Re: libimdb-film-perl in volatile

On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 21:21:40 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Martin! > > You wrote: > > > first of all: am i missing something? > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dak ls libimdb-film-perl > > libimdb-film-perl | 0.27-1 | unstable | source, all > > > > volatile is thought for stable. But

Re: read-edid

Hi, On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 17:48:18 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? > > > I just agree. > > So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable > > and include it in the next

Re: [OSRM] please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2

Hi, On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 23:24:19 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2 for the next sarge point release: > > > apache2 (2.0.54-5sarge2) stable; urgency=low > > * Fix some less critical security issues: > * Denial of service for threaded MPMs: >

Re: [SRM] unace_1.2b-4etch1

Hi, On Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 06:21:05 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi, > > There's an RC bug (#431380) in unace due to it not being 64 bit clean. > Attached the debdiff against stable. Ok to upload? > > I could easily also prepare another backport for oldstable... Go ahead for stable, but we wi

Re: Please hint following udebs

Hi, On Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 14:50:19 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I'd like to ask for the inclusion of following hints to be added: > unblock console-data/2:1.02-2 unblocked > unblock debootstrap/1.0.1 unblocked > unblock devmapper/2:1.02.20-2 already unblocked by vorlon > unblock dhcp/2.0

Re: Please hint following udebs

Hi, On Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 15:25:18 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > please unblock also reiserfsprogs/1:3.6.19-6 which fixes FTBFS #429006. > > No objection unblocked -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: Please hint following udebs

Hi, On Tue Aug 07, 2007 at 21:01:46 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Here goes a new set of hints. I think they're all ok to go but please > let me know if there're any problem that I've missed. > > unblock console-setup/1.18 unblocked > unblock dhcp3/3.0.6-1 unblocked > unblock ttf-khmeros/5.0

Re: please hint udev

Hi, On Fri Aug 10, 2007 at 03:24:56 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > -- > ciao, > Marco debian-installer team, please ACK or NACK Marco's request. Greetings Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: klibc stable/etch fix nfsroot on mips/mipsel

Hi, On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 18:27:58 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > dann frazier wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:05:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > hello stable rm, > > > > > > could you please review #438123 ? > > > the fix propagated in new upstream and is thus in testing / sid.

Re: Bug#438123: klibc stable/etch fix nfsroot on mips/mipsel

D-I team, On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 23:57:03 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > [trimmed long reviewer cc, added debian-boot and fjp ] > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 18:27:58 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > dann frazier

Re: Please hint openssl into testing.

Hi, On Mon Aug 20, 2007 at 19:07:50 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb. Debian Installer Team, comments? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Please hint ttf-dejavu into testing

Hi, On Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 16:25:31 +0200, Davide Viti wrote: > Hi, > could you please hint current version of ttf-dejavu (2.19-1) into testing? > the package provides also an udeb used by the graphical installer. Debian Installer Team, comments? Greetings Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#

Re: Please unblock eject

Hi, On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 00:09:54 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Please unblock eject/2.1.5-4 that is blocked because it builds an udeb. > Since it waited four weeks for devmapper it should be safe by now ;) Any comments from the debian-installer team? Greetings Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Please unblock eject

Hi, On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 12:31:38 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 00:09:54 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: &g

Re: aacraid

Hi, On Tue Aug 28, 2007 at 15:03:52 +0100, Chris Robinson wrote: > Hi > > Is aacraid in the current release (17th Aug)? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 | grep aacr /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-686/kernel/drivers/scsi/aacraid /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-686/kernel/drivers/scsi/aacraid/a

Re: security.debian.org and releases (OldStable)

Hi, On Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 23:35:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello *, > > I have encountered that the security mirror has packages from Woody > and such. And since Sarge (OldStable) will get security updates up > to april next year... > > Question: > > Would be nice, IF, an release (O

Re: [SRM] Candidate patches to d-i for Etch r2

Hi, On Thu Sep 06, 2007 at 08:59:17 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Julien Danjou wrote: > >At 1189059142 time_t, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > >>The debian-installer team would like to fix a few issues that are still > >>present in the Etch version of d-i. > >> > >>Before starting the work on updating the pa

