as
>part of non-haskell related transitions).
>
>As I understand it haskell binnmus are normally handled by Joachim
>Breitner, who has a script that outputs what needs binnmuing and feeds
>output from that script into wanna-build. Is there some issue that is
>blocking this at the moment.
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2019, 16:07 + schrieb Dmitry Bogatov:
> Hi!
>
> With GHC-8.6.5 is in unstable, many haskell libraries are no longer
> uninstallable. Right now I am interested in libghc-shake-dev, since it
> is needed for test suite of src:dh-runit[1].
>
> So, what is the status? Ar
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.08.2019, 16:36 + schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
> > I just scheduled the set of binNMUs seemingly required Haskell. I hope
> > this was the right thing to do at this time. Really someone more active
> > should take over that job.
>
> Where is the documentation of this
Hi,
about the last point: you can treat it like a script and run it with
`runhaskell`
Cheers,
Joachim
Am 27. August 2019 21:50:11 MESZ schrieb Philipp Kern :
>On 8/27/2019 7:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 19:40 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
>>> So, how can we move forw
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
> transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
> creative idea on how to best signal back partial success, let me know.
> :)
>
> (My cu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
in order to fix #814055 and #813078, and prevent auto-removal of
git-annex in testing, without waiting for the current Haskell
transition,
+(Closes: 861976)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner Sat, 06 May 2017 16:56:46 -0400
+
haskell-glut (2.7.0.10-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable as part of GHC 8 transition.
diff -Nru haskell-glut-2.7.0.10/debian/patches/series
haskell-glut-2.7.0.10/debian/patches/series
--- haskell-glut
-1.19/debian/changelog 2016-10-27 18:37:21.0 -0400
+++ lhs2tex-1.19/debian/changelog 2017-06-05 12:29:08.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+lhs2tex (1.19-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Depend on texlive-science (closes: #864225)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:28:59
Dear release team,
the Debian Haskell Team is eager to start on GHC-7.10 real soon,
hopefully before or at DebCamp.
Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the GCC 5
transition?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ#
Dear release team,
from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable should
be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
indicate any errors on release architectures, and the release tracker²
only shows what I believe are false negatives.
Nevertheless, none of th
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
> > should
> > be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
>
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Mind you, some of the haskell packages are waiting for "icu", which
> is waiting for gcc-5. Examples include "haskell
> -blogliterately/amd64"[1] and "haskell-text-icu/amd64"[2].
>
> I am not sure this is good...
well, at leas
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 18:26 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>
> > From the top of my head, there is haskell-src-exts on mips and mipsel,
> > together with reverse dependencies (haskel-hoogle, hlint, hothasktags).
>
> libghc-hlint-dev, libghc-hlint-prof are still in unstable, block
Hi,
Am Montag, den 03.08.2015, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 22:55:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the
> > GCC 5 transition?
>
> I'd rather not have both at the sa
Hi,
I was since then told that arch-all binNMUs are not properly supported,
so sorry for filing a few a while ago. Anyways, one of them was
haskell-intern, where I rebuild libghc-intern-doc to be built against
the version of haddock in unstable (virtual package
haddock-interface-27). But it seems
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 19.12.2015, 12:56 + schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Joachim Breitner:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was since then told that arch-all binNMUs are not properly supported,
> > so sorry for filing a few a while ago. Anyways, one of them was
> > haskell-intern,
Hi Adrian,
Am Montag, den 21.12.2015, 00:00 +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
> On 12/20/2015 11:02 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > ah, I was mislead by the mail address you use, but you are an
> > uploading DD – so since you have built it anyways, why don’t you
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a new upstream version of haskell-utf8-string was uploaded, and it seems
to me that the mainatainer did not request binNMus for the reverse
depdendencies yet. Please schedule the following rebuilds:
n
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is a follow up to #565263. My script did not schedule this binNMU
the last time (I guess the package was in state Building, but agains
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 22:51 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> The upcoming lenny point release includes a fix to ghc6 to resolve a
> deadlock issue on 64-bit architectures, together with a number of
> binNMUs for affected packages on those architectures.
