☝ Enkel onze bevoorrechte relaties, tips die altijd welkom zijn.

Samen vooruit, wie wil dat nu niet? --- Je préfère le français ---

documenting transitions (Re: Accepted net-snmp 5.8+dfsg-1 (source all amd64) into unstable, unstable)

Hi, On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >   I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition. > > https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which speaks to the > Whow, not updated since 2014. > > developer and doesn't mention at all things like goi

Bug#942217: nmu: libapache2-mod-security2_2.9.3-1

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:01:38PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:57:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 15:16 +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > > nmu libapache2-mod-security2_2.9.3-1 . amd64

Bug#942217: nmu: libapache2-mod-security2_2.9.3-1

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 13:15:22 +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:01:38PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:57:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 15:16 +0200,

Processed: transition blocks

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 939580 by 941907 Bug #939580 [src:liquidsoap] liquidsoap: FTBFS with new ffmpeg ocaml library 939580 was not blocked by any bugs. 939580 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 939580: 941907 > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: block 931551 with 941780, block 931551 with 939687

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 931551 with 941780 Bug #931551 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 8 931551 was not blocked by any bugs. 931551 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 931551: 941780 > block 931551 with 939687 Bug #931551 [release.

Bug#942415: transition: meta-kde

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hey, KDEPIM doesn't garantee ABI stability within there libraries only for one release. Our current system is to bump the ABI, when KDEPIM break their ABI. But this has the downside, t

Processed: #942415: retitle 942415 transition: meta-kdepim

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 942415 transition: meta-kdepim Bug #942415 [release.debian.org] transition: meta-kde Changed Bug title to 'transition: meta-kdepim' from 'transition: meta-kde'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#942428: transition: gssdp/gupnp

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello! The gssdp and gupnp transitions are best done together. The transition has previously been discussed a bit on IRC but I'm filing this for tracking purposes for gett