Re: Bug#427104: still apears to be broken with d-i

Hi, On Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 09:25:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > >> In other words: everybody who installs the laptop task gets a useless > >> and confusing question. In joeys words

Re: [SRM] Please review apache2 2.2.3-4+etch3

Hi, > Considering that there is already an update pending for etch r2, and > that CVE-2007-3847 is of similar severity as the issues fixed in > 2.2.3-4+etch2, I think it makes sense to upload +etch3 to s-p-u, too. > Martin Schulze agreed to this. Security team, please ack that. thanks Martin

Bug#443459: release-notes: With beginning of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every point release

Package: release-notes Severity: normal Tags: lenny With the release of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every point release, to reflect the current revision number of the debian release (read as in): now:then: 4.1 4.1r0 That should be documented in the release-note

Re: [SRM] please review gnome-panel 2.14.3-6

Hi, On Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 11:48:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 14 octobre 2007 à 22:36 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 07:31:17PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > > as already approved by Julien on IRC, I have uploaded a new gnome-panel > > > to s-p

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 19:25:42 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:50:42PM +0100, Ina Zobel wrote: > >Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r2 > >= > >[...] > > Ina Zobel? :) My wife, she did the work, she gets the flowers

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 09:33:39 +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:50 +0100, Ina Zobel wrote: > > If you disagree with one bit or another, please reply to this mail and > > explain why these things should be handled differently. > > > flashplugin-nonfree stable9.0.31.

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi Luk, i guess the subject should have been "Preparation of the next oldstable Debian GNU/Linux update" Greetings Martin PS: Happy XMAS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: brltty: Please unblock

Hi, On Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 21:09:42 +0100, Mario Lang wrote: > Hi. > > Please unblock brltty, it needs to go to testing. > gnome-orca is already waiting for it. Debian-Installer-Team: Can you please confirm this unblock request? TIA Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manua

Re: [SRM] #353494 - xserver-xorg does not start on CPUs without CPUID

Hi, On Wed Dec 26, 2007 at 12:26:13 +0100, Michael Karcher wrote: > Dear stable release manager, > > I would like to see the fix to #353494 in a stable point release. Debian > claims to support processors starting at the 486. A bug in the X Server > prevents starting it on any early 486 class pr

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.1r3 = An up-to-date version is at . We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can actually comme

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sat Dec 29, 2007 at 00:20:15 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > The next revision of stable > should therefore be released at the mid of February or 48h before the > release of Etch, whatever comes first. ignore that one. i really should kill that from the skel directory..

Re: Please hint glibc/2.7-5

Hi, On Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 21:31:07 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > glibc/2.7-5 is ready to go into testing. It fixes bug that are present > in the testing version, and hasn't any known regression. > > Could you please hint it? done -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manu

Re: Can aptitude be rebuilt on stable?

Hi, On Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 11:44:35 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > I was recently reminded that the version of aptitude in etch still > has bug #415468, now re-opened as bug #438725. To summarize, it means > that aptitude's manpage looks like this: > >To select a particular versio

Re: PostgreSQL maintenance release for Etch

Hi, On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 14:33:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Martin Pitt [2008-01-04 14:32 +0100]: > > I attach the debdiff > > LALALA, sorry. Here it comes. Please go ahead. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Sarge r7 - what next?

Hi, On Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 23:51:14 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi folks, > > Can we work out what to do with Sarge next please? Right now, we don't > have working CDs nor any way to make them. Can we push r8 through with > just the small d-i update needed, or should I give up on sarge at thi

Re: Sarge r7 - what next?

