Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi, the package openscenegraph-3.4 is being replaced by
openscenegraph, already in the archives. Their rdeps build fine
against openscenegraph.
The plan is to eventually remove openscen
On 22 sep 2014, j...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-09-17 13:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>
>> Ok, let's go! Please upload to unstable.
>
> ping on that?
Done. Thanks a lot!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:55 +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the
>> openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this
>> package includes an embedded, vulner
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
> In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
>> --=-=-=
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the
>> openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that this
>> package includes an embedded, vulnerable copy of the
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:20:50PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
>>
>> > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
>> >> --=-=-=
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >
Alberto Luaces writes:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:20:50PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>>> Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
>>>
>>> > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
>>> >> --=-=-=
>>> &
"Rebecca N. Palmer" writes:
> Sorry for not notifying you earlier; given the names on the git
> commits, I thought Alberto was effectively the maintainer and you his
> sponsor.
Hi, I plan to be the maintainer, but I'm not a DM yet, and so I rely on
the expertise of Manuel in order to make the re
"Rebecca N. Palmer" writes:
>> That's why I'm not so
>> keen on uploading a RC again, given the grief that caused the last one.
>> Maybe we can just patch 3.2.0 and then wait for the 3.2.1,
>
> If you mean real 3.2.0 as opposed to the current 3.2.0rc, that could
> be a good compromise: it has sona
Some additional notes:
1. Upstream's trunk (3.3.1) has currently a soname named "111". From
the logs, it is just a version number bump, but it would make sense to
make sure that the ABI is not broken again. Several weeks ago I used
abi-compliance-checker on OSG, but it failed to finish the analy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
we are packaging the 3.2.1 stable release of openscenegraph, which is
API-compatible with the current version in Debian, so only binNMUs
should be needed.
Reverse dep
10 matches
Mail list logo