>
> ghc6 has not managed to buil
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I uploaded two haskell library packages to experimental, together with a
new version of haskell-devscripts, which depends on the new ghc6
compiler present in experimental. Two arches have started to bu
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 22:53 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Montag, den 18.01.2010, 19:50 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva:
> > Qua, 2010-01-13 às 18:49 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> > > with ghc6-6.12.1, it is really easy to use hash-bas
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 17:56 +0100 schrieb Simon Ruderich:
> The Debian update 3.0.4 updates libghc6-xmonad-dev to 0.7-2+b1
> but libghc6-xmonad-contrib-dev depends on 0.7-2. This causes a
> conflict and prevents the update of libghc6-xmonad-dev.
hmm. With the current haskell packages, t
xmonad to allow for 0.7-2 _and_ 0.7-2+b1 (Closes: #567667)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:26:43 +0100
+
xmonad-contrib (0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Build against the new haskell-x11 with xinerama support
diff -u xmonad-contrib-0.7/debian/control xmonad-contrib-0.7/debian/control
Hi,
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 18:50 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:37 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 15:51 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > > Whilst admitting to not knowing much about the haskell packaging
> >
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 14.02.2010, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Luk Claes writes:
> > Kari Pahula wrote:
> >> The lack of ghc6 on ia64 has kept it from testing since 6.10.1. I
> >> never got it built with a 6.10 compiler but seems like we're pretty
> >> close to getting there with
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Micha Lenk writes:
> > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account
> > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)"
>
> *sigh*
>
> I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is fi
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> > > Micha Lenk writes:
> > > > nmu gnu
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > ok, then maybe something is broken with
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash
> > because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64?
>
> It's a feature.
>
> Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display bin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it seems that https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ is not updated any more
since about January. It would be nice to get those dumps working again.
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Release Team,
for Haskell libraries we now have a system of provides and depends in
place that guarantees that an ABI change in one of the packages makes
broken reverse dependencies uninstallable, simil
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Joachim Breitner writes:
> > nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 . i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Rebuild with
> > ghc6-6.12.1-10'
> > dw ghc6_6.12.1-9 . amd64 hppa i386 mips mips
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> > Such a change is expected to happen very rarely, but we want to be
> > prepared. Therefore, from ghc6-6.12.1-10 on, ghc6 also provides virtual
> > packages corresponding to the ABIs contained in them. We need all
> > h
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it seems that I did not give the required binNMU requests for alpha, so
here they are:
nmu cpphs_1.9-2 . alpha . -m 'Rebuild with ghc6-6.12.1-10'
dw cpphs_1.9-2 . alpha . -m 'ghc6 (>= 6.12.1-10)'
nm
Hi,
thanks for scheduling.
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 13:32 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > and as promised, a hand-crafted list of give-backs of packages which were
> > failing due to ABI mismatches:
>
> All done, after inserting the missing versions :-)
Hmm, I thought one can leave out th
Hi,
I either missed that one or the build log just appeared. Anyways, please
add:
gb hslogger_1.0.9-1 . hppa
dw hslogger_1.0.9-1 . hppa . -m "libghc6-network-dev (>> 2.2.1.7-1),
libghc6-parsec2-dev (>> 2.1.0.1-2)"
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debi
Hi,
some more giveback/depwaits:
gb haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-2 . powerpc kfreebsd-i386
dw haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-2 . powerpc kfreebsd-i386 . -m "libghc6-openal-dev (>>
1.3.1.3-2), libghc6-opengl-dev (>> 2.2.3.0-2)"
gb xmonad-contrib . alpha
dw xmonad-contrib . alpha -m "libghc6-xmonad-dev (>= 0.9.1-2)
Hi,
and more failing build logs are coming in:
gb haskell-http_4006-3 . powerpc alpha kfreebsd-i386
dw haskell-http_4006-3 . powerpc alpha kfreebsd-i386 . -m
"libghc6-network-dev (>> 2.2.1.7-1), libghc6-parsec2-dev (>> 2.1.0.1-2)"
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian
Hi,
and yet more failing build logs are coming in:
gb haskell-network-bytestring . powerpc kfreebsd-i386
dp haskell-network-bytestring . alpha powerpc kfreebsd-i386 . -m
"libghc6-network-dev (>> 2.2.1.7-1), libghc6-parsec2-dev (>> 2.1.0.1-2)"
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
De
Hi,
as promised on IRC, a large list of depwaits. I think that these will
prevent most of the "Package .. not found" FTBFS-Bugs, besides maybe
some that occur due to a race condition with creating this list.
