Bug#565343: RM: bluez-gnome/testing-proposed-updates -- RORM; obsolete

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi Please remove this package from testing-proposed-updates as it interferes with the removal from the package from testing. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is > acceptable and/or viable. Unless it's an option to include opro

Re: Uploading linux-2.6

Ben Hutchings wrote: > There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due > early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes. > Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's > released. > > (Still no stable ABI, sorry.) If the ABI chan

Re: Uploading linux-2.6

Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>>> There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due >>>> early this we

Re: Uploading linux-2.6

Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release >> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel >> from migrating for the time being? &g

Re: nmu: x11-utils_7.5+1

Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:13:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> nmu x11-xserver-utils_7.5+1 . i386 . -m "Rebuild in a clean environment" >> >> x11-xserver-utils/i386 seems to have been built in an environment with >> libxxf86misc and libxp installed, so has picked up ext

Bug#564142: RM: rails/2.2.3-1

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 07:43:11AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> >>> Please remove rails. It has open security issues, which haven't been >>> acknowledged for six weeks. >> removal hint added. >

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

Matthias Klose wrote: > On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): >>> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to >>> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If >>> we finish preparations in the next week, are there any

Re: Please binNMU gnome-phone-manager against new gnome-bluetooth

Bertrand Marc wrote: > Hello, > > A new version of gnome-bluetooth is in unstable since 2009-10-11, and > since then gnome-phone-manager is not installable (see [1]). > Could you binNMU gnome-phone-manager to make it depend on the new > version of gnome-bluetooth ? > > nmu gnome-phone-manager_0.6

Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mi, Jan 27, 2010 at 19:52:35 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> http://release.debian.org/~adsb/ffmpeg_binNMUs.txt is what I believe to >>> be the list of packages potentially needing binNMUs. >>> >>> Exclud

Re: Please binNMU tangerine and banshee against fixed libtaglib-cil-dev

Jo Shields wrote: > Hello, > > There was a bug in libtaglib-cil-dev (= 2.0.3.4+dfsg-1) that made > packages built against it Depends: libtaglib2.0-cil (>= 2.0.3.3) instead > of 2.0.3.4. Only three packages are affected (and one needs a sourceful > upload). Rebuilding against 2.0.3.4+dfsg-2 fixes t

Re: Heimdal migration and libpam-heimdal

Russ Allbery wrote: > I've finished the work to take advantage of the new -multidev packages and > build libpam-heimdal from the same source package as libpam-krb5, which > I'd like to get done for squeeze. However, while getting ready to upload, > I see that Heimdal currently hasn't migrated to t

Re: python-wxgtk2.6

Ryan Niebur wrote: > Could wxwidgets2.6 please migrate to testing? > > It fixes a grave bug (completely uninstallable on squeeze) that was a > result of the python2.6 binnmus. age-days hint set. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Hints for Debian Installer

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello RM team, > > We'll need another debian-installer build since powerpc is broken; then > we can use this opportunity to fix those issues as well. > > Here goes a set of hints related to d-i: > > unblock bogl/0.1.18-3.1 > unblock choose-mirror/2.32 # please age this o

Re: Bug#568163: claws-mail_3.7.4-1_mips failed to build on mayr

Ricardo Mones wrote: > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:44:49 +0200 > Teodor MICU wrote: >> The package claws-mail_3.7.4-1 has failed to build on mips and the cause >> seems to be the CHROOT, not the source code. Because of this the package >> did not migrate to "testing": >> * 24 days old (needed 10 d

Re: PHP5 transition

Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hello, > > We, as in the PHP maintainers, would like to upload PHP 5.3 to unstable. > > The upload requires that every package that ships a php extension be binNMUed > (this would normally be detected by packages becoming uninstallable because > the old phpapi- won't b

Re: Objective Caml 3.11.2 in Debian

Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> I've recompiled (on amd64) all relevant packages with the release >> candidate (announced last Dec 29), and all problems have been sorted >> out. As far as I am concerned, I see no objections in starting the >> transition. >> >> However, release

