On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:41:41 -0700, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> > So perhaps the test is broken,
> > although I'm not sure why it segfaults on those arches and not others, and
> > that
> > may be a real bug.
> I agree that it could be a real bug, but do you think th
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:09 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Sounds good, but let's wait for kibi's ack.
Almost two weeks have passed. Friendly ping, do you ACK or NACK this
fuse3 transition kibi?
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
László Böszörményi (GCS) (2025-03-11):
> Almost two weeks have passed. Friendly ping, do you ACK or NACK this
> fuse3 transition kibi?
Sorry for the delay and thanks for the reminder…
Glancing at the packages in unstable and experimental, the diff between
both udebs looks good, as does the updat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: sysvi...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:sysvinit
Please pre-approve unblocking of package sysvinit.
[ Reason ]
src:kmod removed /etc/init.d/kmod in version 34.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:sysvinit
Bug #1100096 [release.debian.org] unblock: sysvinit/3.14-4 (pre-approval)
Added indication that 1100096 affects src:sysvinit
--
1100096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1094440
Bug #1094440 [release.debian.org] transition: xnnpack, onednn, pytorch{,-cuda}
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1094440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:13:19 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1094931: transition: onnxruntime
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094931,
regarding transition: onnxruntime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Hi there!
Thanks for maintaining python3-ilorest.
ilorest (the shell command line utility), is using python3-ilorest (the
Python library that you maintain). They go together, and should be
uploaded together with the same version. Upstream releases them
together, at the same time. If we don't
On 10/03/2025 01:36, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
I'm seeing autopkgtest failures for libdevice-cdio-perl in the tracker
for libcdio (excuses panel):
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcdio
The failures are in 32-bits architectures, e.g., for i386:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libde
Processing changes file: postgresql-15_15.12-0+deb12u2_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-15_15.12-0+deb12u2_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-15_15.12-0+deb12u2_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Nicholas
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 08:21, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> A ben file already exists
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-14.html
> but it is broken (it reports that all packages are "bad").
Why do you think that it is broken? Shouldn't packages be marked bad
until the
> > A ben file already exists
> > but it is broken (it reports that all packages are "bad").
> Why do you think that it is broken? Shouldn't packages be marked bad
> until they have been rebuilt?
Thanks for your explanations, and sorry for the noise. The packages
have been rebuilt *in experiment
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 05/03/2025 20:35, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
Not a lot of replies on the Perl Team's end. I did not follow-up either,
because I didn't fin the time to review the code further.
What I can say is:
1. Nothing on Debian depends on libdevice-cdio-perl (its rdepends i
Hello Thomas,
Am 11.03.25 um 12:08 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
Hi there!
Thanks for maintaining python3-ilorest.
ilorest (the shell command line utility), is using python3-ilorest (the
Python library that you maintain). They go together, and should be
uploaded together with the same version. Upstr
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u10_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20230607+deb12u10_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20230607+deb12u10_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1099894 [release.debian.org] transition:
addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1099894: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: retitle -1 transition: gnat
Control: affects -1 = src:gnat
Hi Nicolas
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 19:35, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> All seems ready then.
Great! Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 11-03-2025 11:55, Mark Hindley wrote:
Please pre-approve unblocking of package sysvinit.
If the upload happens in the near future, yes.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1100096 [release.debian.org] unblock: sysvinit/3.14-4 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1100096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
On 11-03-2025 00:41, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
I think it is impossible to do what you're suggesting. And I agree with
Gregor Herrmann that it doesn't make sense. Shouldn't we test the new
package?
I'm the first to admit that properly testing transitions in the Debian
CI setup is a hard
* Gabriel F. T. Gomes:
>
> I said this before, but I found this hacky way of doing it to pin-point
> (somewhat) the source of the test failures.
With this hacky setup, where libcdio.so.19 is from version 2.1.0-5, the
segmentation fault is caused by the ABI change, as can be seen in the
following G
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 01:18:21PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here is one final update as the freeze is about to start.
>
> * First and foremost, I consider the transition as over, since there
> are no more packages left that are actionable by me nor is there
> any pending reason to re
* gregor herrmann:
>
> No, they are green all across the board (for tests _within_ testing
> or unstable):
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdevice-cdio-perl/
Thanks for pointing this out.
* Paul Gevers:
>
> I'm the first to admit that properly testing transitions in the Debian
> CI setu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jeolib-mial...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:jeolib-miallib
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu jeolib-miallib_1.1.6-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildd"
Please rebuild the package o
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:jeolib-miallib
Bug #1100163 [release.debian.org] nmu: jeolib-miallib_1.1.6-1+b1
Added indication that 1100163 affects src:jeolib-miallib
--
1100163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 07:53:36PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If the upload happens in the near future, yes.
Many thanks for the quick response. Uploaded.
Mark
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u10_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
28 matches
Mail list logo