dw agda-stdlib_0.3-1 . alpha armel hppa mipsel powerpc s390 kfreebsd-i386 . -m
'libghc6
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this slipped through the first round of binNMUs:
nmu haskell-ghc-paths_0.1.0.6-1 . amd64 hppa kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m
"Rebuild
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the FTBFS with:
HsColour: XXX: hGetContents: invalid argument (Invalid or incomplete
multibyte or wide character)
should be fixed with hscolour-1.16. (Although I don’t quite understand why it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package was built with a previous version of ghc6 which had issues.
At least this particular issue has been fixed by now, please re-try :-)
gb ldap-haskell . armel
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
hdbc-odbc failed on armel, should work with newest ghc6 package:
gb hdbc-odbc . armel
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
hdbc-postgresql 2.2.3.1-1 (s390) was tried with a broken version of
parsec, so please:
gb hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . s390
dw hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . s390 . -m "libghc6-parsec2-dev (>> 2.1.0.1-2)"
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the current ghc6 compiler is unable to provide working packages on ia64,
and a fix is not in sight. I’d like to remove the ia64 build-failure logs
from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php
to m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
haskell-cgi has to be built with a fixed haskell-network:
gb haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390
dw haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390 armel . -m "libghc6-network-dev (>>
2.2.1.7-1)"
Thanks
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please schedule
nmu highlighting-kate_0.2.5-4 . i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 . -m
"rebuild against changed pcre-light ABI"
Th
Hi release team,
although the haskell packages are not really close to a transitional
state yet (armel just built the compiler, mips and mipsel haven’t yet),
I had a look at the haskell packages on
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php. I did not see any surprising
problems, but I was wondering wh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these packages were tried against broken version:
gb arbtt_0.4.5.1-1 . armel
dw arbtt_0.4.5.1-1 . armel . -m "libghc6-x11-dev (>> 1.5.0.0-2)"
gb hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . armel
dw hdbc-postgresql_2.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I overlooked this one due to the wrong log displayed by
status/packages.php (see my mail on d-wb-team about that):
gb hdbc-sqlite3_2.3.0.0-1 . armel
dw hdbc-sqlite3_2.3.0.0-1 . armel . -m "libghc6-hdb
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Joachim Breitner writes:
> > nmu highlighting-kate_0.2.5-4 . i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 .
> > -m "rebuild against changed pcre-light ABI"
>
> Done. Got lost i
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Joachim Breitner writes:
> > Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> >> Joachim Breitner writes:
> >> > nmu highlighting-kate
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these packages were tried against broken version:
dw haskelldb-hdbc_0.13-1 . -m "libghc6-hdbc-dev (>> 2.2.3-1),
libghc6-convertible-dev (>> 1.0.9-1)"
I hope the broken versions will soon be all rebu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have added dep-waits on the binNMUs, but it seems I have never
scheduled these binNMUs:
nmu . haskell-convertible_1.0.9-1 hdbc_2.2.3-1 . armel . -m "Rebuild due to
changed base ABI"
And a correspo
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Joachim Breitner writes:
> > If the package requires too much resources for such an architecture to
> > build, maybe it’s an indication that these architectures are also a too
> > weak to
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:42 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > This might be a solution, yes, though I would prefer not to do
> > this. You've managed to get highlighting-kate's build times down, making
> > it build everywhere but on armel (where it got t
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:56 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Joachim Breitner writes:
> > Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> >> This might be a solution, yes, though I would prefer not to do
> &g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
when scheduling the binNMUs, I forgot that hdbc depends on convertible -
sorry...
dw hdbc_2.2.3-1 . armel . -m "libghc6-convertible-dev (>> 1.0.9-1)"
Greetings,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I’m sure I made this dep-waits before... anyways, these need to be
retried as well:
dw hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 hdbc-odbc_2.2.3.0-1 . armel .-m
"libghc6-convertible-dev (>> 1.0.9-1), libghc6-hdbc-de
Hi,
FYI:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gtk2hs
says gtk2hs has the same version in unstable and testing (0.9.13-5),
which is not the case:
$ rmadison gtk2hs
gtk2hs | 0.9.13-5 | testing | source
gtk2hs | 0.9.13-5 | unstable | source
gtk2hs | 0.
