rly identify status of routes
+ when the gateways are in the hosts file
+ * debian/README: Describe caveats related to network link tests
+
+ -- Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña Thu, 03 Jun 2021
08:13:30 +0200
+
ifupdown-extra (0.31) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix some network scri
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libpam-chroot
[ Reason ]
This version includes fixes to build properly the package including:
- Installing the PAM module in the correct location (#980047)
- Supporti
es: 788793)
+
+ -- Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña Sun, 04 Jul 2021
23:04:35 +0200
+
netselect (0.3.ds1-28) unstable; urgency=medium
* Use debhelper files properly to relocation binaries and
diff -Nru netselect-0.3.ds1/debian/control netselect-0.3.ds1/debian/control
--- netselect-0.3.ds1/debian/contr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Could it be possible to unblock snort 2.9.15.1-5?
[Reason]
This version fixes a RC bug (#984614) that generated a dpkg prompt when users
where upgrading from older versions. It a
similar to
+the following: "crond[PID]: (CRON) bad username (/etc/cron.d/JOBNAME)"
+(Closes: #767016, #801384, #783665) (LP: #1593317)
+
+ -- Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña Sun, 11 Mar 2018 22:32:18 +0100
+
cron (3.0pl1-128+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer up
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:42:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Javier, why was that problem not dealt with? Do you have troubles
> maintaining snort? If yes, maybe orphan it so that someone with more time
> can maintain it... or at least ask for help.
Yes, I have trouble keeping up with Debian
severity 553584 minor
retitle CVE-2009-3641: Possible DoS using specially-crafted IPv6 packets if
package is recompiled with IPv6 support
thanks
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:42:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Please remove snort fro
Hi all,
Unfortunately bastille has a RC bug (#524599) which actually stems from the
fact that it I have been unable to dedicate time to fully support bastille in
Debian. Even though the fix to #524599 is "easy" to fix so users do not get
the warning message, it would just be a cosmetic fix. basti
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock the snort package version 2.8.5.2-7. This package fixes the
following RC bugs: #608590, #603428 and #566308
This package is an improvement over the package in testing and h
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:49:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In future, it would be nice to maybe re-think what we put on which
> CDs. Some people have suggested having a separate CD for docs, which
> I'll admit I'm not such a fan of for a variety of reasons. I'm tempted
> to suggest that we m
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the
> release notes. The current statistics doesn't look good:
(...)
> es: 0 translated messages, 734 untranslated messages.
The current stats for Spanish
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:05:30PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> so please be so kind and remove it?
I've asked ftp masters to remove the package and have opened a bug to the
package (RC) so that it gets removed by release managers from the release.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Descripti
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:44:33AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm going to be building CDs tomorrow. If you want to carry on doing
> translations for a little longer, it's up to you. Just please make
> sure that whatever's in place on the website at midnight tonight (UTC)
> is ready to go.
Ste
Hi release team,
I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly,
this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but
introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kills
the Snort IDS as soon as it receives fragmented traff
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:39:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Luk Claes:
> > Any reason why this regression caused by a security upload, should not
> > be fixed by a security upload (I've put the Security Team in Cc)?
No reason, I just thought this would not be considered a security bug.
>
Hi,
Around two months ago I uploaded doc-debian (the package that ships the FAQ
as well as some of our core documents, like the Social Contract and the
Constitution) and it is still in the NEW queue, waiting for its byhand files
to be processed.
It was a high priority upload, as mentioned in th
Hi there,
There's a very important section in the Release Notes with a FIXME:
Upgrade your kernel or userland first?
http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-kernelorder
Based on #413458 (undeclared linux dependency on etch coreutils, affects
upgrade path?) I
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:42:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > However, users running with 2.6 kernels in Sarge and upgrading, might
> > encounter issues with udev (it does not support versions prior to
> > 2.6.15 and sarge provided 2.6.8), as described in #325568 (Upgrade path
> > for udev needs d
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:17:08PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > > If aptitude is started after that, it will still try to remove quite a
> > > few
> > > packages. Most o
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:22:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is not essential as long as you don't try to reboot before a new
> > kernel has been installed.
