On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:06:42AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux version 4.8.7-1 to unstable over this weekend.
>
> Aside from the upstream stable updates, the currently pending changes
> are:
> * debian/control: Fix build-dependency on openssl to work with new
> ver
t enabling any of the new options?
other thoughts?
Thanks
[1]: yes, probably the options have been added ages ago but I never had
time to rebuild the package...
commit 1c098d8e81b5f2735e381b3977119861f402f7bd
Author: Mattia Dongili
Date: Thu Jan 27 07:10:27 2011 +0900
Update to latest ker
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:42:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 20:23:46 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> > index 51314d6..c853b3c 100644
> > --- a/debian/changelog
> > +++ b/deb
lease unblock.
Thanks!
Full diff is:
commit d3fc4a3f04f67bae4d1fc4f904f35b26554f54b1
Author: Mattia Dongili
Date: Thu Jan 27 07:10:27 2011 +0900
Update to latest kernel config available for squeeze
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili
diff --git a/config.amd64 b/config.amd64
index 6f
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:14:23PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
...
> While testing user-mode-linux I figured that rootstrap is shipping with
> a default configuration that points to squeeze... I'm embarassed, these
^^^
In fact I meant L
/changelog
===
--- trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 331)
+++ trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 334)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+rootstrap (0.3.24-6) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * use the stable release in the default rootstrap.conf
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Sat, 29 Jan 201
cpufreq to honour blacklisted modules
+(closes: #592488).
+ * Load powernow-k8 for AMD family 20 (i.e. AMD E-350 cpus)
+(closes: #627811).
+ * Stop changing printk levels when loading cpufreq modules (closes: #624575
+and closes: #596235).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:1
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:33:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 07:52 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I'm wondering if it's worth updating cpufrequtils in Squeeze to the
> > current version in testing/unstable.
> > There are a couple of fixe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:09:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 06:50 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:33:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 07:52 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > > &
from Stefan Bühler (Closes: #509355).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:01:17 +0900
+
cpufreqd (2.3.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
* backport a patch from upstream repository fixing
diff --git a/debian/patches/03_two_batteries_segfault_fix.patch
b/debian/patches
[d-boot probably not interested in this subtopic]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:48:20PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
> plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26
> before final ack on that re
Hi,
from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
cpufreqd has a grave bug filed (#484467) for the broken ACPI battery
level support.
I (with the cpufreqd upstream hat on) released a new cpufreqd (2.3.0)
that reads from sysfs ra
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:38:49PM +0200, Matthias Rieber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> are there any plans to update the skas patch to be usable in lenny? The
> current patch seems to be still the old one for etch (2.6.18).
>
> I've used the lenny kernel 2.6.22 with
> http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/skas-2.6.2
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:59:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
>> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
>>
>> cpufreqd has a grave bug f
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:59:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> from the debian linux-2.6 svn repository it looks like
>> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is not going to be set for 2.6.26.
>>
>> cpufreqd has a grave bug f
Hello,
the linux-image-* and linux-source packages just made it into testing,
could please allow user-mode-linux as well (it depends on linux-source
to build).
There will be at least another upload of user-mode-linux in the next
days to synchronize with the current linux-source and to fix a coupl
+ACPI thermal zone reported as "acpitz" in /sys (Closes: #497083).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:57:22 +0900
+
cpufreqd (2.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 31c83ea..43c5c66 100
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Mattia Dongili [Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:46:13 +0900]:
...
> > Please allow cpufreqd 2.3.3-2 to enter Lenny.
>
> Unblocked.
Please, could you unblock it one more time? 2.3.3-3 this time though.
The diff from previo
Hello,
I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
is included below).
There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues.
One of the 3 leaks (even if never reported before) can become pretty
annoying
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
> > fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
On 5/23/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > A snippet from changes file
> > ,---
> > | Closes: 310147 310149
> > | Changes:
> >
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:20:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
[...]
> > A snippet from changes file
> > ,---
> > | Closes: 310147 310149
> > | Changes:
> > | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
> > | .
> > |* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>Well, let me know when libsysfs2
> actually hits unstable then...
cpufrequtils needs to rebuild to link against libsysfs2 (now in
unstable).
Can someone schedule an binNMU for it?
z to latest linux-source.
+ * Set new kernel options:
+ SECURITY_APPARMOR_COMPAT_24=y
+ NET_SCH_CODEL=m
+ FQ_CODEL=m
+ * Bump version number to upload as a proper foreign package.
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:11:32 +0900
+
user-mode-linux (3.2-1um-1) unstable; urgency=low
Package: release.debian.org
Hi Release Managers,
Actually I have to blame myself for not checking the status of acpidump
build logs.
Anyway, long story short, I fixed a FTBFS on ia64 that prevented
acpidump_20100513 to migrate to squeeze since April and the version
currently in the next release is
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:46:38PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> Hi Release Managers,
> Actually I have to blame myself for not checking the status of acpidump
> build logs.
> Anyway, long story short, I fixed a FTBFS on ia64 that prevented
>
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:51:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 20:27:06 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64)
> > + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump madt
> > + MANPAGES = acpixtract madt
> > +else
> >
retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3
thanks
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > > madt was also removed from upstream's toplevel makefile since the
> >
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:22:30PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >
Hello,
It seems the package needs to be manually requeued (afaiu) on m68k (I
erroneously dropped m68k in the Architecture field in 0.14.4-4).
Can anybody help?
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:06:38AM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
[...]
> *sigh* That would've been the best solution.
>
> I'd say this is ok, however, please watch security updates as the security
> team will probably forget to update apache2-mpm-itk when apache2 has been
> updated. (->Murphy)
Ehrm
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:09:37PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:06:38AM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > [...]
> > > *sigh* That would've been the best solution.
> > >
> > > I'd say this
Hello,
the reason I'm asking for that is #400580. Basically newer cpufreqd
shipped with a default configuration using the "ondemand" governor which
unfortunatly is now available on every platform (powerpc is affected in
the bug).
The -2 revision of the package simply goes back using only
powersav
Hello,
aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS
due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned
accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153.
Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package
build-depending on iasl is qemu
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
...
> > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
>
> The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing -
> convention would be
ufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2013-03-23 21:51:28.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cpufreqd (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix reading the correct battery attribute
+(Closes: #619913 and Closes: #644567).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:42:31 +0900
+
cpufreqd (2.4.2-1) uns
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cpufreqd
Message-ID: <1364160589.24071.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > c
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:06:35PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 27.03.2013 13:44, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >Mattia Dongili writes:
> >>yes it is, that's what Al did already:
> >>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/acpica-unix_20130214-0.3.html
> >I see.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
...
> Can we just ignore this bug for wheezy? To me, the licensing intention
> seems very clear.
Can it be closed even? I don't think this bug applies at all.
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@
39 matches
Mail list logo