Re: gscan2pdf REMOVED from testing

Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:39:33PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: >> FYI: The status of the gscan2pdf source package >> in Debian's testing distribution has changed. >> >> Previous version: 0.9.29-1 >> Current version: (not in testing) >> Hint:

Re: BinNMU for libjpeg8 transition

Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >>> jpeg8 is now in testing and libterralib and sdop has been fixed already, >>> so I would like to start the transition by uploading a version

Re: BinNMU for libjpeg8 transition

Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > >> It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages >> that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no >> risk of API incompatibility. >> > Then they shouldn't h

Re: BinNMU for libjpeg8 transition

Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:54:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >>> >>>> It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages &

Re: ghc6 still fails to build on ia64; what to do?

Kari Pahula wrote: > I've been trying out various linker flags on merulo and finally found > ones that got ghc6 to build on ia64. Unfortunately, that didn't still > work on the ia64 buildd. > Both stages pass successfully on merulo. On the buildd, the build > fails right at the start of stage 2

Re: BinNMU for libjpeg8 transition

Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Bill Allombert wrote: >>> libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility. >> Can you point me to the section that points to that need? > > http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.

Re: BinNMU for libjpeg8 transition

Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Sven Joachim wrote: >>> On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>> >>>> Bill Allombert wrote: >>>>> libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibilit

Re: Please binNMU dpm and dpm-postgres against updated globus-ftp-client

Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > The new version of globus-ftp-client bumps the soname from 1 to 2. For > this reason dpm and dpm-postgre needs to be rebuilt with the new > version. The other packages depending on globus-ftp-client have been > updated. > > nmu dpm_1.7.4.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild aga

[VAC] Now -> Now + 1 month

Hi To get some rest and peace of mind I'm having a vacation for 1 month. I'm confident that you will be working on getting closer to a freeze even without me and would be very happy if we could freeze soon after I return! I'm also confident that the Release Team members can cope without my prese

Re: Tcl/Tk plans for Squeeze

Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Currently we have three different releases of Tcl/Tk: 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5 > with major differences among them (e.g. 8.3 is not thread-enabled, 8.5 > has a new theme-enabled Tk, etc.). A new pre-release version 8.6 > is already in experimental, too. > > This is a mess

Priorities

Hi I'm back from vacation. I would like to make sure we focus on the priorities to get Squeeze out. >From a first look there are these things: - stop accepting new transitions and (help to) coordinate the outstanding ones - focus on RC bug handling by coordinating the organisation of formal and

Re: parted unblock, and upcoming transition

Colin Watson wrote: > Could parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 be unblocked, please? It's needed > to smooth the path for parted 2.2 in the near future. unblocked. > Speaking of which, I would like to upload parted 2.2 to unstable (it's > currently in experimental) once 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 reaches

I'm resigning as Release Manager

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi It's time to stop thinking I would be able to keep working as Release Manager in this climate, I hereby resign as Release Manager. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt

Re: libmikmod/stable on hppa version problem

On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most >> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1, >> following the usual scheme

Re: libmikmod/stable on hppa version problem

On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >>>> We have run int

Re: libmikmod/stable on hppa version problem

On 07/16/2010 12:09 AM, Luk Claes wrote: > On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at

Re: Releasability of the HPPA port

On 08/07/2010 12:28 PM, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: > Le 7 août 2010 à 06:43, Philipp Kern a écrit : >> On 08/06/2010 10:48 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Finally, a silly question: looking at the bottom line of this chart, it seems > that Debian is "at risk" of becoming a x86/64(+ia64?)-only release[2].

Re: User-testing of testing?

On 08/10/2010 03:43 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: >> So I was wondering if we shouldn't have a list of user-centered >> "stable release goals", such as "open a PDF attachment in icedove", >> "open an OpenDocument attachment in icedove",

Re: User-testing of testing?

