04/12 16:16, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
I regularly check
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a
great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio,
-openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390
On 04/14/2012 07:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> I would like to remove python2.6 for the wheezy release
Since python2.6 was the default python interpreter in Squeeze, shouldn't
we keep it in Wheezy and remove it from Wheezy+1? (as we did with python2.5)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
[ Dropped CC to -release and replaced it by 667...@bugs.debian.org ]
On 16/04/12 11:26, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Hi,
As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be
added to allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related
packages:
easy octave-communications/1.1.0-2 octa
On 04/27/2012 11:12 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
>>> what's the status of the exiv2 transition? It would really be
>>> nice to have exiv2 0.22 in wheezy.
>>
>
> We don't know yet (tbh). The transition page indicates th
the failure
seems not related to exiv2). Do you have news on that?
HTH,
On 04/27/2012 09:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/exiv2.html says not
> started.
>
- or no binNMUs were scheduled
- or everything is broken and still using the old library
-
ing for release
architectures. It has been done for security already.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists
On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
Should we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there?
auto-signing makes things less a PIT
On 15/05/12 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:51 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
On 18/05/12 22:31, Andreas Barth wrote:
mips porterbox: We currently have gabrielli, but as noted above it
sometimes isn't as stable as it should.
fwiw, weasel mentioned that gabrielli has currently disk issues too.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
t is really needed to
fix/remove/age.
I’m worried that B would make the large transition happen after the
freeze.
We were already worried when the transition started without
coordination.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ..
k-util,
haskell-happstack-state, haskell-happstack-ixset, haskell-happstack-data.
Unless I am mistaken these can be removed together with the new packages
coming in.
Yes.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
hers) that were removed from unstable, and
preventing their removal from testing.
I'm still investigating the rest…
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Thanks for this work, Jerome!
On 06/13/2012 09:57 AM, Jerome Vouillon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> IOW, remove the following list?
>>
>> haskell-cryptocipher haskell-clientsession haskell-cprng-aes
>> haskell-tl
On 13/06/2012 18:13, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
Joachim, how this sounds to you?
for details see the reply to Jerome; but all in all: ACK
ok, thanks. I've enabled my hint (with a minor update) and it should be
proc
ixes (that do not require rebuilding the
Haskell world).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.de
packages). I've tagged this bug accordingly. But if you feel that there
is an important (very important) fix that we should have in wheezy,
please let us know.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.o
ickly :)
I've generated the ben trackers:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gtkhtml4.0.html
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/evolution3.4.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
bian.org/r/refpolicy.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe06aa7.4030...@dogguy.org
lution 3.4
> ~
> [dep wait on evolution-dev (>= 3.4)]
>
> tracker
> evolution-webcal
> mail-notification
>
done. (note that tracker is affected by a grave bug #666176. While
this should not block the transition (because if affects testing
versions too), it has
time to do a transition? Did you test them?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe18ce4.4080...@debian.org
into testing before
the release?
fso-gsmd seems to depend on libfsotransport and libgsm0710mux. So I
guess it will need to be rebuilt too.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Unfortunately, we never require that our users upgrade to the latest
> point release before upgrading to stable+1.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#system-status
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤ
open this
transition bug...
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe56dfb.6010...@dogguy.org
ed together omitting bug fixing
> releases. It's possible for users to use libraries of our stack in
> other programs but they have to live with the fact that there is no
> stable ABI yet.
>
> I hope that helps to take your decision. If you need any more
> information pl
On 20/06/2012 13:20, Yavor Doganov wrote:
No, but I'm going to do it now.
Any news?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe9e1a7.
to
1.8 in Wheezy would not buy us more than a year. AFAIK, the security
team didn't raise any concerns about this package in the past. Are there
any other concerns with the 1.6.8 release besides the security aspect?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On 26/06/2012 20:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with NSInvalidArgumentException
textedit.app: Cannot create new documents or open existing text files
and are they fixable?
Besides, do we have a fix for #663388?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 27/06/2012 17:40, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 26/06/2012 20:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
gnustep-dl2: DBModeler aborts on startup with
NSInvalidArgumentException textedit.app: Cannot create new
documents or open existing text files
and are they fixable?
As I'
gards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fec5503.3080...@dogguy.org
$ git submodule update --init
For your convenience, I've added a small paragraph about
britney-tests-live-data.git in the README file in britney2-tests.git
If we find this useful, we can replace the current britney-tests.git
with britney2-tests.git.
Comments are welcome.
Best,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
On 07/01/2012 01:26 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Would warsow (and warsow-data) qualify for a freeze exception?
