Hi again,
Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
>
> On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
> would be a better
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1035843 [release.debian.org] unblock: jed/0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1035843: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035843
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
* Paul Gevers [2023-05-15 21:11]:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 10-05-2023 07:33, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
The version in unstable fixes the RC bug #1035839. I introduced a
regression in the d/jed-common.preinst script when I tried to fix
Bug#1035780.
And a new
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> I've submitted a merge request for adduser adding the Protected:yes field:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/merge_requests/86
I have merged this and prepared a release. Will upload later today.
Gree
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
> >
> > On second thoughts, I thi
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:android-platform-tools
Bug #1036210 [release.debian.org] unblock: android-platform-tools/29.0.6-28
Added indication that 1036210 affects src:android-platform-tools
--
1036210: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036210
Debian Bug Tra
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: android-platform-to...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:android-platform-tools
Please unblock package android-platform-tools
This update fixes the RC bug #1034982
Hi Marc,
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Can somebody in the audience please take a look at the piuparts failure
> on salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/jobs/4223693) and
> confirm that this might be a failure that is caused either by the
> pipeline/job
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > I've submitted a merge request for adduser adding the Protected:yes field:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/merge_requests/86
>
>
Am Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:07:22PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I hope I was following developers reference about t-p-u[6] correctly
> > and pushed
> > I've choosen the version 1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1 to match
> > the requirement that
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > I've submitted a merge request for adduser adding the Protected:yes field:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/merge_requests/86
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ibus-pinyin
Bug #1036225 [release.debian.org] unblock: ibus-pinyin/1.5.0-10
Added indication that 1036225 affects src:ibus-pinyin
--
1036225: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ibus-pinyin
Please unblock package ibus-pinyin.
[ Reason ]
https://bugs.debian.org/1036197 pointed out that a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-sh...@packages.debian.org, 1035...@bugs.debian.org,
debia...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-shiny
I'd like to announce an upload to testing
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-cran-shiny
Bug #1036227 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1
Added indication that 1036227 affects src:r-cran-shiny
--
1036227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036227
Debian Bug Tracking
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fai
In a few configs and scripts the non-free-firmware section was added.
In the script mkdebmirror bullseye was replaced with bookworm.
The script 50-misc can no
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 04:24:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Oops, missed the «-», but then that seems fine :), as earlier today I
noticed that a triggered autopkgtest for another package had failed,
so retriggered it as it looked like a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1035911 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.22
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1035911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:krb5
Bug #1036234 [release.debian.org] unblock: krb5/1.20.1-2
Added indication that 1036234 affects src:krb5
--
1036234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:krb5
Please unblock package krb5
[ Reason ]
My fix for 1020424 was incomplete.
Even with that fix applied, you can end up
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libssh/0.10.5-2
Hello Sebastian,
Sebastian Ramacher [2023-05-16 22:49 +0200]:
> It's too late for debhelper compat bumps. See
> https://release.debian.org/bookworm/FAQ.html
>
> Please re-upload without that change and remove the moreinfo tag
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1036026 [release.debian.org] unblock: libssh/0.10.5-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: libssh/0.10.5-2
Bug #1036026 [release.debian.org] unblock: libssh/0.10.5-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libssh/0.10.5-2' from 'unblock: libssh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org,debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
When trying to unlock the screen and entering a wrong password,
it can lead to an endless loop when usin
Mensagem original
Assunto: Re: Debian 8.3 Jessie KEYEXPIRED 11645052400
Data: 17/05/2023 17:46
De: Alan Homobono
Para: Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Jonathan,
Unsuccessful:
# wget
https://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/debian-archive-keyring/debian-archive-keyring_2017.5+d
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:00 -0300, Alan Homobono wrote:
> Any other suggestions?
Have you tried setting the clock to the past (or using faketime)?
Regards
Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # migrated without unblock
> close 1035017
Bug #1035017 [release.debian.org] unblock: pdl/1:2.081-2
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1035017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Hi,
here is a status update on the adduser situation.
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2023-05-10 08:10:26)
> The remaining 14 failures belong to the following 9 source packages:
>
> amavisd-new #1035841
> debian-edu-fai #1035292
> desktop-autoloader #1035291
> kismet
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:22:48 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock dpkg
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035911,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:24:05 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock libssh
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036026,
regarding unblock: libssh/0.10.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:24:49 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock uhd
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036204,
regarding unblock: uhd/4.3.0.0+ds1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:25:53 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock kanboard
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036205,
regarding unblock: kanboard/1.2.26+ds-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:25:09 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock krb5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036234,
regarding unblock: krb5/1.20.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:27:52 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock android-platform-tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036210,
regarding unblock: android-platform-tools/29.0.6-28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:28:21 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ibus-pinyin
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036225,
regarding unblock: ibus-pinyin/1.5.0-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2023 22:28:49 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock fai
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036229,
regarding unblock: fai/6.0.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
Please unblock package noiz2sa
[ Reason ]
A long time ago noiz2sa shipped a symlink from the noiz2sa-data
/usr/share/doc directory to its arch-any /usr/share/
Why and what time?
Em 17/05/2023 18:46, Stephan Verbücheln escreveu:
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:00 -0300, Alan Homobono wrote:
Any other suggestions?
Have you tried setting the clock to the past (or using faketime)?
Regards
Stephan
--
Atte.,
ALAN HOMOBONO
Analista de TI - Suporte a BD
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:iptables-netflow
Bug #1036246 [release.debian.org] unblock: iptables-netflow/2.6-4
Added indication that 1036246 affects src:iptables-netflow
--
1036246: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: iptables-netf...@packages.debian.org, a...@debian.org,
a...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:iptables-netflow
Please unblock iptables-netflow/2.6-4.
This is an update to
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:30:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It's only been a week, and one of the SRMs has been on a publicised
> (fvo publicised being relevant to DDs) week away. It's a little soon to
> be chasing. :-(
(again) I'm sorry if this felt as chasing, this wasn't my intention.
>
Hi Sebastian,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Please unblock iptables-netflow/2.6-4.
Sorry, but I saw only now that you already granted an unblock today
(well, actually yesterday in CEST as it's already past mightnight).
I waited with the unblock request until I was able to test a full
upgrade of a produc
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 00:44 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> debian-security-support (1:11+2023.05.04) bullseye-updates;
> urgency=medium
>
Hmmm. I didn't expect that would work, although apparently it did, at
least for the package to get as far as stable-new. I'm hoping dak also
dtrt for accepts o
42 matches
Mail list logo
