On 29/08/2022 09.39, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Quick reminder that that's nowish. :)
I had been more VAC than planned ;-)
I spotted the buster upload; thanks. Given the versioning, we will also
need the bullseye upload to be in p-u by next weekend, when the window
for 11.5 closes.
390xx for bu
Hi!
Sorry, I'm updating the request as I found missing stuff while
preparing the companion update for buster!
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 00:37:03 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 13:14:33 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Simon McVittie dijo [Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:19:30AM +0100]:
> > Is armel a realistic candidate for being a Debian 12 release
> > architecture?
>
> I do not feel armel systems are hard to come by, nor marginal in the
> amount of users the
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022, at 8:34 AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Reverse dependencies of abseil are also part of the ongoing Gnome 3 /
> libsoup3 / etc transition. As I'd like to avoid to getting that blocked
> for to long, I'd appreciate a quick fix for the ppc64el FTBFS bug of
> abseil
Hi Simon, all,
On 30-08-2022 14:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
If armel is a candidate for being a release architecture, then I think
that leaves two-and-a-half options:
In the last couple of releases, we have been bad at taking decisions on
this front, so lets assume it is (although this issue is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org
Hi!
This is the counterpart to #1018744 but for buster.
[ Reason ]
This fixes three pending security issue, that the security team (CCed)
wo
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022, at 8:34 AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Reverse dependencies of abseil are also part of the ongoing Gnome 3 /
> libsoup3 / etc transition. As I'd like to avoid to getting that blocked
> for to long, I'd appreciate a quick fix for the ppc64el FTBFS bug of
> abseil
Hi,
On 30-08-2022 22:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
For avoidance of doubt, I didn't ACK or NACK the transition. I just
wanted to answer Simon's question about the course of solutions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
8 matches
Mail list logo