>
> My concern here is: what happens if an upgrade is interrupted in the middle,
> due to such things as a power outage, hardw
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:11:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:51:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 05:11:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > > It can however also b
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> This mail is just a reply to Javier's points. I'll follow up with a second
> mail with a proposal for a procedure 'C'.
>
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 23:17, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> >
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:20:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No, see the mail I sent previously, many things can go wrong after an
> > upgrade
> > and new kernel install: LILO, udev and device reordering might make a
> > system
> > unbootable before (and even after) the kernel upgrade.
>
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:25:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think we should provide recommendations on how to recover and make sure
> > that we point out that network upgrades might need a remote control
> > mechanism
> > (remote console access) just in case.
>
> Right, agreed.
I've ad
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> The announcement is available at
> http://people.debian.org/~tolimar/release.txt (and soon .wml).
> It would be great if you could translate it in time so the anouncement
> would be in all kind of languages in place.
There's a fe
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:17:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - there *is* downtime, a new kernel needs to be installed and that requires
> > a reboot
>
> Installing a new kernel doesn't *require* a reboot. Depends on whether you
> like your downtime to be scheduled or unscheduled. ;)
We
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I have just upgraded a few servers, and frankly I would recommend
> upgrading with apt-get instead of aptitude. As aptitude's own upgrade
> path is broken, it is proposing insane upgrade scenarii unless you do as
> described in the
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:39:46PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> At http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#relnotes we currently have (the
> bits between <<...>> are links):
>
>
> I'd like to propose the following changes:
> - Authors: add everybody listed as such in current version; I don't
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:04:51PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> > In an attempt to prevent drift to a well-known counter argument:
> > DEBIAN/md5sums (used by debsums) are *not* intended as a mean to counter
> > secu
Hi,
I would appreciate if checksecurity version 2.0.11 was allowed into testing.
The changes in this package in sid are minor:
- a new po-debconf translation was added (Portuguese)
- chrony was removed from its Depends (Bug #478203)
Thanks,
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
Hi,
Please allow nessus-plugins 2.2.10-6 into lenny, this package has only once
change in sid which is the addition of a po-debconf translation (to Galician)
Thanks
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Please allow snort (version 2.7.0-19) into lenny, this package has only two
changes in this version in sid:
- fixes a bashism bug, which is a release goal (#489662)
- introduces two po-debconf translations, Russian and Swedish
Thanks,
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear debian-release team,
Xorp in lenny and sid is at version 1.5~cvs.20080519-1, this version is
not however, a final release and has bugs that have been fixed in the
1.5 release which was released a few months later (22nd of July) but we were
not able to package+upload it in time for the freeze
As requested by Luk I have uploaded Xorp (version 1.5) to unstable using
the version at experimental. I have only introduced one change in this
upload: a workaround for an upstream bug in glibc that prevents IPv6
multicast from working properly [1]
Please consider this package version for lenny.
(CC: me on replies, I'm not in the list)
Hi there,
Yesterday I uploaded a new version of package for the Tiger security tool
(3.2.2-6) which introduces fixes to bugs in Debian's (and upstream's) BTS
that I believe might be proper to include in lenny for the benefit of Tiger
users:
- Uses UCF to
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:09:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yesterday I uploaded a new version of package for the Tiger security tool
> > (3.2.2-6) which introduces fixes to bugs in Debian&
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as documented by #435176 and then #495083 libphp-phplot has been
> unusable since May 2007. In fact, it has been empty(!) since May 2008,
> i.e. for over four months, with no-one actually noticing until a bug
> report was f
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:01:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Acidlab does not actually require libphp-phplot. Many users can use acidlab
> > without the plotting functionality.
>
> However, acidlab Depends: on libphp-phplot, so libphp-phplot cannot be
> removed. So, since I think removing li
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:51:32AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I should note that it has 30-something popcon installation and that the
> "available fork" has been in there for more than two years and in
> particular for a full release cycle. There is no reason for the Debian
> project to ke
I have just uploaded fortunes-es version 1.30, the only changes in this
version is some new quotes from Paul Newman, recently deceased. This upload
is a homage to his career and deeds.
