Bug#1080177: transition: libxml2

2025-01-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2025-01-21 15:22:31 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > Aron and Sebastian, > > What is the status of updating libxml2 to a newer version in Unstable? Did the upstream discussion regarding SONAME bump/ABI break come to a conclusion? > There is a lot of log spam like https://bugs.debian.org/1072577 c

Bug#1080177: transition: libxml2

2025-01-22 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Did the upstream discussion regarding SONAME bump/ABI break come to a > conclusion? The upstream issue (mentioned in the initial post here) is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/751 I haven't tried to figure out the curren

Bug#1093794: RM: cutycapt/unstable [armel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- NBS; new build-dependency qtwebengine5-dev unavailable on some arches

2025-01-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: cutyc...@packages.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:cutycapt User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 cutycapt recently switched to build-dep

Bug#1093620: transition: gnustep-multiarch

2025-01-22 Thread Yavor Doganov
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/01/2025 13:24, Yavor Doganov wrote: > >gnustep-base > > Level 2: > >dbuskit > >gnustep-corebase > >gnustep-gui > >gnustep-netclasses > >gnustep-performance > >pantomime > >rsskit > >sbjson > >sope > >universal-detecto

Bug#1090913: transition: ruby3.3

2025-01-22 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
ruby-defaults/1:3.3~0 was uploaded to experimental with ruby3.3 as the default and removing ruby3.1. I generated a list of package to rebuild using the following ben file: title = "ruby3.3-default"; is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby3.1/ | .depends ~ /ruby3.3/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby3.1|ruby3.3|rub

Bug#1093782: transition: libpqxx

2025-01-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 22/01/2025 19:19, Teus Benschop wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: libp...@packages.debian.org, teusbensc...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libpqxx User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition This is a rout

Bug#1093620: transition: gnustep-multiarch

2025-01-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 20/01/2025 13:24, Yavor Doganov wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We at the GNUstep team would like to make the GNUstep librari

Processed: Re: Bug#1093782: transition: libpqxx

2025-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1093782 [release.debian.org] transition: libpqxx Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1093782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1093782: transition: libpqxx

2025-01-22 Thread Teus Benschop
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: libp...@packages.debian.org, teusbensc...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libpqxx User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition This is a routine upgrade, with stable API. It just bumps the ABI from 7.9 to 7.10 B

Processed: transition: libpqxx

2025-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libpqxx Bug #1093782 [release.debian.org] transition: libpqxx Added indication that 1093782 affects src:libpqxx -- 1093782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Re: Bug#962710: libedit2: undocumented change to upstream's SONAME

2025-01-22 Thread Matt Jolly
Hi All, With the trixie freeze dates being announced today I just wanted to touch base on this one and see how the ticket is progressing. We seem to be in agreement that the SONAME should match upstream in the absence of a direct need for a Debian-specific SONAME. The question now is one of when

Bug#1093755: bookworm-pu: package lemonldap-ng/2.16.1+ds-deb12u5

2025-01-22 Thread Yadd
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: lemonldap...@packages.debian.org, secur...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:lemonldap-ng User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] Prior to 2.20.2, lemonldap-ng is vulnerable to a CSRTF issue i

Processed: bookworm-pu: package lemonldap-ng/2.16.1+ds-deb12u5

2025-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:lemonldap-ng Bug #1093755 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package lemonldap-ng/2.16.1+ds-deb12u5 Added indication that 1093755 affects src:lemonldap-ng -- 1093755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093755 Debian Bug Tracking Sys