Hello,
Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 08:11:14 +0100, a ecrit:
> A mixed approach (raising the baseline to allow LLVM and rustc to bump
> their targets, but keeping GCC's default target and thus the majority of
> packages at the current/old baseline and skip the rebuilds there) might
>
Matthias Klose, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 12:35:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> Mixing fp87 and SSE instructions leads to a performance penalty
When they are mixed within a function, sure.
But between functions (and actually it's even about between libraries
here, so even less often), I don't see why.
So again
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 1082237 with 1094985
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1063599 1066316 1067335 1071807 1086577 1086578 1088707
1088823 1090292 1091809 1091938 1092083 1092781 1094109 1094332 1094369 1094370
10
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:37:53AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 10:39:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:24:02AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 08:11:14 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > > A mixed approac
Hi,
Here are the results of my rebuild of reverse build dependencies
of dcmtk. Out of the 35 packages identified by ratt, I have:
* alicevision is a contrib package and for the moment I have
not setup my build infra to pull the necessary non-free
build dependency.
* The 7 following
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:35:51PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I don't think such changes should be made a few weeks before a freeze, or if
> that change should be made at all. This is a discussion that should be made
> during the freeze and then implemented at the start of the next release
> cy
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Étienne,
> Adrian Bunk, on 2025-02-13:
> > The non-ABI-breaking variant is not pretty since instead of
> > stack.top()->isElement()
> > it is now doing
> > dynamic_cast(stack.top()) != nullptr
> > in many places.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:24:02AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 08:11:14 +0100, a ecrit:
> > A mixed approach (raising the baseline to allow LLVM and rustc to bump
> > their targets, but keeping GCC's default target and thus the majority of
>
Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 10:39:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:24:02AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Fabian Grünbichler, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 08:11:14 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > A mixed approach (raising the baseline to allow LLVM and rustc to bump
> > > their targe
I don't think such changes should be made a few weeks before a freeze,
or if that change should be made at all. This is a discussion that
should be made during the freeze and then implemented at the start of
the next release cycle.
The current baseline is i686-linux-gnu, without access to any
Hi Sebastian,
please binNMU these packages.
Thanks a lot!
Jochen
amd64,arm64,armhf:
quickroute-gps
armhf,i386:
s51dude
tcputils
tthsum
unsort
ussp-push
vramsteg
w9wm
windowlab
woff-tools
xkbind
changelog: rebuild with dpkg supporting Rules-Requires-Root.
arm64,armhf,i386:
libtext-table-
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 14:55:14 +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:35:51PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > alternatives could also include to retire the i386 port
I think removing i386 completely would be doing our users a disservice:
that would mean our amd64 users los
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk, on 2025-02-13:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > Ouch, I opened #1095854 and only saw your proposal after that.
> > I put the bookworm-pu update on hold for now. I may amend my
> > work later on, or you can push your changes yourself, h
On 2025-02-13 20:12:05 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> please binNMU these packages.
>
> Thanks a lot!
Scheduled
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon McVittie, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 16:32:30 +, a ecrit:
> > The options as I see them, *including* the options that I would personally
> > prefer to rule out, are:
> >
> > - Status quo: don't change anything. As Fabian says,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1095854 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1095854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Greetings,
I attached the new debdiff to include the patch set provided by
Adrian Bunk in #1094991 instead of mine. The main difference is
that the ABI breaking methods are removed, and their invocations
have been replaced by explicit checks everywhere they were
calle
Simon McVittie, le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 16:32:30 +, a ecrit:
> The options as I see them, *including* the options that I would personally
> prefer to rule out, are:
>
> - Status quo: don't change anything. As Fabian says, Rust code on i386
> will sometimes be miscompiled and might crash.
>
>
please also binNMU these:
changelog: rebuild to fix 1 second offset (#1089088)
amd64:
insighttoolkit5
last-align
libvmod-selector
ortp
os-autoinst
pacparser
python-xxhash
pyx3
r-cran-av
rocksdb
rocsolver
rust-smithay-client-toolkit-0.16
rust-tower-test
rust-tracing-chrome
rust-wat
trilinos
uvlo
Hi Sebastian,
please also binNMU these packages.
Thanks a lot!
on riscv64:
changelog: rebuild to fix 1 second offset (#1089088)
2048-qt
acct
antiword
aoetools
apt-dater
ascdc
asclock
ataqv
audmes
autodocksuite
avra
awesome
bar
baycomusb
bb
bcalm
bctoolbox
bettercap
bibtool
bio-rainbow
bitseq
blk
20 matches
Mail list logo