On 08/10/2010 11:55 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>> - Decide where user feedback will have to go; the obvious answer is the >>> BTS, but we need to decide whether reuse some existing (pseudo) >>> packa

Re: Seeking for advice regarding keepalived

On 08/14/2010 09:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Hi folks, Hi Alexander > some time ago I uploaded keepalived 1.2.0 to debian because it was the first > (development) version with ipv6 support for ipvs. I thought/hoped development > would be faster so that we have a working/stable version with ip

Re: bugs in the unofficial RC bug tracker @ turmzimmer

On 08/15/2010 04:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, Hi > I investigated some differences between http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php > and what UDD sees, and found out that the unofficial RC bug tracker > seems to be missing quite a lot of bugs. > > The main problem seems to be that it doesn't

Re: Unblock brltty?

On 08/16/2010 05:21 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Adam D. Barratt, le Sat 14 Aug 2010 10:09:38 +0100, a écrit : >> The icu transition is ready to go, but currently stalled by brllty which >> is blocked because of its udeb. >> >> As I understand it, the udeb does not use icu > > It doesn't indeed. >

udeb unblock: partman-base [Re: udeb unblocks: netcfg, libdebian-installer]

On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > >> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an >> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were >> asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to migrate netcfg

Re: udeb unblock: partman-base [Re: udeb unblocks: netcfg, libdebian-installer]

On 08/21/2010 10:40 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> "Adam D. Barratt" writes: >> >>> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an >>> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently i

Re: Please unblock istanbul 0.2.2-8

On 08/24/2010 03:16 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > Hi, > istanbul/0.2.2-8 fixes two RC bugs and had already aged in sid without > further reports, please unblock it. debdiff attached. It has already migrated due to my unblock earlier today :-) Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-re

Bug#594873: RM: picprog/testing-proposed-updates -- ROP; not suitable for s90

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi Please remove picprog from testing-proposed-updates, it's up-to-date in testing apart from the binary on s390 which the porter/buildd admin marked as Not-For-Us. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#594875: RM: tijmp/testing-proposed-updates -- ROP; NFU on several arches

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi Please remove tijmp from tpu its binaries are deemed unusable by the porter/buildd admin. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#594877: RM: usbview/testing-proposed-updates -- ROP; NFU on s390

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi Please remove usbview from tpu, it's binaries are deemed unusable by the porter/buildd admin. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Re: Request for approval of FAI 3.4.1

* Michael Prokop wrote: > Ok, 3.4.0 went through NEW (thanks) and I just uploaded 3.4.1 with > the mentioned bugfix to unstable. > > Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#592300: future unblock: xz-utils/4.999.9beta+20100810-1

Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> In any case, please get back to us once the package has reached its 10 days. > > The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days. unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l

Re: Unfreezing pdl_2.4.7+dfsg-1

> Moin, > just finished an upload of a new (minor) upstream PDL version, package built > fine on all architectures. > This release fixes many bugs (most tracked on upstream's sf.net tracker), > brings big improvements on the documentation side, and has a more reliable > test suite. > Could you unfr

Re: redmine 1.0.1-1 : stable release for 1.0 version

> i just uploaded redmine 1.0.1-1 to debian/unstable, which is a very > significant release : >* Upstream update, fixes many 1.0.0 RC bugs, see : > http://www.redmine.org/versions/show/21 >* Patch for libi18n-ruby 0.4.1 support. (Closes: #592672) >* Postinst note should be an error

Re: Re: Freeze exception for gdc-4.3

On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 17:54 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 22 August 2010 16:20, Adam D. Barratt >> wrote: [...] >> The diffstat between the testing and unstable packages is >> >> 824 files changed, 133190 insertions(+), 141498 deletions(-) >> >> which is practically unre

