number of related packages.
Oh I'm sorry I thought we had already discussed this? Needless to say it
is ok to go ahead and remove this package as it is not needed anymore.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
is it
contains tarballs within the source tarball so you can't just diff it
against the package in lenny. Sorry about that. But if you unpack it
you will see it it is the only thing I changed.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
There are problems with this versions' sieve implementation which might
cause problems for users so it would be good if it doesn't enter testing.
I am working on -3 which will fix the issue and hope to upload it today.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-re
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Please open an RC bug against dovecot in unstable if you want to block
it from entering testing.
Sorry I forgot to follow up on this. It is a moot point now anyway as I
have uploaded 1:1.22-2. Next time I will remember to file an RC bug.
--
Jaldhar H
Now that I have uploaded dovecot 1.2.8, dovecot-antispam will need a
binNMU to continue working properly. (See bug #544588 for the gory
details. We are looking at better long-term solutions.)
nmu dovecot_1.2+20090702-1 . ALL [ . -m 'Rebuild for dovecot 1.2.8' ]
--
Jaldhar H. Vya
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:40 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Now that I have uploaded dovecot 1.2.8, dovecot-antispam will need a
binNMU to continue working properly. (See bug #544588 for the gory
details. We are looking at better long-term solutions
I would like to request a freeze exemption for libjs-yui (source package
yui.) The only reason it missed the freeze deadline was because the
package was renamed to fit the draft javascript policy and wound up in
NEW.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain
xt year or so.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usermin, webmin-optional, and webmin-extra are ready to enter testing now
but they need a manual hint due to their circular dependencies.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
ly to 1.190 and above which are not packaged yet.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
es it need a nudge to be autobuilt?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=pgp4pine shows massive
numbers of FTBFS.
Ugh some kind of endianness problem. Am investigating.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=pgp4pine shows massive
numbers of FTBFS.
Ugh some kind of endianness problem. Am investigating.
FYI, I just uploaded a fixed package a little earlier today.
--
Jaldh
. I promptly did an NMU, it has been in unstable for a while without
attracting new bugs and it fixes the 2 important and 6 normal bugs
mentioned above. (At least. I haven't been able to thoroughly
investigate all the bug reports.)
So can it go into sarge?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL P
es except for
webmin
webmin-extra
webmin-optional
and all the binary packages for 1.100 from the archive in order to resolve
this problem.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
y as grave because upstream agrees that this might be the
case. But I've heard nothing else on this from anyone. Perhaps a
severity downgrade is in order?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
s but he's kind of dropped out of sight lately. I'll see if I can give
him a nudge.
In the mean time I see Adrian has tagged this bug unreproducible.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
-6 has been uploaded with all the requested changes.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:16:41 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
-6 has been uploaded with all the requested changes.
dovecot-core.postinst still references conf.d/10-tcpwrapper.conf. Is
that intentional
ch I think
requires a policy change rather than a technical fix. I'll ask on -devel
if I'm on the right track.
Thanks for all your help.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
configuration. Two makefile variables were all that was needed to
change to fix this.
A diff of the changes is attached.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas debian/changelog | 18
debian/control|6 +-
debian/dovecot-core.NEWS | 29 ++-
debian
ition in 5 days rather than 2.
No real reason, it's just usually a habit for when there are RC bugs. So
5 days is fine with me.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
lease. I hope you will agree.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.1211192136280.10007@kubuntu
e tried my best to get this package to a
place where we can be proud to call it part of a Debian stable release. I hope
you will agree.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
security update if the segfaults should prove
exploitable.)
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.1211251655250.3950@kubuntu
ing the right thing but I can change it if
necessary.
If I make these changes as -6, will the RMs allow it for wheezy?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.1211262249450.30396@kubuntu
#576455. Any
instances of /usr/lib/sendmail were changed to /usr/sbin/sendmail (See
debian/patches/sendmail-path.patch in the source.) Hopefully this won't
be a problem for you.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
hen I mentioned this to the security team,
Joey replied:
> Please talk to the stable release managers. We don't consider this
> a vulnerability in dovecot but an update required after the security
> update of PostgreSQL which has to go in via proposed-updates.
So how do I proceed?
I uploaded python-njb last night with priority: high and a note in the
changelog that it fixes RC bug #402760. Please unblock it.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
unstable. A debdiff is attached.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas diff -Nru dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog
--- dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog 2014-12-14 12:28:42.0 -0500
+++ dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog 2015-05-28 19:41:14.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+dovecot (1
On Fri, 29 May 2015, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
I would like to update dovecot to fix a mbox corruption issue that affects
the version in stable. (see bug #776094) Upstream provided a fix which is
included in the version currently in unstable. A debdiff is attached.
Please hold off on this
is the version
currently in jessie.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.10.1505310213160.5598@kubuntu
On Sun, 31 May 2015, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
A debdiff is attached relative to 1:2.2.13-11 which is the version currently
in jessie.
...and I forgot the diff. Here it is now.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas diff -Nru dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog dovecot-2.2.13/debian/changelog
--- dovecot-2.2.13
to be
replaced.]
Personally I think we should be able to isolate just the font-related
changes without too much trouble. If you do not feel up to the task, I'll
take a look tomorrow.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
version fixes these problems. So I would like to propose
it as an update to stable. (The version in testing/unstable is already fixed.)
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas diff --git a/COPYING b/COPYING
index fcc2375..6f0bd44 100644
--- a/COPYING
+++ b/COPYING
@@ -4,6 +4,13 @@ The software is Open Source and free
sertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
Yes the upstream tarball contained a lot of leftover build system
related .orig files so I deleted them from the Debian source. Was there a
better way of doing that? The functionality of the software did not
change in any way by removing this clutter.
--
I deleted the .orig files from the unpacked
source but not from the original tarball (which was made specifically for
this issue so is not pristine anyway.) I will fix this and try again.
When I am ready should I open a new bug or respond to this one?
Sorry for the noise.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 12:33 -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Comparing the package currently in stable with the one you uploaded:
adsb@franck:~$ find maitreya-6.0.5-2/ -name '*.orig'| wc -l
0
a
38 matches
Mail list logo