Hi, On Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 11:56:01 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 23:51:14 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Can we w

Re: Please unblock iso-codes 1.8-1

Hi, On Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 21:30:32 +0100, Tobias Toedter wrote: > Hi, > > if the Installer team has no objections, the following hint could be > added: > > unblock iso-codes/1.8-1 after a short chat with otavio on IRC: unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL P

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (II)

t to comment on this list, please send a mail to the debian release mailing list <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. Last updated 2008/01/17 21:16 UTC -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer |

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (II)

Hi, On Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 22:32:37 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.1r3 > > = > > > Requires further Investigation > > -- > > > una

Re: Memory leak in SUNRPC code

've already submitted a patch upstream and it has been integrated. > > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5541 > > > > It should be backported to Etch. > > > > Is it ok to upload a glibc package with this patch to *stable*? go ahead. --

Re: New udeb hints and sync request

Hi, On Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 16:41:15 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > unblock console-setup/1.21 already unblocked by luk already > unblock openssl/0.9.8g-4 unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU

Re: [SRM] D-I update for Etch 4.0r3 point release

n start working on an upload of D-I itself. > > As there have been a significant number of changes in our mirrors, I'm > thinking of uploading an updated version of choose-mirror too. > > Any objections? no, go ahead. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r3/

ase-notes accordingly. See: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458550 Added to the todo list on http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html Will be pushed to http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r3/ when i send the next preparation mail. Greetings Martin -- Ma

Re: update sun-java5 in non-free to close #462622

ch to *ask* > the release team if they consider such an update at all. i would consider it stable, but i am just about to close r3 after the next dinstall, so we could only consider it only if there would be all archs (ia64, amd64 and i386) availible within 24h from now) or for r4. Greetings Mart

Re: Please unblock user-setup 1.18

Hi, On Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 07:44:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in > with 1.17. unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian &am

Re: Hints to allow win32-loader to go to testing

loader/0.6.0 age-days 6 cpio/2.9-11 unblock cpio/2.9-11 age-days 6 gzip/1.3.12-5 unblock gzip/1.3.12-5 age-days 6 win32-loader/0.6.0 unblock win32-loader/0.6.0 set. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer |

Re: missing block to win32-loader

ldn't > be allowed to go to testing without our approval. > > Please, add (needs approval section): > > block win32-loader added. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Li

Re: Please add following hint to block linux-2.6 until Beta1 is out

images we can need to > delay d-i release. ACK from SRM side. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fing

Re: Please unblock libsdl1.2/1.2.13-2

urrently blocked into unstable because it has an udeb. Could you please > unblock it? unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f8

Re: please allow ltsp 5.1.9-1 into testing

out introducing new > problems, and fixes several bugs. d-i team: any comments about that? Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs

Re: Bug#491263: network-console, etch netinst, openssh

me to spare for the planned schedule but we would need > quick responses if there are issues. > > Any objections against an upload? There would be no other changes. go ahead. if you need any assistance, don't hesitate to contact me (see IRC) Greetings Martin -- Martin Zob

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

be made available in the next update of Debian > +GNU/Linux 4.0, 4.0r5. > > We just agreed with Joerg Jaspert to post-release the missing modules as soon as he has arrived in Argentina. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team

Re: iceape on ia64

nto it. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Give back octave3.0 on sparc

gt; > No, the versions of binutils are the same for both the failing and > > successful autobuilds. BTW, none of the toolchain packages changed: > > > > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.7-12 gcc-4.3_4.3.1-6 > > g++-4.3_4.3.1-6 binutils_2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 libstdc

Re: Pretty, pretty please unblock yelp/2.22.1-6

ing vulnerability; > bump urgency to high; CVE-2008-3533; GNOME #546364; from SVN r3173; > LP: #254860. > > The fix for CVE-2008-3533 is the interesting bit, the rest was just an > embarassing number of tries to get the package actually built. Full diff > available via `d

Re: please unblock deborphan 1.7.26

Hi, On Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 15:15:02 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock deborphan 1.7.26. It fixes an RC bug, contains l10n > updates and corrects the licenses in the file COPYRIGHT. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release T

Re: Unblock request for hobbit/4.2.0.dfsg-14

Hi, On Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 19:31:04 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock hobbit/4.2.0.dfsg-14, it is a translation-only update > that includes a new sv debconf template. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member

Re: please unblock websvn 2.0-3

* Non-maintainer upload. > * Fix unconditional use of debconf in postrm (Closes: #417142). unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d6

Re: Please, hint man-pages-it 2.80-3 for lenny

Hi, On Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 13:16:38 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > It closes #493883 unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de

Re: please unblock opensc

Hi, On Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 16:55:33 +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote: > Hi > > The new opensc package (0.11.4-5) in unstable adds one correction to the last > security patch. The changes are minimal and the changelog entry is below, > could you please unblock it? unblocked --

