libnss-mdns

2005-05-30 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi, I'm presently on the road (currently at GUADEC) and haven't been able to get Net access for a while. However libnss-mdns which is currently in sarge (0.3) does not work on big-endian architectures. The 0.4 version available in unstable does (well no bug reports at least) and has minimal chan

gtk-gnutella

2005-05-30 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi, I'm presently on the road (currently at GUADEC) and haven't had a chance to contact you regarding gtk-gnutella. The version in sarge (0.95) should not be released. It causes harm to the gtkg network. The version in unstable (0.95.2-1) would be better but it presently has a FTBFS against 64-bi

Re: libnss-mdns

2005-05-31 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi Steve, On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:30:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:03:28PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > I'm presently on the road (currently at GUADEC) and haven't been able to > > get Net access for a while. However libnss-m

Re: Upgrades from GNOME 2.6 to GNOME 2.8

2004-10-19 Thread Anand Kumria
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:33:55 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Hi! > > I've performed some tests of partial upgrades from GNOME 2.6 to GNOME > 2.8 in experimental. > > I tried to upgrade one component at a time, and once that was done, I > logged out of GNOME, restarted GDM, and killed the GNOME use

LFS support on Debian 3.1

2004-09-07 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi, I'm not sure who is compiling the Release Notes for Debian 3.1 (thus the CC) but we should probably mention that Large File Support (LFS) is incomplete and that only a limited number of client and server programs are known to work. Programs which work (server): proftpd, vsftpd, bittorrent Pr

Bug Squashing in Sydney, November 27th to 28th

2004-11-09 Thread Anand Kumria
Folks, we can't let the Debian developers in Germany have all the fun and glory. If you are in or around Sydney, let's beat them to the punch and close out as many bugs as we can. Objectives: --- Close as many RC bugs before the Frankfurt BSP and help get sarge out the door. Much of the

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

2004-11-16 Thread Anand Kumria
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:17:10 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:21:20AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > *nod*. For -gtk-gnome readers, this involves a few things for meta-gnome2. Why don't you have a 'meta-gnome2.6' and a 'meta-gnome2.8' with meta-gnome2 itself de