On 2022-06-15 11:38:11, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > I guess this means that libgsasl7 and libgsasl18 cannot be installed
> > on the same system ever, due to the gsasl-common versioned
> > dependencies. That is unfortunate, since there is no real problem
> > with having both versions installed.
>
>
Package: angelfish,release.debian.org
Version: angelfish/22.04-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
seemingly due to the current Qt transition
(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html),
angelfish becomes uninstallable (i.e. aptitude wants to remove it) if I
try to upgrade all the Qt
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:25:19 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1013112: angelfish: Uninstallabale due to Qt
transition, but not listed on
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013112,
regarding angelfish
Hi,
We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for
bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf}
period. I think the possible dates that make sense are:
- July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it)
- July 9th
I think there's already a couple
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for
> bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf}
> period. I think the possible dates that make sense are:
>
> - July 2nd (means fr
Hi Sebastian,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > So I assume that this transition misses relations to
> > qtwebengine-abi-5-15-10 and qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5.
[…]
> The tracker now also checks qtwebengine-abi-5-15 and I have scheduled
> binNMUs for angelfish.
Thanks! Angelfish (at least on amd
6 matches
Mail list logo