Re: Please unblock quesoglc 0.7.1-3

Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 19:23:06 +0100, Bradley Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Please could you unblock quesoglc 0.7.1-3 which has just been uploaded to > unstable and fixes the RC bug #496324. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member

Re: Please unblock mailreader - RC bug fix

Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 16:06:19 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > http://incoming.debian.org/mailreader_2.3.36-3.1_amd64.changes unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listm

Re: Please unblock dblatex 0.2.9-3

ew release will > enable that for some more languages. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Finge

Re: gnucash 2.2.6-2: please allow into testing

is is wildly > wrong; it has no business doing so, especially when EPERM is already the > documented error for the filesystem-doesn't-support-it case.) > > Regardless, gnucash did poorly in this case, and the patch in 2.2.6-2 > fixes the (release-critical) problem. unblocked

Re: proj 4.6.0-2 in lenny?

PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:16:56 -0500 + -- Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 21 Dec 2007 16:46:09 -0500 Why? -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key

Re: Please allow dictionaries-common_0.98.12 into lenny

entation change in flyspell.el version doctring (through the >relevant patch) to make it more informative. (closes: #491553) > > 0.98.10 to 0.98.12 patch attached. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux D

Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny

do > so to ensure a smooth update form Etch to Lenny (as described in Guido's > first mail). done -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbf

Update on 'chairs' within the Stable Release Team

Hi, this mail is to let you know that Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is now full Stable Release Manager and that he will coordinating next point releases. I myself step back from the post as SRM due to [1], but will stay around as SRM wizard for a while. Greetings Martin Zobel-Helas [1

Re: irqbalance update in etch?

ip interrupts with such high numbers, since it's the > +least invasive approach during the stable cycle. > + > + -- Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:06:07 +0200 > + Please mention the Bug# in the changelog. if there isn't any, please go ahead a

[SRM] r5 schedule

we will do the point-release on the next weekend. Thx Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerpr

Re: RFC and status report: Kernel upgrades for woody->sarge upgrades

Hi Matthew, On Thursday, 24 Mar 2005, you wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install > > a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge > > (or better: glibc of woody to gl

Re: ABI-changing kernel security fixes for sarge

Hi Martin, On Friday, 25 Mar 2005, Martin 'Joey' Schulze wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Absolutely. It's bound to happen again. We also need to figure out > > how to do driver updates during sarge's lifetime. I suspect v

Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.

Package: upgrade-reports Severity: serious Archive date: Thu May 19 19:00:01 UTC 2005 Upgrade date: Sat May 21 04:17:36 CEST 2005 uname -a: Linux signy 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 16 16:38:44 CET 2001 mips unknown Method: online ftp, using apt-get Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list: deb ftp://192.168.114.

BSP end of November

Hi all, at the German LinuxWorldExpo last week we talked about organizing a BSP end of November (we thought of 27. - 28. November, which is the last weekend in November). Location is not yet defined, but Frankfurt might be a good idea. I would like to hear from Debian QA and Debian Release if a r

removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

) mps mosix -- Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

Stephen Frost wrote: > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > openmosix > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer. > > Actually, I was working on that alrea

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

Stephen Frost wrote: > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > openmosix > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer. > > Actually, I was working on that alrea

Re: Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

PWLib version is 1.6.5 perhaps one should investigate on that. as i am not very firm in that, i might be wrong. if you want me to compile a new version of GM on hppa without uploading a new one to debian, just drop me a mail containing a link where to fetch the new source. Greetings Martin --

Removal suggestion

these security issues mentioned in the bug-report. Looking at CVS the security issues seem to have only been fixed in the newest verion. One should think about shiping a newer version with debian. Thanks -- Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.helas.net

Re: Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

s to me more likely. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0 . Please don't CC me, I am reading the lists I am posting to. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote: > > > > As you suggested, I&

Re: Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

ng from that patch, is > there a way we can patch gnomemeeting to compile *with* it? Or does the > binutils need to be another version by all means? sorry, for that, my knowlege of GM and binutils is not good enough. i think, its now time for binutils maintainer to step in. Greetings Martin -

