Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Andreas Beckmann
Please unblock python2.7/2.7.18-8, just adding some breaks for smoother upgrades
as requested in #990520. No code changes. The debdiff is in the bug report.
-2021-2388: Enhance compiler validation.
- JDK-8264079: Improve abstractions.
- JDK-8264460: Improve NTLM support.
* Encode the early-access status into the package version. LP: #1934895.
-- Matthias Klose Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:03:54 +0200
openjdk-11 (11.0.12+6-1) unstable; urgency
=high
* OpenJDK 17 snapshot, build 33.
* Regenerate the control file.
-- Matthias Klose Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:48:42 +0200
openjdk-17 (17~32ea-1) unstable; urgency=high
* OpenJDK 17 snapshot, build 32.
* Security fixes:
- JDK-8256157: Improve bytecode assembly.
- JDK-8256491: Better
On 4/7/21 4:12 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 2021-04-07 18:26:47, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package binutils-mipsen/7+c2
>>
>>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock cross-toolchain-base-ports/45, same rationale as given for
cross-toolchain-base in #985363
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock gcc-9-cross and gcc-9-cross-ports, no-change rebuilds using the
gcc-9 version as found in bullseye.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock what-is-python.
* Update package descriptions for the Debian 11 (bullseye) release.
* Bump package versions and provides.
* Provide pdb symlinks in the -dev packages.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock python3-defaults/3.9.2-3.
* Ship index.html to unbreak links in python-policy.html. Closes: #985313.
* Don't ship html policy links in the python3.9 doc directory.
Cl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python2.7. No code changes, just adding a breaks for
upgrades, see #987661 for the issue and the diff for the fix.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock the openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 packages. For openjdk-11, it's the
quaterly security release, and for openjdk-17 it's the next snapshot made after
including the security fixes m
On 5/5/21 8:51 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:29:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>>> And then all the packages currently depending on libdb5.3 will need to
>>> implement, or at least document, a transition stra
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Update libffi to version 3.4.2. The transition was done for Ubuntu, a handful
of bugs regarding build failures (mostly due to GCC 11) are filed in Debian. I
would like to get this done b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
please binNMU packages for the (non-blocking) libgphobos transition, triggered
by the GCC defaults change (dub and cheesecutter are ftbfs, bug reports are
already filed):
Reverse Depends
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please setup a tracker to add python3.10 as a supported python3 version. This is
non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
starting this, just want to hav
I'm planning to upload python3-defaults later tonight, adding 3.10 as a
supported Python version. Packages are able to migrate on their own, there are
no blockages introduced on other transitions.
We have most packages ready to build for 3.10, and around 70 leaf packages still
needing some work.
On 11/18/21 06:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 11/16/21 14:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I'm planning to upload python3-defaults later tonight, adding 3.10 as a
>> supported Python version. Packages are able to migrate on their own, there
>> are
>>
On 2/10/22 11:26, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:59:00PM +0100 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
>> Hi Holger,
>>
>>> and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be
>>> supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's
>>
>> no, 11 i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Please setup a transition window for python 3.10 as the default python3 version.
A tracker is setup at
https://release.debian.org/transit
On 13.03.22 21:59, M. Zhou wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
This involves an upstream source name change (from tbb to onetbb),
as well as SOVERSION bump (from 2 to 12), along with a major API
c
On 18.03.22 17:38, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:42 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote:
FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that.
Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu r
.
- Emit a proper error when users try to use venv
without having it installed.
- Documentation and lintian cleanups.
python3.11 (3.11.2-6) unstable; urgency=high
[ Stefano Rivera ]
* Explain more ways to pass --break-system-packages to pip.
[ Matthias Klose ]
* Fix syntax error in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4. That's the quarterly security update and
should be released with buster. No more updates planned until the next security
update in July.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock: gcc-7/7.4.0-9, some packaging and upstream backports to around
the state of the GCC 9.1 release. If we ship gcc-7, please consider shipping -9
instead of -6.
The removal of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock gcc-8/8.3.0-7 and updated cross builds.
This includes upstream backports to around the date of the GCC 9.1 release.
this includes
gcc-8/8.3.0-7
gcc-8-cross/28
gcc-8-cross-p
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
On 02.05.19 10:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:12:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: nor
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 02.05.19 10:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:12:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian...
