Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Nicola
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 08:33, Nicola Di Lieto wrote:
> as requested I attach the source debdiff. Thank you.
Please go ahead and upoad to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Andrius
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 13:45, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I am seeking pre-approval to upload openbabel/3.1.1+dfsg-6.
Please go ahead and upoad to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Håvard
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 10:21, Håvard Flaget Aasen
wrote:
> Please unblock package libexplain
Please go ahead and upoad to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag.
Regards
Graham
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgee-0.8
[ Reason ]
libgee-0.8/0.20.3-1 in testing currently FTBFS against the current
valac (#988020)
[ Impact ]
libgee-0.8 is not able to be updated in testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package joblib
[ Reason ]
joblib/0.17.0-3 fails its autopkgtests on s390x, a big-endian architecture
[ Impact ]
As per upstream issue #1123 [1], joblib.load() on a big-endia
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Stephen
There's a typo in your changelog, the bug number should be #989862:
+gcc-mingw-w64 (24.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix gcov handling: we need to tell GCC that we have headers, without
+telling it where, and then we need to correct its d
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Samuel
As can be seen in aeskeyfind's excuses [1]:
not blocked: has successful autopkgtest
You'll need to file a RoM; ANAIS bug against ftp.debian.org [2]
requesting removal of aeskyfind's binaries on the architectures where
it no longer builds.
Please close this
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Thomas
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 21:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
You've attached a debdiff against uwsgi/2.0.19.1-7 in unstable, which
is currently blocked [1].
I think it will be best if 2.0.19.1-7 migrates to testi
Hi Thomas, Jonas
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 16:07, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'm hereby attaching the output of:
> git diff -u -r debian/2.0.19.1-6 -r debian/2.0.19.1-7
Thanks.
> Maybe you could unblock debian/2.0.19.1-7 considering this is a target
> patch? Otherwise, Jonas may agree to revert the p
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 17:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Correct: the changes in debian/2.0.19.1-7 should not affect Debian.
Thanks. That was fortunate timing, uwsgi/2.0.19.1-7 and
uwsgi-plugin-php/0.0.12 are both in testing now.
> Sorry for the mess.
No harm done.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Daniele
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 03:12, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> The code for the fix is trivial, I packaged the new release because when I
> looked at diff between the 2 tags, there were: the fix for CVE-2021-33503,
> some
> fix for deprecation warnings emitted in
uwsgi's testing excuses [1] currently shows (amd64 only for clarity):
migrating uwsgi-core/2.0.19.1-7.1/amd64 to testing makes
uwsgi-plugin-luajit/2.0.19.1+5+0.0.6/amd64 uninstallable
migrating uwsgi-core/2.0.19.1-7.1/amd64 to testing makes
uwsgi-plugin-mongo/2.0.19.1+5+0.0.7/amd64 uninstallable
m
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Kumar
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 06:27, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Please permit me to upload the attached targeted fix from upstream
> that fixed erroneous calculations relating to sparse diagonal
> matrices. This fix is needed to prevent some numerical errors,
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Daniele
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 18:34, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Is there something I can do now? Sorry for the new amount of work... :/
These things happen. :) I don't think there's anything we can do now,
except wait to see the results of the autopkgtests.
Regar
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Salvatore
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 09:30, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Please unblock package nfs-utils, or rather this is a pre-approval
> request for it.
...
> Okay to upload?
Please go ahead and upload to unstable, and remove the moreinfo tag
once it h
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Matthias
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 03:12, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Let me know what you think!
Assuming it can happen soon, please go ahead upload to unstable, and
remove the moreinfo tag once it has built.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Andreas
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 16:09, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'd like to drop the Recommends: libomp-9-dev from clang-9
> libomp-*-dev are not co-installable and libomp-dev depends on
> libomp-11-dev. Having the Recomends on the non-default libomp-9-dev
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Andrey
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 10:42, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> unblock kvirc/4:5.0.0+dfsg-5
I don't see 4:5.0.0+dfsg-5 in unstable yet, so I'm not sure if this
was meant to be a pre-approval request. Assuming it was, please go
ahead and upload to unst
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Peter
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 14:03, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> This is a pre-approval request before I upload nomad to unstable to
> fix a security problem (CVE-2021-32575).
Assuming it can happen soon, please go ahead upload to unstable, and
remove the mor
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libserialport/0.1.1-4
Hi Jonathan
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 19:03, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> unblock libserialport/0.1.1-3
I'm assuming this bug was meant as a pre-approval request for 0.1.1-4.
