On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 05:24:38PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> The dependency is not yet fixed, right?
I have committed the fix to Salsa and tagged a release but I am still
waiting on my usual sponsor, Tobias Frost, or someone else to upload.
> I'll unblock it once 5.8.0.40.gc7be7c1-3 hits
Hi,
+1
Would Debian has been engineered instead
of a product of sheer chaos I guess "Wayland support"
would be high on the release priorities.
I'm glad matplotlib was fixed on time
Greetings
On 2025-04-11 16:51:03 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Control: retitle 1102671 unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-6
>
> "Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
>
> > unblock fltk1.4/1.4.2-5
>
> Please make that
>
> unblock fltk1.4/1.4.2-6
>
> which I'll upload soon with a fix for https://bugs.debian.org/1102681
> (and a
Am 12.04.25 um 09:56 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Hi,
On 12-04-2025 08:34, Marc Haber wrote:
Otoh, Essential packages can break many other packages without having
an explicit reverse dependency listed since they are assumed always
present and since it's a bug to explicitly list a dependency on an
Ess
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:adonthell
Bug #1102786 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package adonthell/0.3.8-2
Added indication that 1102786 affects src:adonthell
--
1102786: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102786
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: adonth...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:adonthell
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2025-04-at-vienna
Attach: Desktop/Debian/BSP/adon
Hi Santiago,
On 12-04-2025 17:48, Santiago Vila wrote:
I'd like to know if there is any special way to report a bug
so that version tracking works. See this for example:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=uglifyjs
Normally a bug also shows the version history of in the top rig
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 09:56:02AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We *could* trigger all tests for each essential package. Given how much help
> glibc typically already needs due to flaky tests, I don't think we should do
> that already. We'd also run into infrastructure limitations.
>
> What we can
Hi Blair,
On 11-04-2025 17:14, Blair Noctis wrote:
So:
If all packages affected are handled ("self-contained"),
This is indeed good.
the blast radius is rather small,
In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are in
the low single digit. Otherwise we'd want to be
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie
Bug #1093859 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg
needs resolving for trixie
Changed Bug title to 'release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie' from
'release.debian.org: mip
Hi,
On 12-04-2025 08:34, Marc Haber wrote:
Otoh, Essential packages can break many other packages without having an
explicit reverse dependency listed since they are assumed always present
and since it's a bug to explicitly list a dependency on an Essential
package.
Conform 3.5: "Packages a
Control: retitle -1 release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie
(Retitling because as far as I know, there is no longer a concern about
librsvg specifically)
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 20:37:44 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2025-01-27 20:32:20 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 23
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package luanti-game-minetest
[ Reason ]
When src:minetest was renamed to src:luanti, the common base subgame
"Minetest Game" was split out into src:luanti-game-minetest as u
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:expat
Bug #1102752 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: expat/2.5.0-1+deb12u2
Added indication that 1102752 affects src:expat
--
1102752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Hi László
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 04:46:52PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bookworm
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 + src:expat
>
> Hi RMs,
>
> [ Reason ]
> Expat has three secur
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@packages.debian.org, deb...@rocketjump.eu
Control: affects -1 + src:ktx
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mvdsv/1.11-1 and ktx/1.45-1
Due to a slight miscalculation on my side how l
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ktx
Bug #1102754 [release.debian.org] unblock: ktx/1.45-1
Added indication that 1102754 affects src:ktx
--
1102754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102754
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1102750 + src:luanti-game-minetest luanti-server luanti
Bug #1102750 [release.debian.org] unblock:
luanti-game-minetest/5.8.0.40.gc7be7c1-3
Added indication that 1102750 affects src:luanti-game-minetest, luanti-server,
and luanti
> block
On 2025-04-12 17:05:44 +0200, Lee Garrett wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@packages.debian.org, deb...@rocketjump.eu
> Control: affects -1 + src:ktx
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package mvdsv/1.11-
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:16:17 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ktx
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102754,
regarding unblock: ktx/1.45-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2025-04-12 16:08:29 +0200, Travis Wrightsman wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package luanti-game-minetest
>
> [ Reason ]
>
> When src:minetest was renamed t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1102750 [release.debian.org] unblock:
luanti-game-minetest/5.8.0.40.gc7be7c1-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1102750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
On 12-04-2025 10:58, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 09:56:02AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
What we can already do is ask packages that depend on Essential packages, to
add a hint-testsuite-triggers [1] test. That way we would at least know
which packages to test for.
People al
Hi Paul,
On 12/04/2025 18:42, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Blair,
On 11-04-2025 17:14, Blair Noctis wrote:
So:
If all packages affected are handled ("self-contained"),
This is indeed good.
the blast radius is rather small,
In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are
Dear Release Managers and BTS admins:
I'd like to know if there is any special way to report a bug
so that version tracking works. See this for example:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=uglifyjs
The top 3 bugs in the page are really the same, but they do not appear here:
https
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: n...@debian.org
Dear RT,
As Paul Gevers helpfully clarified in #1102599,
In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are in the
low single digit. Otherwise we'd want to be involved/informed.
The freeze policy p
Control: retitle 1102671 unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-7
Thank you very much for working with me here!
Sebastian Ramacher writes:
> #1102706 [S| | ] [libfltk1.4-dev] libfltk1.4-dev fails to coinstall
> #1102691 [i| | ] [libfltk1.4-dev] libfltk1.4-dev: should depend on
> libcairo2-dev
I've prompt
Processing control commands:
> retitle 1102671 unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-7
Bug #1102671 [release.debian.org] unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-6
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-7' from 'unblock: fltk1.4/1.4.2-6'.
--
1102671: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102671
Debian Bug Tra
Hello Corey,
Am 13.04.25 um 06:32 schrieb Corey Goldberg:
Hi Carsten,
I got your email from the following bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099792
I didn't want to email the bug list directly and have my email exposed
online :)
it would be better to discuss suc
29 matches
Mail list logo