I would appreciate if this package was unblocked since, after all, these data
changes could be considered "docum
Snort 2.7.0-20, recently uploaded to unstable, introduces a fix for a known
security vulnerability (CVE-2008-1804). Please unfreeze this package so that
the fix can move into Lenny.
Thanks
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:31:04PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Please make a new sourceful upload of snort to t-p-u, but please fix
> binNMUability at the same time; I'm attaching a patch. Please make sure
> that the fix is included on the next upload to unstable as well.
I have found out the 'p
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:31:04PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:56:52 +0100]:
>
> Hello, Javier.
>
> > Snort 2.7.0-20, recently uploaded to unstable, introduces a fix for a known
> > security vulnerability (CVE-200
Hi release team,
Since sarge is frozen I would like to ask for approval for the following
packages, they are "leaf" packages (nobody should depend on them):
- oinkmaster (1.2-1): 1.1-1 is not usable since the URLs it points to
download Snort sources are not valid any longer (#305048) (9 days ol
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:23:25AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least
> to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm either.
Why not? Isn't
http://www.debian.org/r
I have recently uploaded several different versions of the harden-doc
package in order to
a) reflect changes introduced in sarge which can affect the security of new
installations
b) update the different translations available
Not all translations are up-to-date and at least one (German)
hasn
As I stated in a previous e-mail oinkmaster 1.2-1 should be introduced into
sarge 1.1-1 is not usable since the URLs it points to download Snort
sources are not valid any longer (#305048) (9 days old)
I don't plan to make a fix through t-p-u to specifically fix #305048, it's
not worth my time and
Hi again,
I would like to request the full Nessus 2.2.4 suite to be approved into
sarge, even though this is a new upstream release from the one in sarge
(2.2.3) the changes in this release are actually bug fixes, no new features
are introduced (well, save for new attack plugins). If not applied,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:13:42AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok, approved.
>
> Can we reasonably expect oinkmaster to continue to work throughout sarge's
> lifetime, though, or is it possible there will be further changes that break
> it?
The upstream changes are targeted at making this work
> > Anibal said:
(...)
> > Javier pushed -10 as an important security improvement for desktop/laptop
> > systems and I agree with him on that regard. Running portmap listening
> > to the world on a desktop/laptop system is a considerable security
> > risk.
Please note that I didn't push this patch
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:14PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >I agree with Joey here. I meant to have that improvement on sarge but now I
> >see that my postint needed a lot of improvement. The changes introduced by
> >Anibal have made the situation worst, by adding a new configuratio
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:07:28PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > Now for the real request. It would be nice if the release notes (html, pdf
> > and txt versions) could be included on the first CD, same as the
> > installation manual. There are 11 languages that qualify:
> >en, es
Yesterday I uploaded a new version of the doc-debian package, which
provides the FAQ, after making updates in the CVS fixing long-standing
bugs [1] as well as making changes in preparation for the sarge release (so
the FAQ says that 'sarge' is stable and gives the correct count of packages
and
I uploaded tinyhoneypot (0.4.6-8) May 11th to fix a serious bug (adduser
was not present in the dependencies) but failed to ask -release to approve
this into sarge.
This serious bug has been recently reported as #312021. If possible,
please approve the latest version of tinyhoneypot into sarge.
I'm just curious since I sent a patch for this bug to #263224 almost a week
ago, sent a mail to debian-release [1] and nobody has taken action. Is
nobody (not even the maintainers!) addressing RC bugs in base packages? Was
this mail lost in the noise? Should I risk an NMU? What is
the Answer t
Hi LaMont and Release Team,
I have dedicated some time to start preparing a modutils NMU fixing both
the current RC bugs and lot of longstanding bugs currently present and
really easy to fix. Attached is the resulting patch (currently untested,
I want to keep working on adding some more fixes).
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:03:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm very concerned by the number of changes included in this NMU, not even
> counting the new upstream version. The release-critical bugs *must* be
The NMU does not include the new upstream, I was just suggesting that as a
possibi
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:03:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> Thanks for taking up the challenge of NMUing this package.