Please go ahead and upload to unstab
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Benjamin
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 08:57, Benjamin Hof wrote:
> I'd be happy to provide a new upload with a more useful autopkgtest
> that executes the test suite, if that'd work for you.
That sounds good! Please go ahead with a new upload and remove the
m
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi David
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 22:33, David Mohammed wrote:
> Please unblock package budgie-desktop
Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag
once it has built.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Control: tags 990808 -1 -moreinfo confirmed
Sorry, I managed to reply to the wrong bug.
Hi Marcos
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 17:33, Marcos Fouces wrote:
> I still not uploaded the package to sid waiting for aproval.
Please go ahead and upload, then remove th
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Salvatore
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 21:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> fail2ban is affected by CVE-2021-32749, see detailed advisory in
> https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/security/advisories/GHSA-m985-3f3v-cwmm,
> which is a possible remote code execution vulner
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Kartik
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 08:33, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> Please unblock apertium-apy (0.11.7-2) which will fix #990917
>
> Let me know if any additional information is needed.
Please see the 'Appropriate changes during Hard and Full Freeze'
section and the 'App
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Stig
Please attach a filtered debdiff to this bug. Something like:
filterdiff -x '*/build-aux/*' -x '*/doc/html/*'
varnish-6.5.1-1--6.5.2-1.debdiff >filtered.debdiff
Please also show the command that you end up using, so we can see
which parts were excluded.
Reg
Hi Kartik
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 10:48, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
It looks like you've attached a binary debdiff. We are looking for a
source debdiff between the version in testing and unstable.
i.e.
debdiff apertium-apy_0.11.6-1.dsc apertium-ap
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Stig
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:00, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Attached is the diff. Changes are the upstream bugfix, as well as two commits
> in the packaging repository:
Thanks. Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the
moreinfo tag once it h
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Sascha
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:57, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> I have added a debdiff to this bugreport that illustrates the
> situation. I could upload to unstable anytime. Please let me know if the
> fix is appropriate and I will initiate an upload if c
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Kyle
Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag
once it has built.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi Andreas
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 14:33, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The fix is not yet uploaded, I intend to 2-day NMU it.
Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag
once it has built.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Praveen
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 21:21, wrote:
> + * Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12.
Please revert this change. See 'Target fixes' section of the freeze policy [1].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#full
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi Étienne
Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag
once it has built.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Frédéric
You didn't include a source debdiff with your unblock request. Also,
the Vcs-Browser URL [1] in debian/control returns 404.
I generated a diff and got the following:
61 files changed, 19938 insertions(+), 2005 deletions(-)
This is unreviewable by us. On
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Javier
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 23:27, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> > $ debdiff snort_2.9.15.1-4_i386.deb snort_2.9.15.1-5_i386.deb
> [..]
>
> The debdiff does not seem to show any actual packaging changes. Are
> you sure you diffed the correct files?
This looks li
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Andrej
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 13:12, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I finally came back from lunch, the latest debdiff and the diffoscope output
> are attached.
The diffoscope output of a no-change rebuild of 1.7.22-1 and 1.7.22-2
should show fewer differences
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ircii/20210314-1
Contro: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Jan
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 16:21, Jan Wagner wrote:
> [ Risks ]
> While the diffstat looks huge, a significant part is removed code.
This debdiff is unreviewable. Please provide a filtered debdiff along
with the comman
Control: retitle -1 [pre-approval] unblock: gutenprint/5.3.3-5
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo + confirmed
Hi Didier
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 17:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> This is a pre-approval request for package package gutenprint.
Please go ahead and upload, and remove the moreinfo tag onc
Hi Andreas
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 11:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu tcpreplay_4.3.3-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to update symbol size
> for pcap_version."
> nmu ipband_0.8.1-5.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to update symbol size for
> pcap_version."
> nmu mpqc3_0.0~git20170114-4.1 . A
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed
Hi Ryan
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 06:24, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> I would like to upload mgba with the following changes:
>
> - fix undefined references in libretro-mgba (breaks using it with
> gnome-games-app; RC bug #986986);
> - backport some targeted fixes spe
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package htop
[ Reason ]
Fix a division by zero in ZfsCompressedArcMeter
[ Impact ]
Users of ZFS-on-Linux, with ZfsCompressedArcMeter enabled in htop, but
no ZFS volumes moun
Hi Ole
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 14:13, Ole Streicher wrote:
> You are right, however it should be ensured to migrate before Bullseye,
> as it downgrades an RC bug. This is not directly visible, since I
> downgraded the bug already after the upload.