On 11.05.19 18:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi doko,
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:23:15 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock the three cross-toolchain-base* packages, rebuilt using glibc
2.28-10, which was already accepted for testing.
cross-toolchain-base 35
cross-toolchain-base-ports 29
cross-too
On 29.05.19 00:23, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
>
> I'm not on the release team and cannot authorize a TPU.
>
>
> As an interested bystander I'd ask that you make sure any TPU contains a
> fix for the serious accessibility issue in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On 12.06.19 20:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 12-06-2019 10:33, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> I talked to Matthias on IRC yesterday, he was ok with the +really
>> version in unstable only as a testbed for a tpu upload with a sane version.
>
> Can you explain why, please?
because we had
On 12.06.19 00:37, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:46:41PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>> I am not a member of the OpenJDK team and contributed far less to the
>> JDK 8 -> 11 transition than Emmanuel has. If he and Matthias are in
>> agreement and the plan is palatable to the
On 19.06.19 22:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 18-06-2019 22:14, tony mancill wrote:
>> Things are looking good so far with 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7 in unstable,
>> and so I would like to prepare the t-p-u upload. At the moment, the
>> version I have is 11.0.3+7-5, since that would have b
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 09.06.19 21:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 20:32:48 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> please unblock the three cross-toolchain-base* packages, rebuilt using glibc
>> 2.28-10, whi
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: reopen -1
On 20.06.19 13:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
> Control: close -1
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 06-06-2019 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:> doko, I know you are
> maintaining quite some key packages, so extra work> is probably not what
> you a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10
naev 0.7.0-2
tulip 4.8.0dfsg-2
wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
> No binary maintainer uploads for bullseye
> =
>
> The release of buster also means the bullseye release cycle is about to begin.
> From now on, we will no longer allow binaries uploaded by maintainers to
> migrate to testing. This means that you will need
On 09.07.19 00:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> The Debian Python teams are working to push early for reduction/removal
> of our python(2) packages with the goal of releasing bullse
On 09.07.19 00:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Ben file:
>
> title = "python-defaults";
> is_affected = .depends ~
> /python|python-minimal|python-dev|libpython-dev|libpython-stdlib|python-doc|python-dbg|libpython-dbg|python-all|python-all-dev|python-all-dbg|libpython-all-dev|libpython-all-dbg|pytho
On 15.07.19 16:36, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 08-07-2019 14:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
>>
>> boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10
>> naev 0.7.0-2
>> tulip 4.8.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please setup a tracker to add python3.11 as a supported python3 version. This is
non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
starting this, just want to ha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Please setup a transition window for python 3.11 as the default python3 version.
A tracker is setup at
https://release.debian.org/transitio
while we have not an 100% agreement to go ahead, I think we should aim for 3.11.
The following steps would be:
- accept the current python3-defaults into
testing (adding 3.11 as supported)
- ask for a transition slot to upload (see #1026825)
python3-defaults with 3.11 as the default
- s
On 26.07.19 20:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 08:45:38AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> readline is in experimental for some time, the changes are API compatible,
>> and
>> afaics there are no build failures cause
GCC 9 was released earlier this year, it is now available in Debian
testing/unstable. I am planning to do the defaults change in mid August, around
the time of the expected first GCC 9 point release (9.2.0).
There are only soname changes for rather unused shared libraries (libgo)
involved, and the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
naev 0.7.0-2
wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
On 17.08.19 15:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
>
> naev 0.7.0-2
> wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
looking-glass 0+b1-1
is needed too.
On 20.08.19 15:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> On 2019-07-20 12:46, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The mips architecture, supporting 32-bit big-endian MIPS CPUs, has
>> been supported in Debian for more than 15 years. Due to the limited 2GB
>> virtual address space and
On 09.07.19 17:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 09.07.19 00:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
could somebody fix the py2-removal tracker again? replacing the terminating \b
chars with \s (4 times)? currently it matches all python-* (python-gi-dev,
python-*-doc, ...) I think we are better with a smal
On 23.08.19 17:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We now have a version of linux (5.2.9-2) that builds on all release
> architectures and doesn't seem to cause build regressions for other
> packages. I think that this should migrate to testing soon, as the
> version in testing is missing important securit
On 21.08.19 21:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 09.07.19 17:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 09.07.19 00:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> could somebody fix the py2-removal tracker again? replacing the terminating \b
> chars with \s (4 times)? currently it matches all pytho
On 31.08.19 16:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
- gcc-9
- gcc-snapshot
I'll take care of these with regular uploads.