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.03.2010, 20:33 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE'
Brockschmidt:
> This is the current result of a hint for ghc6 (including some unrelated
> packages ready to move testing):
>
> finish:
> [ghc6,haskell-devscripts,haskell-opengl,haskell-openal,haskell-alut,haskell-mtl,haskell-quick
Hi,
I’m well aware that some haskell packages are quite heavy to build. But
I’m surprised to see hppa fail where arches like armel and mips* cope.
Is there something else broken?
These packages’ build failure on hppa prevent a testing migration:
hlint (hppa, needs haskell-src-exts)
These packag
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a new haskell-text was uploaded, please schedule
nmu haskell-hstringtemplate_0.6.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new
haskell-text"
dw has
HI,
Am Mittwoch, den 24.03.2010, 13:24 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> I started an agda build on paer 8 days ago - it is still running. Memory
> does not appear to be an issue (swap is available, but unused). Throwing
> more CPU at it might improve things - but I don't think a CPU exists with
> eno
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the build problems of the package frown on kfreebsd are most likely
triggered because the lhs2tex package on kfreebsd was built with
ghc6-6.12, while on the other arches, it was built with 6.10.
I upd
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 19:05 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I updated frown to work correctly when built with ghc6-6.12 (#570868),
> so these builds should work now:
>
> gb frown . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
eh, the important part is the deb-wait for course
dw frow
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 20:16 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> I'm not sure why you're opening a bug against release.debian.org while
> pinging either buildd admins directly or -wb-team@ would be sufficient.
sorry, I was under the impression that wb requests should be handled via
bugs.
affects 575534 ghc6
thanks
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 23:47 +0400 schrieb Stepan Golosunov:
> 24.03.2010 в 13:24:53 -0600 dann frazier написал:
> > I started an agda build on paer 8 days ago - it is still running. Memory
> > does not appear to be an issue (swap is available, but unused). Thr
Hi,
haskell-platform, and all its dependencies have now dated enough to
enter testing, but it did not happen today. I’m currently scanning
through http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl for problems. I
could identify:
* haskell-hsh is not yet built on hppa: 2.0.3-2 vs 2.0.3-3
Last bui
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2010, 21:31 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> So far as I can see, libghc6-configfile-dev's breakage is a result of
> the lack of missingh, so your analysis looks correct.
thanks. @hppa-build-admins: the previous version of missingh built
correctly on peri, the current v
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.05.2010, 12:10 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sex Mai 21 11:26:50 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > it might be ok if they are independent
> > from the transition, but this is actually not trivial to tell
>
> How can one tell
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.05.2010, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > Also, this page only lists i386 Dependency conflicts, so it might miss
> > something.
>
> It lists the first architecture on which a problem is detected (the list
> is mostly alphabetical, but with i386 moved to the start).
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 08:50 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:11:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 02:31:29PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2010,
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 08:50 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:11:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Sorry for the late response, I've given back missingh. I can
Hi,
I think I mentioned it before, but maybe only marginally. The wb-team
gave me wanna-build write requests so that we can schedule
Haskell-related binNMUs without bugging the release- or wb-team. You can
just notify me on d-haskell about rebuilds to trigger.
I’ll have a look at at and then clos
Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.06.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Transition freeze
> =
>
> As announced in the previous release update, we are now instituting a
> freeze on new transitions in order to make it easier to finish
> transitions without them becoming blocked by oth
Hi release team,
unless http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl is misleading, the
following independent sets of source package can migrate if hinted:
haskell-sdl haskell-sdl-gfx haskell-sdl-image haskell-sdl-mixer haskell-sdl-ttf
haskell-xml haskell-feed haskell-filestore haskell-texmath
Dear port maintainers,
haskell-src-exts is currently not buildable on your architecture as it
is too heavy – it even exceeds virtual memory. Of course this does not
shed a good light on the code (and the compiler), but it is nothing that
we (Debian) can fix easily. As this problem is holding up th
aised
> your voice a bit earlier I'm afraid.
fair enough, I just wanted to have it discussed.