>
> --> if you plan to release before May 24, the m
Hi
We are doing a roll call for porters of all prospective release
architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of these
architectures [1] and intend to continue for the development cycle of
Debian Bookworm (est. release mid-2023), please respond with a signed
email containing the follow
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.10-add.html
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 21:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a tracker to add python3.10 as a supported python3 version. This
> is
> non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not
Hi Nilesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> migration. Rest stuff looks okay.
There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by
r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is re
Hi Nliesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 23:00, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> But we should make a list of all such packages and ping for Graham/Sebastian
> to propagate the hints accordingly. Probably that's what Graham wanted to say
> in the first place.
I've already added hints marking r-bioc-biocparallel/1
Hi
A friendly reminder about the porter roll call for bookworm.
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 11:57, Graham Inggs wrote:
> We are doing a roll call for porters of all prospective release
> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of these
> architectures [1] and intend to continu
Hi YunQiang Su
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 11:17, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> For mipsel and mips64el, I
> - test most packages on this architecture
> - run a Debian testing or unstable system on port that I use regularly
> - fix toolchain issues
> - triage arch-specific bugs
> - fix arch-relat
Hi Timo
I've scheduled binNMUs for cinnamon-settings-daemon and wacomtablet.
Please remember that libwacom needs a source-only upload for migration.
Regards
Graham
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team
I would like to transition trilinos from 12.18 to 13.2. Trilinos
13.2.0-1~exp1 has already cleared NEW, the auto-trilinos tracker [1]
is correct, and I have tested reb
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sun, 6 Mar 2022 at 15:03, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a transition window for python 3.10 as the default python3
> version.
> A tracker is setup at
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.10-default.html
>
> Thanks to many Debian and Ubunt
Hi Rebecca
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are:
> - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry
> them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy,
> see #1029533 for a po
Hi Markus
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 19:59, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I noticed there was an upload of opm-common 2022.10+ds-3, but it also
> FTBFS on armhf. I trust this is on your radar.
It turns opm-common was blocked by python3-defaults and
python3-defaults was blocked by opm-common'
Hi Rebecca, Andreas
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med
> matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If
> the autopkgtest on Salsa CI[4] would have passed I would have uploaded.
We will
Hi Tobias
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 12:09, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> sagemath is on track to re-enter testing on February 12 - if that's not too
> late for the soft freeze.
>
> If it's too late, could you help along to make it re-enter sooner?
For a start, I'll let giac migrate early.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Drew
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:12, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I recommend we allow scipy 1.10.1 into bookworm (assuming it passes 10
> day freeze testing as normal). I'm filing this bug to check if you
> agree that's a good idea before building and uploading to unstabl
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Håvard
I don't see ghostscript/10.0.0~dfsg-10 in unstable, so I assume this
is a pre-approval request.
Please explain why we need this fix in bookworm, and why it can't wait
for trixie.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Håvard
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 22:18, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
> The fix is for making the package cross-buildable, not sure what more
> to tell you.
I was hoping for some motivation as to why we needed this fix now
during the freeze, but not to worry, Helmut has al
Hi Alastair
Also, I plan to push 12.1.0~pre-1 from experimental to unstable.
Do you still plan to upload unicode-data 12.1?
Utf8proc 2.4.0, updated for unicode 12.1, has been released and we'd
like to get that version in.
Is anyone aware of any other bits outstanding?
Regards
Graham
On 2019/05/22 13:48, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
No, to my knowledge 12.1.0~pre-1 is close enough (containing "Reiwa").
Unless someone can point to issues requiring it, Its not worth getting
everything else rebuilt.
Ah OK, thanks.
There's probably no need for utf8proc 2.4.0 then either.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
The upload of modemmanager/1.10.0-1 revealed a bug in
modem-manager-gui in the handling of notifications from modems that
can provide location information (#922608).
My upl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
The upload of autopkgtest/5.2 in March 2018 included a fix for quoting
when printing the test command in the testbed (#893035). This caused
autopkgtest regressions in at le
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
On 2017-06-15, pdb2pqr's autopkgtests started to fail (#903759).
Unfortunately, debci logs for these early failures no longer exist.
