09.07.2023 01:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 01:13:55AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
09.07.2023 01:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This does apparently need the -latomic workaround from 2:4.18.3+dfsg-3:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba&suite=bookworm
Sigh!
This is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1040563 - moreinfo
Bug #1040563 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
node-tough-cookie/4.0.0-2+deb12u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1040563: https://bugs.debi
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:node-webpack
Bug #1040683 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
node-webpack/5.75.0+dfsg+~cs17.16.14-1+deb12u1
Added indication that 1040683 affects src:node-webpack
--
1040683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040683
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: node-webp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:node-webpack
[ Reason ]
node-webpack is vulnerable to cross-realm object access
(#1032904, CVE-2023-28154).
Hi,
This request for bookworm has been approved but as yet no upload has been
observed. Please note that the approval window for 12.1 closes by 15th July
and your package should be uploaded and built by that date for inclusion.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
On 7/7/23 21:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 09:01:40PM +0400, Yadd wrote:
[ Reason ]
node-tough-cookie is vulnerable to prototype pollution
How has this been fixed in unstable? You'll need an upload there anyway for
version ordering.
Thanks,
package release.debian.org
tags 1040623 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: bup
Version: 0.33.2-1~deb12u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1040623 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040623 [release.debian.org] bookworm-p
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
package release.debian.org
tags 1036978 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: node-undici
Version: 5.15.0+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1036978 = bookworm pending
Bug #1036978 [release.debian.org] bookworm-p
Processing changes file:
node-undici_5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1+deb12u1_sourceonly.changes
ACCEPT
09.07.2023 10:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
Now after thought about all this in the morning, I think the following should
do it:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+samba (2:4.17.9+dfsg-0+deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=med
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1040639 [release.debian.org] transition: rocksdb
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1040639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2023-07-08 11:30:45 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: affects -1 + src:rocksdb
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transit
Am Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:35:17PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Indeed, I think the pattern is that if we test in testing, with r-cran from
> unstable and r-cran-tibble from testing it fails, but with r-cran from
> unstable and r-cran-tibble from unstable, it works.
>
> I'm working my through the
Hi,
On 09-07-2023 16:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm working my through the list and the ppc64el ci workers have a bit of
backlog; we're getting somewhere, but I'm think I'm still also seeing
different failure modes than the graphics engine, tibble and dplyr.
I admit the only chance I personally
Hi Sebastian!
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 10:29:41PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Please go ahead.
Qt is uploaded.
Unfortunately, qtwebengine FTBFS on mipsel again. We are working on it
together with Adrian Bunk (huge thanks to him for that).
Other Qt packages s
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCE
Paul,
On 9 July 2023 at 17:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
| Did we already discuss that r-cran-ps also seems to be impacted by the
| r-base change of the symbols thingy, as can be seen in r-cran-xopen [1].
Correct me if I am wrong but the "symbols thingy" was not a change in R 4.2.*
to R 4.3.*. It was
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On 9 July 2023 at 11:41, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| For spacetime and stars I suspect (based on past experience) possible
| interaction from the underlying graphics libraries.
Absent-minded typing error: "geospatial", of course. Not "graphics".
Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel |
Processing changes file: bup_0.33.2-1~deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Dirk,
Thanks.
On 09-07-2023 18:41, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 9 July 2023 at 17:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
| Did we already discuss that r-cran-ps also seems to be impacted by the
| r-base change of the symbols thingy, as can be seen in r-cran-xopen [1].
Correct me if I am wrong but the "symbo
Hi Paul,
On 9 July 2023 at 20:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
| On 09-07-2023 18:41, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 9 July 2023 at 17:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
| > | Did we already discuss that r-cran-ps also seems to be impacted by the
| > | r-base change of the symbols thingy, as can be seen in r-cran-xo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
some months ago, we received a new, complete translation of the
installation-guide
into Indonesian.
However, I failed to turn all needed wheels, to get this translation into
Hi,
On 09-07-2023 21:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| I don't understand this then. For several packages we're seeing failures
| in testing even if we only use r-base from unstable and everything else
| from testing to run the test. They pass with a rebuild r-cran-fnn and/or
| a rebuild and update
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
When the emeral theme was added to the alternatives, it was forgotten to
add that to the alternatives removal, too.
[ Impact ]
Leaving broken alternatives after package
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - confirmed
Bug #1040415 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package pacemaker/2.1.5-1+deb12u1
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
--
1040415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: tag -1 - confirmed
Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>
>> Shortly after the release of bookworm we got a report that Pacemaker
>> regressed in certain migration scenarios when compared to the bullseye
>> version. Upstream identi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1040739 bookworm-pu: package desktop-base/12.0.6+nmu1~deb12u1
Bug #1040739 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
desktop-base/12.0.6+nmu1~deb12u1
Changed Bug title to 'bookworm-pu: package desktop-base/12.0.6+nmu1~deb12u1'
from 'bull
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:spip
Bug #1040756 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package spip/4.1.9+dfsg-1+deb12u2
Added indication that 1040756 affects src:spip
--
1040756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:spip
Another upstream release fixed a security issue. It introduces some
factorisation adding two more clean up in
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:spip
Bug #1040758 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package spip/3.2.11-3+deb11u9
Added indication that 1040758 affects src:spip
--
1040758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040758
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:spip
This issue is similar to #1040756 in bookworm.
Another upstream release fixed a security issue. It introduces
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:marco
Bug #1040760 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package marco/1.26.1-3+deb12u1
Added indication that 1040760 affects src:marco
--
1040760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: ma...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:marco
[ Reason ]
In cases where users run KDE apps such as kwrite or kcalc in a MATE
desktop session as superuser
37 matches
Mail list logo