No. It is far too late now.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
e release.debian.org. It makes the work a little easier for
us and prevent us fron "missing" any request. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
loses:
> 637850 * Add German translation in desktop file. Closes: 640230 *
> Add Category "Game" in desktop file. Closes: 652616 * Provide
> infrastructure to i18n the man page. Closes: 640232 * Add german
> translation of man page. Closes: 640244
>
Unblocked. Thanks for
ckage has hit the archive.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff5a9be.1060...@dogguy.org
I've tested it works on i386 amd64 and
armel, so the buildds should build the whole lot soon.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
nable. Please go ahead with the
upload and get back to us once the package hits the archive.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On 05/07/12 08:51, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
Hi,
Axel Beckert uploaded a fix for the following bugs in aiccu:
Bug#667755: FTBFS[kfreebsd] (serious)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667755
Bug#670971: Danish translation
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
notes to help you in
getting a decision.
In order to make a decision, could you please send us a debdiff between
1:2.7.1-2 and what you want to upload to unstable?
Cheers.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
ndkim
upstream) and the former author recommends opendkim instead in all cases.
We should not release Wheezy with this package.
Shouln't this package to be removed from the archive then? IOW, Why
should we keep it in Unstable?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org
_need_ to stay in sync apart the fact that upstream wants
that? are there any checks performed?
Please see the attached debdiff for the proposed changes.
The debdiffs look okay.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
reassign ftp.debian.org
retitle 680005 RoM: src:dkim-milter; superceded by opendkim
thanks
On 06/07/12 13:57, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Yes. It should be removed entirely. I guess I was a bit over
focused.
Ok, doing so.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To
On 04/07/12 17:53, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Would it be OK to upload the newer version to Unstable in order for it
to get into Wheezy?
*sigh* yes.
(Please note the correct contact address).
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
On 05/07/12 21:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
Let me know if there's any more questions you have.
Could you please send us a debdiff between 2.2.2 and the one you want to
upload?
Best,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
heezy.
How this package got tested before the initial upload? There are only a
few days delay between the _two_ uploads.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 06/07/12 15:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
I'm requesting a freeze exception for 3.25+dfsg1-1 of isdnutils
Did you upload it?
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 06/07/12 16:12, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Mehdi,
thank you for the quick reply.
On 06.07.2012 21:32, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 06/07/12 15:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
I'm requesting a freeze exception for 3.25+dfsg1-1 of isdnutils
Did you upload it?
Not yet. I wanted to hear first if it&#x
On 07/06/2012 11:33 PM, peter green wrote:
> I just uploaded a new fpc package to the repositry, there are no
> code changes but there are a couple of fixes to packaging issues that
> I'd like to see in the release.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy
ignoring cruft: 212 files changed, 2842 insertions(+), 2017
deletions(-)
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff
On 06/07/12 14:19, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/07/12 17:53, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Would it be OK to upload the newer version to Unstable in order for it
to get into Wheezy?
FTR, the package has land in unstable and I've added an unblock hint.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674386#10
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ffd6fa0.9030...@dogguy.org
On 11/07/12 16:01, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguy
wrote:
Hi,
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately,
we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable
since the changes are quite large.
I think you mean 1:3.5.3
ere dropped by then).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ffda8df.4080...@dogguy.org
.
gb mono_2.10.8.1-5 . sparc
Given back.
Wanna-build requests should be addressed to the debian-wb-team
mailing-list though, and CC'ing $a...@buildd.debian.org
(CC'ing the former to let them know about the give-back)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNS
On 07/13/2012 02:29 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> llvm-3.0 (3.0-10) unstable; urgency=low
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On 13/07/12 19:29, Noël Köthe wrote:
Hello Mehdi,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.07.2012, 13:59 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
We would like to 634538 fixed for Wheezy. Unfortunately, the
changes brought by tcpreplay/3.4.4-1 are quite large [1] and we are
not able to unblock the package for Wheezy. Would
in a
releasable shape before the freeze. So the answer is obiously: no, sorry.
On the bright side, Wheezy users could use the fixed packages if you
upload them to wheezy-backports. Feel free to upload the fixed packages
to unstable but we won't unblock them.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الد
this update: Why do they
_need_ to stay in sync apart the fact that upstream wants that? are
there any checks performed?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Le 2013-04-05 19:12, Andreas Tille a écrit :
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/scotch.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/format-security.patch
Should I include this or not?
not.
Otherwise I can confirm that I
separated
the bug-fix-only part
Le 2013-11-24 11:02, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
retitle 718767 transition: ocaml 4.01.0
thanks
Le 05/08/2013 10:43, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them
have been fixed i
Le 2014-03-27 20:08, Niels Thykier a écrit :
I noticed that the fix for gtkmathview is sadly incomplete (see
#638761). AFAICT lablgtkmathview does not have an (open) RC bug for
this problem. I hace CC'ed the OCAML maintainers to make them aware
of
it - but I would like to see an RC bug agains
701 - 800 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