The upload of pdb2pqr/2.1.1+dfsg-4 o
Some recent bugs that seem to have been caused by this:
#898245 src:flask-limiter-> python-aniso8601
#932507 src:python-crontab-> python-croniter
#932509 src:pyrsample-> python-xarray
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The GNOME team is ready for this transition now. As usual, lots of Shell
> extensions are affected by API changes and will need porting or removal,
> but as usual, I think removing the affected Shell extensions from
Hi Markus
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 17:30, Markus Blatt wrote:
> I just took a look at the tracker and noticed that opm-common is level 3 and
> opm-simulators is level 2. If build attempts for level 3 come after level 2
> that migth explain the failure in the logs [1] and opm-common should be in a
>
Hi Markus
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 20:01, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I don't think anything is needed right now, thanks. I will schedule a
> rebuild of opm-common once graphviz has built, and then retry
> opm-simulators.
It seems opm-simulators FTBFS in much the same way now after
opm-c
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Nilesh
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 15:51, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> >I guess your recent upload of 0.1.2.1-3 is supposed to fix this and
> >> >is intended to enable the migration, right?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, let's wait until r-base migrates, I gu
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
Hi Nilesh, Dylan
On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 11:33, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11 May 2022 2:06:08 pm IST, "Dylan Aïssi" wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >> Am Fri, May 06, 2022 at 06:10:52PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> >> >
> >> > I have done so, I think we can start the t
Hi
On Thu, 19 May 2022 at 09:45, Paul Gevers wrote:
> There's three package still waiting for an upload, r-bioc-progeny,
> r-bioc-monocle and r-bioc-scater. When is the ETA for those?
In addition, there is r-bioc-grohmm which I happened to notice dropped
off the tracker during the transition.
i.
Hi Nilesh
On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 07:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
It looks like britney has already figured these out:
> r-bioc-annotationdbiset ignore for r-bioc-annotationhub (version in
> unstable passes)
> r-bioc-scran/beachmat Please run tests with new version of biocparallel
I'l
Hi Nilesh
It looks like the only blocker now is waiting for r-bioc-scater [1] to age:
Too young, only 2 of 5 days old
It doesn't get 2-day migration because its autopkgtest regressed in
testing, sometime around 2021-09-23 [2].
I'll file a separate bug for that.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tra
Hi Julian
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 12:03, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> python-pytest-asyncio and pytest-mock need to be upgraded together;
> pytest-mock 3.7.0-2 build-depends on the newer version of
> python-pytest-asyncio (0.18.2-1), while the older version of
> pytest-mock (3.6.1-1) breaks
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi
I noticed some packages in the tracker not appearing in your list;
e.g. openimageio, pcl and yade. These packages have transitive
build-dependencies on libtbb-dev through e.g. libopenvdb-dev or
libvtk9-dev, and should be investigated as well.
Note that we will req
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Pirate
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 10:06, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Please remove ruby-uglifier from testing to allow migration of
> node-source-map to testing. This regression was introduced by webpack 5 in
> testing.
>
> rails no longer build depend on ruby-uglifier.
>
Hi
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 03:11, M. Zhou wrote:
> I personally dislike making the old package libtbb2-dev.
> How about we make the old src:tbb package go through NEW again
> with the following renames:
>
> libtbb-dev -> libtbb-legacy-dev, this sounds much better than libtbb2-dev
> be
Hi Andrius
Thanks for your work on this. My comments below are inlined.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 09:06, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Unrelated FTBFS
> ===
>
> freeture - not in testing
> gmsh - https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/gmsh.html
> kicad - https://tests.reproducibl
Control: tags -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
Hi
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 18:39, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> In the meantime I am test-rebuilding plastimatch, now unblocked by
> #1005485.
There you will hit #1012439, but plastimatch is now no longer in testing.
Please go ahead with the upload of onetbb to
Hi
I've noticed some binNMUs failed on armel; mathicgb [1] (subsequently
fixed by maintainer upload) and r-cran-rcppparallel [2]. Both seem to
fail in a similar way:
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8
efore bookworm is frozen.
We are aware of efforts to have riscv64 ready in time for inclusion in
bookworm.
On behalf of the release team,
Graham Inggs
[1] https://release.debian.org/bookworm/arch_qualify.html
[2]
https://riscv.org/blog/2022/05/mips-pivots-to-risc-v-with-best-in-class-performanc
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Tobi
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 14:30, Tobias Frost wrote:
> opencascade has a new release with bumps so name to 7.6 The transition
> tracker [1]
> correctly picked it up already after the upload to experimental.
