Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-qemu-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! I would like to include upstream qemu version 10.0 in trixie. Currently, qemu is at release-candidate stage, 10.0.0-rc0, and the actual release is planned for 2025-04-15 (or 2025-04-22 if a criti

My current plan for OpenStack in Trixie: I'd like to have Epoxy (aka: 2025.1) in, please let me know if you think the schedule is acceptable

Dear release team, tl;dr: I'd like to push OpenStack Epoxy (aka: 2025.1) into Trixie, but I need the release team approval before uploading to Unstable. 0/ Release names OpenStack, like Debian and Ubuntu, is using named releases. If you get lost, just read this page: https://releases.openst

Processed: unblock: util-linux/2.41 [pre-approval]

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:util-linux Bug #1100975 [release.debian.org] unblock: util-linux/2.41 [pre-approval] Added indication that 1100975 affects src:util-linux -- 1100975: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#1100975: unblock: util-linux/2.41 [pre-approval]

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: util-li...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:util-linux Hi, I figured the util-linux discussion might get lost on the mailing list, so I'm following up with a bug

Processed: unblock: glibc/2.41-6

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:glibc Bug #1100954 [release.debian.org] unblock: glibc/2.41-6 Added indication that 1100954 affects src:glibc -- 1100954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100954 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

De : Patrick Franz À : Pierre-Elliott Bécue Cc : Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ; 1098...@bugs.debian.org Date : 21 mars 2025 19:18:12 Objet : Re: Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2 > Hej, > > Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 18:57:22 CET schrieb Pierre-Elliott Bécue: > [...] >> I would expect that you would

Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

De : Patrick Franz À : Pierre-Elliott Bécue Cc : Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ; 1098...@bugs.debian.org Date : 21 mars 2025 18:38:32 Objet : Re: Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2 > Hej, > > Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 17:51:09 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb > Pierre-Elliott Bécue: > [...] >> It

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

Just a heads up that this might impact Incus/LXD. The release of qemu 9.2 required several updates due to API changes; I haven't looked at qemu 10 at all, so I don't know what sort of changes were made in the upcoming release. I don't think this should block the upload of qemu to unstable, jus

Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

Patrick Franz wrote on 01/03/2025 at 01:09:38+0100: > Hej Emilio, > > Am Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2025, 08:47:58 MEZ schrieb Emilio Pozuelo > Monfort: > [...] >> This close to the freeze, we'll need test rebuild results. And note >> that the freeze is just around the corner, so please provide the

Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

Hej, Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 18:57:22 CET schrieb Pierre-Elliott Bécue: [...] > I would expect that you would test all things that build depends on qt > when you do such a late transition especially when the changeset is > not begnign. I'm sorry, but rebuilding all packages that depend on Qt i