[SRM] Upload of xpenguins-applet?

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Uploaders: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Maintainer: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.2.13), autotools-dev (>= 20020905.1), intltool (>= 0.21), libgnomeui-dev (>= 2.2.0), libpanel-applet2-dev (>= 2.2.0), l

Re: [SRM] Upload of xpenguins-applet?

* Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080405 15:09]: [..] > Please upload. Thanks! Uploaded. Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature

small transistation of a dead upstream game before or after sarge?

Hi! I know, we are quite late with this, I know that the "last call for uploads" has been send a couple of days ago and I know, that the auto builders are quite busy these days. That's why I'm quite unsure what to do in this situation. As you might know, the game tuxracer is dead by upstream, al

Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer

Hi! * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050518 22:20]: > Package: tuxracer > Version: 0.61-6.4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge > > This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it: > > I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete > package in sarge instead of the

Re: Release Notes - non-us being phased out - please comment

Hi! * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050518 19:18]: > *non-us being phased out* [..] > of the non-us archive. If you have lines referring to non-us in your > /etc/sources.list, you may want to check if they can be removed. Chances are ^ apt/ Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn

Re: BSP end of November

Moin! * Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041031 11:13]: > From all the others i would like to hear who considers to come to a > BSP. I'll try to attend; if you like, I can try to organize rooms at my university in Frankfurt Main / Germany Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc De

Re: BSP end of November

Moin! * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041031 17:27]: [ dropping qa ] [ BSP in November ] > I would also like to suggest to do several dist-upgrades from woody > to sarge in order to find the last problems in the dist-upgrade. Is there an »official« way to report successfull migrations fr

Bug Squashing in Frankfurt, November 27th to 28th

invite other Debian people From all over Germany and Europe to join us in Frankfurt. Please let us know if you want to attend the meeting, so we can plan ahead a bit. Please contact Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Location: = Institute of Computer Science Goethe-University Fr

Re: Xorg 6.9

Hi! * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051216 13:30]: > Anyone want to post a list on wiki.debian.org, *without* maintainer names > (which are really only relevant to... the maintainers), so that it can be > used as a potential TODO list for this weekend's BSP? Basicaly done at: http://wiki.d

News in etch

Hi! With etch to be released "really soon now" (well... mor ore less ;) many of us will be in the need of listing new features and other nifty stuff etch will bring to our users; be it DDs invited to give a speach or journalists writing articles. Since it's quite hard to search all those nice thi

Re: Like on page 3.1r3 points to 3.1r2

[ adding -release to ask for an ETA of the images ] Hi! * andrey i. mavlyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060903 18:39]: > > On the page http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ > > the test say's: > > To install Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r3 (sarge), download any of the following > > images: >

Re: Sarge -> Etch upgrade issue

Hi! * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060908 01:46]: > > 1) sarge: > > 1.1) apt-get dist-upgrade -> upgrading to etch [..] > Yes, I can see that apt Recommends: debian-archive-keyring and Suggests: > gnupg. Given that apt should be doing secure archives by default now, the > Suggests: seems

Re: Sarge -> Etch upgrade issue

Hi! * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060908 20:36]: [ apt-get dist-upgrade to etch doesn't install debianrchive-keyring and gnupg ] > > Shouldn't the Recommends: debian-archive-keyring be enought? AFAIK > > the Release Notes recommend using aptitude instead of apt-get. And > > aptitude r

Re: Sarge -> Etch upgrade issue

Hi! * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060910 10:05]: > > = > > The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: > > aptitude-doc-en debian-archive-keyring libtasn1-2-bin locales mtools > > = > Hm, basically I think we need to check the reason for any of these > packa

Re: Sarge -> Etch upgrade issue

* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060910 04:12]: > > [ apt-get dist-upgrade to etch doesn't install debianrchive-keyring and > > gnupg ] > Would someone please file a serious bug against apt for this? Done. #386800. Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signatur

Re: Sarge -> Etch upgrade issue

* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060910 13:57]: > > > [ apt-get dist-upgrade to etch doesn't install debianrchive-keyring and > > > gnupg ] > > Would someone please file a serious bug against apt for this? > Done. #386800. Fixed in 0.6.46.2.

Re: draft guidelines for official CD images

Hi! * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061014 11:10]: > we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official > Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce official CDs for > handing out at fairs. If we are talking about CDs / DVDs to be handed out at fairs

please unblock xpenguins_2.2-5 and xpenguins-applet_2.1.1-4

v, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev, xutils +Maintainer: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev (>= 20020905.1), intltool (>= 0.21), libgnomeui-dev (>= 2.2.0), libpanel-applet2-dev (>= 2.2.0), libgconf2-dev (>= 1.1.

Re: please unblock xpenguins_2.2-5, xpenguins-applet_2.1.1-4, pathological_1.1.3-8 and pathological-music_2

log --- xpenguins-2.2/debian/changelog +++ xpenguins-2.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,26 @@ +xpenguins (2.2-6) unstable; urgency=low + + * revoking the changes for debhelper 5, so the package may be shipped with +etch +- build-depend on debhelper >= 4.1.0 +- debian/compat set to 4 + + -

Re: please unblock xpenguins_2.2-5, xpenguins-applet_2.1.1-4, pathological_1.1.3-8 and pathological-music_2

* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070112 23:33]: > All unblocked. Thanks! Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please unblock xdialog 2.2.1-2

+one? Better use the static one. + + -- Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:43:56 +0100 + xdialog (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -u xdialog-2.2.1/debian/control xdialog-2.2.1/debian/control --- xdialog-2.2.1/debian/control +++ xdialog