I've uploaded a new version after revising _all_ of modutil's bugs. This is
currently labeled 2.4.26-1.1, but if we decide to have a NMU to fix
RC+Importan
(removing debian-policy as per Manoj's wishes)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:09:59PM +0100, Xan wrote:
> Hello to everybody,
>
> Recently, I'm worried about the election of codenames of Debian: 1) how they
> are choosen and by who, and 2) what will happen when the Toy Story names
> finish.
1) You
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> etoken_0.3.9-2
This one should be fixed in 0.3.9-4 already (in sid). As for chrootuid and
remem (which I also maintain) I would like to see the build report.
Thanks for your work.
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:14:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The logs of the failed builds will be available after I got some sleep.
>
> http://bblank.thinkmo.de/debian/build-sarge/
>
chrootuid seems to be a false-positive or
(I'm Cc'ing this to debian-release. List: please CC: me on replies since
I'm not in the list)
Hi Lamont,
Modutils currently holds two bugs (#262941 and #263224) which from a
cursory view seem quite easy to fix but difficult to spot (the system will
not work once rebooted since ppp modules are no
Ifupdown latest version (0.6.4-4.10) has been out for quite a while (since
August) and if includes: translation fixes (#248717, #249233, #247772),
documentation fixes (including #259609, #247772, #255218 ) and normal bug
fixes (#250713, #245067, #242607, #255228, #121755, #258965, #255574,
#242537,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:02:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> >lm-sensors
> >23 days old
> >indirectly blocked by perl
> Hmm. No idea how long perl will take, so this probably deserves an upload
> if the vulnerability is serious enough.
The vulnerability is not serious en
Package: release.debian.org
Version: N/A
Priority: grave
Tags: rm
I would like to request the Release Managers to remove *all* of the OpenVAS
2.x packages from the current testing distribution. This includes the
following packages:
- libopenvas2 / libopenvas2-dev (version 2.0.4-2.1)
- libopenva
Dear Release Managers,
Snort and Daq where removed from testing on December 7th following an upload
to the daq library which did not follow the freeze policy.
Currently, both Snort (2.9.7.0-4) and daq (2.0.4-3) have been available in
unstable for more than a month. Both bugs are RC-free.
I woul
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:20:43AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Back in November 2014, Ivo described the solution to have snort and daq
> into Jessie (See [1]). Unfortunately, this didn't happen and he was forced
> to remove the packages from Jessie, as announced. We understand that the
> outcome w
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 07:12:44PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 27/10/2010 00:06, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> > release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package harden-doc. It fixes #571429.
> >
> >
Hi there release team,
I have made a few (minor) improvements to cron that I would like to squeeze
into before base is frozen. Attached is the .changes file of the package I
have ready to upload. Unlike the gettext one (Santiago's) I don't intend
to do an update to the latest upstream, but it's i
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:07:31AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Probably best to just ask the release team (cc'd) for their preferred
> > approach.
>
> Could we quantify that somewhat? Is one security bug enough? Are 10?
There's no way to quantify that as security bugs are linearly depe
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:25:58AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > That's currently the domain of the BTS. Anyone could publish sufficient
> > security (RC bugs) in a vulnerable package that it would make it impossible
> > for it to be released. Of course that would only be possible if:
>
>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:17:18PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 11:54 +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I value the importance of the DDTP project, but the translating effort
> has only recently seriously started. Looking at the statistics[1], I see
The first DDTP translation ef
Hi release team,
I would like you to consider the latest cron version in Sid (3.0pl1-99) for
etch. The changes since -97 are basicly LSB and SElinux related, although
minor, I would appreciate if those would make it into etch. It has been
available there for 18 days with no new bug reports (relat
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:01:54AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-upgradingpackages
>
> recommands to use 'script' and less
> to view the log. Unfortunately with less I have m
Hi, here's a list of changes I've recently made to some of my packages and
would like to see them go through the freeze (after they have spent some time
bug-free in sid, of course):
- acidbase (1.27-2): uploaded a week ago fixing important bug #402868 (will
not work if installed with a Postgre
(please CC: on replies, I'm not subscribed, sorry for breaking the thread
because of this)
>Luk Claes wrote:
>>Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
>> - debian-goodies (0.27): uploaded yesterday, fixes important (non-RC) bug
>> #264985 (checkrestart is useless in previous releases) and also fixes
>
(Please CC: me I'm not subscribed)
Hi there,
I've uploaded the following packages making translation updates:
- wordtrans (1.1pre14-4), includes l10n, UTF-8 and lintian fixes
- snort (2.3.3-11): translation updates (5 languages) and some template and
PO issues
- portmap (5-25): translation up
I uploaded doc-debian 3.1.4 a long time ago (november 19th) before even the
freeze, but was stuck in the upload queue since it requires manual action
(byhand rules). Now it has gotten into sid.
