On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:37:15AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On 2014-10-09 0:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:27:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >>
> >>O
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 03:08:31PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2014-10-16 15:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >As discussed on IRC, this update introduced a serious regression when
> >using nscd (see bugs #765506, #765526, #765562), due to the patch
> >cvs-CVE-2013-4357.d
bly a few other persons I have forgotten/I am not aware of.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
retitle 681563 unblock: eglibc/2.13-35
thanks
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:30:50AM -0600, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> > Aurelien Jarno (14/07/2012):
> > > I guess it means the unblock is granted, just waited for d-i beta 1.
> &g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
shishi fails to build on 64-bit big endian architectures, and that includes
s390x. More info can be found in bug #670316.
Given it's a reverse dependency of inetutils, it's an important pac
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:29:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 23:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Aurelien Jarno (23/07/2012):
> > > Once d-i beta1 is released, would it be possible to unblock it? Thanks
> > > in advance.
> >
&
reassign 519006 binutils
tag 519006 + patch
forwarded 519006 http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00216.html
thanks
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:27:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have done a rebuilt of part of the archive using gcc-4.4 that defaults
> to -mplt. Unfortunately I
architectures (armhf,
hurd-i386).
eglibc (2.11.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Aurelien Jarno ]
* Update Arabic debconf translation, by Ossama Khayat. Closes: #596161.
* libc6-i386: remplace <= breaks by << breaks now that the transitioned
version of the packages is known
mware loader mechanism, another alternative is to package
all removed (but distributable) firmwares that are currently already
built as .ko in a separate source package, and build
firmware-kfreebsd-nonfree from it. But I agree it would be even better
to be able to load firmware in the same
is has been
discussed[2] on -release before to be valid for a point-release update.
Done in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge2.
When do you expect this version will reach Sarge?
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
relien
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg7.html
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Steve Langasek writes:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
would like to know what does this exactly mean:
- That users are advised not to use them?
- Tha
ons. Is it really a problem?
Also note there will probably be an API + ABI transition for libusb in
etch+1, so we can use back the upstream ABI at this point.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux develo
uploads for the glibc, last upload for openoffice.org).
If the kernel failures still appear to be present, would it be possible
to qualify the port for non-SMP only?
Bye,
Aurelien
[1] http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D
nterested to do the
same in lsusb.
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel3
12.606973832 +0200
@@ -439,6 +439,10 @@
/* Set the timezone. */
__timezone = -types[0].offset;
+ /* since the user specified a hand-made timezone we dont claim to
+ * use tzfile further on */
+ __use_tzfile = 0;
+
compute_tzname_max (stdlen + dstlen);
}
--
.''
t soon (today or tomorrow).
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
t seems we are all busy/in
holidays) could monitor the status of the glibc to make sure the version
2.3.6-16 get into Etch.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMA
Hi,
Due to the recent renaming of libgcj7 to libgcj7-0, pdftk is now
uninstallable in sid, as it still depends on the former package.
Could you please schedule a binNMU on all architectures, so that it
depends on libgcj7-0?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno writes:
Hi,
Due to the recent renaming of libgcj7 to libgcj7-0, pdftk is now
uninstallable in sid, as it still depends on the former package.
Could you please schedule a binNMU on all architectures, so that it
depends on libgcj7-0?
doesn't
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:17:11PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Due to the recent renaming of libgcj7 to libgcj7-0, pdftk is now
uninstallable in sid, as it still depends on the former package.
Could you please schedule a binNMU on all architectures, so that it
testing.
Could you please add a hint? Thanks.
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www
If yes, this could also help the arm port. An emulated arm system under
QEMU on an Opteron 2GHz is faster than some (most of ?) arm build
daemons, and can have a lot more RAM. Just imagine 8 build daemons
running on an octore machine...
