Your message dated Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:03:01 +0200
with message-id <0755ce4c-365e-fe1f-021b-fffec2720...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#939149: nmu: lskat_4:19.08.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939149,
regarding nmu: lskat_4:19.08.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On 29/08/2019 12:08, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and generate the
required
binNMUs (l
On 31/08/2019 18:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 12:53 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I'd like to introduce llvm-toolchain-7 into stretch, as it's needed
>> to update rustc to 1.34.2, which in turn is needed for firefox ESR
>> 68.
>>
>> I have already uploaded the packag
On 30/08/2019 07:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> That leaves:
There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the
excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj from
being a migration candidate.
Cheers,
Emilio
On 2019-09-02 10:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/08/2019 12:08, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
> transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
> creative idea on how to best signal back partial success, let me know.
> :)
>
> (My cu
On 9/2/19 10:43 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the
> excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj
> from
> being a migration candidate.
That's why I filed #939002.
There is also the autopkg
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
package release.debian.org
tags 935947 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: llvm-toolchain-7
Version: 7.0.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 935947 = stretch pending
Bug #935947 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: p
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
On 2019-08-21 12:48, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to the
size of the diff.
Sorry, didn't notice that!
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2019-08-21 12:48, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > >
> > > This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to
> > > the
> > > size o
On 2019-09-02 14:09, Luca Boccassi wrote:
I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a
+deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right
procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing?
Ah, I see. In which case, the lack of fixes isn't an issue, but the
ve
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 14:09, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a
> > +deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right
> > procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing?
>
No worries! Thanks for working on the stable releases! I just
reuploaded the exact same 25.0.0+11+deb10u1 source package as before, I
hope that works!
Fix the Go team mailing list address.
(pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org -> debian...@lists.debian.org)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:03:56AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunat
Hi Jonathan!
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:07 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can
> deal with that if it arises.
Ilmbase and OpenEXR both uploaded to unstable/sid.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
On 2019-09-02 11:03, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
creative idea on how to best signal back partial succ
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:19 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Would it make your life easier if I uploaded a new revision to
> unstable? There's a few small cosmetic cleanups I can do, like
> bumping standards-version and such.
If you've got enough changes to usefully justify a -3 that we could age
to
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 935308 = buster pending
Bug #935308 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: pac
package release.debian.org
tags 935308 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: android-sdk-meta
Version: 25.0.0+
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 06:40:24PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I would prefer JSON as an input format, looking roughly like this:
>
> [{"pkg": "haskell-active", "ver": "0.2.0.13-6", "archs": ["mipsel",
> "mips64el"], "suite": "sid", "reason": "semigroupoids changed from 5.2.2 to
> 5.3.2"}]
Somet
Hi Aurelien,
On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc
>
> I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive:
Thanks for doing so.
> - dante: needs to be binNMUed against the new libc
You already identified that
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 18:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:19 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Would it make your life easier if I uploaded a new revision to
> > unstable? There's a few small cosmetic cleanups I can do, like
> > bumping standards-version and such.
>
> If y
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Paul,
On 2019-09-02 21:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc
> >
> > I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive:
>
> Thanks for doing so.
>
> > - dante:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # to appear at the next sync
> forwarded 939048 https://release.debian.org/transitions/glibc.html
Bug #939048 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/glibc.html'.
> thanks
Sto
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 935308 = buster pending
Bug #935308 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: pac
package release.debian.org
tags 935308 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: android-sdk-meta
Version: 25.0.0+
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: android-sdk-meta_25.0.0+11+deb10u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-7_7.0.1-8~deb9u2_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.189-3_mips.changes
ACCEPT
On 9/2/19 11:12 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/2/19 10:43 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the
>> excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj
>> from
>> being a migration candidate.
44 matches
Mail list logo
