Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Imagemagick changes some internal structures. Upstream bump so (safe), so ask
for a rebuilt.
Ben file:
title = "imagemagick";
is_affected = .depends ~
"(?:libmagickcore-6.q[^-]+-6|libma
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
node-object-path is vulnerable to prototye pollution (CVE-2021-23434 and
CVE-2021-3805
[ Impact ]
Medium vulnerability
[ Tests ]
Test passed with these patches, includ
package release.debian.org
tags 993604 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: freeradius
Version: 3.0.21+df
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 993604 = bullseye pending
Bug #993604 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu:
Processing changes file: freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 9/17/21 7:56 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 07:34:27PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> [ Reason ]
>> As reported in #993895, the update of protobuf to 3.12.4 requires
>> regenerating the header files.
>>
>> [ Impact ]
>> Headers provided by l
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #994097 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package osmpbf/1.5.0-1+deb11u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #994097 to the same tags previously set
--
994097: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994097
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Update libffi to version 3.4.2. The transition was done for Ubuntu, a handful
of bugs regarding build failures (mostly due to GCC 11) are filed in Debian. I
would like to get this done b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #993523 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
osmcoastline/2.3.0-1+deb11u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #993523 to the same tags previously set
--
993523: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993523
Debian Bug Track
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 9/17/21 7:46 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:04:32PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> [ Reason ]
>> As reported on the GIS list by the upstream author, osmcoastline in
>> bullseye doesn't work with projections other than WGS84.
>
> Please g
Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:04:32PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> As reported on the GIS list by the upstream author, osmcoastline in
> bullseye doesn't work with projections other than WGS84.
Please go ahead, and remove the moreinfo tag from this b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #993523 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
osmcoastline/2.3.0-1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
993523: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:09:33PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> The attached debdiff for btrbk fixes CVE-2021-38173 in Bullseye.
>
> This CVE is marked as no-dsa by the security team.
>
> The same patch was already uploaded to unstable with version 0.27.1-
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #993899 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package btrbk/0.27.1-1.1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
993899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 07:34:27PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> As reported in #993895, the update of protobuf to 3.12.4 requires
> regenerating the header files.
>
> [ Impact ]
> Headers provided by libosmpbf-dev are unusuable.
Is that the only package af
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #994097 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package osmpbf/1.5.0-1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
994097: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994097
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org, daz...@packages.debian.org
[ Reason ]
glibc 2.32 uncovered a use-after-free issue in dazzdb (#993770). While
dazzdb technically does not crash o
On 2021-09-15 20:09:26 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-14 09:12:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 at 20:17:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > According to
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-upperlimit-gnome-shell.html
> > > it might be nece
Processing changes file: freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: freera
Processing changes file: freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 at 22:52:45 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> glibc is still not able to migrate, but I have scheduled binNMUs of
> packages involved against the version with the fixed symbols files.
> mutter should be able to migrate in the next run.
>
> If there are other uploads blocked by
Processing changes file:
freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
freeradius_3.0.21+dfsg-2.2+deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi SRMs (2021.04.22_09:57:49_-0700)
Given the lack of reply here, let's stick with the minimal option.
There have been more changes since the last patch, so here's an updated
debdiff. Uploaded to buster-proposed-updates.
> [ Checklist ]
> [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
>
On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> grass & otb in experiment still need to be rebuilt.
grass had a source upload, only otb in experimental needs a binNMU now.
Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc
changes, it allowed libgdal-grass to migrate, but th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
Another regex denial of service
[ Impact ]
Medium vulnerability
[ Tests ]
test passed
[ Risks ]
No risk, patch is trivial
[ Checklist ]
[X] *all* changes are documen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: affects -1 + ricochet-im
X-Debbugs-CC: ricochet...@packages.debian.org
Please rebuild ricochet-im in bullseye and unstable, the transition
from GCC 9 to 10 seems to have changed the
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + ricochet-im
Bug #994584 [release.debian.org] nmu: ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5
Added indication that 994584 affects ricochet-im
--
994584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994584
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The transition from GCC 9 to 10 seems to have changed the size of the
C++ type Type, which breaks a runtime check of this size. I have tested
that rebuilding ricochet-im fixes the runtime err
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 994585
Bug #994585 [release.debian.org] nmu: ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
994585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994585
Debian
30 matches
Mail list logo
