Processed: UPCOMING REMOVAL, also: New upstream release - new home, new repo layout

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > clone 1022009 -2 Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Bug 1022009 cloned as bug 1023093 10

Processed: UPCOMING REMOVAL, also: New upstream release - new home, new repo layout

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1022010 [dleyna-renderer] dleyna-renderer: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > clone 1022009 -2 Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Bug 1022009 cloned as bug 102309

Processed: UPCOMING REMOVAL, also: New upstream release - new home, new repo layout

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1022011 [dleyna-server] dleyna-server: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > clone 1022009 -2 Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0 Bug 1022009 cloned as bug 1023095 10

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.6: Status update + prepared to start

TL;DR I consider myself ready to start the transition now, with removals in the plan. * gupnp/experimental has now successfully built on s390x - this verifies gssdp 1.6.0-2 (with patch from upstream) fixes an old bug caught by the (new) gupnp test * Note: ppc64el has still not built experim

Bug#1023105: bullseye-pu: package tinyxml/2.6.2-4+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] Fixing the no-dsa tagged CVE-2021-42260 [ Impact ] DoS vulnerability [ Tests ] General testing of a few reverse-dependencies. [ Risks ] Targeted fix that has been si

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_2.47-1+2022f_source.changes ACCEPT

Bug#1023118: bullseye-pu: package distro-info-data/0.51+deb11u3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: bdr...@debian.org As usual, a distro-info-data update. [ Reason ] There's a new Ubuntu development release, and also some minor Debian changes. * Update data to 0.5

Processed: Re: Bug#1022248: transition: icu

Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo Bug #1022248 [release.debian.org] transition: icu Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1022248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1022248: transition: icu

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-10-22 19:17:58 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Transition is similar to the previous ones, this time boost1.74 needs > > to be binNMUed after level1 before other level2 packages and pyicu > > will

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_2.47-1+2022f_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.6: Status update + prepared to start

Hello, On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > TL;DR I consider myself ready to start the transition now, with removals > in the plan. [...] > Unless someone tells me I missed something I'll start uploading to > unstable as soon as I feel I have a free time slot (whic

Bug#1022926: transition: glibc 2.36

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: de

Processed: Re: Bug#1022926: transition: glibc 2.36

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html Bug #1022926 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.36 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html'. > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1022926 [release.

Bug#1022926: transition: glibc 2.36

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >... > Speaking of GCC 12 … #1022991 seems to have a first patch available > upstream. Is there any chance that we could start this transition > together with a fix for that bug? IMHO it would be better to have 2.35 uploaded with

Bug#1022705: marked as done (unplanned transition: ghostscript)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2022 18:39:38 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1022705: unplanned transition: ghostscript has caused the Debian Bug report #1022705, regarding unplanned transition: ghostscript to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#1022926: transition: glibc 2.36

On 2022-10-30 17:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian...

Processed: Re: Bug#1020799: Transition: pkg-config to pkgconf: next steps

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1020799 [release.debian.org] transition: pkg-config Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1020799: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020799 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1020799: Transition: pkg-config to pkgconf: next steps

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-10-20 11:25:13 +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve been rebuilding packages with pkgconf for the past couple of weeks, and > it looks very good so far: > > http://pkgconf-migration.debian.net/ > > I have identified and resolved some issues, and mo