Bug#797906: jessie-pu: package dolibarr/3.5.5+dfsg1-2

2016-02-23 Thread Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy)
To fix opened securities hole into dolibarr stable package, i prepared the following 3 patch. This patch is now already included into unstable. It fixes the following CVE: * Fix CVE-2016-1912 (Closes: #812496) * Fix CVE-2015-8685 (Closes: #812449) * Fix CVE-2015-3935 (Closes: #787762) This is the

Bug#797906: jessie-pu: package dolibarr/3.5.5+dfsg1-2

2016-03-20 Thread Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy)
Hi Adam. A fix was prepared to solve several CVE. Security team already answered me they on't plan any DSA released for this patch. All fixes are already included into unstable. Can we push it into stable ? It fixes the following CVE: * Fix CVE-2016-1912 (Closes: #812496) * Fix CVE-2015-8685 (Clo

Bug#861926: Acknowledgement (jessie-pu: package php-tcpdf/6.0.093+dfsg-1)

2017-05-06 Thread Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy)
I made an error when copying and paste the CVE number in my first request. Bug number was correct, so #814030, but CVE related is CVE-2017-6100 Also, this is the full debdiff (i previously provided only the patch file): diff -Nru tcpdf-6.0.093+dfsg/debian/changelog tcpdf-6.0.093+dfsg/debian/ ch

Bug#797906: jessie-pu: package dolibarr/3.5.5+dfsg1-2

2015-09-03 Thread Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy)
Sorry. I didn't understood your answer (my english is not my mother language). You are speaking about "unstable". I am speaking about pushing a CVE fix into stable 3.5.5. This fix is part of a patch that include other fix and this patch is called 3.5.7. My question is can I push fix1 + fix2 + fix

Bug#776458: unblock: dolibarr/3.5.5+dfsg1-1

2015-02-15 Thread Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy)
This is my point of view of what to do for this case: My first choice was to not send any unblock request. Reaon is that CVE need privileged account to be exploited, so it is not a high risk, and I would not like to bother anybody. However, Moritz Muehlenhoff ask me to provide a fix. A fix was al