Control: block 934630 by 919641
Hi Sébastien,
On 02-10-2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> However this time it failed to build on all arches, because of texinfo
> 6.7.0.dfsg.2-2 which was buggy. Since then, texinfo 6.7.0.dfsg.2-3 has
> been uploaded which should fix that. Can you please give
Processing control commands:
> block 934630 by 919641
Bug #934630 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
934630 was not blocked by any bugs.
934630 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 934630: 919641
--
934630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934630
Debian Bug T
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 917972 + pending
Bug #917972 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 941078 + pending
Bug #941078 [release.debian.org] transition: postgresql-12
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 08:48:35 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:46:50PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > There are also several autopkgtest failures triggered by glib2.0 and
> > gobject-introspection.
>
> I quickly looked over these and it seems they're all except one r
Hi,
Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 08:48:35 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> The odd one out is libgtk2-perl which fails test 44:
> ...
>> GdkPixbuf [ warning ] Inline XPM data is broken: Invalid XPM header
>> not ok 44 - Don't crash on partial pixmap data
> I think this might
Hi,
On 03-10-2019 09:39, intrigeri wrote:
> FWIW, libgtk2-perl is going away in Bullseye; most of its
> reverse-dependencies were either ported to GTK 3, or not shipped in
> Buster thanks to RC bugs I had filed, or removed from the archive.
> What's left is tracked there:
>
> - https://bugs.debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 919641 with 941641
Bug #919641 [release.debian.org] transition: readline (7 -> 8)
919641 was not blocked by any bugs.
919641 was blocking: 934630
Added blocking bug(s) of 919641: 941641
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 934630 with 919641
Bug #934630 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
934630 was blocked by: 919641
934630 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 934630: 919641
> block 934630 with 941518
Bug #934630 [release.debian.org] tr
Hi Niko, Dom,
On 25-08-2019 20:39, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Please let us know when we might get a transition slot. Both of us
> are currently rather taken by real life stuff, so would appreciate an
> advance warning if possible.
As discussed on IRC, if you are ready to go in a couple of days (let
say
Your message dated Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:10:33 +0200
with message-id <5678517e-9299-9fce-b95f-b2dc2ac0c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: nmu: nwchem_6.8.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #941482,
regarding nmu: nwchem_6.8.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:37:59 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: nmu: ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #940995,
regarding nmu: ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:29:59 +0200
with message-id <28310b63-55d5-5881-65fd-c115703f0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#872293: nmu: loads of golang stuff
has caused the Debian Bug report #872293,
regarding nmu: loads of golang stuff
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Hi Rhonda,
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:55:52 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:05:23 +0800 Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> > please binNMU the irssi plugins for the last irssi upload. I did a local
> > test
> > build to confirm that they don't need any source change.
[...]
> > dw irssi-plu
Your message dated Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:42:58 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Long list of binNMUs for golang packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #916642,
regarding Long list of binNMUs for golang packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Bug #941673 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
publicsuffix/20190925.1705-0+deb8u1
Added indication that 941673 affects src:publicsuffix
--
941673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian jessie.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for
X-Debbugs-CC: mity...@debian.org
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:32:28 +0300 Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>
> Dear Release team,
>
> Debian is currently shipping with Qt 5.11.3 which is quite outdated.
>
> We would like to update to 5.12.5 release from the 5.12 LTS branch.
> [...]
>
> The 5.12 release fix
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 21:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
Could you please next time provide more context than only the bug
number. It's annoying to need to look it up if all you need to do is
add
"libgit2 transition" somewhere.
ok.
That said, are you aware of any progress on the julia front?
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:00:12 +0100
with message-id
<48b6bc0d1f619142a6189c114e8aefbfec04182a.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#941673: jessie-pu: package
publicsuffix/20190925.1705-0+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #941673,
regarding jessie-pu: package pu
Version: 5.0.1-1
Hi Boyan,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:10:49PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Just FYI: I've updated deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin to make it compatible with Qt
> 5.12.5 so It won't be a blocker for this transition. Let me know if there's
> any other issues.
Thank you! I think we can close b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
node-yarnpkg is vulnerable: it exports auth data in http requests
(#941354, CVE-2019-5448). This patch imports upstream fix.
Cheers,
Xavier
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debi
On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 10:55 -0300, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you about this earlier.
>
> On 7/7/19 3:43 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 02:47 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > [...]
> > > No binary maintainer uploads for bullseye
> > >
Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 09:14 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Octave has now been built everywhere. Will you take care of all the
> failures in the reverse build depends? There are 16 packages that need
> your attention before octave can migrate. I filed one FTBFS bug already,
> but waiting for
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:05:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Niko, Dom,
>
> On 25-08-2019 20:39, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Please let us know when we might get a transition slot. Both of us
> > are currently rather taken by real life stuff, so would appreciate an
> > advance warning if possible.
severity 933407 serious
severity 933408 serious
severity 933411 serious
severity 933412 serious
severity 933415 serious
severity 933416 serious
severity 933419 serious
severity 933424 serious
severity 933425 serious
severity 933426 serious
severity 933427 serious
severity 933431 serious
severity 93
Hi,
I've included the recommended changes for the fix:
rpcbind (1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
* Add 00-rmt-calls.patch (Closes: #939877):
+ Add command line option to enable remote calls at runtime
+ Refresh debian/patches
* debian/control: Update maintainer information
Subject: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
This is my first time with the Debian proposed update process (though I
have done my own Ubuntu SRU once), so please bear wit
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:47:25 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> What environment were the amd64 packages that you uploaded built in?
Sorry, I had built on a stretch environment, so I rebuild it with
git-pbuilder environment,
tested with piuparts, and had uploaded.
28 matches
Mail list logo