Anthony, by any chance, could you arrange for a donation
, sshd is unconditionally linked with libselinux. This
breaks debian-installer on architectures using ssh for the installation,
and also non-Linux architectures.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:19:59AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:36:34 +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have created openssh packages with updated SELinux
build failure, and possibly help solving that issue? That is of course
> needed for us, shadow maitnainers, to get shadow in testing.
>
It builds correctly on my machine, so it's is probably a transient
problem with the build daemon.
Requeuing the package should work.
--
.'&#x
,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
s the new DST in Brazil for this summer.
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 |
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> FYI, we will need to update the timezone in the sarge glibc, in order to
> take in account the "Energy Policy Act 2005". If I remember correctly,
> updating to the latest version should also fix the DST for Brazil.
>
> I will tr
any responsibility for what you broke. Splendid.
This is not a regression, the build failure comes from the build daemon.
For a few weeks, the arm build daemon called "netwinder" fails to build
every package that uses /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.6.
gnucash is now built on arm and is
rday, so hopefully this should be solved in
> the next few days.
The buildd software with default configuration automatically warns the
build daemon maintainer (via an email) if a package is in uploaded state
for more than 7 days.
So theoretically, there is no need to warn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ilable machine. This is
not the case for the alpha architecture.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | ww
loads to
authorized persons only, as they have already done for alpha and arm.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/
test). Closes: #405411.
+ * debian/patches/any/cvs-zdump-64-bit.diff: new patch from CVS to fix zdump
+on 64-bit architectures. Closes: #402776.
+ * debian/quitlrc: new file.
+ * debian/rules.d/quilt.mk: use debian/quitlrc instead of default ~/.quiltrc.
+ Closes: #406136.
+
+ -- Aurelien Ja
006. The uploads being of
priority low they should wait 10 days in unstable. I guess we need a few
day after the total freeze to prepare the delay.
So my guess is that this date is around 20th November 2006. Or maybe
before, but not later.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:57:17PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > glibc 2.3.6.ds1-10 is in Etch for 12 days and is only missing the alpha
> > build.
> >
> > The diff is attached below, the changes are either translation upd
taking too much memory). Can anyone re-schedule all
> of these builds?
Already asked a week ago, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2007/01/msg00085.html
It seems the arm buildd maintainer is unresponsive.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' :
David Broome a écrit :
> Hello - Is this going to be released into the main stable disto before March?
I don't know when the next release of sarge is planned. Could someone
from the stable release managers can answer this question?
> Quoting Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
update the glibc in Sarge. If this is not possible to do
that in time, I would like the project to announce it officially.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECT
The stable release team said yes. I have no more details.
David Broome a écrit :
> Hello - is there any news about this? Will there be a release planned
> in the next 4 weeks?
>
> Dave,
> Quoting Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> David Broome a écrit :
&
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have attached a new version of what we plan to upload. It includes a
> > few more fixes backported from the unstable version (look at the end of
> >
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:40:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:54 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > >
37519)
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:38:24 +0100
+
base-installer (1.115) unstable; urgency=low
[ Miguel Figueiredo ]
diff --git a/kernel/powerpc.sh b/kernel/powerpc.sh
index 34d18e9..578ba1a 100644
--- a/kernel/powerpc.sh
+++ b/kernel/powerpc.sh
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
arch_get_kernel_fl
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:09:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 655158 + squeeze confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 22:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Debian Squeeze is currently not installable on Power 7 based IBM
> > pSeries, unless the Power
query-failure.diff
(révision 5155)
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+2012-02-02 Aurelien Jarno
+
+ * resolv/res_query.c(__libc_res_nsearch): succeed if the first
+ query fails, but the second query succeeds.
+
+diff --git a/resolv/res_query.c b/resolv/res_query.c
+index 947c651..c88268f 100644
+
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 23:11 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > eglibc 2.11.3-2 shipped in Debian Squeeze 6.0.4 suffers from a
> > regression in the resolver code with broken DNS server not answering
> > corre
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 658424 + confirmed squeeze
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at
o
moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days
and schedule an upload for the middle of the week. There are other
important bugs not related to kfreebsd to handle.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net
t this can be a big
> problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does.
