Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 986003
Bug #986003 [release.debian.org] unblock: bc/1.07.1-3
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
986003: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986003
Debian Bug Tra
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2021-03-30 22:32:08, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package dwarf-fortress
>
> [ Reason ]
> It has been noted in #986119 that the u
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #986172 [release.debian.org] unblock: dwarf-fortress/0.47.04+dfsg1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
986172: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986172
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #986175 [release.debian.org] unblock: underscore/1.9.1~dfsg-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2021-03-30 22:49:43, Yadd wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Please unblock package underscore
>
> [ Reason ]
> un
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:19:23 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock docx2txt
has caused the Debian Bug report #986169,
regarding unblock: docx2txt/1.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:22:21 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock rocksndiamonds
has caused the Debian Bug report #986118,
regarding unblock: rocksndiamonds/4.2.2.1+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
This is a bug-fix point release from upstream adding some
exception handling in the oslo.messaging code, which I
believe would be valuable to have in Debian.
Only the .p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-oslo.cache
This new release adds support for pymemcache, which was by
the way already available in the relevant backend driver,
here, dogpile.cache.
The relev
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Le 31/03/2021 à 09:52, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-03-30 22:49:43, Yadd wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascri
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #986175 [release.debian.org] unblock: underscore/1.9.1~dfsg-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:05:05 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock underscore
has caused the Debian Bug report #986175,
regarding unblock: underscore/1.9.1~dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #986172 [release.debian.org] unblock: dwarf-fortress/0.47.04+dfsg1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986172: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986172
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Am 31.03.21 um 09:55 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> ACK, please remove the moreinfo tag once the new version is available in
> unstable.
0.47.04+dfsg1-1 has just been accepted into unstable.
Regards
Sven
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:18:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock dwarf-fortress
has caused the Debian Bug report #986172,
regarding unblock: dwarf-fortress/0.47.04+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
Hi,
Unfortunately 2.10 didn't make it into bullseye in time (#984557). I tried
getting the unit tests from 2.9.16 to work with python 3.9, but I had to give
up
On 3/31/21 7:30 PM, Lee Garrett wrote:
> Unfortunately 2.10 didn't make it into bullseye in time (#984557). I tried
> getting the unit tests from 2.9.16 to work with python 3.9, but I had to give
> up. I don't feel comfortable with maintaining such a large package over the
> lifecycle of bullseye w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
It has been noted in #986119 that the upstream release tarballs for
dwarf-fortress include shared libraries but no corresponding source
code is available. The shared libra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 986119 with 986216
Bug #986119 {Done: Sven Bartscher }
[src:dwarf-fortress] Source package includes shared libraries with GPL
violations
986119 was not blocked by any bugs.
986119 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 986119:
Hi,
On 2021-02-25 10:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear DSA,
>
> As is custom for the Release Team, I'm asking you what your plans are
> with respect to testing upgrading DSA maintained machines to bullseye.
>
> If my information is correct, in the past you'd first upgrade a non
> critical machine to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: jvalle...@mailbox.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[ Reason ]
A security issue was found and reported to the security team:
https://security-tracke
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:20:09PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 3/31/21 7:30 PM, Lee Garrett wrote:
> > Unfortunately 2.10 didn't make it into bullseye in time (#984557). I tried
> > getting the unit tests from 2.9.16 to work with python 3.9, but I had to
> > give
> > up. I don't fee
22 matches
Mail list logo
