Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@packages.debian.org
Please approve the following update for src:cups
[ Reason ]
Mikko Rapeli reported a USB printing regression in #989073, which, lukily
enough, was alre
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed d-i
Bug #988442 [release.debian.org] unblock: linux/5.10.38-1
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
988442: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
@boot: needs d-i ACK. As I believe you are aware of, the upload has
already happened.
@kibi: feel free to age it if/when you see fit
Paul
On 19-05-2021 17:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: linux/5.10.38-1 (pre-approval checking)
>
> O
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 988578 - moreinfo
Bug #988578 [release.debian.org] unblock: dmidecode/3.3-2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988578 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
988578
tags 988578 - moreinfo
thanks
Hello Sebastian,
dmidecode is now in unstable.
CU
Jörg
Am Mittwoch, dem 19.05.2021 um 20:28 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 2021-05-17 19:04:20 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > Control: tags 988578 - moreinfo
> >
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please unblock package broadcom-sta
>
> [ Reason ]
> Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-source package.
>
> [ Impact ]
> It is not possible to build a package using module-assistant and the
> version of broadcom-sta-source in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #988627 [release.debian.org] unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988627
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #988627 [release.debian.org] unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988627
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Dear Paul,
Thanks for your checking!
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please unblock package broadcom-sta
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-sou
Paul Gevers (2021-05-27):
> Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
>
> @boot: needs d-i ACK. As I believe you are aware of, the upload has
> already happened.
>
> @kibi: feel free to age it if/when you see fit
We've just discussed that (with Salvatore) on IRC minutes ago, and it
seems like this unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ceph,
I've upgraded the package to upstream release 14.2.21, which contains the
subject's CVE fixes. The Ceph release notes are over here:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/l
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2021 13:50:09 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988627: unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-16.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #988627,
regarding unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please approve the following update for src:fai
[ Reason ]
Fixes minor bug 988987 which affects only
VM environment when using raid setup.
Another simple fix in a script in fai-doc.
[ Im
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2021 15:40:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock adminer
has caused the Debian Bug report #989121,
regarding unblock: adminer/4.7.9-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2021 15:42:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock node-cpr
has caused the Debian Bug report #989146,
regarding unblock: node-cpr/3.0.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 10:50 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please unblock package broadcom-sta
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-source package.
> >
> > [ Impact ]
> > It is not possible to build
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 988494 with 988492
Bug #988494 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ircii/20190117-1+deb10u1 [QA] [RC] --
Internet Relay Chat client
988494 was not blocked by any bugs.
988494 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 988494: 988492
> than
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package radsecproxy
Version 1.8.2-4 fixes a minor CVE in some of the provided example helper
scripts.
There is no change to any other active code in radsecproxy itself. A
fu
Hi Thomas,
Ping.
Paul
Note: without reply, we'll close the bug without action
On 20-04-2021 11:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-04-17 12:02:44 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@package
tag 989037 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On 24-05-2021 11:35, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 22:12:59 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This new rails version renewed its versioned dependency on ruby-marcel.
>> The new ruby-marcel version doesn't look like a targeted fix, so it
>> doesn't fit the fr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 989037 moreinfo
Bug #989037 [release.debian.org] unblock: rails/2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
989037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 989172 unblock: fai/5.10.3
Bug #989172 [release.debian.org] please unblock fai/5.10.3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: fai/5.10.3' from 'please unblock fai/5.10.3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2021 21:13:28 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock fai
has caused the Debian Bug report #989172,
regarding unblock: fai/5.10.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package geeqie
[ Reason ]
Geeqie recommends ufraw-batch and suggests ufraw which both has been
removed from bullseye, this update removes these dependencies in
geeqie.
[ Ris
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package scrollz
This upload fixes a grave bug (#986215) by applying a patch from an
upstream PR targeting that specific issue. I've received exploit code
from upstream and te
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
Please unblock package smartdns
[ Reason ]
Fix invalid systemd unit file, https://bugs.debian.org/989072
[ Impact ]
systemd journal will have "Unknown key" no
Dzień dobry,
prowadzisz firmę, która jest na skraju bankructwa?
Twoje zadłużenie wynosi ponad *500 000 zł*?
Nie łam się, nie wszystko stracone! Na co dzień pomagam zawodowo właśnie takim
osobom, jak Ty!
Za sprawą wieloletniego doświadczenia w prowadzeniu
postępowań przekształceniowych zgromadzi
27 matches
Mail list logo