>
Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix
that in an upload today.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net
am not
> sure what the relative hardware specs are but it could be that corelli
> is just too slow to run those (likely floating-point heavy) test suites
> in the sbuild time limit.
>
> I haven't looked closer, though.
>
The problem with the octeons is that while they
-strings.diff: new patch from
+upstream to fix FORTIFY_SOURCE format string protection bypass. Closes:
+#660611.
+ * patches/any/local-sunrpc-dos.diff: fix a DoS in RPC implementation
+(CVE-2011-4609). Closes: #671478.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:42:42 +0200
+
eglibc
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:12:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 675886 + squeeze confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 00:26 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We would like to fix some bugs in the stable eglibc version.
> >
> > One bug was suppos
ready to re-enable this patch for wheezy once it
has been merged upstream, or even when at least the tag value is merged
upstream.
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Descri
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:54:27PM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Aurelien,
>
> thanks for informing us.
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future,
> > which m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
eglibc/2.13-34 has been uploaded in time for going to testing [1] and
got an freeze exception. However it is blocked due to 'block-udeb'. As
this version doesn't change anything wrt debian-i
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:21:05PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Aurelien Jarno (14/07/2012):
> > eglibc/2.13-34 has been uploaded in time for going to testing [1] and
> > got an freeze exception. However it is blocked due to 'block-udeb'. As
> >
2012-07-14 17:10:02.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+i2c-tools (3.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * decode-dimms: exit gracefully when no EEPROM are found on the system
+(Closes: #681057).
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Sat, 14 Jul 2012 17:09:59 +0200
+
i2c-tools (3.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
les.d/debhelper.mk: Unconditionally create tmp.substvars.
+Closes: #780431.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:17:56 +0100
+
+glibc (2.19-16) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Samuel Thibault ]
+ * patches/hurd-i386/cvs-libpthread-dlopen.diff: New patch to allow
+libpthread.so
copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+glibc (2.19-18) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Aurelien Jarno ]
+ * debhelper.in/locales.templates: allow the C.UTF-8 locale to be
+selected as the default locale. Closes: #782241.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:50:11 +0200
+
glibc (2.19-17) unstable; urgency=m
n kfreebsd should be trivial. Patches welcome.
I haven't been able to find mails about that on the debian-bsd mailing
list. Could you please point me to them?
[...]
> For the Debian glibc maintainers, Adam Conrad
Now I understand why I was not in the loop, I am not member of the team
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:03:58AM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would
> > have been nice to keep the other people in the team in
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:39:25AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 07.05.2013 17:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and
> >> GCC
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:35:16PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider
> > that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was k
ther people
involved in the s390 port first though.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The eglibc transition has already started, but given a few packages have
to be rebuilt against the new libc, I thought it was a good idea to
open a bug.
The packages using private glibc
.debian.org and is kept
> in
> another place.
>
hppa porters have ignored my emails during a few years, and then started
to write me during a few more years using an email address that went
to /dev/null, so they never got my answers, and thus never answered me...
This is true th
to
discover (and fix) toolchain issues early in a release cycle than
late.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
(1:3.1.2-6+deb6u1) squeeze; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport patches from upstream to skip probing for EDID or graphics
+cards, as it might causes hardware breakage (closes: #724736).
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:54:02 +0200
+
lm-sensors-3 (1:3.1.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix
2013-10-01 22:18:24.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+lm-sensors (1:3.3.2-2+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport patches from upstream to skip probing for EDID or graphics
+cards, as it might causes hardware breakage (closes: #724736).