Hi,
I will stop building the mipsel and mips64el cross packages from the binutils,
gcc-8-cross, gcc-9-cross, gcc-defaults, cross-toolchain-base packages. There is
infrastructure to build these cross compilers from the binutils-mipsen,
gcc-8-cross-mipsen, gcc-9-cross-mipsen, gcc-defaults-mipse
On 05.09.19 11:41, YunQiang Su wrote:
Matthias Klose 于2019年9月4日周三 下午1:46写道：
Hi,
I will stop building the mipsel and mips64el cross packages from the binutils,
gcc-8-cross, gcc-9-cross, gcc-defaults, cross-toolchain-base packages. There is
Thank you for your great work on cross toolchains
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
naev 0.7.0-2
wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
looking-glass 0+b1-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU these packages for the recent isl upload to unstable:
that only affects various gcc packages. the native and cross compilers are
uploaded, the -mipsen packages are in unstabl
On 27.09.19 12:48, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
It looks like it is already fixed upstream:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=273174
So please backport that change to the Debian package.
The Debian MIPS maintainers should get this backported upstream, then it get's
updated in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU these packages for the binutils 2.33 upload to unstable:
naev 0.7.0-2
wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
looking-glass 0+b1-1
kcov 36+dfsg-1
also, binutils-mingw64 might need a so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please setup a tracker to add python3.8 as a supported python3 version. This is
non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
starting this, just want to h
On 25.10.19 18:09, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
no. based on what rationale?
And to prevent said gcc-9 version from migrating, to not break something
else (no idea wh
On 11.10.19 18:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On 10-10-2019 15:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please setup a tracker to add python3.8 as a supported python3 version.
This is non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built.
I'm not yet starting this, just want to have an ove
On 26.10.19 22:09, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
What should be done with modules where Python 3.8 compatibility requires moving
to a new upstream release that doesn't support Python 2, but the Python 2
package still has dependencies (so can't be removed yet under existing rules)?
- Split them into
On 28.10.19 22:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
Dear all,
The visible progress on this bug report stopped several days ago. I'd
like to try an get it a bit further. I'm expecting frustration on all
sides,
yes, and side note that I will use the same terms of "several days ago" for a
three day silence in
On 29.10.19 15:09, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2019-10-29 13:09:46 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote:
Am 29. Oktober 2019 12:49:44 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre :
In case makefile magic triggers some rebuild, you can also run the
generated executable directly (with the right environment varia
15:33, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote:
Hi,
Am 31. Oktober 2019 15:15:10 MEZ schrieb Matthias Klose :
And afaik there was no test rebuild for
bullseye
either.
Accepted cppunit 1.14.0-4 (source) into unstable
On July 26:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1049803/accepted-cppunit-1140-4-source-into
This weekend, I am planning to upload python3-defaults, adding python3.8 as a
supported Python3 version. This may introduce some churn in unstable until the
basic binNMUs are available as well.
Details for the addition can be found at [1], known issues and patches are filed
[2]. There was no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
britney doesn't run autopkg tests for binNMUs. E.g. for a library transition,
britney only runs the tests triggered by the library package, it doesn't run the
autopkg tests for all the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Library packages still have ABI differences despite the best effort to track
them, and often migrate undetected. Reasons for that might be
- No symbols files provided in the package.
[CCing debian-science]
On 10.11.19 13:18, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
yes, please do [raise pandas 0.25 blocking bugs to "important"]
Done, but only 2 of them have been fixed since.
This leaves 13:
has patch or Ubuntu fix: matplotlib2 patsy python-apptools sc
On 10.11.19 14:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
patsy is a leaf package, no problem.
scikit-learn, needs mdp, pymvpa2, I think that's manageable, so I'm volunteering
to do the NMUs, preferably with a 0 or 1 day delay.
PyMVPA has other RC issues, is removed from testing, so ignore it fo
On 10.11.19 14:46, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
mdp isn't in testing either, but if you're using a policy of "no py2removals
that break packages in testing", tnseq-transit (Depends: statsmodels) and
possibly stimfit (Recommends: pandas) need to be done as well. Those are both
thought to need new u
On 07.11.19 15:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This weekend, I am planning to upload python3-defaults, adding python3.8 as a
> supported Python3 version. This may introduce some churn in unstable until
> the
> basic binNMUs are available as well.
>
> Details for the addition
On 12.11.19 23:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.11.19 15:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> This weekend, I am planning to upload python3-defaults, adding python3.8 as a
>> supported Python3 version. This may introduce some churn in unstable until
>> the
>> basic bi
On 02.12.19 20:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01-12-2019 22:45, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Paul, this is the thread i was talking about.