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >> As I can see it currently, the state of haskell in testing is quite
> >> well. So if we’d upload
Dear release team,
as I did not receive any reply on this mail from the buildd admins:
Am Montag, den 12.07.2010, 18:12 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> haskell-src-exts is currently not buildable on your architecture as it
> is too heavy – it even exceeds virtual memory. Of course thi
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 31.07.2010, 22:14 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I’m now asking you for a solution to haskell-src-exts on mips, mipsel,
> armel, s390. A forcehint would help transitioning some packages
> (especially haskell-dummy), a removal of the outdate binaries from
> un
Hi Marco,
Am Freitag, den 06.08.2010, 15:56 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sex Ago 06 12:03:01 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > Am Freitag, den 06.08.2010, 11:25 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> > Silva:
> > > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's m
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 08.08.2010, 02:25 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sáb Ago 07 11:34:05 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > looks like there went something more wrong with the git archive.
> > Attached is the diff between the sources as uploaded to th
8-01 22:14:45.0 +0200
+++ haskell-texmath-0.3.0.2/debian/changelog 2010-08-22 16:06:02.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+haskell-texmath (0.3.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Run ghc6 without active timer (+RTS -V0 -RTS) to avoid build
+problems on hppa
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner Sun, 22 A
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it was pointed out to me that serna needs to be rebuilt:
nmu serna-free_4.3.0.20110221-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild to bump sip-api dependency
(
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 16:47 + schrieb Iain Lane:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:00:16PM +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 09:38 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> >Silva:
> >> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of S
Hi Mark,
Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Mark Hymers:
> On Sun, 27, Mar, 2011 at 10:06:54AM +0530, Joachim Breitner spoke thus..
> > I guess the arch-any ghc6 packages are still in the archive, given that
> > they are owned by a different source package. Maybe
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 12:22 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Mark Hymers:
> > On Sun, 27, Mar, 2011 at 10:06:54AM +0530, Joachim Breitner spoke thus..
> > > I guess the arch-any ghc6 packages are still in the a
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Mark Hymers:
> On Sun, 27, Mar, 2011 at 04:11:49PM +0530, Joachim Breitner spoke thus..
> > Status: The bad arch-all package is gone from the Packages list, but
> > still present in incoming.debian.org, which is also consider
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be
possible?
For the ghc transition, these settings should do, if I guess t
Hi Julien,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
> > useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an ex
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2011, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 03/29/2011 08:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Hi release team,
> >
> > the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/
> > look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to u
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Christoph Berg:
> I'd still prefer an more or
> less official answer to the original question :)
I’m also interested in that, as we have a lot of duplication across the
debian/control files of haskell packages and if there is a chance for
poli
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:28:58 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hallo Joachim,
>
> am Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:24:30PM +0530 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Christoph Berg:
>> > I'd still prefer an more or
>> > less official answer to the original
an spending time on it and afterwards
noticing that it will not be used.
PPS: I am still traveling India, so my replies might be a bit slower than usual.
--
Joachim Breitner
e-Mail: m...@joachim-breitner.de
Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de
ICQ#: 74513189
Jabber-ID: nome...
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 13.05.2011, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > * Do you think it can handle all current and anticipatable
> > requirements? (I’m not involved in release team work and might missed
> > some conditions.)
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.05.2011, 11:44 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > And in
> > the absence of conflicts, this means that A and B are co-installable.
>
> Yes, but what about this, T is the package we're considering to mi
Hallo,
Am Montag, den 16.05.2011, 20:17 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 19:03:35 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 16.05.2011, 11:44 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > > On Sun, 15 May 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2011, 11:58 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure we need to deal with it from the start at the SAT
> solver level.
>
> We could instead include it as a "post-process filter&qu
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