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > > > openmosix > > > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction fro

Re: Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

y for the delay, but i had no access to the hppa on weekend as network connectivity of our university had some problems on weekend. so here comes the result: You need to recompile pwlib, openh323 and GM. Hope that helps. Greetings Martin. -- Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or

Re: status of non-US

ONE_ package? Only my 0.02$ Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0 . Please don't CC me, I am reading the lists

Dist-Uprade on HPPA64

Hi, at the BSP last weekend we tried to dist-upgrade on a HPPA64 (HP C360, PA8000 Processor). Dist-upgrade does not work smoothly, but one can work around the problems. libc6 on HPPA64 depends on a kernel newer than the supplied standard kernel on woody for HPPA64. Installing a newer kernel (take

Re: Dist-Uprade on HPPA64

Hi Andreas, On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote: > Hi, > > some more questions: > > What would be the issue with installing an 32bit-kernel for > dist-upgrades? (If this is a silly idea, please tell me.) i did not test it. should i? I also don't think it's a good idea to install a 32bit-kernel.

Re: Dist-Uprade on HPPA64

Hi Matthew, On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would > > make it easier for us, because we don't need an extra package in the > > archive. But yes, your reason is

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (IV)

Hi Joey, please also update base-config. #154482 is still valid for sarge, and is very annoying. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (I)

Hi Joey, there was some discussion[1] wether the next stable update could have some timezone data updated in the glibc package. Greetings [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile/2006/02/msg0.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Please unblock clamsmtp

Hi, On Sun Oct 10, 2010 at 13:41:42 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I just uploaded a new version of clamsmtp with the only change being a updated > translation. Please unblock it and let it move to squeeze. done -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian &

Bug#600703: unblock: qmail/1.03-49.1

gn qmail_1.03-49.1_i386.changes wasn't found in the keyring(s). Please try again and come back later! :) Cheers Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc

Re: squeeze-ignore for Bug #509287?

n since September 14 (more than a month from now), i am about to remove that package from testing in 10d from now. Due to r-depends I will need to remove some other packages too: * mondo * tob Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer

Re: Please unblock virtualbox-ose

Neil, On Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 09:49:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > 3) Remove the package from squeeze did you had a look at it's r-depends? Removing is not an option. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Lin

Re: Bug#606327: vmmemctl missing in squeeze

Hi, On Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 19:21:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > reassign 606327 open-vm-tools > severity 606327 important > thanks > > On 12/08/2010 01:54 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> This makes the package partly unsuable > > right, partially, correcting se

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

ed from | Xen because of a request from the mainline kernel maintainers. Instead, you | should use xvda1 (as a corresponding example) instead. | | -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http:/

Re: About libchipcard 0.9.1-7sarge0

Hi Julien, On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > By the way, the packages was marked has "missing for arm" on the wiki, I > don't know what it means since according to the buildd log[2], it was > built. Mea culpa, its sparc and not arm that is missing. you can check that if you run madison on m

Re: timeline for next kernel update round

Hi Moritz, On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three > > > ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I can't speak > > > for d-i.

Re: timeline for next kernel update round

Hi Moritz, On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote: > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three > > > > ABI changing security

Re: stable update for devmapper requested

Hi Roger, On Friday, 10 Mar 2006, you wrote: > Dear stable release manager, > > The following patch is a fix for a serious problem with the stable > release of devmapper. Please go ahead and upload. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

Hi Aurelien, > Changes: > glibc (2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1) stable; urgency=low > . >* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update to tzdata2006b. Could you please reupload and include a fix for #314408 [1]. This has been discussed[2] on

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

Hi Aurelien, > > Done in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge2. > > When do you expect this version will reach Sarge? > We release Debian Sarge r2 when it's ready. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Accepted perl 5.8.4-8sarge4 (source sparc all)

Hi Brendan, > Changes: > perl (5.8.4-8sarge4) stable; urgency=low > . >* Don't generate broken md5sums for libperl5.8 (closes: #354466). >* Preserve timestamps in /usr/share/doc. >* Fix problem with utf8/taint interaction (thanks to Steinar > Gunderson for analysis/patch). > .

<    1   2   3   >