Bug#1098999: transition: bobcat

2025-02-26 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: bob...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:bobcat User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, The bobcat source package 6.07.01 introduces an enum change that will require sourceful uploa

Processed: transition: bobcat

2025-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:bobcat Bug #1098999 [release.debian.org] transition: bobcat Added indication that 1098999 affects src:bobcat -- 1098999: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098999 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

2025-02-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 25/02/2025 20:19, Patrick Franz wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi Release Team, we would like to request a transition for Qt 6.8.2 such that it

Processed: Re: Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2

2025-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1098901 [release.debian.org] transition: Qt 6.8.2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1098901: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098901 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 26 Feb 2025 at 01:41pm GMT, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 20:33:46 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I believe that there is a procedural issue which trumps the substantive >> issue about merging or not merging [/usr/bin with /usr/games] > ... >> I would encourage those

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I'm -1 on changing Policy here, even though the change would not have landed this week had you realized it affected these packages. By the way, the games I maintain in the GNOME team install to /usr/games/ . I believe this is a deviation from what distros not based on Debian do. We don't touch the

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 20:33:46 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > I believe that there is a procedural issue which trumps the substantive > issue about merging or not merging [/usr/bin with /usr/games] ... > I would encourage those of you most interested in the merge to do an MBF > requesting the merge

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Simon McVittie [250226 14:45]: > Do we know that this is only a practical problem for /usr/games, or are > there also collisions between /usr/bin/foo and /usr/sbin/foo in practice? /usr/bin/foo and /usr/sbin/foo is where this started, and most packages got fixed. The remaining ones have open bu

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Helmut Grohne [250226 23:31]: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:41:54PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > What I would like to avoid here is having maintainers feel that they > > should reject attempts to resolve naming collisions with reasoning like > > "this is part of a merge like the /usr-merge an

Bug#1086798: bookworm-pu: package mariadb 1:10.11.10-0+deb12u1

2025-02-26 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi release team, The MR https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/98 has been reviewed (thanks Sylvain) and I think it is ready to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. I've attached the output `git diff debian/1%10.11.9-0+deb12u1 -- debian > debian-1%10.11.9-0+deb12

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:59:54PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Simon McVittie [250226 14:45]: > > Do we know that this is only a practical problem for /usr/games, or are > > there also collisions between /usr/bin/foo and /usr/sbin/foo in practice? > > /usr/bin/foo and /usr/sbin/foo is wh

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:41:54PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > What I would like to avoid here is having maintainers feel that they > should reject attempts to resolve naming collisions with reasoning like > "this is part of a merge like the /usr-merge and I didn't like the > /usr-merge", becaus

Bug#1098925: transition: glibc 2.41

2025-02-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Aurelien, On 26/02/2025 06:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: gl...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:glibc User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I would

Processed: Re: Bug#1098925: transition: glibc 2.41

2025-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1098925 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.41 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1098925: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098925 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-26 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: debian-policy Version: 4.7.1.0 Severity: important X-debbugs-cc: hel...@subdivi.de, vinc...@vinc17.net, bi...@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org Hello, Thank you all for your replies. I believe that there is a procedural issue which trumps the substantive issue about merging o