Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 308 armel
> 313 armhf
> 316 i386
> 613 mipsel
>
> I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
> architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Greetings, Sebastian,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 08:17:41PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Filippo
On 2022-11-11 10:56:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Greetings Sebastian,
Thank your for your message.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:04:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 m
Control: block -1 by 1024563
Control: block -1 by 1024565
Control: block -1 by 1024567
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1024563
Bug #1023731 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.16
1023731 was not blocked by any bugs.
1023731 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1023731: 1024563
> block -1 by 1024565
Bug #1023731 [release.debian.org] transition: r-a
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1024563
> Control: block -1 by 1024565
> Control: block -1 by 1024567
>
> Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
> I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
> blocker.
As this is happening e
Hi Sebastian,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > Control: block -1 by 1024567
> >
> > Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencie
On 21 November 2022 at 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
| > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
| > > Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
| > > I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bu
On 11/21/22 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
As this is
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new packages. So
>
On 11/21/22 17:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
higher levels manually to be able to build
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024567
Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
308 armel
313 armhf
316 i386
613 mipsel
I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org/
Hi Adrian and others,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new pac
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian and others,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packag
Hi Filippo
On 2022-11-21 09:58:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > > > > For the libs under my control, the transition is already prepared and
> > > > > these
> > > > > projects are going to be linking against the Qt6-built library,
> > > > > contrary to all
> > > > > the other packages detaile
On 2022-11-21 16:39:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by 102456
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 2:00 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-10-30 14:08:55 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package 0ad and gnucash fail to build [1][2] with ICU 72.1 and bugs are
> > filed.
> > Package supercollider failed to build due to another issue [3]. Its
> > packaging Git has a
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:43:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1022248: transition: icu
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022248,
regarding transition: icu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On 11/20/22 20:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/19/22 20:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-11-11 11:55:45 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.ali
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:27:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1023955: transition: rocksdb
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023955,
regarding transition: rocksdb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:27:46 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024027: transition: ros-class-loader
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024027,
regarding transition: ros-class-loader
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1023535 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945
>
> On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertag
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-11-21 08:03:26 +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hello Release Team,
>
> libpinyin ups
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1024540 [release.debian.org] transition: libpinyin
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1024540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
binary-any + binary-all, but binary-any does not build on most
architectures.
This results in autopkgtest failure due to missing binaries on
the architectures without binaries where autopkgtest is anyway
run due to the binary-all.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:52:39AM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
Source: grub2
Version: 2.04-16
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ftpmas...@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
grub2 currently uses grub-efi-signed-* as source package names for the
S
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:38:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024588: genomicsdb needs hinting into testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024588,
regarding genomicsdb needs hinting into testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Hi Nilesh,
Le lun. 21 nov. 2022 à 18:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>
> Lastly I also want to higlight that: while bioc transition is in theory a
> transition (I agree)
> but to my understanding, there is no _real_ API change. It is just the tool
> taking the
> API field from DESCRIPTION file into
Hi,
We have been performing the rebuilds and fixing packages for a while,
you can see the results of our last test rebuild (from the beginning of
this month) here:
https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.1
Some package listed as build failures were actually fixed already. From
the list w
On 2022-11-21 20:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead after filing the bug against malitt-keyboard.
Ok.
* maliit-keyboard bug: https://bugs.debian.org/1024593
* libpinyin 2.7.92-2 uploaded to unstable
31 matches
Mail list logo
