Hi Matthias,
On 10.09.2016 00:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> While the Debian Release team has some citation about the quality of the
> toolchain on their status page, it is not one of the release criteria
> documented
> by the release team. I'd like to document the status how I do understand it
>
Matt Taggart wrote:
> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
> much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
> the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the future either). This has
> been stated on the debian-hppa list seve
dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>>
>>> Matt Taggart wrote:
>>>> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't
>>
dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> dann frazier wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>>> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>>>>
>>>>
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
>
>> Patch in parisc git tree:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf032137aacb3640d7dd9d75b2b607
CC: linux-paric mailing list
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>>> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
&g
dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:46:34AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> CC: linux-paric mailing list
>>
>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +01
dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
>>
>> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at
>> least the kernel doesn't panic() anymore). Since the issue is related to
>> threading
On 06/16/2009 08:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
PS: if you want an HPPA-specific issue to play with,
http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=ruby1.9&ver=1.9.0.1-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1213563978&file=log&as=raw
might be a good candidate.
In reali
On 07/05/2009 01:34 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:57:56PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Did something change to peri? I'm currently only seeing them on
penalosa.
UP kernel, maybe?
Both peri and penalosa run 2
On 07/30/2009 07:44 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/07/msg2.html
I can't comment on this issue. I hope Dave can?
On 10/07/2009 02:43 PM, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [090816 13:24]:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [090730 16:51]:
As from release team point of view, it is necessary that there is a plan
how hppa can and will return in the forseeable future to normal mod
CC'ed: parisc-linux kernel development list
Andreas Barth wrote:
during the upload of python2.5, the build failed on hppa due to stalls
in the test suite, see http://bugs.debian.org/483042 and
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=python2.5&ver=2.5.2-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1211583145&file=log
(Matt
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
I spent hours trying to do the hppa porters' work by investigating the
ruby1.9 bui
dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
I just looked into ruby19 on hppa.
The makecontext()/setcontext()/switchcontext() functions which went into
libc-ports recently [*2] will not help here.
Instead, I think only when at some
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: affects -1 src:palo
This pre-unblock request is to get a decision from the Bookworm
release team if I'm allowed to upload the palo 2.23 bug-fix version.
- palo is a bootloader fo
issues with the Linux kernel at that time. Currently,
upstream kernel 3.10 (stable) and kernel 3.11 do work reliable on all
major machines.
-- Helge Deller
On 09/01/2013 09:33 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
&g
17 matches
Mail list logo
