Processed: python-py: FTBFS with Python 3.11 as a supported version

2022-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1021984 by -1 Bug #1021984 [release.debian.org] (some kind of) transition: add python3.11 as a supported python3 version 1021984 was not blocked by any bugs. 1021984 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1021984: 1021871 > affects -1 + src:lru-di

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:32:10PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo [...] > Please remove the moreinfo tag once they cleared NEW. [...] All of them (gssdp, gupnp and rygel) has made it through NEW, thus removing moreinfo tag. I'll start wo

Processed: Re: Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #1022003 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1022003: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022003 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#1022064: transition: libavif

2022-10-19 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org Severity: normal I plan to start yet another libavif transition as shown in the following transition tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libavif.html

Processed: Re: Bug#1022064: transition: libavif

2022-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1022064 [release.debian.org] transition: libavif Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1022064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1022064: transition: libavif

2022-10-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-10-19 12:06:24 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org > Severity: normal > > I plan to start yet another libavif transition as shown in the fo

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, I've just started looking at building patched reverse dependencies and ran into some issues. librm has upstream commits that adds support for gssdp/gupnp 1.6, but apparently hasn't actually ported to libsoup-3.0 yet so it completely fails to build if using this... upstream issue filed and

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: block -1 by 1019353 On 2022-10-19 20:57:53 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello, > > I've just started looking at building patched reverse dependencies and > ran into some issues. > > librm has upstream commits that adds support for gssdp/gupnp 1.6, but > apparently hasn't actually

Processed: Re: Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1019353 Bug #1022003 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0) 1022003 was blocked by: 1022011 1022009 1022007 1022010 1022008 1022003 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1022003: 1019353 -- 1022003: https:/

Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)

2022-10-19 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1019353 [...] > Let's see where we are after the perl transition. Depending on how > responsive librm upstream is, that might give them enough time to fix > the remaining issues. [...] ACK, but I'd also like