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:45:50
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:57:21AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 squeeze confirmed
>
> Hi again,
>
> Aurelien Jarno (2013-10-02):
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:49AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 wheezy confirmed
>
> Hi Aurélien,
>
> Aurelien Jarno (2013-10-02):
> > lm-sensors upstream has reported an hardware breakage issue with
> > versions 3.3.2 or older. This causes lapto
o experience as buildd admin so far and hence are not
> sure how the actual duties of a buildd admin look like.
Thanks, help is appreciated. You need to ask debian-admin to have buildd
admin rights on the machine sompek.debian.org. Please also send me a,
SSH key, I'll create you an account on buildd.debian-ports.org.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dd admins btw.?
Me.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
bugs
I have been involved in this architecture for a few years, especially
at the toolchain level.
I am a DD.
Aurélien Jarno
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tion notes for Squeeze[1] and Wheezy[2].
I would still like to see some proofs of this claim, as already asked
multiple times.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-releas
nd to help other porters
if needed to:
- fix toolchain issues
- fix arch-related bugs
I am a DD.
Aurelien Jarno
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o the problem, the
code is there to support mips, so there should not be that much to
change. In the meantime defaulting to gcj seems to be the things to do.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
e default java to it on
mips and mipsel?
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:10:13AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel. It was a
> > problem of ugly casts done without taking care of alignement issues. See
> >
atch I sent for MIPS also mentions SPARC as it has the same
alignment constraints. That said the patch fixes zero, while SPARC is
using hotspot by default instead. Maybe using zero on SPARC is a
possibility, though it will decrease performances.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 04:23:04PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 23.11.2013 14:01, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> > The patch I sent for MIPS also mentions SPARC as it has the same
> > alignment constraints. That said the patch fixes zero, while SPARC is
> > using hotspot by d
t a question about any objections, but about a call to the ppc64
> porters if they are able to maintain such a port in Debian. There is no
> response yet.
>
Hiroyuki Yamamoto is the porter behind ppc64, so please consider that as
an answer.
--
Aurelien Jarno
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:21:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 08:56 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > First of all I have to say I am a bit uncomfortable opening such a bug
> > report with a not so small changelog so close to the 7.3 rel
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:55:34PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 18:48:00 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:21:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On F
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:00:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On 2013-12-23 11:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:55:34PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 18:48:00 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrot
and it also failed to build on a
few other architectures which might also need a give-back.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
lli does need
> occasional reboots too, IIRC.
I agree that corelli and gabrielli are unstable, though it's clearly not
related with the load. I am not aware of any issue with lucatelli, do
you have some more details?
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB7
Hi,
First of all thanks for your answer, it's really appreciated to have
more details.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:51:21PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:14:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:28:04PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote
:
| eglibc (2.13-38+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=medium
|
| [ Aurelien Jarno ]
| * debian/patches/localedata/cvs-de_AT-Februar.diff: new patch from
| upstream to fix February month name in de_AT locale. Closes: #738544.
This is a tiny patch which doesn't change code and would make Aus
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:38:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 20:37 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We would like to fix a some issues that have been identified in the
> > eglibc version included in wheezy. Th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
architectures except armel and
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 09:09:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
> uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
> architectures except armel and armhf. We have done manual builds on
> these a
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:17:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 31/05/14 21:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
> > uploaded in experimental and has been buil
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:43:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > > The problem is a missmatch between the jmp_buf size in perl vs. modules
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 07:15:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> That said, feel free to upload perl now.
It has been uploaded, and is now installed on all s390x buildds.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net h
re related.
> - pcp: fails everywhere: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pcp
> and #752171, fix apparently trivial
It build successfully, thanks.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel3
ien
[1]
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee4ec1d7f9bdbdfc87117133478cfb2f6653e65c
[2] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.19#Packaging_Changes
[3] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-07/msg00316.html
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the
> > setjmp/longjmp functions [1] [2]. Symbol versioning is used to handle
> >
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:21:30AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:18:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I can follow up with a list affected packages, but we are slowly
> > discovering them one by one, so it might takes time. So far we have:
> >
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:49:04AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> >
501 - 600 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