Re: Re: strongswan update to 4.4.x

> On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:18:23 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> Trying to see how it looks like, I ended up with a big diff. >> >> 489 files changed, 27220 insertions(+), 11439 deletions(-) >> >> Is there any sane way to review this? > > Maybe the best way would be to contact upstream. In my expe

Re: ublocks for security fix uploads

On 09/13/2010 05:55 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Hi, Hi > Please unblock the following packages that fix security issues: > > unblock cacti/0.8.7g-1 > unblock drupal6/6.18-1 > unblock iceape/2.0.7-1 > unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2 all unblocked > unblock libgdiplus/2.6.7-3 unblocked and aged to

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? >>> They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. >>> Importa

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

also e-mail us to propose a new goal, including > a description of the goal and an indication of how progress on the issues may be tracked > (e.g. a pointer to a set of appropriate user-tagged bugs). # bootperformance Advocate: Petter Reinholdsen and Luk Claes State: confirmed Wiki: ht

Re: Number of berkeley db packages reduction

On 04/05/2011 02:55 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to coordinate reduction of BDB packages since I took the > unhappy job (as I could expect) to maintain BDB in Debian after Clint > have orphaned them. > > The main issue which I have encountered (in cyrus-imapd) is that the > chang

Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing

On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Julien, > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org >> resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's >> reasonable, the release p

Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing

On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Luk, > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>>> This is still abo

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-2)

On 06/05/2011 06:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will > include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use > in Debian Live. > > Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have > to change the

Re: SAT based britney - formalisation of the problem

On 07/01/2011 10:25 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Ralf Treinen wrote: >> In fact, from out point of view the DIMACS format or MAX-SAT input >> format are already a specific encoding technique, and we think that >> one should first find a logical specification of what ex

Re: security support for lenny / upgrades from lenny to wheezy

On 07/05/2011 03:45 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:30:03 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: > >> [Please Cc me, I am not subscribed.] >> >> Hi, >> >> I am forwarding a discussion from debian-user. I'd love to hear an >> official statement about this. AFAICS, this issue hasn't been >> expli

Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer

On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, Hi Otavio > During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to > debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review > and comments. > > Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this > in

Re: Changes to Debian Installer release process

On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the > Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking > with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian > Installer release process and it would b

Re: binNMUs?

On 08/01/2011 08:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > >> e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus >> way to handle it. >> > Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to "handle" it at > all. Why could

Re: Changes in release goals for Wheezy

Hi Scott On 08/02/2011 05:39 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > As the drafter of the proposed release goal for Python [1], I will confess > some surprise when I read on d-d-a [2] that this had been dropped for Wheezy > without being involved any discussion or at least notification. Regardless, >

Re: binNMUs?

On 08/02/2011 10:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Luk Claes wrote: >> Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch >> where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats? > > Maybe they try to tackle the "

Bug#642390: pu: package ipmitool/1.8.11-2+squeeze1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch? diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa tches/series --- ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ++

Bug#642390: pu: package ipmitool/1.8.11-2+squeeze1

On 09/22/2011 07:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tag 642390 + squeeze confirmed > thanks > > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 07:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch? >> >> diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmi

Re: Bug#622146: nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid broken

On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: >>> "Adam" == Adam D Barratt writes: >> Adam> The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly) >> Adam> marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the >>

Re: Bug#622146: nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid broken

On 09/12/2011 08:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: >>> "Adam" == Adam D Barratt writes: >> >> >> Adam> The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly) >> Adam> marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the >>

Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

Hi The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: * ifeffit (#648839) * uwsgi (#640347) * libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857) * libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598) * prima (#628500) * nginx (#649061) * libsignatures-perl (#636132

Re: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

On 11/18/2011 08:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 20:52:48 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > >>> * genders (#646286): patch ready, maybe NMU? >> >> Uploaded in the meantime. >> > Uploaded, but still broken. Maybe the patch was applied without running the autotools? Cheers Lu