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
Regards
G
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Jérémy
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 19:09, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> nodejs 18.6.0 will soon be the active version of nodejs:
> https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/
>
> I rebuilt and checked all reverse-build-deps of libnode-dev/nodejs,
> and dealt with most of the regressions
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Tobi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 16:51, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I've uploading 7.6.3 right now to experimental; as I removed the confirmed
> tag, please reACK
> the "go ahead" -- I've tested that all r-depends that worked before are still
> compiling
reACK
Regards
Hi Tobi
On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 at 18:51, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I'd suggest to start binNMU freecad
freecad is not in testing, and requires a source-only upload because
of the arch:all binaries uploaded by the last uploader.
Also, #1007013 and #1014875 need fixing.
> and maybe then proceed to remove
Hi Tobi
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 11:42, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Maybe it would be a good idea to revert pmix to 4.1.2 ? (e.g
> pmix-4.2.0+really-4.1.2-1) be uploaded and then
> do a proper transistion?
That would be appreciated by the release team.
Regards
Graham
Control: forwarded -1 https://deb.li/3Kf4j
Hi Matthias
On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 12:18, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a tracker to add python3.11 as a supported python3 version. This
> is
> non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
> starting this, just want
Hi Nicholas
On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 at 23:51, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> I have a bug tagged serious in the package libevent I maintain [1], I've
> been told the solution is to start a transition workflow.
>
> As mentioned in the transition doc [2], I uploaded the fixed package in
> experimental, but I'm w
Hi Sebastian
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Is that really worth the effort for this one missing symbol? I'd just
> make sure that is stays around regardless of glibc version.
There was a patch proposed in the corresponding Ubuntu bug [1],
re-introducing the symbol, how
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Matthias
ICU has migrated. Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Hi Bas
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 09:15, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Please also binNMU gdal & python-shapely in experimental:
>
> nmu gdal_3.6.0+dfsg-1~exp1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with
> Python 3.11 as supported"
> nmu python-shapely_2.0~b2-1~exp1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuil
Hi Scott
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 04:03, Scott Talbert wrote:
> 2) Rebuild wxWidgets with soname bump and then rebuild all packages that
> use wx (about 67 packages).
>
> What do you think is the best way to proceed?
Option 2 seems the safest. Please upload to experimental and request
another tra
Control: tags -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
Hi Sandro
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 at 19:39, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> numpy provides 2 virtual packages, to track the ABI/API version as
> advertised by the upstream project. Between unstable and experimental,
> we did not bump the ABI package (which stays at `pyth
Hi Sandro
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 23:27, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> thanks, numpy/1.23.5-2 has just been uploaded to unstable.
\o/
> thanks! on the same line, i'm planning on upgrading matplotlib
> (another foundation package) from 3.5.x in unstable to 3.6.x (latest
> upstream release). Do you want me
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Sandro
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 at 19:03, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> All in all, i think this transition is rather manageable and i'd like
> to upload to unstable, if you're ok with it.
Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Hi Matthias
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 17:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a transition window for python 3.11 as the default python3
> version.
Python3-defaults with Python 3.11 as a supported version has now
migrated to testing. Let's go ahead with this once PHP 8.2 (#1014460)
and qtbase
Hi Timo, Stefano
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 18:46, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>
> Hi Timo (2022.12.22_12:56:20_+)
> > > There have been rebuilds in Ubuntu that give us some idea of how much
> > > work remains. I think it's tractable, but also will have some package
> > > casualties.
> > I have some sp
Hi Matthias
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 18:24, Matthias Klose wrote:
> while we have not an 100% agreement to go ahead, I think we should aim for
> 3.11.
Action speaks louder than words, and there's been a whole lot of work
done to push this forward.
> The following steps would be:
>
> - accept t
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Matthias
Happy new year!
On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 at 12:17, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Python3-defaults with Python 3.11 as a supported version has now
> migrated to testing. Let's go ahead with this once PHP 8.2 (#1014460)
> and qtbase-opensource-src (#102
Hi Drew
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 12:12, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Looks like deal.ii needs another binNMU against sundials 6.4.1+dfsg1-3
> to catch the new libsundials-nvecparallel-mpi6
A binNMU was scheduled for 6.4.1+dfsg1-2 [1].
-3 shouldn't be relevant for building, however we hit a 'illegal
instr
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 12:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> is_good doesn't match what's currently used for builds with php8.2:
>
> phpapi-20220829
This has just been merged, thanks Adrian!
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/transition-data/-/merge_requests/36
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
