Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
With zita-convolver 4.0.3 the library name changes from libzita-convolver3 to
libzita-convolver4.
Affected packages:
guitarix
ir.lv2
jconvolver
pulseeffects
x42-plugins
zita-bls1
zita-c
s/library name/package name of the library/g
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/03/2020 13:19, Dennis Braun wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> With zita-convolver 4.0.3 the library name changes from libzita-convolver3 to
> libzita-convolver4.
>
> Affected packages:
>
> guita
Yes, all should work fine.
Bug fixes for jconvolver and zita-bls1 are waiting in experimental.
Am 03.03.20 um 14:15 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 03/03/2020 13:19, Dennis Braun wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usert
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
node-nodedbi is incompatible with Node.js ≥ 12 (#953028). I'd like to
see it removed from testing (only) to permit Node.js 12 migration.
Cheers,
Xavier
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #953005 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
serverspec-runner/1.2.2-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
953005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 01:00 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> This update is to fix #939645 [1]. The debdiff is attached.
Apparently not. :-)
Regards,
Adam
Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 18:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Followup-For: Bug #952960
>
> I've uploaded the fix to unstable and updated the diff (Vcs* fields
> changed, see attached).
>
Thanks, please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
Bug #952960 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
ruby-factory-girl-rails/4.7.0-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #952960 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
ruby-factory-girl-rails/4.7.0-1+deb10u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #952785 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package dojo/1.15.0+dfsg1-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
952785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 11:28 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Le 01/03/2020 à 22:52, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> > > +#CVE-2019-10785.patch
> >
> > The patch is commented in the series file and thus does not get
> > applied.
> >
> > Andreas
>
> Sorry for this error. Here is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #952441 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
user-mode-linux/4.19-1um-1+b1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #952441 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
user-mode-linux/4.19-1um-1+b1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
952441: https://bu
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:02 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> Control: fixed 951329 user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2
>
> El 25/02/20 a las 21:05, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 14:49 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
>
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 12:26 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I'd like to fix an important bug in backuppc which prevents
> `systemd reload backuppc.service` from failing. As a result of this
> bug backuppc has to be restarted for systemd's supervision to be
> reset,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #952586 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package backuppc/3.3.2-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
952586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952586
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:24:42PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> libgusb is carrying in debian a patch[0] to revert/fix an after the fact
> change that was done upstream in the versioning of the symbols.
>
> I don't think we should/can carry this patch forever and due to the fact
> that the n
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #953005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sorry. Now it should be.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Ar
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #950795 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package puma/3.12.0-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
950795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 20:43 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Followup-For: Bug #953005
>
> Sorry. Now it should be.
>
Thanks, please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 17:33 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> The proposed update will fix CVE-2019-16770 (#946312) for Buster
> users. The security team marked the issue no-dsa and asked to
> schedule the fix via the next point release. The debdiff is attached.
> The pat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #953005 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
serverspec-runner/1.2.2-1+deb10u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #953005 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
serverspec-runner/1.2.2-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
953005: ht
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2020, 20:37 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 17:33 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > The proposed update will fix CVE-2019-16770 (#946312) for Buster
> > users. The security team marked the issue no-dsa and asked to
> > schedule the fix via the next point
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 20:19:12 +0100 Julien Cristau
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:24:42PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > libgusb is carrying in debian a patch[0] to revert/fix an after the
fact
> > change that was done upstream in the versioning of the symbols.
> >
> > I don't think w
Am Montag, den 02.03.2020, 15:01 -0300 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro:
> On 02/03/2020 08:35, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Hi Lucas
> >
> > I notice kamailio and klayout still appear red in the Debian tracker
> > [1], but went green in Ubuntu [2].
> >
> > Do you have any ideas? Do we miss something in Debia
24 matches
Mail list logo