Re: Please unblock ptex-bin 3.1.10+0.04b-2.1

Sven Hoexter wrote: > Hi, > please unblock ptex-bin 3.1.10+0.04b-2.1, this should resolve #503543. already unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please hint git-buildpackage 0.4.40 into testing

Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > please allow git-buildpackage into testing. The changes between 0.4.36 > and 0.4.40 were mostly documentation and bugfixes. 0.4.40 is needed to > work properly with Git 1.6 (which plenty of people will switch to during > lenny's lifecycle). 0.4.43 unblocked Cheers Lu

Re: approval for planned upload of policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-5

Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Tuesday 11 November 2008 18:59, Neil McGovern wrote: >> All ok, please upload and ping when it's approaching time for an >> unblock. > > the package was uploaded 3 days ago. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Freeze exception for libgeo-ipfree-perl/0.2-7

gregor herrmann wrote: > Hi release team, > > I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for libgeo-ipfree-perl, 0.2-7. > > This version fixes #505736 - outdated and incorrect country data file. > > Summary: > libgeo-ipfree-perl contains a country data file (with mappings > between IP address ranges

Re: t-p-u upload for mxallowd

Niko Tyni wrote: > Hi release team, > > as discussed earlier, mxallowd needs a tpu upload due to an uncoordinated > libnetfilter-queue sid upload. > > The maintainer asked me to handle this, so here's the proposed debdiff(s). > > The first, very short one is against the current sid version (1.6b

Re: Some unblock requests, again

Josselin Mouette wrote: > gnome-settings-daemon (2.22.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low > > gnome-power-manager (2.22.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > > gksu (2.0.0-6) unstable; urgency=low > > epiphany-browser (2.22.3-8) unstable; urgency=low > > fontconfig (2.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low All unblock

Re: unblock request munin 1.2.6-8

Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock munin 1.2.6-8, it has been sitting in sid for ten days without > collecting any new errors. 1.2.6-8 only contains some polishing and trivial > fixes which make it function nicer and/or safer. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: Bug#475737: remove otrs2 from lenny?

Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Hi, > > given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3 > weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2 > from lenny? I'll have a look at fixing it. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: unblock requests for rails 2.1.0-6

Adam Majer wrote: > Please unblock rails 2.1.0-6 > > There is a small upstream security fix included in that release. Debian > patch is available on git [1]. There is also an upstream announcement of > the security patch on Google Groups [2]. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: please unblock tor 0.2.0.32-1

Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get tor 0.2.0.32-1 into lenny. > > It's a new upstream version of the current stable tree. That means it > only saw bugfixes and no new features. > > At least one of the fixes is a security fix in the traditional sense: > Tor didn't properly drop

Re: Please consider unblock kernel-package/11.013

Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > This version corrects a bug that caused kernel images on sparc > to fail, and that bug is in testing as well. This closes a RC bug. (It > has just been uploaded with a high urgency, with a one line change, the > other changes have been in the archive fo

Re: freeze exception for fakeroot_1.11

dann frazier wrote: > hey, > fakeroot_1.11 fixes a bug that prevents eclipse from building from > source. Since fakeroot is used by sbuild on our buildds, a fakeroot > update is necessary to ensure that we can rebuild eclipse updates > for lenny. > > I'm not a fakeroot maintainer, but the maintai

Re: Bug#501253: Reappear on 0.7.19

close 501253 thanks Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Deng Xiyue wrote: >> Followup-For: Bug #501253 >> >> reopen 501253 >> found 501253 0.7.19 >> thanks >> >> Now apt-utils 0.7.19 brings back libdb4.4 again, at least on i386. >> Hope it's just a unclean build environment. If it is the case, it'll >>

Re: freeze exceptions for texlive-extra

Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all, > > I guess you know the game, more license clean ups occurred in TeX Live: > > The following happened from .dfsg.9 to .dfsg.10: > > blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs): > - cellular > - cmastro > - china2e > > OTOH, I reinstantiated