I would appreciate if this packag was allowed into testing, the changes are
mostly documentation-relate
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:41:45AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> PS: I don't like hardcoded lists of languages in Makefiles, maybe something to
> look into?
Maybe, the fact is that only rarely new languages are added here, and we also
want the feature to "not publish" a given language in CVS (because
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061224 02:10]:
> > A Google search for "debian upgrade reports" (no quotes) returns a page
> > [0] that is out of date since it is a template for a woody -> sarge
--> [0] is http://release.d
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> That being said, attached is a patch to the current upgrade-report.html page
> to add additional information (and do not make it depend on a specific Debian
> release). I think it's worthwhile menti
Please allow the following packages to move into testing
- remem (2.12-13) - debconf templates translations (one new, five updated due
to change in the debconf templates)
- euro-support (1.36) - included a new translation
Thanks
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please consider allowing manpages-es-extra (0.8a-16) into testing. This
version fixes a FTBFS bug (#379072) which was not spotted because this
package was Arch: all and was not being autobuild.
Thanks
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I recently uploaded a new version of harden-doc, the package that provides
the "Securing Debian Manual" as it contains many documentation fixes to make
it up-to-date with etch I would like to be unblocked so it can get into etch.
I might make a new release (3.12) after the current one, as some th
being provided or an error when downloading the mirror list
+ Now the script will at least abort with a (hopefully useful) error
+ message instead of writting a useless sources.list (Closes: 23)
+- More verbose output when netselect-apt fails indicating possible causes
+ of e
h netselect, due to an incorrect file
+ being provided or an error when downloading the mirror list
+ Now the script will at least abort with a (hopefully useful) error
+ message instead of writing a useless sources.list (Closes: #23)
+- More verbose output when netselec
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:26AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Please find attached a proposed diff (generated using interdiff) with the
> > > fixes that would be included in the new pack
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:48:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> This obviously fell through the cracks somewhere; apologies for that.
No worries. This happens to me a lot too :)
> Looking at the bugs listed in the changelog, #665876 is still listed as
> open in testing / unstable. Reading the
rm_conffile /etc/cron.daily/standard "3.0pl1-123" -- "$@"
if [ "$1" = "purge" ]; then
rm -f /etc/cron.allow /etc/cron.deny
diff -u cron-3.0pl1/debian/control cron-3.0pl1/debian/control
--- cron-3.0pl1/debian/control
+++ cron-3.0pl1/debian/control
@
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:26:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> With those changes, please feel free to go ahead; thanks.
Done, I just uploaded a package with those changes, thanks for the fast
response.
Regards
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:51:37AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2013-04-29 11:00, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> >Please unblock doc-debian so that the latest version moves over into
> >Wheezy. This package only ships documentation and it should not
> >impact
> >any other stuff.
>
> It's
t working since
+samhain tries to retrieve an MX record for 'localhost' from the DNS
+ (Closes: 709754)
+
+ -- Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:53:32 +0100
+
samhain (2.8.3a-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #602678)
diff --git a/debian/pos
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:57:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 18:06 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > I have recently updated Samhain in sid and have fixed some important bugs.
> > As
> &
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:48:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've just flagged the re-upload for acceptance into p-u; thanks.
You're welcome.
> As a side-note, please don't close pu bugs in your upload. They remain
> open until the package has been included in a point release, at which
> po
94 matches
Mail list logo