>>
>> you were copied in the original email:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00098.html
>>
>> if there is something the RT wants to disc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Not really a transition, but a binNMU for one package should be done:
gcc-mingw-w64
Not asking for any -mipsen package, because these are not in testing.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra b-d
on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs.
a7xpg
cheesecutter
dub
dustmite
gunroar
ii-esu
mu-cade
parsec47
projec
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Two packages are built using gccgo, the binNMUs should be done with an extra b-d
on gccgo (>= 4:10.1).
uswgi
gitbrute
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done
with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1).
wlcs
goxel
On 7/21/20 7:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra
> b-d
> on gdc (>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please setup a tracker to add python3.9 as a supported python3 version. This is
non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
starting this, just want to have
gt;>
>> On 2020-07-15 12:14:06 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>>> Packages build ok with the libgc from experimen
I'm now NMUing both guile-2.2 and guile-3.0 to just ignore the test results on
ppc64el, without closing the bug reports. It's blocking the gcc-10 migration to
testing.
On 8/14/20 11:33 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm now NMUing both guile-2.2 and guile-3.0 to just ignore the test results on
> ppc64el, without closing the bug reports. It's blocking the gcc-10 migration
> to
> testing.
now, the NMUs fail with the same OOM error on armh
On 9/12/20 8:55 AM, Vasyl Gello wrote:
> Hi Matthias!
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:50:33 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Control: severity -1 important
>>
>> lowering the severity, please use the BFD linker if possible, CCing to the
>> mips
>> porters.
&g
status update:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/10/msg00033.html
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
While we are still in the first phase, adding 3.9 as a supported python3
version, please setup a tracker for 3.9 as the default python3 version, re-using
the tracker for 3.8 as the defaul
as outlined in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00023.html
it's now time to go ahead with the 3.9 defaults change.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/11/msg00012.html
has a status update about outstanding issues, focusing on the key packages.
While not every fix is avail
[removed the Python 2 bits]
On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: debian-security-support
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org
> openjdk-15 will be included, but not covered by support
> (as it's only needed to bootstrap openjdk-16 and
On 11/18/20 1:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matthias Klose:
>
>> As background: OpenJDK 12 can only be built with 11, 13 with 12, 14 with 13,
>> 15
>> with 14, 16 with 15. Only having 11 in bullseye would make backports more
>> "interesting".
>
&g
On 11/18/20 7:46 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> [removed the Python 2 bits]
>>
>> On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Package: debian-security-support
>>> Severity: norm
On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> For OpenJDK there are two other possibilities, which would require approval
>> by
>> release managers / stable release managers.
>>
>> - openjdk-16 will
On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
>
> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
>
> Can you schedule that?
no, according to
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html
ldb ftbfs on s390x.
On 11/20/20 9:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
>>
>> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
>>
>> Can you schedule that?
>
> no, accordi
On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> I am sorry for the later response.
>Hi,
>
> I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release (est. end
> of 2024):
>
> For mipsel and mips64el, I
> - test most pac
Package: release.debian.org
openjdk-N (non-default) should not trigger autopkg tests. All these don't make
any sense, as the tests are always run using the default JRE/JDK.
E.g. for 13, these were triggered today:
autopkgtest for airport-utils: amd64: Test in progress, arm64: Test in progress,
On 12/2/20 5:42 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:40:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Thanks for the upload.
>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
>> still
>> open...
>
> ping, has there been any progress on this?
chatting with Moritz
On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
>>>> still
>>> ping, has there been any progress on this?
>
Hi
I would like to upload binutils version 2.5.2-1 to unstable later this week. The
2.25.2 release is announced for this weekend ([1]). It imports fixes towards
the next stable version.
The pending fixes in the package are:
* PR27218, memory access violation in dwarf2dbg.c
* PR gas/2719
On 1/26/21 6:53 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>>>> :) note however that "#975016:
On 1/27/21 9:47 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 26-01-2021 18:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I would like to upload binutils version 2.5.2-1 to unstable later this week.
>> The
>> 2.25.2 release is announced for this weekend ([1]). It imports fixes towards
On 1/28/21 8:36 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 27-01-2021 22:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I have been following the way the linux source package was uploaded.
>> Apparently
>> the package entered unstable with just an announcement like this. An
1 - 100 of 769 matches
Mail list logo