Re: Unblock request: kpax 20080304-2

Barry deFreese wrote: > Hi, > > Please unblock kpax 20080304-2. Fixes RC bug. Here is a debdiff of the > changes: Already unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: security issue unblocks

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hi, > > Please unblock: > > squirrelmail/2:1.4.15-4 > pdns/2.9.21.2-1 both unblocked > Please accept from t-p-u: > > redhat-cluster/2.20080801-4+lenny1 approved Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Please unblock electric_8.07-2

Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please unblock package 'electric' version 8.07-2? > 'electric' was previously orphaned and removed from unstable/testing. > It has been recently updated and brought under debian-java team > umbrella. Sorry, it's way too late to reintroduce packages into testi

Re: Please unblock python-django 1.0.2-1

Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi -release, > > Please unblock python-django 1.0.2-1. The associated changelog entry is: > This is an upstream bugfix release with over 200 bug fixes [0], contains no > new features and has no known backwards compatible changes [1] [2]. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBS

Re: Request for update Drgeo package in Lenny

Francisco García wrote: > Hello, > I would like to update the package Drgeo [1] in lenny. I have > made a NMU with this package fixing some bugs, and made some > important improvements. > One of the bugs I have closed has grave severity. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Please unblock lxrandr and lxterminal for lenny

Andrew Lee wrote: > Dear Release Managers, > > Please unblock lxrandr and lxterminal. The lxrandr closes #492509 and added > a patch to solve the LVDS output cannot detect current resolution problem. > And lxterminal closes #503388 and adjust it's priority for alternatives > system. both unblocke

Re: Unblock iceweasel-l10n 3.0.4+debian-1

Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock iceweasel-l10n 3.0.4+debian-1. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unblock request: genpower 1.0.5-2.3

Barry deFreese wrote: > Hi, > > Please unblock genpower 1.0.5-2.3. Mainly for the piuparts bug fix > (#455026) but it also contains a few other small bugfixes. Here are the > changelog entries (Yes I messed up the first upload): unblocked cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: freeze exception for xserver-xorg-input-evdev

Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > xf86-input-evdev 2.0.8 is a bugfix release, see the upstream changelog > below. I'd like to see xserver-xorg-input-evdev/1:2.0.8-1 in lenny. > > Most of the changes are due to a fix for resume, where the driver might > have to reopen the device file, and make sure

Re: Please unblock rsyslog 3.18.5-1

Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi release team, > > please consider unblocking rsyslog 3.18.5-1. > Although it is a new (bugfix only) upstream release, the actual code changes > are > very small, as you can see from the attached debdiff. About 3/4 are > documentation updates. > > The upstream changes c

Re: Please hint util-vserver 0.30.216~r2772-5 [was: handling util-vserver regression]

Micah Anderson wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've decided to go ahead and backport the pieces necessary to solve the > RC bugs that exist due to the capability problems, the disabled cron and > the kernel regression. > > So, at your earliest convenience, please hint in 0.30.216~r2772-5 of > util-vserver

Re: redhat-cluster tmpfile fixes

Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > please accept redhat-cluster 2.20080801-4+lenny1 which I have just > uploaded to testing-proposed-updates: > >* Fix several tmpfile race conditions, among them CVE-2008-4192 and > CVE-2008-4579. (Closes: #496410) approved cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Bug#502234: nvidia-cg-toolkit: perl runtime warnings during upgrade

Andres Mejia wrote: > On Thursday 23 October 2008 04:04:26 am Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> "Andres Mejia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I have a fix for this (and similar issues I found with perlcritic) >>> ready for upload. Could an exception be made for this kind of fix? >> Patch? If this i

Re: list of possible QA hints

Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: >> Hi, >> is it possibile to hint those QA packages? >> >> The list contains packages with supposedly small changes (usually only in >> debian >> revision). > > having a closer look there are only a few

Re: Please unblock chkrootkit 0.48-8

Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Hi, > > please consider unblocking chkrootkit 0.48-8, it introduces several bug fixes. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >