Processed: (some kind of) transition: add python3.8 as a supported python3 version

2020-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 942106 + pending Bug #942106 [release.debian.org] (some kind of) transition: add python3.8 as a supported python3 version Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 942106: https:/

Re: Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements

2020-01-03 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sun 29 Dec 2019 at 11:20am -08, Russ Allbery wrote: > Paul Gevers writes: >> On 21-11-2019 13:59, Paul Gevers wrote: > >>> [Disclaimer: the words below are as a member of the release team, but >>> not necessarily those of the team. We haven't discussed this yet.] > >> We have had a dis

Bug#947930: transition: gspell

2020-01-03 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:20:13 +0100 Laurent Bigonville wrote: > [...] > BUT ATM there is an issue with gnome-software (and sysprof) on ppc64el > that should be fixed first before we can start the transition. > [...] The problem is now fixed in sysprof and gnome-software, so IMVHO there is nothing

Bug#947365: transition: libvigraimpex

2020-01-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-01-03 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 31-12-2019 18:26, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Afaict the involved packages should propagate to testing in 3 days, when > > enblend-enfuse is old enough. I have commited the fix. [1] > Unfortunately libvigraimpex is (hopefully only temporarily) blocked b

Bug#948088: buster-pu: reject package from NEW queue libsoldout/1.4-3

2020-01-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I made a mistake and uploaded libsoldout/1.4-3 to stable instead of unstable. Please reject the package from the pu NEW queue. I'm sorry. :( Sven

Bug#948098: RM: blogilo -- FTBFS, uninstallable, abandoned upstream

2020-01-03 Thread John Scott
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-CC: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, he...@debian.org Please remove Blogilo from unstable. It's been broken since Oct. 2018 when it couldn't be built for a KDE PIM transition and its dependencies are u

Bug#948098: RM: blogilo -- FTBFS, uninstallable, abandoned upstream

2020-01-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 16:05 -0500, John Scott wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, he...@debian.org > > Please remove Blogilo from unstable. Unstable, or testing? The former is FTP team's

Processed: Re: Bug#948098: RM: blogilo -- FTBFS, uninstallable, abandoned upstream

2020-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #948098 [release.debian.org] RM: blogilo -- FTBFS, uninstallable, abandoned upstream Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #948098 to the same values prev

Bug#948098: RM: blogilo -- FTBFS, uninstallable, abandoned upstream

2020-01-03 Thread John Scott
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org On Friday, January 3, 2020 4:20:00 PM EST you wrote: > Unstable, or testing? The former is FTP team's balliwick, not Release. Unstable. Thanks for the quick catch! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#948104: buster-pu: package python3.7/3.7.3-2+deb10u1

2020-01-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Similar to the python2.7 update which landed in Buster 10.2. Debdiff below. All these are fixed in bullseye/sid (but none had a dedicated bug) Cheers, Moritz diff -Nru pyth

Please add a tracker for the enchant -> enchant-2 transition

2020-01-03 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hello, Could you please add a tracker for the enchant -> enchant-2 "transition" I'm not expecting to see this transition happening overnight as it requires changes in almost all packages (the build system at least) to use the new library, but that's not really a problem as the source package has

Bug#947464: marked as done (buster-pu: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-1+deb10u1)

2020-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:26:35 -0600 with message-id <20200103222635.76000...@spike.lustfield.net> and subject line RFS Not Needed has caused the Debian Bug report #947464, regarding buster-pu: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-1+deb10u1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Re: Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements

2020-01-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Sean Whitton writes: > Let's definitely reconsider those 'must' requirements in response to > this work, but let's not commit ourselves to the idea that it's always a > bug for the Release Team's conception of an RC bug, and Policy 'must' > requirements, to disagree. > The Release Team's concept